Royse777 is Casino Critique

[AB de Royse777]

It's not like if you create a new account you get a fresh new start like no one knows what your past was.

Casino Critique is an official account which is representing a business where I am not the only one.
Hack it's worthless to tell you anything. It was my fault that I chose wrong guy to tell the secret who seemed a member I thought I could trust.

My worse nightmare of keeping Casino Critique disconnected from my personal account turned out to be a reality now.

I simply did not feel secure to do so.

But, and here comes the important part, what evidence do we have that Royse777 did not play a major role in Bitlucy(777)?

There are evidences. But like I said always, I am not going to make the log pubic, I explained my reason too why I can not. There are also members who were shown data in private (since I do not want to bring everything public) that at least should prove that bitlucy and me was not the same person.

Now coming to major roles or minor roles, It was no secret that I always told I was offered 10% that he was promised me but of course it was just promise. There were no written contract or legal things. It was just words. In reality I lost cash out of my pocket, which is no secret.

You did not have to believe my word if some of the people who were involved (worked) in Bitlucy would willingly come and tell about my involvement and role. There were at least 4 to 5 users including Legendary and Hero members who are still around but I never seen them to tell a single word yet. Are they scared that they may have the same reputation issue if they come and tell anything?

At least one or two of them could come here and tell that I and Bitlucy were two different persons and I was offered 10% of the profit that bitlucy will make. They obviously was seeing who was controlling finance and every major things on the website.

Promise, privacy even if that was not confirmed by me to keep or not, matters for me (that's why even after all these insults, disbelieve, trashing - I am still not mentioning any of the names). I was trusting you with Casino Critique keeping hidden but you broke it (yeah you did not promise, I get it).

Should you think anyone else will ever tell you anything that was meant to be private for them. I will not trust you anymore with any confidential information. And I suggest everyone to think twice to do the same.

it turns out that not only does Royse777 keep it a secret that this guy is ban evading

It's not like I was actively defending AnotherAlt, I was just ignoring and not talking about it. I can act/react/stay silent[1] in anything that I want.
Are you telling I am forced to speak every single incident that is happening on the forum?

we can't trust and hire him for a big project with money involved, you can't be trusted.

We? "you can't be trusted"? Who are these we? There are still a lot of people who trust me for over $0.01*10,000x. Still I am actively single handily holding a bitcoin wallet key for an escrow that I did not ask for, it sounds cheap that I am using it in an argument. Feel free to find it. So when you are saying "we", you are manipulating your logic to fit your desire instead of apologizing of the wrong doing you did by breaking the trust I put in you.

And trusting with the money involved in the CC project?
I still don't understand how would you fail to understand it was a 2 of 3 multisig wallet unless you believe that the two other cosigners have not earned a name yet to listen whatever I tell them.

Hire naim for project when he is banned from the forum?
Should I not hire people who will work hard for the project even knowing that they are not getting paid for the work until the project makes money.
Start a project with zero fund in hand. Then you will realize how hard it is.

I PMed over 10 users to be the cosigner of the escrow once two of the escrow told they can not continue for their busy schedule. All of them denied more or less for the same reason. One was going extra mile saying he does not think he can do it considering the reputation/mess, in other words he sounded he was not feeling secure because it may effect his reputation. He was also saying we can not raise the money we are expecting so there is no value in it for him.

You see, when you have money everyone will do everything for you but when you don't have it then no one will take risk, very few will be same like minded as you and will be willing to work.
I have contacted a lot of users to be in the project but when they learn they will not get paid until we make a revenue then they back up. Yeah we are lucky in the way we got few people who are currently in the team and believe in the project. If they were not in the project then it would have been impossible to bring it live (technically we are still working to bring it live).

[1]. I do not want to specifically point it since none of you may not notice, it's better to keep it that way. I noticed similar example of being silent from another user (well not just a user but far more than a user). Everyone has their right to stay silent in any incident if they chose to.

[1714560648]

1714560648

[suchmoon]

It's really sad to see people getting caught red-handed doing something shady and continuing to argue it on "procedural" grounds. It doesn't matter how offended or betrayed you feel, Royse777. Not in this context anyway.

I don't understand the logic of not disclosing your sockpuppeting to people involved in the project but disclosing it to outsiders, if I correctly understand what's happening here. Regardless of how it leaked, I'd be pissed if I had any dealings with CC and didn't know that you were CC.

