Royse777 is Casino Critique

[virasog]

Oh, I didn't notice Royse777 was already here.
So, You are started responding to him again? What's the point? Do you believe you will be able to satisfy him? If so, You are wrong. TrollyBag is not going to stop. Now, I am a bit suspicious about Casino Critique and TrollyBag. Why do I feel like Mr. JollyBad is behind the project and doing all this drama just to promote the platform and spread it over the forum?

Haha, that's funny, Someday someone will come up with the conclusion that both of them are brothers and doing all this drama to promote their casino
I know this is not true because there are better ways to promote the casinos and not by the trolls.
 
Are we going to get to a conclusion on this, or this is going to be a never ending debate forever???

[1714530727]

1714530727

[1714530727]

1714530727

[1714530727]

1714530727

[1714530727]

1714530727

[Bitcoin_Arena]

Oh, I didn't notice Royse777 was already here.
So, You are started responding to him again? What's the point? Do you believe you will be able to satisfy him? If so, You are wrong. TrollyBag is not going to stop.

Well, from what it looks, it seems he stopped... for now.

Speaking of all these new accounts creating topics in order to cause some friction and then disappear in a thin air. It's likely Royce777 created some enemy or enemies probably from signature campaigns or bounties as he was a manager. The common thing about these account is they seem to be bitter about campaign managers
1. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5414027.msg60963524#msg60963524
2. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5412164.0

[UmerIdrees]

Speaking of all these new accounts creating topics in order to cause some friction and then disappear in a thin air. It's likely Royce777 created some enemy or enemies probably from signature campaigns or bounties as he was a manager. The common thing about these account is they seem to be bitter about campaign managers
1. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5414027.msg60963524#msg60963524
2. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5412164.0

It's not just Royse, but there are members who won't like certain managers for a number of reasons and hence they will launch such posts against them only to satisfy themselves, but the result is always all in vain. Some may have hard feelings about not being accepted and others might have jealousy.

Also, these people use random newbies accounts which shows them that they can't stand their arguments from their original accounts.

[Poker Player]

It's been a while since I've been in the reputation section, and, in fact, I think I'm going to end up putting it on ignore because I'm a bit fed up with the unnecessary drama, sometimes stirred up by alts. At first I enjoyed coming here more, as it's like the gossip on Bitcointalk, but I'm getting fed up.

I would like to make a reflection that has been going through my mind.

I know what Casino Critique's main account is.

And I think that hiding it in the end has been detrimental, because, in my opinion, that person has a pretty decent reputation, I'd say. Although not perfect. That person sent me a PM telling me about the project and offering me a free chip. I did not promise them that I would not tell who that person is, although I understood that they preferred not to disclose it. I didn't remember anything the PM said about no disclosing and I had to look at the PM again before writing this post to realize that it said:: "...Casino Critique is my official account. Please keep it unpublished."

In my case, I have not disclosed it but not for money or anything else, because I am not involved in the project and I have had little to no relationship with the people involved during my time in the forum. I simply understand that the people on the project prefer not to disclose it, and I respect that.

The only thing I could have been involved in would have been to invest some chips, but it didn't convince me, as it didn't convince almost anyone else. It seems that the project will continue despite the adversity of lack of funding and if it is finally a successful project will be mainly due to persistence, effort and faith in the project that have those who make up the team.

Although I think it would have been better to say who Casino Critique is, I don't think this issue has had any influence on the funding. I think such big numbers on a new project is what people don't see clearly.

I just prefer to improve my financial situation in a boring but safe way: DCA to the S&P 500, DCA Bitcoin and some RE.

[Poker Player]

Well, in view of recent events, I, who did not promise to keep the secret (I was simply asked for) am going to confirm that Royse777 is Casino Critique, which I could prove with the PM, but I don't think it will be necessary.

Yes Royse777 not only helped to keep secret that AnotherAlt was Naim027, a known cheater and plagiarist while evading the ban, but also included him in his Casino Critique project.

Right now I'm hesitating because at the very least I'm going to leave him a neutral negative spirit tag, if not a negative tag directly and I don't care if those of you who are his friends fill me with retaliatory negative feedbacks.

