Doxxed team can help a new gambling platform?

[Fivestar4everMVP]

Actually it’s better to find the own ideology for the crypto gambling.We can’t trust blindly anyone or anymore.It’s essential to do background verification for the gambling sites.From that you get some good knowledge about gambling site.The Kyc based gambling is mostly not used by most of the people,Since they look for gambling without any kyc.Because even they play gambling with the unaccounted money.It doesn’t matter and so they may not like to use their own identity.Some may not to share because of their family members to know they playing of gambling.

The matter of avoiding kyc is all dependent on the worth of your bankroll and which casino you chose to gamble on.
If you are gambling with a huge amount of money, that is a high roller, and requesting withdrawals that are quite substantial as well, then there is a chance that you would hardly find a casino where you would play on without passing kyc verification, except you decide to gamble on a non licensed casino, which can be extremely risky as well, as we all know that majority of unlicensed casinos are being operated by scammers..
So at the end of it all, it is better to pass kyc and play on a safe casino, than doge kyc verification and end up losing your money to petty scammers.

[ethereumhunter]

I guess regulated casinos (which require KYC from users) aren't anonymous. You have to investigate their licenses, so you will find more informations of where their headquarters is located, who is the responsible individual for the business, etc... Staff team doesn't expose themselves on their casino's website and social medias, but with some further research I believe it's possible to find the details you are looking for, because they shouldn't be completely hidden too.

They still can be. A license cost money and that's supposed to be the incentive for a casino to stay fair and obey the law. If there are complaints, the issuer of the license takes it away.
It doesn't mean a commission that sells these licenses is some kind of detective agency. They require someone's name and address and that person could be a drunkard or a drug addict who they pay.
A license doesn't mean transparent staff. It means there were fees paid and there weren't enough complaints yet for that license to be taken away.

But we will find it difficult to determine who is behind the casino team because their identities are not exposed to the public. But maybe if we ask the regulator that provides the license, we can get the answer, especially if the casino doesn't respond to our complaints. As long as the casino can provide the best for its members, gamblers or their members will not be too curious because gamblers also respect the confidentiality of the casino team. And only the regulator will know who owns the casino and its staff.

[Desmong]

Hi friends, I am still on the matter of helping a friend who wants to build his own gambling project, the question of the day is about KYC verification, why are popular crypto gambling platforms are not KYC verified themselves? I mean the team behind the online casino why are they not KYC verified and they ask for KYC instead?

Wouldn't it be more fair if they want to stay behind the veil and not as users KYC verification? If they are scared of the law/regulations it makes sense the are verified too, doxxed or something .

Anyway fast forward to my second question, will a gambling platform be more attractive for users if the team are 100% doxxed?

Many casinos do not like to unviel the owner or team in charge of the casino to prevent scrutiny that could lead to more invesgation about the owner of the casino in case they had done something illegal at the past time. KYC is not a problem because many gamblers do not care about that.

[BenCodie]

I guess regulated casinos (which require KYC from users) aren't anonymous. You have to investigate their licenses, so you will find more informations of where their headquarters is located, who is the responsible individual for the business, etc... Staff team doesn't expose themselves on their casino's website and social medias, but with some further research I believe it's possible to find the details you are looking for, because they shouldn't be completely hidden too.

They still can be. A license cost money and that's supposed to be the incentive for a casino to stay fair and obey the law. If there are complaints, the issuer of the license takes it away.
It doesn't mean a commission that sells these licenses is some kind of detective agency. They require someone's name and address and that person could be a drunkard or a drug addict who they pay.
A license doesn't mean transparent staff. It means there were fees paid and there weren't enough complaints yet for that license to be taken away.

But we will find it difficult to determine who is behind the casino team because their identities are not exposed to the public. But maybe if we ask the regulator that provides the license, we can get the answer, especially if the casino doesn't respond to our complaints. As long as the casino can provide the best for its members, gamblers or their members will not be too curious because gamblers also respect the confidentiality of the casino team. And only the regulator will know who owns the casino and its staff.

I think it is very unlikely that a regulator will expose the information of a casino operator unless there is very significant grounds to do so. I think it would also require both a violation of license rules and/or the law as well as grounds for a court proceeding before it would even be considered. Otherwise, the most you will get from them is the information of the company that holds the license. To find out the ownership of that company would also be a similar process to what was explained.