Now it sounds that you're not regretting your own behavior but the fact that you got caught, which is what scammers tend to do.

[AB de Royse777]

I don't understand the logic of not disclosing your sockpuppeting to people involved in the project but disclosing it to outsiders, if I correctly understand what's happening here.

Pardon if I am confused now. Are you telling the CC team members and former escrow team did not know who is forum account Casino Critique?
If that's you got then you have wrong information.
All core team members and former escrow team members know Casino Critique is me.

In addition to, there are some other known forum members (I felt comfortable to disclose) to whom I offered free chips or other to whom I was reaching out to assemble the team - I told them who casino critique is and why I am hiding it from public. One of them were Poker Player too, I trusted him to keep it in PM and hidden from public.

Update:
I just noticed Poker Player, you left negative feedback to Casino Critique account too.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=3490051

Poker Player 2022-10-16 Reference Alt account of Royse777. I don't trust him/her for the reasons exposed in the reference thread.

Casino Critique is not a personal account but an official account which represent the project CasinoCritique.com. The project consists of other 5 forum members. How it's appropriate to leave a red feedback because of whatever reputation I managed to have?

[suchmoon]

I don't understand the logic of not disclosing your sockpuppeting to people involved in the project but disclosing it to outsiders, if I correctly understand what's happening here.

Pardon if I am confused now. Are you telling the CC team members and former escrow team did not know who is forum account Casino Critique?
If that's you got then you have wrong information.

Who are all those who knew it?

[naim027]

~Snip~

I do not have words to answer you. You are one of those who supported my ban appeal. I appreciate it. I had very little interaction with you, and You knew about my post quality and ability to build a reputation. That was the only reason why you supported my ban appeal. With the naim027 account, I never asked for a post review. I guess you agree with that.

I want to mention again that none of my accounts were created after I got banned. My account was active before I got banned. I asked you via PM if you allow post reviews for alt accounts. Yes, I tried to escape with not banned AnotherAlt and Cryptosoul accounts. That was my wrong move.

Before that, The community had already proved me a liar and speculated a lot of things about me. There was a time when I was thinking of telling the community those were my alts, but I ended up evading the ban. I don't want to mention the username, but I am telling you that people offered me another account to continue on the forum (Evading the ban) via PM. I didn't accept the offer, but it encouraged me to continue with my existing accounts. There was another story about why I sent eight merits to the Dic3l0v3r account. A Legendary member was offering me a merit exchange. I did that with him and thought, why not do it with my alt. After a week or so, I saw it was not allowed. 

I don't want to ruin their reputation just because my reputation was ruined. But if you promise me privacy security, I can give you my account credentials, and you can check those PMs yourself.

I was a noob guy and learned everything from this community. This community made me like this. I was not smart enough to understand what I should allow or not. But things happen.

He published his private email address willingly

Is it was on the forum? On which post? Help me quote the post, please.

[AB de Royse777]

Let me not name there names but put the links. I hope they would see the situation I am in which is forcing me to bring their profiles without asking their permission. Please don't see it unnecessary, please forgive me. I am totally lost.

Who are all those who knew it?

Okay since you asked:

Former escrow team members:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=881377
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2003859

Team members:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1139993
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=131333
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=325028
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2344286
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=146583
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2473857
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=205954
And few more who left the team or removed for various reasons including https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1187984

Users (except one or two, like I said only those who I thought I am comfortable to disclose) on this spreadsheet who was offered free chips:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1FEo0vBAyBOE5ZFDu9Z-LmOtc7iy2UKXETl878Ydj51c/edit?usp=sharing

There are also many others who are offered to join partnership and or done some work for the project to get paid / or have promised to get paid.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1052091
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=300014
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=487418

And many more users, I do not have a list in hand and I can not remember all of them.

If I reached out to them from Casino Critique account then I told them I am Royse777, if I reached out to them from my personal account then I said Casino Critique is the official account. In every case I told them why I don't want to disclose it in public. None of them seems to be pissed. Some of them even suggested me it's better to do considering the situation I am in after bitlucy scam and some over interested users to reacting in that.

