RoyalStarsCasino.com | Crypto Fastest Growing Casino | Best No Wagering of 375%

[btc78]

with 7 reviews in ask gambler? not sure if this can be consider a best way to trust you fully as Bitcointalk member for years , and since this is one of the biggest forum and I also believe a biggest crypto gambling community , best to gain trust and good reviews from people inside this forum.


__________________________________

Welcome to the forum , hope that in the coming days you will extend your advertising here and spend some funds to generate luring gamblers here.

[QueenVera]

It's almost a month you guys got registered on the forum and I would just want to know howfar you have gone with your activities and hope there are positive growth for your company since your registration on the forum which I'm sure should be.
I want to advice that you should be very fair in all your dealings here on the forum as the forum is one of the safest place you can be provided you're doing the right thing and always try to have a very active customer service team that is always available and active to respond to the pressing needs and demands of the gamblers as this is one way you can always fight through the heart of gamblers.
If you want to gain more visibility, it will be advisable if you run a signature campaign to enhance your visibility through marketing and there are very good and reputable campaign managers like @Hhampuz just incase you need one, you can always slide in his DM.

[suzanne5223]

Yes, it will be fair. Meanwhile, the basic KYC is what they requested from me before I make any deposit.

Yes, basic verification is a verification that is given before making a deposit and this verification usually only contains details of the name and details of the country of residence.
In the casino that I use, everyone asks for this verification the first time they make a deposit and we don't need to worry because basic verification doesn't really ask for anonymous personal identification details.
When the casino can give us a high sense of comfort and confidence, completing verification and giving KYC is not a bad thing as long as we gamble with the true aim of having fun and not causing trouble.

Having some casinos that also requested for basic information before making the first deposit is the reason why I do not see anything wrong with the way the casino is operated but some user seems to be making a big deal out of it and if the main reason of their habit is because the casino is new it is understandable.

[barbara44]

It's not so simple for someone to hand over documents in a new casino, without reputation, and it also doesn't make sense to keep asking for KYC after the deposit for people who play with cryptocurrencies, their KYC doesn't even have levels, they as soon as the person wants to make a withdrawal they ask: proof of payment. see the nonsensical part of it all:

- Person X deposits 1000$ in that casino, plays and loses everything, as he lost everything in the casino, so he will not be asked for KYC, that is, the casino will not ask him for proof of payment.

- Person Z deposits 100$ and plays at the casino and manages to win and keeps 200$ and decides to withdraw the 200$, but they will ask him for KYC, that is, they will ask him for proof of payment of the 100$ he deposited, they will ask him ID verification, proof of address

I ask you the following: if KYC is very important for the casino then why didn't they ask for KYC from person X who made a deposit of 1000$ and lost everything at the casino? why doesn't the casino just ask for basic KYC and then when they detect suspicious activity they could ask for high level KYC like ID verification, proof of address? Wouldn't it be more practical and fair for them to do that? but they prefer the path that will allow them to get the most profit possible from their customers.

when people encounter casinos with these behaviors, they tend not to use those casinos and will continue to use the old and trusted casinos that are more moderate and fair in KYC

Not only in a new casino but on an old casinos too. We are not comfortable on giving our KYC to them for some reasons. Each casino has different rules when it comes to KYC. Some require it on the beginning while the others ask it before a user withdraw their money.

There is also levels of verification on some. Lower levels are easy to pass. They are just basic information like email and phone number but there must be perks for each of them to encourage the players to verify on higher level. KYC is important for a casino because this is where their regulators are requiring them. Casino costumer are still free to not do it but they will only abandon their account and money.

[LUCKMCFLY]

You have a point. Casino not asking for KYC when the user deposit but choosing to require KYC after the player want to withdraw her winning is not fair. However, have any of you guys tried to register on the casino because I did to check if everything said is true, and from what i see the casino asks for the information when a new user wants to make her first deposit which is still fair from my end. Besides, the information didn't contains anything that have to do with documents or ID, and after spending some minutes at the casino was even given 20 free rounds.

