Is this a Strategy? Is it a good Strategy?

[hannahB4]

In the last year, we have seen a lot of celebrities who have come out on social media to call out their other celebrities and with this eventually, some are proven to be true while others are just to pull a crowd and make people notice them on their page. This year for instance there is a celeb who got married to another wife and has been creating a scene with that though personally I haven't been interested in knowing more

[Dr.Bitcoin_Strange]

Well, in my country, people would say that "in every industry or organisation, there are a lot of unethical things going on." Some times you cannot really tell if it's just some planned troubles for their gains or not, but I still don't believe that all those fights and issues are real; some of them are just orchestrated so they can gain more attention. They could also just pay some bloggers to also publicise some fake content with edited pictures or video. In my opinion, as long as those acts don't harm any individual directly or indirectly, then it's good, but anything that harms or inflicts pain on another is bad strategy; it's only for a selfish interest.


Cheers 🥂, Dr.Bitcoin_Strange 👺👺

[AmoreJaz]

Not entirely. There could be some benefit if possible but I do believe just like many said already that these are just people who do not have too many people who challenge their ego and that's the only reason. When you are Elon Musk, you have lower level people who criticize you and you have workers who will do what you ask or you fire them so you basically have power over everyone, so when another alpha dog like Mark comes along and risks bruising your ego, you end up locking horns. This is of course nothing, they ain't fighting and won't ever fight and all of this is for just show, there is no way they would, they just want to "look tough" but they will not be fighting, that's not going to happen for sure.

or bottomline, they would want more attention from the public and so can further increase the demand of their respective company services. yes, there's ego involved. you know just part of being human.
also, for some retired athletes calling names, that means, they want more money if they can attract large fans asking for their exhibition fight.

[BenCodie]

Yes, when career and soul reach bottom, selling out for fake fights are clearly what they do. Anyone who actually thinks these are real fights where danger is actually posed to someone, is sorely mistaken. Every single fight since the birth of YouTube fighting has been in at least some way orchestrated, and the higher the status of the individual, the more orchestrated it probably is.

Public beef or fights involving billionaires, celebrities, or even top companies often puts them into the spotlight, attracting attention and generating increased traffic, hence, more income.

I get the idea that this is because of Mark Zuckerberg and Elon Musk's potential fight.

Lol. Are you sure this isn't just AI playing tricks on you, like it is to so many every day on social media? Or, maybe Elon started this because he can't live without clout, and Zuckerberg is a very easy target. Though, zuckerberg will never go into this, the idea is infantile and stupid..while Zuckerberg is a twat, a violator of our rights and a negative influence on the evolution of society to date, I doubt highly he is stupid enough to enter himself into a publicity fight.

[serjent05]

Public beef or fights involving billionaires, celebrities, or even top companies often puts them into the spotlight, attracting attention and generating increased traffic, hence, more income. My question arises as to whether you think some or most of these conflicts are genuine or intentionally crafted/orchestrated by the parties involved to maintain their prominence and financial gains.

We never know, only the person involved knows whether their conflict is genuine or made up just to get the attention of people and profit from the even when they have to meet in an arena to "fight".

Also, could this be considered as a strategic element of their business or career strategy? And If so, is this a good strategy?

It can be depending on how each camp will approach the media in taking advantage of the situation and promoting their current projects and stuff.  Whether it is a good strategy or not is still dependent on how they capitalize on the attention and how they publish their strategy.

[Stable090]

Public beef or fights involving billionaires, celebrities, or even top companies often puts them into the spotlight, attracting attention and generating increased traffic, hence, more income. My question arises as to whether you think some or most of these conflicts are genuine or intentionally crafted/orchestrated by the parties involved to maintain their prominence and financial gains.
Also, could this be considered as a strategic element of their business or career strategy? And If so, is this a good strategy?

Most of the fight between influencers are just to get public attention, when you see some billionaires or influencers have misunderstand between each other, then you will see that it’s acted and their fight is not real. Most of them just need traffic just to promote their business or any other thing they are doing, most of them just want to have recognition by people.