Too all of you guys (team members and free chip holders). It feels to me I am using all your names to defend myself. If this was only about Royse777 then I would not care, but since Poker Player tagged our official account I have no other way but to use everything in my hand to protect it. Again please forgive me.

[suchmoon]

And many more users, I do not have a list in hand and I can not remember all of them.

Then I'm totally confused now why this was such a big deal with 5 pages of cover up. How could you possibly not have seen that trying to keep a secret that was impossible to keep (given the number of people involved) would backfire and make you look like you're scheming something fishy.

[AB de Royse777]

This will be my last response to any topic related to my personal account, the bitlucy scam where I barely had any control, my lost reputation, requesting everyone to remove me from trust list including everything else that is happening because of me and why I kept Casino Critique official account disconnected from my personal account. I decided to shake the peace and stop defending everything that is coming towards my way. I told the CC team that after today I am going to start fresh again.

Please note: There are very few forum members still exists who are trying to make this place better, genuinely working for it. If you feel it from the heart that you are one of the very few then please do not get offended. Whatever I am saying are from my personal experience for the record. I don't expect anything to change from it. But since I will not talk about all these anymore, I want to tell my last words which are relevant.

Why I requested everyone to remove me from their trust list?
I lost faith from the trust system, I am sorry. It became a meaningless system to me. Trustlist has became a powerful tool for members to manipulate the trust system in their favor. They do not judge others feedback leaving accuracy at all. They do not care about the outcome for other of their wrong choices.

People are leaving negative feedback
- Just because one chosen to stay silent in a matter (My silence in Naim's ban evasion),
- Keep confidential conversation in private because they respect privacy and decides to keep promise.
- They demands why a project have a member who was banned. (An independent project decides who they will hire or partner with as long as not a threat to lose money).
- A new service who do not want to settle with an escrow (Best Change case)
- Demands to make private information public even when it was shared with handful trusted members
- Continue leaving retaliatory feedback but others just ignore and decides to move on.

People are leaving positive feedback
- To impress high rank members to climb the reputation ladder.
- To impress their employers
- They want to have the person in their favour because the person is too arrogant and complected to handle

People are leaving neutral feedback
- They know leaving a negative will look them too bad

People seeking positive feedback:
- By taking loans
- Busting scams as it's a profession
- Hunting alts same as it's a profession
- Constantly policing to make a name

Members are doing all sorts of unethical practice (very less people are doing it from moral obligation) for their personal benefit and satisfaction just to build up a great reputation. Then they are pitching these reputation to advertisers to hire them.
Again these are my personal observations. If I would give this post more time then I could have write more but anyway.

Bitlucy and my lost reputation
I had no control over any finance and independent decision making in bitlucy. It was not my project, I was offered 10% of the revenue. There were no contract, no legal documents (I was promised but there I made one mistake that I never should have done in my entire life, I can only regret it) but some verbal promise. My trust, my honesty, my loyalty was used so badly that even I lost over $6.2k from my own pocket plus 14 to 16 hours of works for two to three long months without having offs (one or two days I took I guess). But many people don't believe it, some people are even over interested and blaming everything on me. It made them pissed because I did not share conversation log, blockchain evidences (I can't remember if I did it in public) in public. I did not share in public because it could insecure my privacy, but they kept demanding it.

What hurt me the most that none of the people from the bitlucy team who worked with me from the forum (Including Legendary and hero members) thought to say a word that bitlucy was not my project and I did not have major decision making role. But anyway, I respect others privacy and the decision they choose to take, they decided whatever they thought was good for them. Maybe they are scared to back me publicly, in case they also discover reputation crisis like me.

Why I decided to keep casino critique official account disconnected from my personal account in public?
After bitlucy scam, I gone through mental trauma. Losing savings, defending reputation eventually losing it, major clash with two over interested forum members - everything was too much to take. At some point I realized whatever I do, they will hunt to destroy me. I was in depression because I was too attached with everything related to save the forum reputation. I was too depressed that I had to consult with doctor and was taking treatments. I lost business, lost savings, lost the respect from the community - all were not easy to deal with especially when this place is a part of my daily life and mental emotion.

In the mean time, I was looking for something. Then the idea of Casino Critique born. But with the ruined situation of my personal account especially not wanting to deal with the two specific members anymore, I decided to keep it disconnected from my personal account so that I can focus on the project only.