[snip]

Well, those things are what one should always know, I don't know if that appears in the T&C, but of course it's annoying because they should say that they do require it, because for many users seo is usually a great nuisance, but if the kyc is sent and they do not approve it quickly or if, on the contrary, they tell them to send the documents again and to be more demanding, with more requirements, that has happened to me and that bothers me, but in any case, if you have already made a profit, then there is no other option than to send them Because it's obvious that when things are in our favor and with money, it's time.

If the casino didn't keep the new users informed about their KYC policy it is not fair but in the situation where the new user is asked to go through a slight information request before the first deposit and the KYC policy stated that "The process we have in place to verify a player’s account involves three elements of verification; ID verification, proof of address & proof of payment. The player has to provide documents in 48h after requesting the payout, and the merchant will review them in 48 hours. "
I believe it is fair enough to know that there's a chance for KYC requests that have to do with the private document when making a first withdrawal.

Totally on board with your KYC policy ideas, buddy! It's a fact, casinos gotta be crystal clear about their verification game and document demands. Nobody wants surprises, especially with private intel and money matters.

But hey, when the KYC rules are out in the open, it's A-OK for casinos to ask for the goods when a player cashes out. Like they say, "knowledge is power" – get the scoop, and you're ready to roll.

Think of it like an adventure – if you know you need a passport and visa to get into some country, you'll have your papers in tip-top shape before hitting the road. Same deal with KYC stuff. If a player's clued in about the doc requirements for getting their dough, they'll be locked and loaded.

Because of course, things are like that, when they become clear, but as has been said, this is an issue where it is not known who can be right, there are first you want to defend the KYC process, I have already said it in the paticular , I have only done favorites and I do not want to do more kyc with any others, I know that the KYC is by orders of governments, and the controlling entities, and that is something that I do not like, and although it is not a whale Or and a player who is so relevant in terms of spending a lot of money, the things that I require now I do not agree, but since I get to play enjoy there are times there are exceptions.

[suzanne5223]

Because of course, things are like that, when they become clear, but as has been said, this is an issue where it is not known who can be right, there are first you want to defend the KYC process, I have already said it in the paticular , I have only done favorites and I do not want to do more kyc with any others, I know that the KYC is by orders of governments, and the controlling entities, and that is something that I do not like, and although it is not a whale Or and a player who is so relevant in terms of spending a lot of money, the things that I require now I do not agree, but since I get to play enjoy there are times there are exceptions.

Let's get this straight. I don't think this is just an act of him/her/myself trying to defend the casino KYC process but telling the truth about the situation on the ground because it shouldn't surprise every crypto enthusiast that as time goes on there will be some sort of restriction and KYC rules implemented in some crypto-related business.
From what I see about this casino they operated just like some of the reputable casinos we have on this forum but I don't know if KYC will be required if users want to withdraw the minimum balance.

[LUCKMCFLY]

Because of course, things are like that, when they become clear, but as has been said, this is an issue where it is not known who can be right, there are first you want to defend the KYC process, I have already said it in the paticular , I have only done favorites and I do not want to do more kyc with any others, I know that the KYC is by orders of governments, and the controlling entities, and that is something that I do not like, and although it is not a whale Or and a player who is so relevant in terms of spending a lot of money, the things that I require now I do not agree, but since I get to play enjoy there are times there are exceptions.

Let's get this straight. I don't think this is just an act of him/her/myself trying to defend the casino KYC process but telling the truth about the situation on the ground because it shouldn't surprise every crypto enthusiast that as time goes on there will be some sort of restriction and KYC rules implemented in some crypto-related business.
From what I see about this casino they operated just like some of the reputable casinos we have on this forum but I don't know if KYC will be required if users want to withdraw the minimum balance.