[AmoreJaz]

I guess regulated casinos (which require KYC from users) aren't anonymous. You have to investigate their licenses, so you will find more informations of where their headquarters is located, who is the responsible individual for the business, etc... Staff team doesn't expose themselves on their casino's website and social medias, but with some further research I believe it's possible to find the details you are looking for, because they shouldn't be completely hidden too.

They still can be. A license cost money and that's supposed to be the incentive for a casino to stay fair and obey the law. If there are complaints, the issuer of the license takes it away.
It doesn't mean a commission that sells these licenses is some kind of detective agency. They require someone's name and address and that person could be a drunkard or a drug addict who they pay.
A license doesn't mean transparent staff. It means there were fees paid and there weren't enough complaints yet for that license to be taken away.

But we will find it difficult to determine who is behind the casino team because their identities are not exposed to the public. But maybe if we ask the regulator that provides the license, we can get the answer, especially if the casino doesn't respond to our complaints. As long as the casino can provide the best for its members, gamblers or their members will not be too curious because gamblers also respect the confidentiality of the casino team. And only the regulator will know who owns the casino and its staff.

I think it is very unlikely that a regulator will expose the information of a casino operator unless there is very significant grounds to do so. I think it would also require both a violation of license rules and/or the law as well as grounds for a court proceeding before it would even be considered. Otherwise, the most you will get from them is the information of the company that holds the license. To find out the ownership of that company would also be a similar process to what was explained.

if there is a legal complaint towards the casino, there is chance that you can extract the ownership details from the licensing company. however, not many people go in this route as we all know it is hard to traverse the route of court proceeding. unless, you have significant amount of money that are at stake and you want to recover it. i guess, if the site is not responding from you, you can very well contact the licensing company as they are the one responsible with their gambling license. if you have valid grounds, and you win with your case, the licensing company can strip off their license.

[CryptSafe]

I guess regulated casinos (which require KYC from users) aren't anonymous. You have to investigate their licenses, so you will find more informations of where their headquarters is located, who is the responsible individual for the business, etc... Staff team doesn't expose themselves on their casino's website and social medias, but with some further research I believe it's possible to find the details you are looking for, because they shouldn't be completely hidden too.

They still can be. A license cost money and that's supposed to be the incentive for a casino to stay fair and obey the law. If there are complaints, the issuer of the license takes it away.
It doesn't mean a commission that sells these licenses is some kind of detective agency. They require someone's name and address and that person could be a drunkard or a drug addict who they pay.
A license doesn't mean transparent staff. It means there were fees paid and there weren't enough complaints yet for that license to be taken away.

But we will find it difficult to determine who is behind the casino team because their identities are not exposed to the public. But maybe if we ask the regulator that provides the license, we can get the answer, especially if the casino doesn't respond to our complaints. As long as the casino can provide the best for its members, gamblers or their members will not be too curious because gamblers also respect the confidentiality of the casino team. And only the regulator will know who owns the casino and its staff.

I think it is very unlikely that a regulator will expose the information of a casino operator unless there is very significant grounds to do so. I think it would also require both a violation of license rules and/or the law as well as grounds for a court proceeding before it would even be considered. Otherwise, the most you will get from them is the information of the company that holds the license. To find out the ownership of that company would also be a similar process to what was explained.

if there is a legal complaint towards the casino, there is chance that you can extract the ownership details from the licensing company. however, not many people go in this route as we all know it is hard to traverse the route of court proceeding. unless, you have significant amount of money that are at stake and you want to recover it. i guess, if the site is not responding from you, you can very well contact the licensing company as they are the one responsible with their gambling license. if you have valid grounds, and you win with your case, the licensing company can strip off their license.

This is one of the reasons why it is good to making sure you do your research before engaging or dealing with any casino. One of the things I always check for before I engage in gambling site is the license they have. I check for where the license was issued and the organization that issued the license, when the license was issued and I also check if the license do have a renewal or valid time of expiration. I do this because getting a license for casino is an automatic kyc between the casino ownership and the government issuing the license so I could be able to find out who they are if anything goes wrong with my funds under their custody. This information I get from the casino or the license issuing organization can help me track the ownership of the casino if anything happens. This o do to be on the safe side.

