Another New Rule On Gambling Adverts Ban Celebrities and Sports Stars

[ipanks]

snip

I think the casino has begun to think about the new law while they are still looking for what needs to be added to their rules. The existence of new laws makes casinos need to change their way of promoting and chances are they will try different ways than before. What is clear, celebrities hired by the casino will lose a source of income that may be large.

[noormcs5]

snip

I think the casino has begun to think about the new law while they are still looking for what needs to be added to their rules. The existence of new laws makes casinos need to change their way of promoting and chances are they will try different ways than before. What is clear, celebrities hired by the casino will lose a source of income that may be large.

Do you know any casino's who actively want to implement this new law.  Since many casinos are not regulated and not licensed, they are not bound to obey each and every law. Many casinos won't implement this new laws.

Also celebrities won't be much effected as will get other opportunities to gain money.

[leea-1334]

It does not seem clear to me what this new rule mean. It does not seem to be a ban on using sports personalities,,, just to not let them target Under 18s (which for me is a very very fair rule).

Role models like it or not live in a different time,,, but they can post their half naked bodies on IG and Under18s can see that easily (or use Google on their own of course).

[og kush420]

It does not seem clear to me what this new rule mean. It does not seem to be a ban on using sports personalities,,, just to not let them target Under 18s (which for me is a very very fair rule).

Role models like it or not live in a different time,,, but they can post their half naked bodies on IG and Under18s can see that easily (or use Google on their own of course).

Hum - that is a valid point but that again goes in their personal domain. Their half naked body would not affect youngster to do that since they would be aware of their culture - but showing someone that this hobby is productive will surely have some impact on kids. And the society where different ethnicity live together this would have a bad impact.

[Hamphser]

It does not seem clear to me what this new rule mean. It does not seem to be a ban on using sports personalities,,, just to not let them target Under 18s (which for me is a very very fair rule).

Role models like it or not live in a different time,,, but they can post their half naked bodies on IG and Under18s can see that easily (or use Google on their own of course).

Hum - that is a valid point but that again goes in their personal domain. Their half naked body would not affect youngster to do that since they would be aware of their culture - but showing someone that this hobby is productive will surely have some impact on kids. And the society where different ethnicity live together this would have a bad impact.

You cant really say that it wont really be make not some effect considering on how influential social media is and when it comes to exposure then its no surprising that audience ages or viewers cant really be filtered out

which means there's always a tendency and its indeed even on simple google search where images something like this or connected to it would really be likely to seen therefore having such ban wont really be that
much effective but its really that a very fair rule which had been said above but of course with such changes there would really be someone to be affected.

[RyanSmith23421]

they will find a way to get those stars in the ads lol in some other way...

[Theones]

It does not seem clear to me what this new rule mean. It does not seem to be a ban on using sports personalities,,, just to not let them target Under 18s (which for me is a very very fair rule).

Role models like it or not live in a different time,,, but they can post their half naked bodies on IG and Under18s can see that easily (or use Google on their own of course).

I think that is a good move.
We all know that Celebrities already have so many things which bother them - so they don't want to take a burden of any trouble on them. MAybe they are allowed to do this. They would keep themselves away from trouble.

[Flexystar]

I find it really funny, IDK why but internet is so simple these days and youngsters are so developed that they are always one step ahead of us. Don't take me in wrong way but children are very smart now and no matter what you do to stop such advertisement they pop in somehow.

Do you know when you are on single wifi connection in house and somebody watches or searches a keyword then anyone connected to that network will start receiving the advertisement automatically because sometime ads are IP tracked and they release on every device that's connected.

We have made simple accessible universe for ourselves but at the same time we have made complex optimisation process.

I think branding is different stuff, they should focus on the ad media networks logics.

[Fatunad]

I find it really funny, IDK why but internet is so simple these days and youngsters are so developed that they are always one step ahead of us. Don't take me in wrong way but children are very smart now and no matter what you do to stop such advertisement they pop in somehow.

Do you know when you are on single wifi connection in house and somebody watches or searches a keyword then anyone connected to that network will start receiving the advertisement automatically because sometime ads are IP tracked and they release on every device that's connected.

We have made simple accessible universe for ourselves but at the same time we have made complex optimisation process.

I think branding is different stuff, they should focus on the ad media networks logics.

No one would able to browse it out or would able to see those ads if it would be totally be prohibited or be blocked with those celebrities which had been used on gambling ads.
Just like on what others been saying on here that its still a considerable act since we know on who would be the one will benefit or would be avoided out which is the youth
or young minds but you did have a point that kids or youngster nowadays are smart and since that almost everyone is connected to net then its really something hard
to avoid these things completely.

[DoublerHunter]

~snip~

Do you know when you are on single wifi connection in house and somebody watches or searches a keyword then anyone connected to that network will start receiving the advertisement automatically because sometime ads are IP tracked and they release on every device that's connected.

