Do you believe my argument is invalid, and I am accusing them without any reason?
I can't really tell, your "
evidence" isn't convincing.
I saw they did some transactions with the three accounts
So what's the problem? The whole point of Bitcoin is to make transactions. Sending from A to B doesn't mean they belong to the same person, that would happen if A and B both send funds in one transaction to C. But even then, it could be coinjoin, or it could even be A shared their private key with B.
It happens!Blockchain evidence always requires an interpretation.
As you can see, I just wanted to know if he had some business deal or what connection he has with the two of them.
It's none of your business. He
may choose to disclose his deals, but if he doesn't, it proves nothing. Ask me about my business deals: if I wanted them to be public, I would have created a thread when I made the deal.
I believe in the future; You will see a lot of ban evaders here on the platform. You will understand. But, you will end up watching them. If scammers and cheaters also do the same.
That's been happening for years.
All you need is, accept your mistakes; remove the tag; remember all the suggestions made to you. Move on.
Or, you just move on
You're putting way too much weight on a non-DT neutral tag. Anyone can leave any feedback they want. Check
The Pharmacist's Untrusted feedback and scroll down real quick. It means nothing
But yes. Theymos can figure out alts.
From the history of Bitcointalk:
A year or two ago I was researching fingerprinting techniques that'd work against pretty much anyone with JavaScript enabled, and I found several promising leads on that front. But then it occurred to me that I don't really want bitcointalk.org to be known as the #1 forum on the leading edge of de-anonymization technology, so I stopped pursuing it seriously...