The next time I make a Bitcoin transaction, I am not going to sign and broadcast it for a few minutes once the information gets sent over to my Ledger just to see if the same feature is also present with Bitcoin.
Looking forward to seeing the result
[as it stands, you're the first to report this design flaw].
Ledger's fault is producing a hardware wallet with such limited memory. But I can't blame them for the size increases of individual apps. It would be like blaming Bitcoin Core for each new block that gets added to the blockchain and the resulting decrease of your own disk capacity.
I completely agree with everything that you said, but at the same time, it has led to more work for other developers
[I recently noticed a few of them released two versions for their apps, just so it could fit the nano s a bit longer while also taking out some of its functionalities] and fewer features for its end-users.
Some people running Linux are reporting issues with S plus,
I have seen problems related to Ledger failing the genuine test before.
~Snipped~
Surprisingly, I didn't know about some of this stuff...
Goodbye old friend...
Unfortunately, the same can't be said with regard to some of its official resellers