[BenCodie]

I guess regulated casinos (which require KYC from users) aren't anonymous. You have to investigate their licenses, so you will find more informations of where their headquarters is located, who is the responsible individual for the business, etc... Staff team doesn't expose themselves on their casino's website and social medias, but with some further research I believe it's possible to find the details you are looking for, because they shouldn't be completely hidden too.

They still can be. A license cost money and that's supposed to be the incentive for a casino to stay fair and obey the law. If there are complaints, the issuer of the license takes it away.
It doesn't mean a commission that sells these licenses is some kind of detective agency. They require someone's name and address and that person could be a drunkard or a drug addict who they pay.
A license doesn't mean transparent staff. It means there were fees paid and there weren't enough complaints yet for that license to be taken away.

But we will find it difficult to determine who is behind the casino team because their identities are not exposed to the public. But maybe if we ask the regulator that provides the license, we can get the answer, especially if the casino doesn't respond to our complaints. As long as the casino can provide the best for its members, gamblers or their members will not be too curious because gamblers also respect the confidentiality of the casino team. And only the regulator will know who owns the casino and its staff.

I think it is very unlikely that a regulator will expose the information of a casino operator unless there is very significant grounds to do so. I think it would also require both a violation of license rules and/or the law as well as grounds for a court proceeding before it would even be considered. Otherwise, the most you will get from them is the information of the company that holds the license. To find out the ownership of that company would also be a similar process to what was explained.

if there is a legal complaint towards the casino, there is chance that you can extract the ownership details from the licensing company. however, not many people go in this route as we all know it is hard to traverse the route of court proceeding. unless, you have significant amount of money that are at stake and you want to recover it. i guess, if the site is not responding from you, you can very well contact the licensing company as they are the one responsible with their gambling license. if you have valid grounds, and you win with your case, the licensing company can strip off their license.

Companies that offer licenses are much less likely to give any information about customers who purchased a license from them, no matter what the circumstances. There is a very large process to go to court even if you have the monetary resources. I doubt anyone would go through that process unless they had a valid and sizeable claim, not just to extract information. So overall, no, it's not possible to extract information from casinos without a tiresome process that wouldn't be worth it unless a very large claim was to be paired with it.

[RealMalatesta]

Hi friends, I am still on the matter of helping a friend who wants to build his own gambling project, the question of the day is about KYC verification, why are popular crypto gambling platforms are not KYC verified themselves? I mean the team behind the online casino why are they not KYC verified and they ask for KYC instead?

Wouldn't it be more fair if they want to stay behind the veil and not as users KYC verification? If they are scared of the law/regulations it makes sense the are verified too, doxxed or something .

Anyway fast forward to my second question, will a gambling platform be more attractive for users if the team are 100% doxxed?

Many casinos do not like to unviel the owner or team in charge of the casino to prevent scrutiny that could lead to more invesgation about the owner of the casino in case they had done something illegal at the past time. KYC is not a problem because many gamblers do not care about that.

KYC is actually a major problem and it is one of the hottest topic in the cryptocurrency right now. Whether it's about crypto exchange or crypto gambling sites. Many crypto users doesn't want to be KYC'ed because for them it invades their privacy and they are afraid that their KYC data's can be leaked or sold later on and can fall on the wrong hands, making the situation even harder. We gamblers hate KYC, so we do care if a gambling site requires it.

We also want for the casino team to KYC themselves to prove that they are clean and free from illegalities in the past and it can give us an assurance that they will easily be traced by the authorities if ever they do something fishy.

[Fivestar4everMVP]

Hi friends, I am still on the matter of helping a friend who wants to build his own gambling project, the question of the day is about KYC verification, why are popular crypto gambling platforms are not KYC verified themselves? I mean the team behind the online casino why are they not KYC verified and they ask for KYC instead?

Wouldn't it be more fair if they want to stay behind the veil and not as users KYC verification? If they are scared of the law/regulations it makes sense the are verified too, doxxed or something .

Anyway fast forward to my second question, will a gambling platform be more attractive for users if the team are 100% doxxed?

Many casinos do not like to unviel the owner or team in charge of the casino to prevent scrutiny that could lead to more invesgation about the owner of the casino in case they had done something illegal at the past time. KYC is not a problem because many gamblers do not care about that.

We also want for the casino team to KYC themselves to prove that they are clean and free from illegalities in the past and it can give us an assurance that they will easily be traced by the authorities if ever they do something fishy.