Yes, it is indeed what you say, I had not misinterpreted it, what happens is that I say it in a general way, for the kyc processes in crypto they should not exist, but it must also be understood that for the casino processes It is necessary to be up to date with the contributions of the Baoj Country, which they are affiliated with and must comply with their regulations, personally I have had to comply with casino kyc on occasions,well few are my favorites, but it is already something that one does for have them as favorites and as the best option so that everything is ok when making Withdrawals and any type of transaction.

[suzanne5223]

Because of course, things are like that, when they become clear, but as has been said, this is an issue where it is not known who can be right, there are first you want to defend the KYC process, I have already said it in the paticular , I have only done favorites and I do not want to do more kyc with any others, I know that the KYC is by orders of governments, and the controlling entities, and that is something that I do not like, and although it is not a whale Or and a player who is so relevant in terms of spending a lot of money, the things that I require now I do not agree, but since I get to play enjoy there are times there are exceptions.

Let's get this straight. I don't think this is just an act of him/her/myself trying to defend the casino KYC process but telling the truth about the situation on the ground because it shouldn't surprise every crypto enthusiast that as time goes on there will be some sort of restriction and KYC rules implemented in some crypto-related business.
From what I see about this casino they operated just like some of the reputable casinos we have on this forum but I don't know if KYC will be required if users want to withdraw the minimum balance.

Yes, it is indeed what you say, I had not misinterpreted it, what happens is that I say it in a general way, for the kyc processes in crypto they should not exist, but it must also be understood that for the casino processes It is necessary to be up to date with the contributions of the Baoj Country, which they are affiliated with and must comply with their regulations, personally I have had to comply with casino kyc on occasions,well few are my favorites, but it is already something that one does for have them as favorites and as the best option so that everything is ok when making Withdrawals and any type of transaction.

Yes, the KYC requirement of the cryptocurrency casino should have existed but it exist ever since a lot of crypto scammers are abusing the decentralization of the ecosystem.
Having said that, both the gambling and crypto market is a broad markets therefore there will always be room for more but the decision belong to each gambling or crypto enthusiast to decide if they are going to use the new one just like we see some meme coin enthusiasts going for PEPE.

[LUCKMCFLY]

Because of course, things are like that, when they become clear, but as has been said, this is an issue where it is not known who can be right, there are first you want to defend the KYC process, I have already said it in the paticular , I have only done favorites and I do not want to do more kyc with any others, I know that the KYC is by orders of governments, and the controlling entities, and that is something that I do not like, and although it is not a whale Or and a player who is so relevant in terms of spending a lot of money, the things that I require now I do not agree, but since I get to play enjoy there are times there are exceptions.

Let's get this straight. I don't think this is just an act of him/her/myself trying to defend the casino KYC process but telling the truth about the situation on the ground because it shouldn't surprise every crypto enthusiast that as time goes on there will be some sort of restriction and KYC rules implemented in some crypto-related business.
From what I see about this casino they operated just like some of the reputable casinos we have on this forum but I don't know if KYC will be required if users want to withdraw the minimum balance.

Yes, it is indeed what you say, I had not misinterpreted it, what happens is that I say it in a general way, for the kyc processes in crypto they should not exist, but it must also be understood that for the casino processes It is necessary to be up to date with the contributions of the Baoj Country, which they are affiliated with and must comply with their regulations, personally I have had to comply with casino kyc on occasions,well few are my favorites, but it is already something that one does for have them as favorites and as the best option so that everything is ok when making Withdrawals and any type of transaction.

Yes, the KYC requirement of the cryptocurrency casino should have existed but it exist ever since a lot of crypto scammers are abusing the decentralization of the ecosystem.
Having said that, both the gambling and crypto market is a broad markets therefore there will always be room for more but the decision belong to each gambling or crypto enthusiast to decide if they are going to use the new one just like we see some meme coin enthusiasts going for PEPE.

It is very difficult for things in casinos to go the way of No-KYC, they cannot go against this because they would simply go from the right path of licenses and legal, unfortunately legal has to do with the non-privacy and not having anonymity, what I am saying is the following, why does a crypto casino have to make or follow government rules? The governments have always wanted to have control of everything, and about crypto, things cannot be done here because of what satoshi always wanted, and well I understand very well that casinos like this one must follow the rules, but I think it is very difficult You can't find a casino that doesn't have such requirements.

