Food security in the world has been shaken by Russia's actions

[Ozero]

Apparently you do not understand the meaning of the word "blockade", but I will explain it to you now. The blockade means Russia is blocking shipping through Ukrainian ports in the Black Sea. Ports in the Danube are not under blockade, navigation through them by any ships flying the flags of third countries can be carried out without hindrance. However, Russia reserves the right to strike dual-use port infrastructure because it has good reason to believe that it is being used to transport weapons to Ukraine. With these strikes, Russia contributes to the speedy end of the conflict, albeit not in the way that Ukraine likes.

This means that Russia reserves the right to strike at the dual-use port infrastructure, since it has only some reason to believe that the port infrastructure is being used to transport weapons to Ukraine. Don't you regard such attacks on the port infrastructure as terrorist acts? I'm not even talking about delivering strikes with "calibers", that is, high-precision weapons, on residential buildings, as it happened the other day in Krivoy Rog, where the entrance from the fourth to the ninth floors was destroyed by "calibers".

Then why does Russia call the strikes on the Kerch bridge a terrorist attack, if the occupiers constantly transport heavy military equipment to the southern front in Ukraine through it?

[Argoo]

war always bring negative impact to the world, I hope ukranian citizens safe and have enough food. as far as I know Ukrania was known as big producer of wheat which produce 433 million ton during 2000-2020. it is not small amount, my country recieve indirect impact of this war although it is not so big impact but it will be better if the world is in peace and keep developing. Although my staple food is rice but sometime I eat wheat derivative product. that war is not influence my country too much but I hope the war will be over soon and no more people die. I don't really care about Russia and Ukrania Government or why this happen, both side must have their own reason and it's too complicated for me to understand. my only concern was the citizens, please keep the citizen safe.

How can civilians in Ukraine be safe if Russia has been shelling the entire territory of Ukraine every day with all types of weapons for almost a year and a half? In the last year alone, Russia has fired over 5,000 cruise missiles into Ukraine. Many cities and other settlements of Ukraine, together with civilians, have actually been turned into ruins.

Despite heavy losses in manpower and equipment, the Putin regime is not going to stop attacking Ukraine and does not give up its intention to seize it. Therefore, the war can continue for a long time if events do not occur in Russia itself that will change these aggressive plans.

[be.open]

Apparently you do not understand the meaning of the word "blockade", but I will explain it to you now. The blockade means Russia is blocking shipping through Ukrainian ports in the Black Sea. Ports in the Danube are not under blockade, navigation through them by any ships flying the flags of third countries can be carried out without hindrance. However, Russia reserves the right to strike dual-use port infrastructure because it has good reason to believe that it is being used to transport weapons to Ukraine. With these strikes, Russia contributes to the speedy end of the conflict, albeit not in the way that Ukraine likes.

This means that Russia reserves the right to strike at the dual-use port infrastructure, since it has only some reason to believe that the port infrastructure is being used to transport weapons to Ukraine. Don't you regard such attacks on the port infrastructure as terrorist acts? I'm not even talking about delivering strikes with "calibers", that is, high-precision weapons, on residential buildings, as it happened the other day in Krivoy Rog, where the entrance from the fourth to the ninth floors was destroyed by "calibers".

Then why does Russia call the strikes on the Kerch bridge a terrorist attack, if the occupiers constantly transport heavy military equipment to the southern front in Ukraine through it?

Because the Crimean bridge consists of two branches - automobile and railway. The railway branch is dual-purpose, and the automobile is civil. The railway line of the Crimean bridge is a legitimate military target for Ukraine, and the attack on the road line is a terrorist act. And do not pretend that you are too stupid not to understand the difference yourself.

[Wong Gendheng]

As we know Russia is a large country that produces a lot of food products, and when there is a war, of course Russia will do everything possible to secure food stocks, and this makes a big impact on many countries that depend on the supply of food ingredients from Russia.

[pooya87]

You can keep your sarcasm to yourself. Although you probably already have a stomach ulcer from this level of sarcasm, but I don’t need it.

That's not sarcasm, that's the effects of being severely brainwashed. One of the side effects of it is seeing the world in complete black or white with nothing in between.
This is why over a year ago when Russia was cut from SWIFT these people claimed it is the "end of Russia", they even set a deadline of a couple of weeks and stuff like that. And whenever other people disagreed with their extreme views they could only interpret them as meaning the other end of the spectrum (as in "everything is fine without a single problem") because as I said they have lost the ability to think or see anything between totally black and totally white.