If their fight is really real, then why will they bring it to the social media, if they are really having fight, then they should face themselves offline and I see no reason why they should come to social media. The real billionaires will fight offline, the once fighting online are just looking for traffic that’s all.

[flyingcarpet]

Public beef or fights involving billionaires, celebrities, or even top companies often puts them into the spotlight, attracting attention and generating increased traffic, hence, more income. My question arises as to whether you think some or most of these conflicts are genuine or intentionally crafted/orchestrated by the parties involved to maintain their prominence and financial gains.
Also, could this be considered as a strategic element of their business or career strategy? And If so, is this a good strategy?

Sometimes we may hear the conflicts between the two well-known parties and this may bring them to the news. We never know if this is being done to gain popularity or if it is just natural. Even we hear some known personality will tweet about the bitcoin price prediction and gain hype. Though their prediction never comes true, yet people listen to them and they are talked about all over the internet.

Sometimes these personalities will publish good or bad news about crypto creating a pump or dump in the market. Elon Musk is a perfect example of this as how he changed his profile photo and/or title to Bitcoin and removed it causing the market to move. These celebrities want to be in the news and they would do all the dirty things to be part of the news. I would not call it a "Good Strategy "

Actually, we cannot explain it with popularity or naturalness. We can explain this with the habits from the past to the present. Does everyone behave the same way, of course not, but previous versions or similar of what we sampled always did the same things.

According to the tweets, those who invest in their future are already doomed to lose, but they are not aware of this. Of course we have to follow some people, but that doesn't mean they're always right.

As the Bitcoin halving approaches, even more people will show up and say something positive or negative about the market. Some will fight each other. According to some, this is a strategy, according to others, it is a behavior that cannot be taken seriously. This is not a good strategy in my opinion.

[KingsDen]

Public beef or fights involving billionaires, celebrities, or even top companies often puts them into the spotlight, attracting attention and generating increased traffic, hence, more income. My question arises as to whether you think some or most of these conflicts are genuine or intentionally crafted/orchestrated by the parties involved to maintain their prominence and financial gains.
Also, could this be considered as a strategic element of their business or career strategy? And If so, is this a good strategy?

I have only noticed this with musicians in my country. When a certain music is no longer trending and the society almost forgetting him. He will organise a beef with another music who is popular. When they trend on social media, the former will likely regain popularity.
Sometimes the unsuspecting audience will want to invite both for a show to see if they will honour. In the end, the musics will gain in the process and the general public will keep speculating and analysing, whilst the musicians will plan another method of public distractions.

[tabas]

Public beef or fights involving billionaires, celebrities, or even top companies often puts them into the spotlight, attracting attention and generating increased traffic, hence, more income.

I get the idea that this is because of Mark Zuckerberg and Elon Musk's potential fight.

Lol. Are you sure this isn't just AI playing tricks on you, like it is to so many every day on social media?

I've first read the billionaire and celebrity and those two were the first people that have came to my mind since they've made noise about their possible bout.

Or, maybe Elon started this because he can't live without clout, and Zuckerberg is a very easy target.

Possible, he's always wanting attention despite that he's already got it for owning several known companies.

Though, zuckerberg will never go into this, the idea is infantile and stupid..while Zuckerberg is a twat, a violator of our rights and a negative influence on the evolution of society to date, I doubt highly he is stupid enough to enter himself into a publicity fight.

From what I've read, he's trained physically and that's why he's obliging to make this bout happen. But you're right, this fight has something to do more than what we're thinking as public stunt.

[uneng]

My question arises as to whether you think some or most of these conflicts are genuine or intentionally crafted/orchestrated by the parties involved to maintain their prominence and financial gains.
Also, could this be considered as a strategic element of their business or career strategy? And If so, is this a good strategy?

