Do you agree with ChatGPT on the club that might win the premier League?

[danherbias07]

This concludes that human analysis is still better than AI. Sure, they can provide all the details about what is happening in the league, as for this example the Premier League. But obviously, it is not updated and I doubt that AI knows what happened yesterday or maybe even a couple of weeks ago, worse, a year.
It needs to be maintained every day which also means it cannot be used for long hours during maintenance which ain't possible or they won't make money out of it.
We humans, as big fans of our own sports are always updated. Recent games, injuries, stats, and recent history. AI won't have that unless they are connected with all the things that are happening which I think is a load of RAM. I won't suggest believing it even if it goes right sometimes.

[Lanatsa]

Just like on what others been stating or clarified out or making up some additional info then it does show that ChatGPT is really just giving off that past and present or whatever information that it is really available.

Informations and given out mentions arent that precise or something that wouldnt really be giving you a convincing reply if you are really that a die hard fan of Football.
You would be able to point out on whats missing specially into those players who hadnt been mentioned out.

This is why its not really that recommendable on putting yourself or trust 100% on what Ai do suggest out.

[ralle14]

If only we were at the start of the season then all three would be good suggestions but now that we're at the 2/3 of the season only Man City has the best shot out of the three. Man United is sitting at third but unfortunately, the difference in points is too much, and with the remaining games left it's impossible to see both Man City and Arsenal drop a lot of points.

[fullhdpixel]

This concludes that human analysis is still better than AI. Sure, they can provide all the details about what is happening in the league, as for this example the Premier League. But obviously, it is not updated and I doubt that AI knows what happened yesterday or maybe even a couple of weeks ago, worse, a year.
It needs to be maintained every day which also means it cannot be used for long hours during maintenance which ain't possible or they won't make money out of it.
We humans, as big fans of our own sports are always updated. Recent games, injuries, stats, and recent history. AI won't have that unless they are connected with all the things that are happening which I think is a load of RAM. I won't suggest believing it even if it goes right sometimes.

That is because we can customize what we really want to see or analyze but AI are specifically programmed so they can mostly end up with the same results but if you are a beginner in sports betting, it will be better to use them than just relying on your gut feeling or relying on to some tipsters as they can be a scam and only wants to grab your money.

If the ChatGPT analysis is not updated, maybe we need to report it to their developers so that they can improve the app because sometimes they can miss looked these things and that is why there is a "Report an issue/bug" button on the software or app that we are using in order for them to be informed about it.

[sunsilk]

This is going to lose you a lot of money. AI or chatgpt or any other AI tools might give some interesting answers that will make you think it's right because it's an AI but not all that it says are recommended.

When it's come to these games or sports, we know better than AI and it just admitted that it's not good in giving predictions. So, someone who's lazy enough will do this but also, should be aware that he's just about to lose all of his money.

It was said that GPT4 is the most advance currently but with what I know, it's like a person that keeps on learning but let's see if on this matter will it also learn.

[Viscore]

If I'm not mistaken, the AI is a bit stupid in this case and anything that has anything to do with anything after the end of 2021, because it has data that only goes back to that period. At the moment when the AI is "online" in the sense that it has all possible data, then it will probably be able to give much more accurate and precise answers.

This could be a problem for bookmakers, because players will have a very good tool for analyzing matches, and thus a greater chance of winning.

Maybe because the app lacks updates that need to be fed on the system, otherwise players who seek for advice may not get the best and lose their bets eventually. This is the reason why using ChatGPT is not completely reliable, at least we should focus on our own analysis because our human minds are more capable to analyze compared to this chatbot that only tells what has been fed to it. But maybe in the future, ChatGPT will able to give us precise details for betting.

[carlfebz2]

If I'm not mistaken, the AI is a bit stupid in this case and anything that has anything to do with anything after the end of 2021, because it has data that only goes back to that period. At the moment when the AI is "online" in the sense that it has all possible data, then it will probably be able to give much more accurate and precise answers.

This could be a problem for bookmakers, because players will have a very good tool for analyzing matches, and thus a greater chance of winning.

Maybe because the app lacks updates that need to be fed on the system, otherwise players who seek for advice may not get the best and lose their bets eventually. This is the reason why using ChatGPT is not completely reliable, at least we should focus on our own analysis because our human minds are more capable to analyze compared to this chatbot that only tells what has been fed to it. But maybe in the future, ChatGPT will able to give us precise details for betting.