[Ozero]

Apparently you do not understand the meaning of the word "blockade", but I will explain it to you now. The blockade means Russia is blocking shipping through Ukrainian ports in the Black Sea. Ports in the Danube are not under blockade, navigation through them by any ships flying the flags of third countries can be carried out without hindrance. However, Russia reserves the right to strike dual-use port infrastructure because it has good reason to believe that it is being used to transport weapons to Ukraine. With these strikes, Russia contributes to the speedy end of the conflict, albeit not in the way that Ukraine likes.

This means that Russia reserves the right to strike at the dual-use port infrastructure, since it has only some reason to believe that the port infrastructure is being used to transport weapons to Ukraine. Don't you regard such attacks on the port infrastructure as terrorist acts? I'm not even talking about delivering strikes with "calibers", that is, high-precision weapons, on residential buildings, as it happened the other day in Krivoy Rog, where the entrance from the fourth to the ninth floors was destroyed by "calibers".

Then why does Russia call the strikes on the Kerch bridge a terrorist attack, if the occupiers constantly transport heavy military equipment to the southern front in Ukraine through it?

Because the Crimean bridge consists of two branches - automobile and railway. The railway branch is dual-purpose, and the automobile is civil. The railway line of the Crimean bridge is a legitimate military target for Ukraine, and the attack on the road line is a terrorist act. And do not pretend that you are too stupid not to understand the difference yourself.

Did you yourself come up with the fact that Russia does not use the road branch of the Crimean bridge for the transfer of military equipment in order to use it in the war against Ukraine? Then I am the first to give a link to a site with a video of how tractors on platforms transport caterpillar military equipment along the automobile branch of the Crimean Bridge. As can be seen from the text of this link, it was published online on December 8 by one of the builders of the bridge, who recorded the movement of several pieces of equipment from the height of the railway line. On the video, you can replace the column of tractors with tanks that are moving to the Crimea along the bridge. The video shows a wide panorama of the Crimean bridge, which cannot be confused with any other bridge.

https://sud.ua/ru/news/obshchestvo/130280-rossiya-perebrasyvaet-tanki-v-okkupirovannyy-krym-cherez-kerchenskiy-most

https://flot2017.com/okkupanty-perebrasyvajut-cherez-krymskij-most-tehniku-foto/

https://24tv.ua/ru/na-krymskom-mostu-fiksirujut-kolonny-vrazheskoj-tehniki-smi_n2150756

https://www.rbc.ua/ukr/news/rosiyski-viyskovi-perekidayut-tehniku-timchasovo-1666009462.html

https://www.unian.net/war/rossiya-aktivno-perebrasyvaet-voennuyu-tehniku-iz-kryma-foto-12055437.html

[khiholangkang]

Food security in the world has been shaken by Russia's actions

This ongoing conflict between Ukraine and Russia has had profound impact on human lives worldwide and its ripple effects are of global concerns. One of the significant consequence is logistic issue, resulting in food and gas shortage not only in war zone but all over the world as Ukraine and Russia are major suppliers of food items and petroleum products.The severity of this situation can potentially trigger severe economic meltdown globally that concerns all of us..

In the light of these grave circumstances, it is imperative for world community to take decisive actions and make vigorous efforts to facilitate a  peaceful resolution to this conflict.

To be honest at the beginning of the problem can be resolved easily, enough Ukraine did not join NATO the problem might not be this far, and Vladimir Zelensky still forced his decision to join NATO who made Putin angry with him, if even Ukraine wanted to join NATO it could be in In another way that is better in the future, or not the Putin regime can be fired first, it allows a safe path not to rush to enter NATO.
As far as the people of the world, have held a demonstration, blocking and others have been done, but that has not been unhemored at all, how the firmness of the world is also very difficult to control Russia, even though the United Nations class that says that.

This peace seems to be done if one of the two relents, but it is impossible for Russia to do it, what is more likely is Ukraine who claims to lose here.
What is done today by Russia to attack in a "need" may be motivated in this case to further pressure Ukraine, but if other countries are affected, I think Russia will get more pressure from other countries in this case, this is like block international trade.

