A superstitious strategy?

[Fredomago]

First time to hear that game called casino war so I got curious and do more investigation, only to found out that this game was a card game but AFAIK, the martingale method mainly works in dice games. Maybe this was the reason why you aren't successful at the end. If happens that you win at your early tries then you should also learn how to stop.

Martingale can be applied to every gambling games around. You can use it even for sports betting. The problem is that this strategy is never going to work for too long, despite the game you are playing. OP may say it's about luck, but I say it's about playing against a slight house edge of 1%-2% which is inevitably going to smash gamblers' winning probabilities on long run. Martingale works in the same way for every games, though.

Logically right, Martingale strategy can be applied to every games whatever type is it, to the extent that you can also use it in sports betting but along the way suffering from huge losses might take place, without luck losing streak can be more than your expected numbers and adding to that is the house edge which really killing your bankroll in the long stay inside the game.

[1714233960]

1714233960

[1714233960]

1714233960

[1714233960]

1714233960

[1714233960]

1714233960

[Lida93]

Most gamblers must have went through this, sometimes luck appears to be your side specially in games like casino war or dice.

Today, morning I was playing casino war, I just use martingale - I know it's lame strategy. But I won most of time.

Then later at noon, luck just didn't appear to be on my side. A constant losses with win every once in a while to recoup the losses and then losing streak, all funds gone.

Now, let's be some superstitious and say, if you play only when luck appears to be on your side, would you call that a good strategy?

There's clear line between luck and strategy which every good gambler ought to understand. There are times in gambling that all you need to get winnings is nothing short of a strategy to use, strategy is an approach, a tactics you need to follow with to get what you want out of your stake. Gambling is like a Warfield, you don't go to war without strategizing on how to go about it and just be hoping on luck, as  lucks follows after a good strategy led down.
Superstition has no place in gambling ,if you were lucky to win on one day or two or more straight up, you weren't lucky without a play pattern which is strategy itself.

[blockman]

It's not a strategy because you don't have to think about it, you'll wait for the result to come, and then if it's favorable to you then you'll figure out that you're lucky if you're winning at most times. But if not, then that means you're not lucky and just losing everything you've got. And if there's someone that has been doing this strategy for so long and only gambles to continue when he's lucky, and then stops completely when for the first few bets he's already losing.

Exactly!

You cant call it a strategy since you are just basically be doing up those casual actions or moves that you had on the time you do engage a particular gambling game.If it do turns out to be positive or profitable then
it would be normal that you would be thinking that your current strategy is working.

Just like been said that there's no thing on this world which would affect or increase your winning chances or probability or simply luck on dealing with a gambling game considering that
everything is random. Never make yourself been pushed on believing on things which are impossible to point or notice it out.

You can notice if you think that you're lucky and that's through having a winning streak. You decide if that's luck with you or you're the one who's genius and you're beating the house.
But even if you think that you're not lucky and you're just able to beat the house, it's not an action that will be like that forever. You'll also start to get beaten eventually with an idea that goes by the play with whatever you'll try to do, you win some and yet you'll still lose and it cannot be skipped.

[Desmong]

Most gamblers must have went through this, sometimes luck appears to be your side specially in games like casino war or dice.

Today, morning I was playing casino war, I just use martingale - I know it's lame strategy. But I won most of time.

Then later at noon, luck just didn't appear to be on my side. A constant losses with win every once in a while to recoup the losses and then losing streak, all funds gone.

Now, let's be some superstitious and say, if you play only when luck appears to be on your side, would you call that a good strategy?

Many things had been happening whether we believe in luck or not but what I know is that I don't try to gamble too much when I am losing. I do make sure I limit the way I gamble so that I will not lose all my gund because of greed of optimistic zeal of winning the next one. I have had big loses at sometimes in my life and I'm still accepting my fate.

[seoincorporation]

Now, let's be some superstitious and say, if you play only when luck appears to be on your side, would you call that a good strategy?

For sure is a good strategy to play when luck is on our side, but the problem is to know when the good streak will end because that's the point when people send their balance to zero.

Martingale is for sure a good strategy with the right luck but is about the long run to have a bad ending. If we set a goal before starting the session that would help us to walk away sometimes with the money.