I was successfully working until someone decided to create this topic. But they failed anyway, since I was ignoring to response trolls. Everything was going as planned until Poker Player decided to break the trust that I had for him. He felt himself so important that even knowing the reason, even knowing all other members who know who I am but respecting my private request - he decided to disclose it.

Basically it's my fault that I picked wrong guy who was too sick to take this chance to get some attention. He was seeking for it from the last few days, that's another topic to talk anyway. Truth is the reason I trusted him because he successfully created an image around him of trusting him but it turns out trusting poker player with nondisclosure information is a wrong choice.

Again, since I will not have any contribution in the related topics, anyone who tells anything after this post, is not going to get any response from me. It's not that I am ignoring you, or don't want to response to clear anything that you want to know, it's because I need peace, I want to stay mentally healthy.

I am working on to shake the peace and going to give my 100% focus in casinocritique.com. I am proud to have a lovely team, they are backing me mentally. I don't want to let them down. Our hustle will end once Casino Critique will be one of the leaders in crypto casino industry.

Cheers,

And many more users, I do not have a list in hand and I can not remember all of them.

Then I'm totally confused now why this was such a big deal with 5 pages of cover up.

I appreciate you read the last long post, I don't expect you to read everything from this too. Here is the straight answer of your simple question.
"...with the ruined situation of my personal account especially not wanting to deal with the two specific members anymore, I decided to keep it disconnected from my personal account so that I could focus on the project only. "

[Smartvirus]

And many more users, I do not have a list in hand and I can not remember all of them.

Then I'm totally confused now why this was such a big deal with 5 pages of cover up. How could you possibly not have seen that trying to keep a secret that was impossible to keep (given the number of people involved) would backfire and make you look like you're scheming something fishy.

For someone that was caught in some shaddy deal with the devil and hot yo see the light only after the devil had robbed her of her time, money and reputation, I think the person still deserves a second chance to life on the things he loves. I think Royse777 has done her bit of explaining and having her confidentiality in a few with hopes of rebuilding a lost reputation could be given a benefit of the doubt, looking at the other many reputable members involved.
Most of what the cryptocurrency is about revolves around trust and privacy, with confidentiality not making much sense to us, where then do we stand in issues of privacy.

One who suspects something shaddy has got to speak up anyways but I can't help but have a soft core for Royse777.

[suchmoon]

And many more users, I do not have a list in hand and I can not remember all of them.

Then I'm totally confused now why this was such a big deal with 5 pages of cover up.

I appreciate you read the last long post, I don't expect you to read everything from this too. Here is the straight answer of your simple question.
"...with the ruined situation of my personal account especially not wanting to deal with the two specific members anymore, I decided to keep it disconnected from my personal account so that I could focus on the project only. "

I understand this as the initial motivation. I don't understand the cover up when you got outed. That was the time to say "yep, it's me, not really a secret because many more users know this" and move on. You knew at that point that this secret has no chance so what was the plan?

And yes, I misunderstood the posts of some other users earlier in the thread... I thought they were saying "we know who CC is and it's not Royse777" but actually they were just playing along with your charade. So you didn't deceive them as I initially thought. You just deceived everyone else.

For someone that was caught in some shaddy deal with the devil and hot yo see the light only after the devil had robbed her of her time, money and reputation, I think the person still deserves a second chance to life on the things he loves. I think Royse777 has done her bit of explaining and having her confidentiality in a few with hopes of rebuilding a lost reputation could be given a benefit of the doubt, looking at the other many reputable members involved.
Most of what the cryptocurrency is about revolves around trust and privacy, with confidentiality not making much sense to us, where then do we stand in issues of privacy.

One who suspects something shaddy has got to speak up anyways but I can't help but have a soft core for Royse777.

Well, see above. According to Royse777, everything and everyone is wrong except Royse777. Benefit of the doubt usually comes with remorse and humility, which is severely lacking here.

Anyway, let's backtrack a little bit. If I was considering investing in whatever this CC project is I would surely want to know who is involved in it. Wouldn't you? So we could find a lot of reputable members linked to it but one important member was hiding. That's kinda sketchy in its own right. Then it turns out it's Royse777, recently involved in a scammy casino. I would consider this whole scheme very dishonest and deceptive.