[fruktik]

Did you yourself come up with the fact that Russia does not use the road branch of the Crimean bridge for the transfer of military equipment in order to use it in the war against Ukraine? Then I am the first to give a link to a site with a video of how tractors on platforms transport caterpillar military equipment along the automobile branch of the Crimean Bridge. As can be seen from the text of this link, it was published online on December 8 by one of the builders of the bridge, who recorded the movement of several pieces of equipment from the height of the railway line. On the video, you can replace the column of tractors with tanks that are moving to the Crimea along the bridge. The video shows a wide panorama of the Crimean bridge, which cannot be confused with any other bridge.

https://sud.ua/ru/news/obshchestvo/130280-rossiya-perebrasyvaet-tanki-v-okkupirovannyy-krym-cherez-kerchenskiy-most

https://flot2017.com/okkupanty-perebrasyvajut-cherez-krymskij-most-tehniku-foto/

https://24tv.ua/ru/na-krymskom-mostu-fiksirujut-kolonny-vrazheskoj-tehniki-smi_n2150756

https://www.rbc.ua/ukr/news/rosiyski-viyskovi-perekidayut-tehniku-timchasovo-1666009462.html

https://www.unian.net/war/rossiya-aktivno-perebrasyvaet-voennuyu-tehniku-iz-kryma-foto-12055437.html

       Why then build this bridge, if not used for the delivery of military equipment? Something tells me that this was invented long before the military conflict. It is for this reason that they began to build it. People are always thought of last.
        Yes, the bridge plays an important role, but not decisive. There are workarounds for delivering everything "necessary", but much more dangerous ways than this. I could, of course, be wrong about this.

[be.open]

Apparently you do not understand the meaning of the word "blockade", but I will explain it to you now. The blockade means Russia is blocking shipping through Ukrainian ports in the Black Sea. Ports in the Danube are not under blockade, navigation through them by any ships flying the flags of third countries can be carried out without hindrance. However, Russia reserves the right to strike dual-use port infrastructure because it has good reason to believe that it is being used to transport weapons to Ukraine. With these strikes, Russia contributes to the speedy end of the conflict, albeit not in the way that Ukraine likes.

This means that Russia reserves the right to strike at the dual-use port infrastructure, since it has only some reason to believe that the port infrastructure is being used to transport weapons to Ukraine. Don't you regard such attacks on the port infrastructure as terrorist acts? I'm not even talking about delivering strikes with "calibers", that is, high-precision weapons, on residential buildings, as it happened the other day in Krivoy Rog, where the entrance from the fourth to the ninth floors was destroyed by "calibers".

Then why does Russia call the strikes on the Kerch bridge a terrorist attack, if the occupiers constantly transport heavy military equipment to the southern front in Ukraine through it?

Because the Crimean bridge consists of two branches - automobile and railway. The railway branch is dual-purpose, and the automobile is civil. The railway line of the Crimean bridge is a legitimate military target for Ukraine, and the attack on the road line is a terrorist act. And do not pretend that you are too stupid not to understand the difference yourself.

Did you yourself come up with the fact that Russia does not use the road branch of the Crimean bridge for the transfer of military equipment in order to use it in the war against Ukraine? Then I am the first to give a link to a site with a video of how tractors on platforms transport caterpillar military equipment along the automobile branch of the Crimean Bridge. As can be seen from the text of this link, it was published online on December 8 by one of the builders of the bridge, who recorded the movement of several pieces of equipment from the height of the railway line. On the video, you can replace the column of tractors with tanks that are moving to the Crimea along the bridge. The video shows a wide panorama of the Crimean bridge, which cannot be confused with any other bridge.

https://sud.ua/ru/news/obshchestvo/130280-rossiya-perebrasyvaet-tanki-v-okkupirovannyy-krym-cherez-kerchenskiy-most

https://flot2017.com/okkupanty-perebrasyvajut-cherez-krymskij-most-tehniku-foto/

https://24tv.ua/ru/na-krymskom-mostu-fiksirujut-kolonny-vrazheskoj-tehniki-smi_n2150756

https://www.rbc.ua/ukr/news/rosiyski-viyskovi-perekidayut-tehniku-timchasovo-1666009462.html

https://www.unian.net/war/rossiya-aktivno-perebrasyvaet-voennuyu-tehniku-iz-kryma-foto-12055437.html

Yep, December 8, 2018.

You indicated the date, but why didn’t you say anything about the year? Because that year there was no special operation yet, and even probably the railway line of the Crimean bridge. The rest of the links are all the same crooked handwriting of Ukrainian propaganda. It is foolish to transport military equipment over a road bridge, which can hardly cope with the flow of civilian traffic when there is a separate railway line nearby.

[Ozero]

Yep, December 8, 2018.