[Hamphser]

Because of course, things are like that, when they become clear, but as has been said, this is an issue where it is not known who can be right, there are first you want to defend the KYC process, I have already said it in the paticular , I have only done favorites and I do not want to do more kyc with any others, I know that the KYC is by orders of governments, and the controlling entities, and that is something that I do not like, and although it is not a whale Or and a player who is so relevant in terms of spending a lot of money, the things that I require now I do not agree, but since I get to play enjoy there are times there are exceptions.

Let's get this straight. I don't think this is just an act of him/her/myself trying to defend the casino KYC process but telling the truth about the situation on the ground because it shouldn't surprise every crypto enthusiast that as time goes on there will be some sort of restriction and KYC rules implemented in some crypto-related business.
From what I see about this casino they operated just like some of the reputable casinos we have on this forum but I don't know if KYC will be required if users want to withdraw the minimum balance.

Yes, it is indeed what you say, I had not misinterpreted it, what happens is that I say it in a general way, for the kyc processes in crypto they should not exist, but it must also be understood that for the casino processes It is necessary to be up to date with the contributions of the Baoj Country, which they are affiliated with and must comply with their regulations, personally I have had to comply with casino kyc on occasions,well few are my favorites, but it is already something that one does for have them as favorites and as the best option so that everything is ok when making Withdrawals and any type of transaction.

Yes, the KYC requirement of the cryptocurrency casino should have existed but it exist ever since a lot of crypto scammers are abusing the decentralization of the ecosystem.
Having said that, both the gambling and crypto market is a broad markets therefore there will always be room for more but the decision belong to each gambling or crypto enthusiast to decide if they are going to use the new one just like we see some meme coin enthusiasts going for PEPE.

It is very difficult for things in casinos to go the way of No-KYC, they cannot go against this because they would simply go from the right path of licenses and legal, unfortunately legal has to do with the non-privacy and not having anonymity, what I am saying is the following, why does a crypto casino have to make or follow government rules? The governments have always wanted to have control of everything, and about crypto, things cannot be done here because of what satoshi always wanted, and well I understand very well that casinos like this one must follow the rules, but I think it is very difficult You can't find a casino that doesn't have such requirements.

As a business owner then you wouldnt really be having no choice because if you would turn out to be having no plans on getting license then you really that operating illegally as per government rules
which means that you dont have the right on making some operation and also even if we do place ourselves on a decentralized market, having that license on gambling casinos is much preferred by
gamblers on where they do have that kind of confidence or assurance that they are really dealing with a legit site.It is really that people does on being anonymous but they are dealing with a centralized platform
on which it would really be just that normal that tendencies or chances that information would really be asked out is really high and this is where gamblers should really be that expecting something
like this to happen along the way.

[suzanne5223]

Because of course, things are like that, when they become clear, but as has been said, this is an issue where it is not known who can be right, there are first you want to defend the KYC process, I have already said it in the paticular , I have only done favorites and I do not want to do more kyc with any others, I know that the KYC is by orders of governments, and the controlling entities, and that is something that I do not like, and although it is not a whale Or and a player who is so relevant in terms of spending a lot of money, the things that I require now I do not agree, but since I get to play enjoy there are times there are exceptions.

Let's get this straight. I don't think this is just an act of him/her/myself trying to defend the casino KYC process but telling the truth about the situation on the ground because it shouldn't surprise every crypto enthusiast that as time goes on there will be some sort of restriction and KYC rules implemented in some crypto-related business.
From what I see about this casino they operated just like some of the reputable casinos we have on this forum but I don't know if KYC will be required if users want to withdraw the minimum balance.