I will think about it in the next few hours.

[LoyceV]

Yes Royse777 not only helped to keep secret that AnotherAlt was Naim027

When I read that post, I assumed he meant his real name, not his other forum accounts:

@Royse777, I want to be anonymous in this forum. After this post, Only you, bitlucy owner, and another guy from this forum will know who am I. Please don't reveal me.

a known cheater and plagiarist while evading the ban, but also included him in his Casino Critique project.

The one in the project was/is naim027, it was already publicly known he was banned for plagiarism. Only the ban evasion wasn't known to us at that time.

I don't care if those of you who are his friends fill me with retaliatory negative feedbacks.

Ifi that happens, you should care and fight to have them removed. Retaliation tags are never acceptable. To be fair: I don't think I've seen retaliation from Royse777 ("or friends") because of negative feedback on Royse777.

[AB de Royse777]

Well, in view of recent events, I, who did not promise to keep the secret (I was simply asked for) am going to confirm that Royse777 is Casino Critique, which I could prove with the PM, but I don't think it will be necessary.

No it is not necessary. But I think this was an unnecessary move from you. I was trusting you like I did some others.

Yes Royse777 not only helped to keep secret that AnotherAlt was Naim027, a known cheater and plagiarist while evading the ban, but also included him in his Casino Critique project.

For casino critique project we need people who will work there, believe in the project. Why it matters if a user is banned?
When a campaign manager is hiring a participant, what does he consider? He consider user who will follow his rules. He does care less how good a poster is. Have you not seen it from your example.
As a project owner my concern is who will fit to my needs or better say our needs. Naim seemed a good fit who is hardworking, I offered him and he accepted. What does it has to do with someone who is banned forum? The forum is not sponsoring the project or the forum does not have a rules such like a ban user from the forum can not start a bitcoin project or involve in a bitcoin project.

Now about hiding CC from my main account.

1. It's an official account. May be it worth to know who is behind it but should it be mandatory, is a project obliged by some rules that they will have to announce it from their own account? 

2. After bitlucy there were few users including two specific users who are waiting to destroy anything that I will do or take, do you think it was good for the project to announce that CC is the project I am going to start. I simply did not feel secure to do so.

Now since you brought it open, you made my life harder.   

[naim027]

Yes Royse777 not only helped to keep secret that AnotherAlt was Naim027

Some people exist in the world who care about privacy. They keep their promises, and Royse777 is not the only one who respects others' privacy. People even hide others' privacy when they know the person is trying to correct his mistakes (Mine was an incorrect way to correct mistakes) if they think he is unlikely to scam others. The world is full of good people; we just don't realize them. Loyce respected others' privacy until he saw a reason to disclose it.

Try again: PRIVACY. Until I see a reason not to, I respect people's privacy.
You of all people should appreciate that, given that you're hiding behind an alt account. Feel free to PM me who's alt you are, and I'll respect your privacy too.

but also included him in his Casino Critique project.

Does it matter to a company to know whether I am banned or not? Suppose they know. Does it matter to them? Should they care about my forum background, or should they care about the other projects that I have done? BTW, I am not on the project for a couple of days now. CC is Supposed to announce that.

[FatFork]

Some people exist in the world who care about privacy.
~

Your concern for your privacy is a load of bull. Don't use the term as a shield to hide behind when you are being a prick. People who care about their privacy do not publish their real name, address, phone number or email address on the web for anyone to see. If you are truly concerned about your privacy, then you should be more careful when posting personal information online.


Source: http://www.itsnaim.com/#contact

Does it matter to a company to know whether I am banned or not?

The fact that you were banned from the forum was never a issue, as far as I know. Many members even supported you in your ban appeal thread. It became, however, an issue when it was discovered that you disrespected the community by ban evading and lying about it. Surely you can tell the difference?

Suppose they know. Does it matter to them? Should they care about my forum background, or should they care about the other projects that I have done?

Yes, if they knew about your dishonesty, it should have mattered to them. Your forum background is your reputation, and that's kind of important here.  

BTW, I am not on the project for a couple of days now. CC is Supposed to announce that.

That's a moot point now.