^ I did not know this!
So possible that the ads will prone to the children that they will come curious and try the ads.
But I disagree with this, this is not their concern, it should be us (as a parent) who watch and guide our children's future. So at this point, if we know that the celebrity has an advert for a gambling platform, just keep away this to your children and tell them gambling is not good and they should not be addicted to it, awareness could be fine too.

[Uang_kartal]

~snip~

Do you know when you are on single wifi connection in house and somebody watches or searches a keyword then anyone connected to that network will start receiving the advertisement automatically because sometime ads are IP tracked and they release on every device that's connected.

^ I did not know this!
So possible that the ads will prone to the children that they will come curious and try the ads.
But I disagree with this, this is not their concern, it should be us (as a parent) who watch and guide our children's future. So at this point, if we know that the celebrity has an advert for a gambling platform, just keep away this to your children and tell them gambling is not good and they should not be addicted to it, awareness could be fine too.

I just heard this time, maybe what you mean is public area wifi that is connected freely in some city parks or is it a play area or shopping center? If so, people who are connected just stop by and if they get home/enjoy the connection, maybe not because the radius of the capture distance, maybe you mean Pop up? This is an advertisement decoration that appears on your cellphone screen and is not only about gambling and the company's arena gives the intro, I've experienced it.
I agree with you and the others that we as parents cannot completely spy on gadgets from our supervision, if we want we turn off javascript and turn on pop ups and redirects on gadgets, maybe it will help a little.
In my opinion the company is not wrong and has the right to develop their flagship products and services. It is undeniable that the artist is the sweetener of all types of sales, both goods, services and licenses (gambling). and the easiest media for hypnoselling to boost company profits

[Hamphser]

~snip~

Do you know when you are on single wifi connection in house and somebody watches or searches a keyword then anyone connected to that network will start receiving the advertisement automatically because sometime ads are IP tracked and they release on every device that's connected.

^ I did not know this!
So possible that the ads will prone to the children that they will come curious and try the ads.
But I disagree with this, this is not their concern, it should be us (as a parent) who watch and guide our children's future. So at this point, if we know that the celebrity has an advert for a gambling platform, just keep away this to your children and tell them gambling is not good and they should not be addicted to it, awareness could be fine too.

There is some regulatory board which do really protect and filter out on what are the ads that would be shown on tv but its totally different when we are on online world on which it would really be hard to filter it out.

Its a good initiative just i was saying earlier but it would really be that hard to implement and having that zero exposure which is something that impossible.They could impose things
but expect that it wouldnt be completely be that effective.

[Theones]

I find it really funny, IDK why but internet is so simple these days and youngsters are so developed that they are always one step ahead of us. Don't take me in wrong way but children are very smart now and no matter what you do to stop such advertisement they pop in somehow.

Do you know when you are on single wifi connection in house and somebody watches or searches a keyword then anyone connected to that network will start receiving the advertisement automatically because sometime ads are IP tracked and they release on every device that's connected.

We have made simple accessible universe for ourselves but at the same time we have made complex optimisation process.

I think branding is different stuff, they should focus on the ad media networks logics.

There are various ways of advertising the business without adding face to it. In our region most of the big brand has removed faced and celebrities to the ads.
So it think its a good move not to add faces. Rather focus on the services and product. That would cut the cost as well.

[leea-1334]

It does not seem clear to me what this new rule mean. It does not seem to be a ban on using sports personalities,,, just to not let them target Under 18s (which for me is a very very fair rule).

Role models like it or not live in a different time,,, but they can post their half naked bodies on IG and Under18s can see that easily (or use Google on their own of course).

I think that is a good move.
We all know that Celebrities already have so many things which bother them - so they don't want to take a burden of any trouble on them. MAybe they are allowed to do this. They would keep themselves away from trouble.

Fk celebrities man,,, I got my own things bothering me,,, I could not care less if they are banned from advertising crypto or gambling or their own hair products. I love athletes as sportspeople, I love Son (South Korean footballer) but can give 2 craps about what clothes he wears.

Hum - that is a valid point but that again goes in their personal domain. Their half naked body would not affect youngster to do that since they would be aware of their culture - but showing someone that this hobby is productive will surely have some impact on kids. And the society where different ethnicity live together this would have a bad impact.

I have no idea what you are talking about. I am talking about role models influencing people who are not old enough to vote,,, therefore not able to make their own rational decisions. I agree we cannot show them gambling ads, but at the same time we are showing them nudity-for-money.

[Silberman]

It is nothing really new, after all businesses are experts at finding a way to get around the law and in many cases from the beginning they were behind those making those laws to make sure there are ways to get around them, so I do not find this to be surprising at all, besides unless a very specific criteria is devised to make this a reality I think this is a law that is not going to have too much of an effect in the daily operations of casinos.