These aren't real conflicts, it's all about marketing. The fights are intentionally orchestrated picking two popular celebrities or a professional fighter and a celebrity to generate most engagement as possible from the public on social medias. So there is a large amount of material to be explored by different professionals of the digital industry, such as youtubers, articles' writers, gamblers tipsters and media in general, besides moving huge sums of money through sponsorship by famous brands which want their products and services being advertised on these events. It's a totally efficient strategy, because people always want to see new modalities on fighting industry.

[Oasisman]

Public beef or fights involving billionaires, celebrities, or even top companies often puts them into the spotlight, attracting attention and generating increased traffic, hence, more income. My question arises as to whether you think some or most of these conflicts are genuine or intentionally crafted/orchestrated by the parties involved to maintain their prominence and financial gains.
Also, could this be considered as a strategic element of their business or career strategy? And If so, is this a good strategy?

Whatever the purpose behind it, I'm pretty sure it's for financial gains it may be indirectly, but would eventually end there. This has been used by several social media influencers. They create their own scripted beef and conflict to attract more viewers and subscribers of course to maximize the monetization on their account. No matter who the bad guy is since bad publicity is still a publicity and haters will add value to your views.
If we are referring this to Zuckerberg and Musk, these two guys doesn't need social media monetization majority of the YouTubers does, but they definitely are up into something that will need to maintain their names on every social media and news outlet.

[hatshepsut93]

I doubt that the fights between celebs are staged, and I doubt that they are highly beneficial to their business. But it's just a way to keep themselves popular, those people are very vain and get sad when their social media stats go down, so they behave eccentrically to keep being relevant.

As to why this wasn't happening in 20th century - people back then were more restrained, and the mass culture was happening on radio, television and newspapers, while today everyone has their own platform for interacting with their fans through social media.

[odunybiz]

Public beef or fights involving billionaires, celebrities, or even top companies often puts them into the spotlight, attracting attention and generating increased traffic, hence, more income. My question arises as to whether you think some or most of these conflicts are genuine or intentionally crafted/orchestrated by the parties involved to maintain their prominence and financial gains.
Also, could this be considered as a strategic element of their business or career strategy? And If so, is this a good strategy?

I can say most of this fight are  gimmick to increase their financial status. I could remember here when two Fuji musicians were fighting then. Both sings to abuse each other and people keep buying. It's even part of the album that sell most for the two parties.

[LogitechMouse]

Public beef or fights involving billionaires, celebrities, or even top companies often puts them into the spotlight, attracting attention and generating increased traffic, hence, more income. My question arises as to whether you think some or most of these conflicts are genuine or intentionally crafted/orchestrated by the parties involved to maintain their prominence and financial gains.
Also, could this be considered as a strategic element of their business or career strategy? And If so, is this a good strategy?

Inspired by Elon "Mars" Musk, and Mark "Meta" Zuckerberg, eh? That's why you created this thread.

As for their conflicts, I don't see any deep reason as to why they need to fight physically. Obviously, this is just for clout, and popularity. They just wanted to advertise their product which is Twitter, and Meta. I don't know if there's any reason why these 2 billionaires will fight in the ring, and TBH when I saw that they will really fight with each other, I was shocked, but at the same time laughing because this is the first time I'll be seeing 2 billionaire fighting with each other. I wonder who will be the next? Jeff Bezos? Warren Buffet might be a judge as well, or even Jamie Dimon. Kidding aside, this fight is just like what Jake Paul, and Floyd Mayweather are doing. It's just for the promotion, and nothing else.

Career strategy? Yes I guess this is a career strategy for them, but for unknown reasons, I don't know why they want to have more popularity thru fighting. I mean they can just debate with each other. That would've been better I think. As for this as a good strategy. Just think about this. Either it's good publicity, or a bad publicity, it's still publicity, and that results to more money, and more popularity.

[noorman0]

Whether it's pure feud or fabrication, I shouldn't care about it all.