Yes, it is indeed what you say, I had not misinterpreted it, what happens is that I say it in a general way, for the kyc processes in crypto they should not exist, but it must also be understood that for the casino processes It is necessary to be up to date with the contributions of the Baoj Country, which they are affiliated with and must comply with their regulations, personally I have had to comply with casino kyc on occasions,well few are my favorites, but it is already something that one does for have them as favorites and as the best option so that everything is ok when making Withdrawals and any type of transaction.

Yes, the KYC requirement of the cryptocurrency casino should have existed but it exist ever since a lot of crypto scammers are abusing the decentralization of the ecosystem.
Having said that, both the gambling and crypto market is a broad markets therefore there will always be room for more but the decision belong to each gambling or crypto enthusiast to decide if they are going to use the new one just like we see some meme coin enthusiasts going for PEPE.

It is very difficult for things in casinos to go the way of No-KYC, they cannot go against this because they would simply go from the right path of licenses and legal, unfortunately legal has to do with the non-privacy and not having anonymity, what I am saying is the following, why does a crypto casino have to make or follow government rules? The governments have always wanted to have control of everything, and about crypto, things cannot be done here because of what satoshi always wanted, and well I understand very well that casinos like this one must follow the rules, but I think it is very difficult You can't find a casino that doesn't have such requirements.

You said it yourself that "very difficult for things in casinos to go the way of No-KYC, they cannot go against this because they would simply go from the right path of licenses and legal, unfortunately, legal has to do with the non-privacy and not having anonymity"
Therefore if the casino wants to make its business legal and well-established they have to follow the government rules

[Slow death]

You said it yourself that "very difficult for things in casinos to go the way of No-KYC, they cannot go against this because they would simply go from the right path of licenses and legal, unfortunately, legal has to do with the non-privacy and not having anonymity"
Therefore if the casino wants to make its business legal and well-established they have to follow the government rules

It is true that casinos must follow the laws of governments, they are not wrong about that. but it is also necessary to moderate, the license provider and not even the governments do not determine in what time the casino must ask for kyc, so and I imagine that it is up to each casino to determine whether it will ask for kyc when creating an account or if it will ask for kyc when the client makes his first deposit, or if it will ask for kyc when the client wants to make a withdrawal or if it will ask for kyc when the client is detected that he has some suspicious activity.

so in some good and reliable casinos they are not forcing kyc on people, they encourage people to do kyc by giving some kind of compensation in case the person complies with kyc, but there are certain casinos that looked at kyc as a great chance not to allow that the customer manages to withdraw money from the casino, these scam casinos keep letting the person make a deposit and when the person wants to withdraw they ask for kyc and then when the person gives them all the documents they invent that the documents that the person delivered are false documents and block the person's account, so it is very important to be very careful with new casinos

[ultrloa]

Because of course, things are like that, when they become clear, but as has been said, this is an issue where it is not known who can be right, there are first you want to defend the KYC process, I have already said it in the paticular , I have only done favorites and I do not want to do more kyc with any others, I know that the KYC is by orders of governments, and the controlling entities, and that is something that I do not like, and although it is not a whale Or and a player who is so relevant in terms of spending a lot of money, the things that I require now I do not agree, but since I get to play enjoy there are times there are exceptions.

Let's get this straight. I don't think this is just an act of him/her/myself trying to defend the casino KYC process but telling the truth about the situation on the ground because it shouldn't surprise every crypto enthusiast that as time goes on there will be some sort of restriction and KYC rules implemented in some crypto-related business.
From what I see about this casino they operated just like some of the reputable casinos we have on this forum but I don't know if KYC will be required if users want to withdraw the minimum balance.

Yes, it is indeed what you say, I had not misinterpreted it, what happens is that I say it in a general way, for the kyc processes in crypto they should not exist, but it must also be understood that for the casino processes It is necessary to be up to date with the contributions of the Baoj Country, which they are affiliated with and must comply with their regulations, personally I have had to comply with casino kyc on occasions,well few are my favorites, but it is already something that one does for have them as favorites and as the best option so that everything is ok when making Withdrawals and any type of transaction.