EDIT: added an archived version of the site
EDIT 2: removed an archived version of the site (everyone can find it on their own)

[naim027]

Then you should be more careful when posting personal information online.

What is the point of blurring the image while posting the source link? This is a dummy website used as a dummy template, nothing else. The website link was never published anywhere, and I am curious how and where you found it. What did you want to achieve by posting this? A couple of merits?

I am one hundred percent sure the link was never posted before.
Why are you so interested in me? Looking for my personal information and everything else. I already said I am not an Anonymous.

Yes, if they knew about your dishonesty

I accept my bad things. I was dishonest about multiple accounts on the forum. What else? Did I scam anyone? Does anyone get any harm due to my lie? Did I lie about anyone else?

Keep your hand over your body and answer if you can. Are you 100% Honest? You never lied?


Now I am seriously scared of internet wolves. I didn't care about my security or personal information before. There was a time I used my Facebook status to save my wallet's private keys. That's much dumb I am.

[suchmoon]

People who care about their privacy do not publish their real name, address, phone number or email address on the web for anyone to see.

I guess if your last name is "Bitches" you kinda have to name your child like this:

I accept my bad things. I was dishonest about multiple accounts on the forum. What else? Did I scam anyone? Does anyone get any harm due to my lie? Did I lie about anyone else?

You might want to take a break. I don't see how digging your hole deeper makes any sense for you now.

As for harm, there was something about bonuses that you tried to double-dip with your sockpuppets. I can't be arsed to look it up, but again - stop digging or someone won't be so lazy.

[naim027]

I badly need a break. I will write some bullshit tomorrow. It's already 1 AM and I can not sleep. It's been a couple of days I cannot sleep. I used to post my photos and my family photos on social media. Why are those fuckers searching for my personal information? How they are related to my forum account? What if they use my family photos to harm me? I didn't kick anyone's balls. There are a lot of scammers and Unethical people on the forum and they making money from it. I didn't scam anybody. I got scammed multiple times. People making fun of me. People taking advantage of my illness.

[FatFork]

People who care about their privacy do not publish their real name, address, phone number or email address on the web for anyone to see.

I guess if your last name is "Bitches" you kinda have to name your child like this:

Yeah, maturity isn't exactly his strong point.

[The Sceptical Chymist]

The fact that you were banned from the forum was never a issue, as far as I know. Many members even supported you in your ban appeal thread. It became, however, an issue when it was discovered that you disrespected the community by ban evading and lying about it. Surely you can tell the difference?

As far as Casino Critique is concerned, naim027's involvement wouldn't matter to me much, even after he was revealed to have those other alt accounts.  It's not the worst offense in the world to have concealed that fact, even though it wasn't honest.  The fact is that he's not the only team member, and he's certainly not running CC (to the best of my knowledge; I've been fooled before).

I'm pissed only because he hid the fact that AnotherAlt and Cryp0Soul were his alts, and he was asking for post history reviews with the naim027 account still appealing a ban.  He made no secret that those two accounts were under his control, but he hid the fact that the naim027 acccount was also his, likely knowing I'd never give merits to either alt if I knew it.

I badly need a break. I will write some bullshit tomorrow.

Yeah, that sounds like a sayonara from somebody who knows they're finished on the forum.  They usually write something like that or go out in a fit of rage.

[AB de Royse777]

EDIT: added an archived version of the site

FatFork, you are not allowed to post archive link that has personal information. Knowingly or unknowingly it may harm the person. If you really want to keep the link then everything deserve to be in the investigation board or it should be deleted. I don't know what consequences it will bring for you if you don't delete it, you can not move it to investigation board since you are not the topic creator.

If you are not aware then read this

The reason that doxxing has been allowed up until now is that it's occasionally very useful in scam investigations. However, oftentimes doxxing someone is used as a weapon in itself instead of a part of any investigation, and as a result innocent people are sometimes hurt. So to protect the innocent while hopefully not hampering scam investigations too much, here are some new rules on doxxing:

1. Personal information must be confined to the new "investigations" board (under Scam Accusations), which is only visible to Members and above. Personal information is defined as anything which links a user's online identity (username, email, etc.) to their meatspace identity, excluding links that the person himself has posted. It is not allowed to post somebody's personal information in any other public place, including in signatures.
2. It is not allowed to post someone's dox if it is especially obvious that you're just using the dox as a weapon. For example, if there are no remotely-plausible trade complaints, then the person can't be a scammer, and their dox should not be posted.
3. As before, anything that the legacy insecure government/banking system requires to be secret is not allowed anywhere. This includes social security numbers, credit card numbers, and certain account numbers.

