long2905
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 21
Merit: 0
|
|
December 17, 2021, 02:00:19 AM Last edit: December 17, 2021, 02:11:16 AM by long2905 |
|
v1.33 1. Fixed index problem in stats when running with a selection of the gpu's. 2. Added more pools. 3. Improve the EXIT code for LHR gpu's 4. Improved the stability and speed of the --lhr-unlock 5. Improved --dagintensity more stable on higher clocks. 6. Try to remove more rejected shares on the hiveon pool (again) 7. Fixed bug in the LHR detector 8. Fixed Hang if selecting a non existing cuda device
Errors during regresstion testing. fixed build tomorrow
linux tomorrow
Note that the default unlock setting is a bit agressive and might not work. Lhr unlock support negative numbers so you can try to adjust it.
--lhr-unlock [-50,-50,-50] any LHR number we can expect for 3080 or 3080ti for example?
|
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
|
December 17, 2021, 08:55:34 AM Last edit: December 17, 2021, 11:05:38 AM by sp_ |
|
any LHR number we can expect for 3080 or 3080ti for example?
v1.32 could do 85MHASH, v1.33 can do 95 MHASH. (3080ti) 11000 memory, 75% tdp 0 core. Might need tuning. defaults are nerfed. v1.33 has semi Autotune, but you need to start correct. LHR unlock is still in BETA, so we do small adjustments/improvements for each release. --------- linux binaries of v1.33 released.
|
|
|
|
Reinseik
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 2
Merit: 0
|
|
December 18, 2021, 12:11:40 AM |
|
Why are the temperatures or consumption or anything not shown? so it cannot establish temperature limits because the miner simply ignores the limits that I set by not showing them, the gpus are from the 5000 and 6000 series and the version of the drivers is 21,11,03
|
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
|
December 18, 2021, 01:18:35 AM |
|
Why are the temperatures or consumption or anything not shown? so it cannot establish temperature limits because the miner simply ignores the limits that I set by not showing them, the gpus are from the 5000 and 6000 series and the version of the drivers is 21,11,03
How do you set the limits? The correct way is: --lock-cclock [[x,x],[x,x],[x,x],[x,x],[x,x],[x,x],[x,x]]
|
|
|
|
Reinseik
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 2
Merit: 0
|
|
December 18, 2021, 01:59:58 AM |
|
Why are the temperatures or consumption or anything not shown? so it cannot establish temperature limits because the miner simply ignores the limits that I set by not showing them, the gpus are from the 5000 and 6000 series and the version of the drivers is 21,11,03
How do you set the limits? The correct way is: --lock-cclock [[x,x],[x,x],[x,x],[x,x],[x,x],[x,x],[x,x]] with --templimit as it puts in the command list, what happens is that the miner does not show anything other than the hashrate, it does not show or core speed, temperatures or consumption, it only puts a 0 in all that
|
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
|
December 18, 2021, 11:24:51 AM |
|
Can you run nvidia-smi please whats the output.
Then you can try to query the device for stats with:
nvidia-smi --query-gpu=gpu_bus_id,temperature.gpu,power.draw,fan.speed,clocks.sm,clocks.mem,temperature.memory -i 0000:01:00.0 --format=csv,noheader,nounits
|
|
|
|
|
th3dark1nSid3me
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 15
Merit: 0
|
|
December 19, 2021, 11:11:38 AM |
|
Exact same settings on same 7 x 3060 TI FHR with TBM v 1.32 and v 1.33. Running at -450 Core clock, 2400 Memory clock and 130W power limit. Getting lower hashrate on 1.33, switched back to 1.32. Running SMOS with nv470.74 drivers.
-d -K 1 --dagintensity 1 --xintensity 284 -a ethash -H eu1.ethermine.org -p 4444 -r 40 -y 20 -t 120 -W "MAIN_WALLET" -w $rigName -P x --maintenance-wallet "MAINTENANCE_WALLET" --maintenance-percent 5
RIG is online >24H.
TBM 1.32 reports 437,xx MH/s. I keep seeing wrong reported values (pool side). Reported hashrate on MAIN_WALLET is full rigs capacity not the 95% of it (as it should) and it fully correlates with what TBM is saying (437,xx MH/s). Reported hashrate on MAINTENANCE_WALLET remains 2,5 MH/s stable. Average hashrate in MAIN_WALLET is low. It's about 380 - 384 MH/s. Average hashrate on MAINTENANCE_WALLET is between 18-22 MH/s.
So, 2 issues here. One is the wrong reported values in MAIN and MAINTENANCE wallets respectively. Two is the lower overall real hashrate than the reported one.