If you ever own a casino, the biggest mistake I think you would make is to KYC yourself to the general public, I believe that casino owners always KYC themselves to the licensing authorities before they are given a license to operate , this should be enough already.
If a casino owner KYC themselves to the general public, they are simply putting their life, their business, their family at a very big risk, there are many angry losers out there willing and ready to do anything to have their money back, and you never can who is who, As a casino CEO, making your identify visible and such players getting hold of your identity and address could spell doom for you are your family.

[Desmong]

The functions of protein a particular platform of casino gambling sites and the any form of gambling website in their action or their take his to respond to any problem that happened to the site so I believe that a thing of a particular site and their function is to solve a problem or handle a problem that I come across their customers or who patronize the platform so anything that like such I will like customers to 222 nicely platform

Gambling is suppose to be easy and friendly so we all should stick to what makes us happy when we bet on them not something that will make us regret when we took a step that is very detrimental to our health and social lifestyle.
It is not easy to make money in gambling when we are betting on the wrong game that couldn't bring out output.

[Broadanbig]

Hi friends, I am still on the matter of helping a friend who wants to build his own gambling project, the question of the day is about KYC verification, why are popular crypto gambling platforms are not KYC verified themselves? I mean the team behind the online casino why are they not KYC verified and they ask for KYC instead?

Wouldn't it be more fair if they want to stay behind the veil and not as users KYC verification? If they are scared of the law/regulations it makes sense the are verified too, doxxed or something .

Anyway fast forward to my second question, will a gambling platform be more attractive for users if the team are 100% doxxed?

Many casinos do not like to unviel the owner or team in charge of the casino to prevent scrutiny that could lead to more invesgation about the owner of the casino in case they had done something illegal at the past time. KYC is not a problem because many gamblers do not care about that.

We also want for the casino team to KYC themselves to prove that they are clean and free from illegalities in the past and it can give us an assurance that they will easily be traced by the authorities if ever they do something fishy.

If you ever own a casino, the biggest mistake I think you would make is to KYC yourself to the general public, I believe that casino owners always KYC themselves to the licensing authorities before they are given a license to operate , this should be enough already.
If a casino owner KYC themselves to the general public, they are simply putting their life, their business, their family at a very big risk, there are many angry losers out there willing and ready to do anything to have their money back, and you never can who is who, As a casino CEO, making your identify visible and such players getting hold of your identity and address could spell doom for you are your family.

Any casino CEO who dares put him or herself on public light in the name of kyc is doing that it at his or her own perils because that is not wisdom. Although they do get license which requires them doing a kyc with their license issuing organization  and that is enough for them to run their casino as long as they present their license number on their legal documents online their casino but should not be cajoled to make a public kyc otherwise what ever they see is their own cup of tea.
You can imagine being a debtor and hiding from being seen  than when you owe some debt and publicly showing yourself. Your paymasters would definitely come to demand their debt back from you. This is the situation of the comment you just made. In as much as kyc is concerned, it is not compulsory for everyone. If you do not want to kyc, look for other casino that does not kyc then get engaged with them. It is not a compulsory thing but it is necessary depending on the casino you get involved with.

[Yatsan]

Hi friends, I am still on the matter of helping a friend who wants to build his own gambling project, the question of the day is about KYC verification, why are popular crypto gambling platforms are not KYC verified themselves? I mean the team behind the online casino why are they not KYC verified and they ask for KYC instead?

Wouldn't it be more fair if they want to stay behind the veil and not as users KYC verification? If they are scared of the law/regulations it makes sense the are verified too, doxxed or something .

Anyway fast forward to my second question, will a gambling platform be more attractive for users if the team are 100% doxxed?

Many casinos do not like to unviel the owner or team in charge of the casino to prevent scrutiny that could lead to more invesgation about the owner of the casino in case they had done something illegal at the past time. KYC is not a problem because many gamblers do not care about that.

We also want for the casino team to KYC themselves to prove that they are clean and free from illegalities in the past and it can give us an assurance that they will easily be traced by the authorities if ever they do something fishy.

If you ever own a casino, the biggest mistake I think you would make is to KYC yourself to the general public, I believe that casino owners always KYC themselves to the licensing authorities before they are given a license to operate , this should be enough already.
If a casino owner KYC themselves to the general public, they are simply putting their life, their business, their family at a very big risk, there are many angry losers out there willing and ready to do anything to have their money back, and you never can who is who, As a casino CEO, making your identify visible and such players getting hold of your identity and address could spell doom for you are your family.