Yes, the KYC requirement of the cryptocurrency casino should have existed but it exist ever since a lot of crypto scammers are abusing the decentralization of the ecosystem.
Having said that, both the gambling and crypto market is a broad markets therefore there will always be room for more but the decision belong to each gambling or crypto enthusiast to decide if they are going to use the new one just like we see some meme coin enthusiasts going for PEPE.

It is very difficult for things in casinos to go the way of No-KYC, they cannot go against this because they would simply go from the right path of licenses and legal, unfortunately legal has to do with the non-privacy and not having anonymity, what I am saying is the following, why does a crypto casino have to make or follow government rules? The governments have always wanted to have control of everything, and about crypto, things cannot be done here because of what satoshi always wanted, and well I understand very well that casinos like this one must follow the rules, but I think it is very difficult You can't find a casino that doesn't have such requirements.

As a business owner then you wouldnt really be having no choice because if you would turn out to be having no plans on getting license then you really that operating illegally as per government rules
which means that you dont have the right on making some operation and also even if we do place ourselves on a decentralized market, having that license on gambling casinos is much preferred by
gamblers on where they do have that kind of confidence or assurance that they are really dealing with a legit site.It is really that people does on being anonymous but they are dealing with a centralized platform
on which it would really be just that normal that tendencies or chances that information would really be asked out is really high and this is where gamblers should really be that expecting something
like this to happen along the way.

I will have doubts to play on casino like this since nowadays license is one necessary needed to see if a casino is ready to comply on legal matters. And its hard to trust a casino avoiding such thing since we don't know how legitimate they are also they could just run away without leaving any trace to their casino players. For sure they might tell to avoid KYC but many people get used to it and totally fine with this implementation since we are now aware that this is part of legalization.

[suzanne5223]

You said it yourself that "very difficult for things in casinos to go the way of No-KYC, they cannot go against this because they would simply go from the right path of licenses and legal, unfortunately, legal has to do with the non-privacy and not having anonymity"
Therefore if the casino wants to make its business legal and well-established they have to follow the government rules

It is true that casinos must follow the laws of governments, they are not wrong about that. but it is also necessary to moderate, the license provider and not even the governments do not determine in what time the casino must ask for kyc, so and I imagine that it is up to each casino to determine whether it will ask for kyc when creating an account or if it will ask for kyc when the client makes his first deposit, or if it will ask for kyc when the client wants to make a withdrawal or if it will ask for kyc when the client is detected that he has some suspicious activity.

so in some good and reliable casinos they are not forcing kyc on people, they encourage people to do kyc by giving some kind of compensation in case the person complies with kyc, but there are certain casinos that looked at kyc as a great chance not to allow that the customer manages to withdraw money from the casino, these scam casinos keep letting the person make a deposit and when the person wants to withdraw they ask for kyc and then when the person gives them all the documents they invent that the documents that the person delivered are false documents and block the person's account, so it is very important to be very careful with new casinos

Normally, KYC is introduced by the government and I expect the Master license holder to set up their rules and regulation which will be in line or comply with the government rules.
The Master license holder also provides the casino with their rules and regulation while leaving everything to the casino owner to also create terms and conditions that follow the rules and regulations provided by the Master license holder. However, the casino that didn't request KYC when the gambler makes a deposit and later request KYC when the user wants to withdraw are the casino that abuses the KYC system.

[michellee]

I will have doubts to play on casino like this since nowadays license is one necessary needed to see if a casino is ready to comply on legal matters. And its hard to trust a casino avoiding such thing since we don't know how legitimate they are also they could just run away without leaving any trace to their casino players. For sure they might tell to avoid KYC but many people get used to it and totally fine with this implementation since we are now aware that this is part of legalization.

We may find it difficult to avoid KYC, which has begun to be implemented in many crypto casinos, so we must be prepared for it. Even though there are still casinos that don't implement KYC too strictly, as the popularity of casinos can increase, the government will definitely intervene in legality.