This is where people should be thinking about that not all  chatgpt responses is really up to date considering that it would really be still needing to be fed up by various informations or latest on to be added up into
the library or whatever its been called.This is why humans are still far superior when it comes to certain corners or things which we know that there's no way that it could be beaten up by some AI or automation.
Any responses shouldnt really be taken up seriously and really be that relying on what information had been given out. Well, we do have our own choice but its not that something bad
for you to consider on adding up those information to be added up to yours.

[wiss19]

This concludes that human analysis is still better than AI. Sure, they can provide all the details about what is happening in the league, as for this example the Premier League. But obviously, it is not updated and I doubt that AI knows what happened yesterday or maybe even a couple of weeks ago, worse, a year.
It needs to be maintained every day which also means it cannot be used for long hours during maintenance which ain't possible or they won't make money out of it.
We humans, as big fans of our own sports are always updated. Recent games, injuries, stats, and recent history. AI won't have that unless they are connected with all the things that are happening which I think is a load of RAM. I won't suggest believing it even if it goes right sometimes.

That is because we can customize what we really want to see or analyze but AI are specifically programmed so they can mostly end up with the same results but if you are a beginner in sports betting, it will be better to use them than just relying on your gut feeling or relying on to some tipsters as they can be a scam and only wants to grab your money.

If the ChatGPT analysis is not updated, maybe we need to report it to their developers so that they can improve the app because sometimes they can miss looked these things and that is why there is a "Report an issue/bug" button on the software or app that we are using in order for them to be informed about it.

Actually, AI isn't programmed so that it can generate the same result for each prompt. If you have used ChatGPT, you will see that even if you use the same prompt, it will give a different answer for each prompt, which may have the same meaning but it will not be the exact same answer, because it is not the normal chatbot but it utilizes artificial intelligence.

And, there is no need to report anything to the developers since it is already mentioned when you open it that its data only goes up until 2021 and it doesn't have any knowledge of the events that occurred after that. They have the advanced version with more access and availability but it needs you to buy a subscription.

[worle1bm]

There are way too many factors AI can't explain. So, no it won't be able to predict the outcome on Premiere League, if it does it would only be some kind of coincidence kind of prediction. Well, we can't say AI will be the same this way in the coming years, it's being trained and could be more intelligent than ever.

They are collecting data from the past instances and we can't rely on them as they are also making predictions according to what input they have.But if we say they are right about each outcome then it's not right and placing bets according to their answers would be more stupidity I think.They are not reliable source of information especially in this gambling related queries.

[pungopete468]

Of course not. I tried to read the tips and ideas of the known sports betting enthusiast but even if they give a good tips of course there's always a doubt about it, what more if it would come to something that doesn't actually have own mind to decide things or to analyze the current team roster, we can probably use it to as an assistant to give information but we cannot let it decide and we just follow it.

[arwin100]

There are way too many factors AI can't explain. So, no it won't be able to predict the outcome on Premiere League, if it does it would only be some kind of coincidence kind of prediction. Well, we can't say AI will be the same this way in the coming years, it's being trained and could be more intelligent than ever.

They are collecting data from the past instances and we can't rely on them as they are also making predictions according to what input they have.But if we say they are right about each outcome then it's not right and placing bets according to their answers would be more stupidity I think.They are not reliable source of information especially in this gambling related queries.

Its pure stupidity to think about they well get higher chance to win on their bets by the help of AI prediction since they should know that as you said AI only collecting the data's already available in world wide web. AI cannot predict the future so I wonder why there are still many people believe on those thoughts where there's no strong supporting evidence that it really happened and AI is accurate in terms with this predicting events which didn't happened yet.

[Strongkored]

So what are your thoughts on this, do you agree with ChatGPT or not??

This robot is only correct when mentioning only one club, namely Manchester City, but even then it does not include the name Erling Haaland whose contribution to the club this season has been very big.
And his opinion about Liverpool is very wrong as LFC fans really hopes they are like that but in reality they are not, as well as about Man United which is even better than LFC this season, and it seems that this robot hasn't been too updated because it doesn't mention Arsenal and also Newcastle, so this proves that they only manage old data and can't help bettors to win bets but maybe in the future when it continues to be developed maybe even though I still doubt that.