You indicated the date, but why didn’t you say anything about the year? Because that year there was no special operation yet, and even probably the railway line of the Crimean bridge. The rest of the links are all the same crooked handwriting of Ukrainian propaganda. It is foolish to transport military equipment over a road bridge, which can hardly cope with the flow of civilian traffic when there is a separate railway line nearby.

In the text of the article for the video, only the day and month were indicated, which is why I referred to them to be accurate. A date without a year is usually applied when the event corresponds to the latest possible year in time, i.e. in this case it would correspond to 2022. But this is not essential, because we are talking about the transfer of Russian military equipment by the automobile branch of the Crimean bridge in general. It doesn't even matter here whether it was before the full-scale Russian invasion in February 2022 or later.

The fact remains that both the railway and the road are used by Russia to transfer military equipment to the occupied Ukrainian peninsula of Crimea, which means that this bridge is a legitimate military target for the Armed Forces of Ukraine. In addition, even if Russia did not use the Crimean bridge for military purposes, it was still built illegally, without agreement with Ukraine, which means that Ukraine itself has the right to determine its fate, especially after the de-occupation of Crimea. Therefore, damage or destruction of the bridge cannot be considered a terrorist attack, as Russia presents to the world community.

[be.open]

Yep, December 8, 2018.

You indicated the date, but why didn’t you say anything about the year? Because that year there was no special operation yet, and even probably the railway line of the Crimean bridge. The rest of the links are all the same crooked handwriting of Ukrainian propaganda. It is foolish to transport military equipment over a road bridge, which can hardly cope with the flow of civilian traffic when there is a separate railway line nearby.

In the text of the article for the video, only the day and month were indicated, which is why I referred to them to be accurate. A date without a year is usually applied when the event corresponds to the latest possible year in time, i.e. in this case it would correspond to 2022. But this is not essential, because we are talking about the transfer of Russian military equipment by the automobile branch of the Crimean bridge in general. It doesn't even matter here whether it was before the full-scale Russian invasion in February 2022 or later.

The article itself at your link was published on December 9, 2018. But of course it doesn't matter to you, I already understood that.

The fact remains that both the railway and the road are used by Russia to transfer military equipment to the occupied Ukrainian peninsula of Crimea, which means that this bridge is a legitimate military target for the Armed Forces of Ukraine. In addition, even if Russia did not use the Crimean bridge for military purposes, it was still built illegally, without agreement with Ukraine, which means that Ukraine itself has the right to determine its fate, especially after the de-occupation of Crimea. Therefore, damage or destruction of the bridge cannot be considered a terrorist attack, as Russia presents to the world community.

There is no need for Russia to present anything to the world community, the world community already understands everything very well. Ukraine screwed up with its counteroffensive, has been marking time for two months now and in a couple of places was only able to get closer to the first line of defense. This, even with a big stretch, cannot be sold to the West as a victory, although the West has provided Ukraine with everything necessary for success. Ukraine can successfully fight only against civilians, that is, engage in terror - and the West on the eve of the elections will not support failed terrorists. A diplomatic row is already flaring up between Ukraine and Poland, and there is talk in the West about the possible assassination of Zelensky. And Ukraine itself is preparing a "peace summit" in Saudi Arabia and suddenly became preoccupied with the opinion of the "Global South", although the previous peace summit in Copenhagen completely failed and its participants could not even agree on any joint communiqué.

[DrBeer]

As everyone remembers - after July 17, "formidable Russia" announced to the whole world that it was offended, and withdraws from the grain deal, and now ALL ships entering Ukrainian ports will be considered objects for attack. And Russia will fulfill its promises ....
Russia once again, started pathetic attempts at threats, and expectedly "shit itself"
The other day, 3 grain ships entered Ukrainian ports. Ships of Israel, Greece and Turkey.
The terrorist country was shown that it is nothing and no one is afraid of it, the terrorist country was shown that the Black Sea is not an internal sea of Russia, and its fantasies about the water area of temporarily occupied territories, it can stick in any orifice .

PS Yes, African countries, which came to see the Kremlin clown, refused "gifts from the white dwarf" in the form of free grain

[Ozero]

There is no need for Russia to present anything to the world community, the world community already understands everything very well. Ukraine screwed up with its counteroffensive, has been marking time for two months now and in a couple of places was only able to get closer to the first line of defense. This, even with a big stretch, cannot be sold to the West as a victory, although the West has provided Ukraine with everything necessary for success. Ukraine can successfully fight only against civilians, that is, engage in terror - and the West on the eve of the elections will not support failed terrorists. A diplomatic row is already flaring up between Ukraine and Poland, and there is talk in the West about the possible assassination of Zelensky. And Ukraine itself is preparing a "peace summit" in Saudi Arabia and suddenly became preoccupied with the opinion of the "Global South", although the previous peace summit in Copenhagen completely failed and its participants could not even agree on any joint communiqué.