The government will keep an eye on those casinos, whether new or old and will ask casinos that have not yet implemented KYC to implement it immediately. And some gamblers who are ready with everything certainly won't refuse it because they realize that sooner or later, doing KYC has a condition from the casino.

But we have to be careful when doing KYC and only do KYC at reputable casinos so they can be held accountable if something happens. And as long as the casino is trusted, we don't have to worry if the casino runs away.

[ultrloa]

I will have doubts to play on casino like this since nowadays license is one necessary needed to see if a casino is ready to comply on legal matters. And its hard to trust a casino avoiding such thing since we don't know how legitimate they are also they could just run away without leaving any trace to their casino players. For sure they might tell to avoid KYC but many people get used to it and totally fine with this implementation since we are now aware that this is part of legalization.

We may find it difficult to avoid KYC, which has begun to be implemented in many crypto casinos, so we must be prepared for it. Even though there are still casinos that don't implement KYC too strictly, as the popularity of casinos can increase, the government will definitely intervene in legality.

The government will keep an eye on those casinos, whether new or old and will ask casinos that have not yet implemented KYC to implement it immediately. And some gamblers who are ready with everything certainly won't refuse it because they realize that sooner or later, doing KYC has a condition from the casino.

But we have to be careful when doing KYC and only do KYC at reputable casinos so they can be held accountable if something happens. And as long as the casino is trusted, we don't have to worry if the casino runs away.

Hard to trust but it be more harder for us to trust new casino claiming that they are don't require KYC because they don't have reputation yet and hard to trust some big amounts especially for whales. That's why I rather comply and choose to play those reputable casino since provably they do their best to protect the data of their consumers since they don't want to ruin their reputation just for this reasons.

[LUCKMCFLY]

Because of course, things are like that, when they become clear, but as has been said, this is an issue where it is not known who can be right, there are first you want to defend the KYC process, I have already said it in the paticular , I have only done favorites and I do not want to do more kyc with any others, I know that the KYC is by orders of governments, and the controlling entities, and that is something that I do not like, and although it is not a whale Or and a player who is so relevant in terms of spending a lot of money, the things that I require now I do not agree, but since I get to play enjoy there are times there are exceptions.

Let's get this straight. I don't think this is just an act of him/her/myself trying to defend the casino KYC process but telling the truth about the situation on the ground because it shouldn't surprise every crypto enthusiast that as time goes on there will be some sort of restriction and KYC rules implemented in some crypto-related business.
From what I see about this casino they operated just like some of the reputable casinos we have on this forum but I don't know if KYC will be required if users want to withdraw the minimum balance.

Yes, it is indeed what you say, I had not misinterpreted it, what happens is that I say it in a general way, for the kyc processes in crypto they should not exist, but it must also be understood that for the casino processes It is necessary to be up to date with the contributions of the Baoj Country, which they are affiliated with and must comply with their regulations, personally I have had to comply with casino kyc on occasions,well few are my favorites, but it is already something that one does for have them as favorites and as the best option so that everything is ok when making Withdrawals and any type of transaction.

Yes, the KYC requirement of the cryptocurrency casino should have existed but it exist ever since a lot of crypto scammers are abusing the decentralization of the ecosystem.
Having said that, both the gambling and crypto market is a broad markets therefore there will always be room for more but the decision belong to each gambling or crypto enthusiast to decide if they are going to use the new one just like we see some meme coin enthusiasts going for PEPE.

It is very difficult for things in casinos to go the way of No-KYC, they cannot go against this because they would simply go from the right path of licenses and legal, unfortunately legal has to do with the non-privacy and not having anonymity, what I am saying is the following, why does a crypto casino have to make or follow government rules? The governments have always wanted to have control of everything, and about crypto, things cannot be done here because of what satoshi always wanted, and well I understand very well that casinos like this one must follow the rules, but I think it is very difficult You can't find a casino that doesn't have such requirements.