I'm not really interested in the entertainment space, it's just that I caught some interesting patterns when 2 public figures get into a fight or other scandal where news websites start covering with sometimes exaggerated narratives to extend the duration of the conflict. At least it can be read clearly that it's a kind of attempt to exploit the public spotlight to get a favorable traffic rating for ad revenue on the site.

If that is a strategy, then yes it is the best strategy considering the typical internet users in my country.

[blue Snow]

Public beef or fights involving billionaires, celebrities, or even top companies often puts them into the spotlight, attracting attention and generating increased traffic, hence, more income. My question arises as to whether you think some or most of these conflicts are genuine or intentionally crafted/orchestrated by the parties involved to maintain their prominence and financial gains.
Also, could this be considered as a strategic element of their business or career strategy? And If so, is this a good strategy?

It seems so, Like Elon and Mark, they create drama to popularize themselves to the public. I'm not surprised about it because I often find things like this in my country. They attract media interest to publise them by free, because they know people will curious and interesting to find what happen with them. after fame, and people curious to know what product behind them, there is no fighting in the arena, they will greet and forgive each other. They play this strategy is equally like collaboration work and join venture marketing.

[bettercrypto]

Public beef or fights involving billionaires, celebrities, or even top companies often puts them into the spotlight, attracting attention and generating increased traffic, hence, more income. My question arises as to whether you think some or most of these conflicts are genuine or intentionally crafted/orchestrated by the parties involved to maintain their prominence and financial gains.
Also, could this be considered as a strategic element of their business or career strategy? And If so, is this a good strategy?

Is this related to what I read the other day in an image battle between Mark Z. and Elon Musk? It's like here he relates to what you're saying, am I right?

Maybe, maybe it's just a strategy to get the attention of the majority of people and in fairness they did effectively to get the attention of millions of people around the world in fact, and they did it because of the influence and popularity they have .

[komisariatku]

Public beef or fights involving billionaires, celebrities, or even top companies often puts them into the spotlight, attracting attention and generating increased traffic, hence, more income. My question arises as to whether you think some or most of these conflicts are genuine or intentionally crafted/orchestrated by the parties involved to maintain their prominence and financial gains.
Also, could this be considered as a strategic element of their business or career strategy? And If so, is this a good strategy?

Not all conflicts are caused by problems, some of them are planned, and that's how opinion works. Especially if they fight on social media, I think it's more to increase prestige and later impact on each other's business. So don't think about it too much, because the more we highlight them on social media, the happier they will be because that's the goal.

Currently, there are many influencers who increase prestige on social media by creating conflicts. It's not healthy, but it works for the most part. I have been off social media for over 2 years, social media is a lie in life and full of hypocrisy

[Kakmakr]

It all depends...

I doubt that either Zuckerberg or Elon Musk needs more exposure, because they are already very prominent business people. On the other hand you have Youtubers and Streamers that wants to stay relevant and they will fight in these exhibition fights to get maximum exposure for their social media presence. 

I think these fights are orchestrated and planned and not worth my time and money to bet on. I watch the fights, but I will not pay to watch the fights.. if you understand what I am saying. 

[ancafe]

My question arises as to whether you think some or most of these conflicts are genuine or intentionally crafted/orchestrated by the parties involved to maintain their prominence and financial gains.

Unfortunately, we are presented with news of conflicts between one person and another that have an impact on the public, most cases like this happen to artists and they often have scenarios to make their fame come back after their fame has faded due to the emergence of many new artists. What's worse, there are people who dare to get involved in dealing with personal matters that don't need to be disclosed to the public, but because they want their names to be discussed again, they will do whatever they can even though it's private. Ironically, the world of artists has lost its identity, ethics and no longer provides moral education to the next generation.

Also, could this be considered as a strategic element of their business or career strategy? And If so, is this a good strategy?

In the world of entertainment, they don't talk about good and good things, but about how to achieve something they want. It can be said that it was one of the strategies they implemented to make their career go up again, good and bad clearly cannot be modeled in real life.