⭐⚽⭐ Rainbet's Bitcointalk Sports Fanatics League (BSFL) – 13000$ rewards ⭐⚽⭐

[arallmuus]

Edit : dang ralle, our thoughts are so alligned that we only have 3 different answers lol. This is gonna be bloody round

The number of similar answers is shocking. I knew we'd likely have the same answer in Dota, but not in the others. 

The first two questions might be enough to decide the winner, depending on who favors luck.

Yeah we could either settle this by thursday or we could wait all the way until UCL but whoever gets question #4 would be getting an edge for sure as that is 50 50 question. For some reason I thought No would be the minority answer on that question but it seems that it even out

I need GOAT Antony to carry Betis tomorrow. I had a hunch that he could win that and there will be alot of memes about how bad Manchester United treat him later on the internet if he wins. This is the only reason I took Betis to lift the trophy, well I hope I dont regret this 

[Harkorede]

@Harkorede take it easy on me bro! I need 3 points to make sure I don't fight relegation so early this season, its my aim every season as usual. Want to improve on last one.

You might have the advantage here, I haven't checked anything yet, after I submitted my answers I thought I would be able to circle back and crosscheck some of my answers especially the tennis and dota 2, but I couldn't.

I also do need all the 3 points to keep my good streak alive, we have 4 different answers but it's our duel is really not going to happen until Thursday or Friday, since we have the same answers in the first 6 questions.

[cygan]

✂️

With my current performance with the tips, I treated myself to an Icarus Pizza Wallet instead of the rebuy,

I am almost moved to look this up. Almost.

then just go for it
the pizza card mentioned by Koal-84: [SALE] Icarus Timeline Edition 05/2025 (designed by ZETRA)🔐🕰️
and if you are still interested, you can find the other Icarus card editions in the following thread: [ANN - INFO] Project Icarus: The forum redemption story 🔐

@all sorry for the off-topic

[slackovic]

Damn, Botafogo won the game 1-0 and I chose "both to score" so I lose that point. Luckily imarios went with "Universidad does not lose" so no one gets a point here. Since the second question is the same, I'll be looking for the result of Oklahoma game 5 to get my first point in this round. We have five more different answers so anything can happen.

[cryptofrka]

Yeah, they played with 10 players from 27th minute onwards - I'm surprised that they managed to win at all.

Not good, Hhampuz strikes against both Mafias simultaneously. Hopefully we get him on tennis and DOTA.

[Chi20]

@cryptofrka,  seems like you have forgotten to unlock the spreadsheet for mobile viewing since the start of the new season. Kindly do the needful  🙏

[Trofo]

Hey guys, new article is up, give it a read while we wait for the next set of games to start.
https://sportsbet.io/blog/clubhouse/bitcoin-sports-fanatics-league-season-7-starts-round-1-re-cap

[cryptofrka]

@cryptofrka,  seems like you have forgotten to unlock the spreadsheet for mobile viewing since the start of the new season. Kindly do the needful  🙏

Done.

It is not seasonal, I have to restrict access before every round and then allow access once I unhide the answers.
Sometimes I forget to do this of course

__________________________

Can't believe I have to support Chelsea today due to LMS points. I still hope they lose.

[slaman29]

You might have the advantage here, I haven't checked anything yet, after I submitted my answers I thought I would be able to circle back and crosscheck some of my answers especially the tennis and dota 2, but I couldn't.

I also do need all the 3 points to keep my good streak alive, we have 4 different answers but it's our duel is really not going to happen until Thursday or Friday, since we have the same answers in the first 6 questions.

So far 0-0 for us both, we liked Botafogo but even with their red card somehow they kept a clean sheet and only scored 1 goal (actually even with 10 men). I guess what happened was as soon as they got the shock lead they closed their doors and defended like hell.

BTW No advantage for me unless I decide to stay in office late... Mostly when I submit I am out then home then sleep Deadline is 1 am my time.

Can't believe I have to support Chelsea today due to LMS points. I still hope they lose.

Same. And I saw some usual people pick Betis even tho thats my idea but I wanted to win LMS.

[mv1986]

@B1g4udge we literally have 10 different answers That is very rare, but a lot of fun. The DOTA question isn't looking good for you as I think those Yakult's Brothers will probably be out before the playoff bracket starts an you got them as finalists and winners. As for the Roland Garros H2H question, the only player you had on "yes" to reach the round of 16 was now eliminated by Mededovic. But still doesn't mean too much as I have to get it right with my selections of course. This is going to be a long duel with all those different answers!