You said it yourself that "very difficult for things in casinos to go the way of No-KYC, they cannot go against this because they would simply go from the right path of licenses and legal, unfortunately, legal has to do with the non-privacy and not having anonymity"
Therefore if the casino wants to make its business legal and well-established they have to follow the government rules

And that's where the bad is, why? because initially there was not so much control over the casinos, now yes, when a few years ago they saw casinos with bitcoin they did not take them into consideration , now that bitfoin is so Booming , it has so many things that the governments can do, they saw the form of Take those things or those profits for them to eat from there, that's what I don't like , I don't agree and I never will , because people don't let them be free, and yes , it's difficult because when we see the way to governments always limit them to win , so for me that is Playing dirty.

[suzanne5223]

And that's where the bad is, why? because initially there was not so much control over the casinos

Yes, there was not much control over casinos until some cryptocurrency scammers started using casinos as a means to mix their crypto for free and it's endangering the casino.

now yes, when a few years ago they saw casinos with bitcoin they did not take them into consideration , now that bitfoin is so Booming , it has so many things that the governments can do, they saw the form of Take those things or those profits for them to eat from there, that's what I don't like , I don't agree and I never will , because people don't let them be free, and yes , it's difficult because when we see the way to governments always limit them to win , so for me that is Playing dirty.

The booming of the cryptocurrency market could be the reason why the government looking into the crypto market and the gambling ecosystem but what triggers their attention to switch to cryptocurrency is because of the people that are abusing the liberation provided by crypto.

[Blitzboy]

~

And that's where the bad is, why? because initially there was not so much control over the casinos, now yes, when a few years ago they saw casinos with bitcoin they did not take them into consideration , now that bitfoin is so Booming , it has so many things that the governments can do, they saw the form of Take those things or those profits for them to eat from there, that's what I don't like , I don't agree and I never will , because people don't let them be free, and yes , it's difficult because when we see the way to governments always limit them to win , so for me that is Playing dirty.

Are casinos truly victims of government intervention and lost freedom? Or are they simply playing by the societal rules to maintain order? In a world where legalities govern our actions, isnt compliance necessary to maintain credibility?

When Bitcoin entered the picture, the anonymity it provided led to an upheaval of the traditional system. Its undeniable! Yet, when we champion for 'freedom', should we not also consider its consequences? Anarchy isnt the answer, my friend! And thats precisely what unlimited freedom, without checks and balances, could lead to.

True, its unfortunate that cryptocurrencies are used to fund illegitimate activities, yet isn't that the price we pay for the lack of regulation? Would you want your Bitcoin investments to be a free-for-all, open to manipulation without oversight?

[suzanne5223]

Are casinos truly victims of government intervention and lost freedom? Or are they simply playing by the societal rules to maintain order? In a world where legalities govern our actions, isnt compliance necessary to maintain credibility?

Yes and no because KYC was not introduced when it all started until gamblers and scammers abused the use of cryptocurrency casinos which lead to casinos facing government intervention and KYC requirements, as they operate in a highly regulated industry. Besides, in some jurisdictions, crypto casinos are prohibited or subject to strict regulations.
No, because some casinos also abuse the KYC requirement or rules given to them by their Master license holder.

When Bitcoin entered the picture, the anonymity it provided led to an upheaval of the traditional system. Its undeniable! Yet, when we champion for 'freedom', should we not also consider its consequences? Anarchy isnt the answer, my friend! And thats precisely what unlimited freedom, without checks and balances, could lead to.

Yes, we should also consider its consequence. Remember, crypto provides great opportunity and great risk.
 Anarchy isn't the answer for?

True, its unfortunate that cryptocurrencies are used to fund illegitimate activities, yet isn't that the price we pay for the lack of regulation? Would you want your Bitcoin investments to be a free-for-all, open to manipulation without oversight?

Regulation or not. There's no way the manipulation of the market can be stopped since there are a lot of trades executed on OTC and DEX which will literally impact the Bitcoin market price. Besides, only a centralized project can be regulated.