Yes, the world community is well aware of who is the aggressor and terrorist. And with the counterattack, the Armed Forces of Ukraine are fine. The Russian invaders in the south have set up solid mine and other barriers, and it is unacceptable for Ukraine to clear the territory with the bodies of their soldiers during assaults. Therefore, gradual combat work is being carried out with advancement. At the same time, pinpoint strikes destroy Russian command and concentration points, ammunition depots and military equipment in positions in order to deprive the occupiers of the ability to provide effective resistance. This will take more time than anyone in the West expected. In addition, the Armed Forces of Ukraine do not have an advantage in the air, and with such a balance of power, no one in the West would risk launching a major offensive. This is contrary to their military doctrine.
However, by autumn, the Armed Forces of Ukraine should liberate the south of Ukraine and reach the Sea of Azov and Crimea.

[Joshapat]

Sad to see the sabotage carried out by Russia for food crops and grains, we know that many countries depend on ukraine grains so that will make economic problems more complicated, of course my country will also receive a direct impact because according to the official government report that ukraine is the 8th country who became an exporter to my country.

[be.open]

There is no need for Russia to present anything to the world community, the world community already understands everything very well. Ukraine screwed up with its counteroffensive, has been marking time for two months now and in a couple of places was only able to get closer to the first line of defense. This, even with a big stretch, cannot be sold to the West as a victory, although the West has provided Ukraine with everything necessary for success. Ukraine can successfully fight only against civilians, that is, engage in terror - and the West on the eve of the elections will not support failed terrorists. A diplomatic row is already flaring up between Ukraine and Poland, and there is talk in the West about the possible assassination of Zelensky. And Ukraine itself is preparing a "peace summit" in Saudi Arabia and suddenly became preoccupied with the opinion of the "Global South", although the previous peace summit in Copenhagen completely failed and its participants could not even agree on any joint communiqué.

Yes, the world community is well aware of who is the aggressor and terrorist. And with the counterattack, the Armed Forces of Ukraine are fine. The Russian invaders in the south have set up solid mine and other barriers, and it is unacceptable for Ukraine to clear the territory with the bodies of their soldiers during assaults. Therefore, gradual combat work is being carried out with advancement. At the same time, pinpoint strikes destroy Russian command and concentration points, ammunition depots and military equipment in positions in order to deprive the occupiers of the ability to provide effective resistance. This will take more time than anyone in the West expected. In addition, the Armed Forces of Ukraine do not have an advantage in the air, and with such a balance of power, no one in the West would risk launching a major offensive. This is contrary to their military doctrine.
However, by autumn, the Armed Forces of Ukraine should liberate the south of Ukraine and reach the Sea of Azov and Crimea.

Do you yourself believe in it? It seems that Ukraine has already lost more territory in the Kupyansk direction since the start of the counteroffensive than it has acquired in Zaporozhye. At this pace, by autumn, instead of fantasies of access to the Sea of Azov, Ukraine may face a much harsher reality.

[Ozero]

Ahaha, I recognize the crooked handwriting of Ukrainian propaganda. There is no and never was any blockade for the Danube, transport grain by land and along the Danube as much as you like, the blockade is only for transportation along the Black Sea. The problem with transportation along the Danube is not in the blockade by Russia, but in its depth, which is insufficient for large bulk carriers. In small river barges - as much as you like, you can even transport grain by plane

On the night of August 2, Russia launched several dozen "Shaheds" with which they attacked both the port infrastructure of Ukraine and the capital. The air forces of the Armed Forces of Ukraine managed to destroy 23 strike UAVs overnight. Including Izmail, the most important port of the Danube navigation, was attacked. The blows fell on the "Sea Port", an elevator, grain hangars. As a result of the attack, the invaders damaged almost 40 thousand tons of grain, which was supposed to go to African countries, China and Israel. The probable reason for the attack on Izmail was that the day before yesterday several ships, including Israeli, Greek and Turkish ships, decided to ignore the Russian naval blockade and the threats of the Russians, and continued to move to the ports of Ukraine in the Danube mouth, in particular to Izmail. In addition to port infrastructure and granaries, the terrorist country is attacking Ukrainian fields where the harvest takes place, in particular, the Nikolaev and Kherson regions.