[vivekdhyani1]

Question for mafia(Snake & Heyna) and Jeremypwr , any plan for Club world cup ?? paid pool or some kind of sponsor promo

[Trofo]

Question for mafia(Snake & Heyna) and Jeremypwr , any plan for Club world cup ?? paid pool or some kind of sponsor promo

Nothing for now but I am quite sure there will be something.

We will cover it trough BSFL and we will have a chat with Steve on that topic soon. Paid pool without sponsorship is always an option but it is much sweater when we have some extra money for the rewards.

[jeremypwr]

Question for mafia(Snake & Heyna) and Jeremypwr , any plan for Club world cup ?? paid pool or some kind of sponsor promo

If there's enough interest, I can host FIFA Club World Cup Prediction Contests @ Games and rounds

[cryptofrka]

Fellas, you're sleeping on the job! Slissy, hosemary, what is happening fellas?
Nobody realized we made a mistake on the women's tennis question. Obviously, 'less than 8' was supposed to be '8 or less', which means that now if Sabalenka loses exactly 8 games we don't have a correct answer.

Unfortunately, we can't just use the answer that we initially thought we did because that would be unfair to some of you - so if it turns out to be 8, we'll simply void the question.
In such cases we also reduced the points needed to survive LMS, so if this question is void 2 points will be enough for survival, as long as it is not the weakest score of course.

[slackovic]

Fellas, you're sleeping on the job! Slissy, hosemary, what is happening fellas?
Nobody realized we made a mistake on the women's tennis question. Obviously, 'less than 8' was supposed to be '8 or less', which means that now if Sabalenka loses exactly 8 games we don't have a correct answer.

Unfortunately, we can't just use the answer that we initially thought we did because that would be unfair to some of you - so if it turns out to be 8, we'll simply void the question.
In such cases we also reduced the points needed to survive LMS, so if this question is void 2 points will be enough for survival, as long as it is not the weakest score of course.

Wow, it's funny that no one realized that there is a mistake in the question. We all probably didn't think about it and calculated that the "less than 8" includes 8 games. At least that is how I saw that answer. But it's fair to void the question if the correct answer is the one no one could have selected.

[arallmuus]

Nobody realized we made a mistake on the women's tennis question. Obviously, 'less than 8' was supposed to be '8 or less', which means that now if Sabalenka loses exactly 8 games we don't have a correct answer.

It never even cross my mind when I answered this that there was an error on this lol. I mean yeah considering that the 2nd option was 9-12 then anyone would instantly recoqnize the 1st option to be 0-8 though so no one actually realized this

Unfortunately, we can't just use the answer that we initially thought we did because that would be unfair to some of you - so if it turns out to be 8, we'll simply void the question.

Why though? I mean you guys could just change all "less than 8" answers into "8 or less" because thats what everyone thought it was but voiding it seems to be a good option as well. Either way it wont really matter much I guess

Edit : second thought, voiding seems to give better benefits because that means 2 points are safe already

[hosemary]

I mean yeah considering that the 2nd option was 9-12 then anyone would instantly recoqnize the 1st option to be 0-8 though so no one actually realized this

This is exactly what I got from the women's tennis question and I didn't notice the error at all.

I remember there was the same error in the cup finals/play-off matches of season 5.
In question number 4, the first option was "less than 7" and the second option was "8-9". I noticed the error when it was too late and the round was over. The correct answer was "8-9" and no one was affected by that error.

[CLS63]

CLS63 who are the champion team in Division 2 of the previous season lifted their trophy in the first home match of the new season. And they celebrated their return to Division 1 with their fans. CLS63 board have stated that their target is not to relegate from the league this season.

[vivekdhyani1]

Lord Anthony waving his magic again , now he is part of the a spanish team that lost a major final since 2002.
Taking into account World Cups, European Championships, Champions League and the UEFA Cup/Europa League , record stands now at 27 wins & 1 loss.

[Harkorede]

Fellas, you're sleeping on the job! Slissy, hosemary, what is happening fellas?
Nobody realized we made a mistake on the women's tennis question. Obviously, 'less than 8' was supposed to be '8 or less', which means that now if Sabalenka loses exactly 8 games we don't have a correct answer.

Unfortunately, we can't just use the answer that we initially thought we did because that would be unfair to some of you - so if it turns out to be 8, we'll simply void the question.
In such cases we also reduced the points needed to survive LMS, so if this question is void 2 points will be enough for survival, as long as it is not the weakest score of course.

I literally saw this at first glance through the questions, but I just didn't bring it up, it felt dumb, because I thought it's not rocket science to know what the question meant, my apologies, lol. I didn't know it could result to such a decision.


------------------------

Chelsea somehow turned things around to get me my first LMS point of the round, and with the new 2 minimum threshold I should be good for this week, I believe.