And that's me - someone who didn't really consider Royse777 guilty in the BitLucy debacle. Now imagine if someone thinks Royse777 is a scammer and they get deceived by the presence of all these reputable members in the CC project and put their money into it, only to find out that a scammer (in their view) is involved and said reputable members hid that information.

I don't think that's right. I don't think that's how you rebuild reputation. I think being honest is how you rebuild reputation.

I might be wrong though. Maybe sockpuppeting and lying about it and blaming others is the Bitcointalk way.

[FatFork]

<cut>
Is it was on the forum? On which post? Help me quote the post, please.

Exactly. You exposed your email address with your alt account Crypt0S0ul, as already noted in your "Welcome back again!" topic:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5416864.msg61108552#msg61108552

[LoyceV]

Why I requested everyone to remove me from their trust list?
I lost faith from the trust system, I am sorry.

Marlboroza tried that, it didn't work. Many people are unhappy with the Trust system, but in my opinion you can't fix a decentralized system by making it less decentralized. If the wrong people abandon the system, it gets worse, not better.

Everything was going as planned until Poker Player decided to break the trust that I had for him.

With each additional person who knows a secret, the chance of it leaking increases. Eventually, it becomes inevitable. I think Poker Player has a point here:

I, who did not promise to keep the secret (I was simply asked for) am going to confirm that

There's a difference between being told a secret with the request to keep it a secret, and promising to keep it a secret before you're told said secret.

I was in depression because I was too attached with everything related to save the forum reputation. I was too depressed that I had to consult with doctor and was taking treatments.

That sucks Give it time, give it some distance.

FWIW: Royse777: I still stand by this:

To me, it sounds like "Lucy" got the idea to create a casino without having funding for a bankroll and promotion. I've seen people like that, also in real life. Typically, the promises keep piling up and it's always "tomorrow" or "in a few days" to keep you waiting without coming through. People like that can be very convincing, and I've seen many people fall for that for a long time. By the time they've had enough, others get stuck in the same web of lies and it continues to make new victims.

For what it's worth: I believe you (Royse777) didn't have bad intentions. But I also believe you messed up big time by not seeing the red flags. If a campaign can't be paid up-front, and if the campaign manager has to pay for things out of his own pocket, you can bet there's no money in the casino. The moment the campaign couldn't be paid should have been the moment to put the campaign on HOLD. As an experienced campaign manager, you should have seen the red flags. By continuing the promotion with your forum reputation tied to it, I can imagine that made people believe the site could be trusted.
I think you waited too long to pull the plug, and you waited too long to come clean here. I wish you the best though.

I don't think that's right. I don't think that's how you rebuild reputation. I think being honest is how you rebuild reputation.

Agreed. Mistakes were made, even if they were unintentional. But from there, it could have been handled better with more openness.

[NotATether]

Why are we still babbling about this debunked accusation 3 months later?

And how can we be sure that the OP isn't yet another naim027 alt (thus this entire thread would just be a gigantic troll-fest)?


Just in case it's not clear - Read the 3rd reply after this post.

[suchmoon]

debunked accusation

That was my initial impression too but it turns out that at least part of it is true.

[examplens]

This will be my last response to any topic related to my personal account
...

Royse777, I will give you a well-intentioned criticism.
starting from the fact that everything is exactly as you claim, when we talk about the Bitlucy case, your biggest mistake is that you waited for the matter to culminate and to publicly present the problem to them. so you were uncertain and indecisive, which caused the justified suspicion of the other members.

I completely understand opening a new CC account, partly because of the shaken trust in your name and you did not want the new project to be burdened with it from the beginning. But, again at some point when the discussion started about whether you are really behind the CC account, you were indecisive and didn't end the whole thing and tell the truth. Although it was obvious that many members already knew the real identity behind CC, it was a matter of time before it would become public.
So in just a few months, you make the same mistake twice. You certainly don't need anything to blame anyone who presented the confirmation that you are behind the CC account, negative image about everything is only your fault.

I'm still not sure why you insisted on raising funds for the project CasinoCritique (I already asked about that ). you were looking for money for wages for the work you will do on your project, this still sounds strange to me.

Unfortunately, after this drama and things about the team member naim027, you start the whole project from a much weaker position rather than if you just introduced him as Royse777 and possibly asked for help in promotion (or whatever), which will be paid when the project starts to bring in profit.