This applies retroactively to old posts. If a thread contains a lot of personal information strewn throughout it, then the whole thread will be moved to Investigations. If it's only a few posts, then those will be split off. From now on, it's probably a good idea to create two threads for big scammers: one in Scam Accusations and one in Investigations.

Did naim ever posted the URL on the forum? If he posted it before then it might be fine but if he did not then you are liable for it to bring it on the forum.

Update:
I reported the post so that mod can take care of it. But I think it's better if you delete it before search engine crawl it and have a cache version. It may already did, we don't know.

Another update:

EDIT 2: removed an archived version of the site (everyone can find it on their own)

It's better if you remove the website URL too. It still exists in the clear web which is linked to the forum.

[FatFork]

EDIT: added an archived version of the site

FatFork, you are not allowed to post archive link that has personal information.

I'm not sure about that because I didn't post his personal information on that website, he did it himself. But I've removed the archived version because it's not relevant to proving my point anyway.

Did naim ever posted the URL on the forum? If he posted it before then it might be fine but if he did not then you are liable for it to bring it on the forum.

He published his private email address willingly, everything else has already been crawled by spiders since his website was public anyway. That's exactly why I said that his so-called concern for his privacy is a bunch of bullshit.


EDIT:

It's better if you remove the website URL too. It still exists in the clear web which is linked to the forum.

A website URL is not considered personal information and the content of his website is up to him (his website currently contains no personal information as far as I can see):

[AB de Royse777]

He published his private email address willingly, everything else has already been crawled by spiders since his website was public anyway. That's exactly why I said that his so-called concern for his privacy is a bunch of bullshit.

When I go to the website I see some inappropriate texts right now but since you archived it or it was archived before, when I go to the archived version I can see there is a picture, phone number with the email address.

One can not find it via the forum only if you remove the URL. The information can be in the clear net which is not a problem but it can not be linked to the forum via public boards. It has to be in the investigation board if it's necessary to have it on the forum.

[JeromeTash]

Yes Royse777 not only helped to keep secret that AnotherAlt was Naim027, a known cheater and plagiarist while evading the ban, but also included him in his Casino Critique project.

Funny how he chose the AnotherAlt username and It was right in our faces this whole time

I don't care if those of you who are his friends fill me with retaliatory negative feedbacks.

I will think about it in the next few hours.

I don't think any sensible DT member would send retaliatory feedback.

[The Sceptical Chymist]

Funny how he chose the AnotherAlt username and It was right in our faces this whole time

Well to be fair, anyone could have been behind an account with that username.  Did any of us have any reason to suspect that it was naim027?  If there was, I sure as hell missed it, though I knew it was Crypt0Soul's alt account.

I don't think any sensible DT member would send retaliatory feedback.

If there were any DT members who gave Poker Player a neg for negging Royse777 and/or naim027 and his alts, I think they'd be making a mistake by doing so.  Not a big enough mistake to warrant an exclusion from my trust list, but this is a case where there shouldn't be any trust retaliation--Poker Player laid out his reasons, and IMO they're solid enough to justify him leaving a neg.

That said, I have no idea who's on DT these days.  Probably almost everyone posting in this thread, right?

[PaperWallet]

Since Royse777 is CasinoCritique, and CasinoCritique is raising funds, shouldn't CasinoCritique be tagged as well? The people who deal with CasinoCritique have no idea what the history of the holder of that account is. I think it is the duty of other members who know to put the same tags on CasinoCritique that are on Royse777. Then the person dealing with CasinoCritique would decide for themselves upon reading those tags.

It's not like if you create a new account you get a fresh new start like no one knows what your past was.

Edit: Have done so myself and tagged CasinoCritique, with reference to Royse777 account.