Most of the kids indulge themselves in trouble when they are not having a check and balance. Also Celebrates have a role towards society - they have to promote a positive image of the society for the sake of glory and peace. They cannot take any blame on them. In our country we have never seen any actor promoting smoking - which is injurious to health.

What happens is that even if you are right and some people that are famous take their position with responsibility and do their best to avoid promoting stuff that could deteriorate the lives of people that does not mean that all people have that very same opinion, which is why this law is being passed on the first place, however it is going to be very difficult for a law like this to be enforced as I am not so sure how they are going to measure that a star is too famous among the young and forbid them to promote a casino.

[mm2543363580]

What happens is that even if you are right and some people that are famous take their position with responsibility and do their best to avoid promoting stuff that could deteriorate the lives of people that does not mean that all people have that very same opinion, which is why this law is being passed on the first place, however it is going to be very difficult for a law like this to be enforced as I am not so sure how they are going to measure that a star is too famous among the young and forbid them to promote a casino.

Sometimes people can not pre guess the affects of certain thing - Gambling is a very controversial stuff in many religions. People are not that liberal in every society.
And since society is a mix of different culture - so they have to be extra careful in every way. Good move though - I appreciate it!

[Desmong]

It does not seem clear to me what this new rule mean. It does not seem to be a ban on using sports personalities,,, just to not let them target Under 18s (which for me is a very very fair rule).

Role models like it or not live in a different time,,, but they can post their half naked bodies on IG and Under18s can see that easily (or use Google on their own of course).

This people are creating different rules just to jeopardize our passion but who cares about it. I think they are trying to reduce the influence of sport celebrities on teenagers and gambling addicts. The rule are meant to target gambling platform with bigger restrictions from using the influence of celebrities to lure innocent children, maybe adults too from becoming gambling addictive.
That's a good try though!

[shasan]

There are some gambling websites that offer free exchanges at their disposal where you can quickly convert your cryptocurrencies to fiat; and the other way around.

You are right and I have sen it on bitsler too and I have used that service as well. But when I used the service for converting cryptocurrency to fiat I noticed that they are charging me about 10% or more as a convert charge while we can use from converter site/exchange site is to lower than this amount. Though there might have only few gambling site who may convert for free.                                                                                                                                                     

[LUCKMCFLY]

I very much agree with your opinion, in fact games of chance, sports companies around the world have as their main measure to accept adults, from 18 years of age you are an adult in my country, I do not know if they differ from other countries that the age of majority begins at 21.

For me the biggest of all the problems is that they are attacking the business model under which casinos and sports betting are also supported and it is through influencers, some athletes are influencers without them proposing it, just imagine a Messi or a CR7 on a casino platform that will attract almost all players, so I think the point is a bit tricky, it is to speculate on a business model that is developing much more currently.

All gambling casino platform have term or service allowed for adult and not prohibited for children created account, but not effective when have several gambling platform not using KYC for beginning gambling. Free for children or gambler under 18 years old active on several gambling site trough deposit by cryptocurrency, maybe have different thing when deposit fund for gambling casino account by fiat because children can't created bank account if still under 18 years old or without have ID card.

Most the gambling casinos have their terms regarding the age restriction and of course its the player's responsibility to check it but its 2022 guys most of the people don't read the instruction and terms they just created an account and if they meet some trouble they are just checking it, that's why its better if the gambling platforms always makes a notifying the members or the users with this agreements but mostly its just an accept if the user is age 18 above and after that they can proceed now, its ideal they have some child protection.

Well, I am particularly a person who is very supportive of everything that is about privacy and anonymity, but when they are seen, including the danger to children, and that in some way affects them, at least for me thinking as a parent, it is The only thing in life that makes me bow my head is because of the children, it's the only thing, and seeing it from the point of view that sometimes casinos require their KYC considering how bad this represents, the only good thing for me is that can guarantee that it keeps children out of danger, it is the only thing for which I would dare to defend a possible KYC on any platform.

[Peanutswar]

There are some gambling websites that offer free exchanges at their disposal where you can quickly convert your cryptocurrencies to fiat; and the other way around.

You are right and I have sen it on bitsler too and I have used that service as well. But when I used the service for converting cryptocurrency to fiat I noticed that they are charging me about 10% or more as a convert charge while we can use from converter site/exchange site is to lower than this amount. Though there might have only few gambling site who may convert for free.                                                                                                                                                     

This kind of feature makes their users feel that its convenient to use their platform because they have already an integrated feature of swapping their coins but only a few platform I saw this kind of feature but mostly expensive when they use it to exchange but still it's convenient i guess the same fee too if they convert and deposit, also most of the people use this feature just to prevent having too much high fees.