[Peanutswar]

Currently, many people right now is getting caught with the capability of ChatGPT this will serve as a good source of information but again its an open source there's no assurance that there's a all of the information right there is correct many people now are using this to make a bet and just asking for the ChatGPt for the possible winners of the game we know how does the algorithm makes a good answer for the possible winners base in the information it could give but its not suitable all the time, still depends on the players and teams, this serve as a tool only but not as a god always answer for the predictions that makes you give a profit.

[molsewid]

Currently, many people right now is getting caught with the capability of ChatGPT this will serve as a good source of information but again its an open source there's no assurance that there's a all of the information right there is correct many people now are using this to make a bet and just asking for the ChatGPt for the possible winners of the game we know how does the algorithm makes a good answer for the possible winners base in the information it could give but its not suitable all the time, still depends on the players and teams, this serve as a tool only but not as a god always answer for the predictions that makes you give a profit.

Yes I agree, AI are just collecting information from other open sources and databases. It has a good sense of analytics that's why those three are being on the list. So I think we should not rely all our bets on AI, still at the end of the game we are the one who chooses our main team. AI are just being created by man and operated by man, we can have our own decisions because if we are into something we know better than it.

[Finestream]

Out of curiosity I did that too. There's a disclaimer that they don't have beliefs and opinion and what they do is just provide you an information which you can just get in the google for the description on that team and the other team but you know what? I would rather listen to the free tips I read online and get idea or information from it, rather than listening or believing to what an AI would say.

Well, it’s not bad at all to try to listening to AI, but always remember that AI machine only relies on the datas that are already programmed in the computer, if there are sudden changes, AI won’t be reliable at all. That’s why it’s still advisable to listen to what your mind tells, as your own analysis is based from your personal gained knowledge and perspective.

[Davidvictorson]

So what are your thoughts on this, do you agree with ChatGPT or not??

ChatGPT predicting the club that might win the premier League is like my grandpa predicting who will win the Turkish league. Want to know why? They know absolutely nothing about football or prediction.
ChatGPT has not be programmed to make prediction of any sort, so the responses here is absolutely incorrect. As a matter of fact if you look down to the end of the ChatGPT window, you would see this text

ChatGPT Mar 23 Version. Free Research Preview. ChatGPT may produce inaccurate information about people, places, or facts.

I rest my case. This should tell you now, whether I agree or disagree.

[gabbie2010]

AI doesn't really determine the real fact and how can it predict which to qualify if not getting the recent update from the previous session. One thing you should know about this AI of a thing is being coded by just an ordinary individual just like me and you, and all information displayed here are based on assumptions and probability statement which maybe right or wrong.
Such a shameless AI.

I pity gamblers who rely solely on ChatGPT to make predictions, it's obvious that ChatGPT is based on past records and data both real and unreal put together as output thus it may contain few facts, of course Man City might indeed win the league, however it is still a probability because I can't also rule out Arsenal despite some of their recent unfavorable results EPL matches are very difficult to predict, meanwhile I also read an article where ChatGPT outputted some programming codes which had to be sorted out by experience programmers because it contain of alot of bugs and errors thus it has to be fixed that means AI is never reliable in solving many problems

[pawanjain]

I really don't think that AI should be used quiet yet if money is involved. Betting is fun and we can take a reference from AI but we shouldn't depend on it completely.
We have to do our own analysis and only place the bets out of our own experience and knowledge.
AI is not fully matured yet and it will take few more years for it to be really considered when money is involved.

[ethereumhunter]

Of course not. I tried to read the tips and ideas of the known sports betting enthusiast but even if they give a good tips of course there's always a doubt about it, what more if it would come to something that doesn't actually have own mind to decide things or to analyze the current team roster, we can probably use it to as an assistant to give information but we cannot let it decide and we just follow it.

If you can get info from other sources and compare it with tips and ideas from sports betting fans, you will see if the tips from these people are valid or not, so you can immediately place a bet or will look for other sports bets. Something with doubts will not always give us something good, so we should look for something else. But to use ChatGPT for now maybe not be a good idea because as long as we can still find info from reliable sources, we better stick with it because we already see the results.

[uneng]

Even though the AI didn't match the correct 1st club of the league, we can't deny it was pretty accurate inside an error margin which is completely acceptable when trying to guess the correct winner of a competition. However, it just confirms what many members of this forum are saying since a long ago: to use an AI isn't guarantee of winning on sports betting on long term. Future events can't be foreseen with assurance by gamblers, much less by AIs.