As a side note if you have any recommendations about my config they are most than welcome. I manage a total of 10 GH/s in mixed AMD and NVIDIA rigs and I would like to switch them all in TBM as long as it is as stable and fast as other miners. My only reason for switching is the implementation of the maintenance fee since this is exactly the feature I want to get easily paid for my maintenance work.
|
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
|
December 19, 2021, 11:19:18 AM |
|
Average hashrate in MAIN_WALLET is low. It's about 380 - 384 MH/s. Average hashrate on MAINTENANCE_WALLET is between 18-22 MH/s.
Se in my previos post. Regression logs showed problems with 1.32 and 1.33 . GPU timeouts, and stratum timeouts. On some of my test rigs the rig was sleeping for 3 minutes almost every hour, loosing 5% poolside hash. For single card rigs not a problem, and might work on some pools. But still a pretty serious bug. We are working on a better fix. The 1.34 windows version still have stratum disconnects but only 5 seconds instead of 180++
|
|
|
|
th3dark1nSid3me
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 15
Merit: 0
|
|
December 19, 2021, 11:52:44 AM |
|
Average hashrate in MAIN_WALLET is low. It's about 380 - 384 MH/s. Average hashrate on MAINTENANCE_WALLET is between 18-22 MH/s.
Se in my previos post. Regression logs showed problems with 1.32 and 1.33 . GPU timeouts, and stratum timeouts. On some of my test rigs the rig was sleeping for 3 minutes almost every hour, loosing 5% poolside hash. For single card rigs not a problem, and might work on some pools. But still a pretty serious bug. We are working on a better fix. The 1.34 windows version still have stratum disconnects but only 5 seconds instead of 180++ Understood. I'll wait for v 1.34 to be released in SMOS.
|
|
|
|
wasarianta
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 40
Merit: 0
|
|
December 19, 2021, 06:18:20 PM |
|
Se in my previos post.
Regression logs showed problems with 1.32 and 1.33 . GPU timeouts, and stratum timeouts.
On some of my test rigs the rig was sleeping for 3 minutes almost every hour, loosing 5% poolside hash. For single card rigs not a problem, and might work on some pools. But still a pretty serious bug. We are working on a better fix. The 1.34 windows version still have stratum disconnects but only 5 seconds instead of 180++
1.34 https://ibb.co/2S78sWQi let it run... https://ibb.co/pQrZSfJ
|
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
|
December 19, 2021, 06:48:07 PM Last edit: December 19, 2021, 07:20:37 PM by sp_ |
|
i let it run...
The timeout timer is set to only 5 seconds in this build. Fast reconnection seem to improve the poolspeed, but we need to investigate why it happens. edit: Found a fix. In testing now..
|
|
|
|
JL97786
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 11
Merit: 0
|
|
December 19, 2021, 11:49:17 PM |
|
Will the latest Linux builds be released soon? Why do they always lag windows releases?
|
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
|
December 20, 2021, 07:49:48 AM Last edit: December 20, 2021, 09:08:35 AM by sp_ |
|
Will the latest Linux builds be released soon? Why do they always lag windows releases?
1.34 fix has been released for windows. We have regression testing in a windows farm environment, it we find something we delay the linux release. Linux 1.34 soon. We also found a bug with a mixed card rig AMD/NVIDIA. For mixed cards, its best to run 2 instances of the miner. One with amd cards, the other with Nvidia.
|
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
|
December 21, 2021, 07:49:44 AM Last edit: December 21, 2021, 07:35:46 PM by sp_ |
|
|
|
|
|
long2905
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 21
Merit: 0
|
|
December 21, 2021, 09:15:24 AM |
|
you are killing it with new releases
|
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
|
December 21, 2021, 07:35:24 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
JL97786
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 11
Merit: 0
|
|
December 21, 2021, 07:47:00 PM |
|
Thanks, will you release cuda 11.4 build soon?
|
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
|
December 21, 2021, 07:53:16 PM |
|
Thanks, will you release cuda 11.4 build soon? The 11.5 build is faster, and early x-mas holiday now. So might not be buildt in a few days. The team is Tired. 10 months of hard work completed..
|
|
|
|
Wolf9466
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 22
Merit: 2
|
|
December 21, 2021, 11:23:10 PM |
|
Thanks, will you release cuda 11.4 build soon? The 11.5 build is faster, and early x-mas holiday now. So might not be buildt in a few days. The team is Tired. 10 months of hard work completed.. All that hard work stealing open source code, making some improvements, and then profiting off of it without giving back. Must be tiring.
|
|
|
|
|