[carlfebz2]

Most gamblers must have went through this, sometimes luck appears to be your side specially in games like casino war or dice.

Today, morning I was playing casino war, I just use martingale - I know it's lame strategy. But I won most of time.

Then later at noon, luck just didn't appear to be on my side. A constant losses with win every once in a while to recoup the losses and then losing streak, all funds gone.

Now, let's be some superstitious and say, if you play only when luck appears to be on your side, would you call that a good strategy?

There's no other things which we could determine that we are lucky but on the time that we are experiencing some wins which it is really that something very common.There's no other things on this world which

could really influence your luck factor or chances which it really comes in a random way on which there's no way you could say that you would be lucky on a particular moment.This is why we should make ourselves

that realize thats not how things do works.If you do keep on pushing then it would  really be ending up for yourself to be that desperate which is something
that you should really be putting up into your mind always.

[goldkingcoiner]

Most gamblers must have went through this, sometimes luck appears to be your side specially in games like casino war or dice.

Today, morning I was playing casino war, I just use martingale - I know it's lame strategy. But I won most of time.

Then later at noon, luck just didn't appear to be on my side. A constant losses with win every once in a while to recoup the losses and then losing streak, all funds gone.

Now, let's be some superstitious and say, if you play only when luck appears to be on your side, would you call that a good strategy?

If luck was something that was easy to get, or had algorithmic instructions which we could follow in order to create a lucky event, I think physicists probably might have noticed already. Personally until we find a way to replicate lucky events 100% every time, I will not believe in luck. But who knows what superstition actually is and what it is not? Perhaps in the far or near future we could discover luck is actually an integral part of physics and maybe we will even figure out how to manipulate luck.

Best not to count too much on coincidences to start boasting of having discovered a luck formula. 

[darkangel11]

I wouldn't call any strategy that works superstitious. What OP did wasn't anything strange or unseen. A gambler who thought to have a lucky streak continuing to play until he loses everything. That's one of the most common things in gambling if you ask me.

Now, let's be some superstitious and say, if you play only when luck appears to be on your side, would you call that a good strategy?

For sure is a good strategy to play when luck is on our side, but the problem is to know when the good streak will end because that's the point when people send their balance to zero.

Martingale is for sure a good strategy with the right luck but is about the long run to have a bad ending. If we set a goal before starting the session that would help us to walk away sometimes with the money.

How do you know when luck is on your side? The problem people have is they overestimate their luck and their abilities. They think they can keep wining and make gambling into a job. They can't!
Martingale isn't a good strategy.

[BitDane]

I wouldn't call any strategy that works superstitious. What OP did wasn't anything strange or unseen. A gambler who thought to have a lucky streak continuing to play until he loses everything. That's one of the most common things in gambling if you ask me.

Now, let's be some superstitious and say, if you play only when luck appears to be on your side, would you call that a good strategy?

For sure is a good strategy to play when luck is on our side, but the problem is to know when the good streak will end because that's the point when people send their balance to zero.

Martingale is for sure a good strategy with the right luck but is about the long run to have a bad ending. If we set a goal before starting the session that would help us to walk away sometimes with the money.

How do you know when luck is on your side?

There is no way to know if you are really lucky but player get a grasp of it and think they are lucky when they won in consecutive huge bet.  I think you will also believe that you are lucky if you hit a lottery  .

The problem people have is they overestimate their luck and their abilities. They think they can keep wining and make gambling into a job. They can't!
Martingale isn't a good strategy.

I think it is not overestimating but rather they failed to recognize when to stop.  Martingale has its own strength and weakness which is controlled by the ability of a player to know when to stop.

If luck was something that was easy to get, or had algorithmic instructions which we could follow in order to create a lucky event, I think physicists probably might have noticed already. Personally until we find a way to replicate lucky events 100% every time, I will not believe in luck. But who knows what superstition actually is and what it is not? Perhaps in the far or near future we could discover luck is actually an integral part of physics and maybe we will even figure out how to manipulate luck.

Best not to count too much on coincidences to start boasting of having discovered a luck formula. 

There is no luck formula because the same as you, I also think luck does not exist.  It is just a word to describe certain positive events that comes to a person way but scientifically, there is no such thing as luck but only chance.