Any casino CEO who dares put him or herself on public light in the name of kyc is doing that it at his or her own perils because that is not wisdom. Although they do get license which requires them doing a kyc with their license issuing organization  and that is enough for them to run their casino as long as they present their license number on their legal documents online their casino but should not be cajoled to make a public kyc otherwise what ever they see is their own cup of tea.
You can imagine being a debtor and hiding from being seen  than when you owe some debt and publicly showing yourself. Your paymasters would definitely come to demand their debt back from you. This is the situation of the comment you just made. In as much as kyc is concerned, it is not compulsory for everyone. If you do not want to kyc, look for other casino that does not kyc then get engaged with them. It is not a compulsory thing but it is necessary depending on the casino you get involved with.

Problem probably is misconception of KYC purpose. Reputable online casino teams' information are publicized and if not, on their license, on the usual which is to lessen the worry of their players. In my opinion, gambling platforms are requiring KYC procedures to avoid allowing anyone to withdraw one's fund. There are instances wherein devices and accounts are being accessed and one way to lomit such instances is for them to verify in every withdrawal. Another guess is to prevent underage players to ccess their platforms; we all know why. But I do get the point why there is a trust issue being emphasized in this procedure. Just keep in mind that if you're in the right casino, there's nothing much to be worried of.

[klidex]

Hi friends, I am still on the matter of helping a friend who wants to build his own gambling project, the question of the day is about KYC verification, why are popular crypto gambling platforms are not KYC verified themselves? I mean the team behind the online casino why are they not KYC verified and they ask for KYC instead?

Wouldn't it be more fair if they want to stay behind the veil and not as users KYC verification? If they are scared of the law/regulations it makes sense the are verified too, doxxed or something .

Anyway fast forward to my second question, will a gambling platform be more attractive for users if the team are 100% doxxed?

Many casinos do not like to unviel the owner or team in charge of the casino to prevent scrutiny that could lead to more invesgation about the owner of the casino in case they had done something illegal at the past time. KYC is not a problem because many gamblers do not care about that.

KYC is actually a major problem and it is one of the hottest topic in the cryptocurrency right now. Whether it's about crypto exchange or crypto gambling sites. Many crypto users doesn't want to be KYC'ed because for them it invades their privacy and they are afraid that their KYC data's can be leaked or sold later on and can fall on the wrong hands, making the situation even harder. We gamblers hate KYC, so we do care if a gambling site requires it.

We also want for the casino team to KYC themselves to prove that they are clean and free from illegalities in the past and it can give us an assurance that they will easily be traced by the authorities if ever they do something fishy.

Yes, it's true that all crypto users on exchanges or exchange platforms, even in the crypto gambling industry, many of them object to the existence of KYC requirements for exchanges and exchange platforms, they are more afraid and wary of someone hacking and knowing the assets they are storing, even The main fear is if it gets stolen all the valuable assets that have been collected and stored.
If in the crypto gambling industry it seems that gamblers are more afraid if their personal data is used to carry out unwanted actions such as committing fraud.
Maybe what you said is right that it should be better if in the future the gambling platform can provide proof that the platform is free from past licenses which can cause problems so that every gambler feels safe and trusts when giving KYC.

[QueenVera]

I really don't think being doxxed had any major role to play on the management team of a casino because just as most users have also stated here, there have been casinos who had their team doxxed but still ended up a failed project.
To me what really matters the most is staying transparent at all time and doing what is right and I also think that that one of the major reason why the team don't do kyc as maybe it isn't required by the licensing board.

[tabas]

I really don't think being doxxed had any major role to play on the management team of a casino because just as most users have also stated here, there have been casinos who had their team doxxed but still ended up a failed project.
To me what really matters theost is staying transparent at all time and doing what is right and I also think that th

I agree, there are casinos that even having a verified team, they're not exempted to failure. Being transparent is what most gamblers want, we want to know the current status of a casino if ever some issues have been brought about them. Like, they're going to give some statements or thoughts on what really is their standing just to give assurance to their customers that there's nothing to be worried about. Although we hear it a lot whenever some issues are being experienced but with such resources, we can tell if they're transparent or not.