[NotATether]

debunked accusation

That was my initial impression too but it turns out that at least part of it is true.

You're right - I didn't read the most recent reply from Royse.

[The Sceptical Chymist]

Now it sounds that you're not regretting your own behavior but the fact that you got caught, which is what scammers tend to do.

Just giving my $0.02 once again, but I still don't think Royse777 or any of the CC team members are or were trying to scam anyone.  I was pissed that Royse777 tried to silence criticism from yahoo62278, but other than that I don't have any issues with him.  

Regardless of him concealing his true identity with respect to the CC project, there's still the fact that he's only one member and the funds are protected by their escrow system (to the best of my knowledge).  Naim027's involvement was known right from the beginning, too.

Unfortunately, after this drama and things about the team member naim027, you start the whole project from a much weaker position rather than if you just introduced him as Royse777 and possibly asked for help in promotion (or whatever), which will be paid when the project starts to bring in profit.

You're right about that, and though I understand why Royse777 wanted to hide his identity I kind of figured it would be revealed one way or another.  Members here are justifiably suspicious, tenacious, and aren't stupid.  There's not a lot that can be hidden for long if they start digging.

One who suspects something shaddy has got to speak up anyways but I can't help but have a soft core for Royse777.

I haven't read the whole bitlucy drama in excruciating detail, but my impression from the start is that Royse777 never scammed anyone.  If he was guilty of anything, it was making some wrong decisions based on his judgement of the information he had--and kept getting--at the time.  I gave him the benefit of the doubt, because I'm not sure how I would have acted in his shoes, and we all know hindsight is 20/20. 

[Poker Player]

Why are we still babbling about this debunked accusation 3 months later?

Debunked NotATether? I can't believe you would say that coming from a quality poster like you. I think you are blinded by personal empathy.

Well, you're forcing me to do something I didn't think was necessary.

Gift Chip for Poker Player
« Sent to: Poker Player on: September 08, 2022, 11:56:27 AM »
« You have forwarded or responded to this message. »

I hope you are doing great buddy!

I am behind the project Casino Critique and forum account Casino Critique is my official account. Please keep it unpublished.
Link of our ANN: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5409868.0

I would like to Gift you a Chip worth 0.001 BTC, which is on me. :-)
It's under the clause:

9. Team have the right to invite known gamblers, Bitcointalk members or ANYONE to this FREE gift promotion.

Would you mind replaying with a BTC address so that I can add it for you?

On the ANN thread you will be able to see more details including the Chip allocated for users on the spreadsheet.

Cheers,

PS: Feel free to reach out to me on my telegram for any question: @Royse777

That was my initial impression too but it turns out that at least part of it is true.

I'm done with dramas. You won't see much of me in this section. I have done what the voice of my conscience tells me is the right thing to do, and I am not going to enter into endless discussions about my tag and my motives.

[PaperWallet]

I might be wrong though. Maybe sockpuppeting and lying about it and blaming others is the Bitcointalk way.

Just maybe... Here's one who at least asks some honest questions, but on the other hand if you think you have a duty to make it better, you have tools that you can use such as red tagging someone for what red tagging is meant to be. If you want to check a counter example of what a good use of a red tag is, you just have to check my profile for the red tag you left me 

[NotATether]

Why are we still babbling about this debunked accusation 3 months later?

Debunked NotATether? I can't believe you would say that coming from a quality poster like you. I think you are blinded by personal empathy.

Well, you're forcing me to do something I didn't think was necessary.

Get a grip on yourself, I already wrote that I didn't see his last post.

EDIT:

I rarely check on Reputation threads, because I have neither time nor interest in mudslinging. The last time I checked on this thread was sometime in early October. I guess you can figure out why, because nearly all the posts up to this point have been just flame wars between DT members, and with both a job & a nonprofit to attend to, I categorically ignored the whole conversation.

So it shouldn't come as a surprise even when the mic is dropped, I may not see it, especially when the the thread is pages deep in arguments and personal attacks.

PS. I was ready to invest 0.04 BTC with Casino Critique. I probably would not have had the confidence in doing so had I known that it was Royse777 raising the money, with him being fresh off the heels of the BitLucy snafu and all, with him saying he needs some time to cool down from it.