Thus, Russia has once again committed a terrorist attack, and also continues to do everything to ensure that those countries that are sorely lacking in food suffer from hunger.

Due to blows Russian, wheat prices in Chicago jumped 6.5%. Traders are again concerned about what is happening in Ukraine. Ukrainian farmers are already feeling how the strikes of the Russian Armed Forces affect the global food market.

Sources :
https://24tv.ua/ru/ataka-dronami-rossija-atakovala-portovuju-infrastrukturu-izmaile_n2364347

https://focus.ua/economics/583056-sereznyy-ushcherb-iz-za-ataki-vs-rf-na-izmail-ceny-na-prodovolstvie-v-mire-vyrosli-smi

[serveria.com]

Ahaha, I recognize the crooked handwriting of Ukrainian propaganda. There is no and never was any blockade for the Danube, transport grain by land and along the Danube as much as you like, the blockade is only for transportation along the Black Sea. The problem with transportation along the Danube is not in the blockade by Russia, but in its depth, which is insufficient for large bulk carriers. In small river barges - as much as you like, you can even transport grain by plane

On the night of August 2, Russia launched several dozen "Shaheds" with which they attacked both the port infrastructure of Ukraine and the capital. The air forces of the Armed Forces of Ukraine managed to destroy 23 strike UAVs overnight. Including Izmail, the most important port of the Danube navigation, was attacked. The blows fell on the "Sea Port", an elevator, grain hangars. As a result of the attack, the invaders damaged almost 40 thousand tons of grain, which was supposed to go to African countries, China and Israel. The probable reason for the attack on Izmail was that the day before yesterday several ships, including Israeli, Greek and Turkish ships, decided to ignore the Russian naval blockade and the threats of the Russians, and continued to move to the ports of Ukraine in the Danube mouth, in particular to Izmail. In addition to port infrastructure and granaries, the terrorist country is attacking Ukrainian fields where the harvest takes place, in particular, the Nikolaev and Kherson regions.

Thus, Russia has once again committed a terrorist attack, and also continues to do everything to ensure that those countries that are sorely lacking in food suffer from hunger.

Due to blows Russian, wheat prices in Chicago jumped 6.5%. Traders are again concerned about what is happening in Ukraine. Ukrainian farmers are already feeling how the strikes of the Russian Armed Forces affect the global food market.

Sources :
https://24tv.ua/ru/ataka-dronami-rossija-atakovala-portovuju-infrastrukturu-izmaile_n2364347

https://focus.ua/economics/583056-sereznyy-ushcherb-iz-za-ataki-vs-rf-na-izmail-ceny-na-prodovolstvie-v-mire-vyrosli-smi

Using the same logic you used regarding the Crimea bridge attack - sea ports are "military infrastructure" and "legitimate target" for Russia.  

Btw, these were probably just another "legitimate targets" right?  

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-65683374

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-66368016

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/jul/30/moscow-buildings-damaged-in-overnight-drone-attacks-that-russia-blames-on-kyiv

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/07/31/world/europe/ukraine-drone-strikes-russia.html

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2022/5/12/ukraine-accused-of-deadly-cross-border-attack-on-russian-village  

[DrBeer]

Ahaha, I recognize the crooked handwriting of Ukrainian propaganda. There is no and never was any blockade for the Danube, transport grain by land and along the Danube as much as you like, the blockade is only for transportation along the Black Sea. The problem with transportation along the Danube is not in the blockade by Russia, but in its depth, which is insufficient for large bulk carriers. In small river barges - as much as you like, you can even transport grain by plane

On the night of August 2, Russia launched several dozen "Shaheds" with which they attacked both the port infrastructure of Ukraine and the capital. The air forces of the Armed Forces of Ukraine managed to destroy 23 strike UAVs overnight. Including Izmail, the most important port of the Danube navigation, was attacked. The blows fell on the "Sea Port", an elevator, grain hangars. As a result of the attack, the invaders damaged almost 40 thousand tons of grain, which was supposed to go to African countries, China and Israel. The probable reason for the attack on Izmail was that the day before yesterday several ships, including Israeli, Greek and Turkish ships, decided to ignore the Russian naval blockade and the threats of the Russians, and continued to move to the ports of Ukraine in the Danube mouth, in particular to Izmail. In addition to port infrastructure and granaries, the terrorist country is attacking Ukrainian fields where the harvest takes place, in particular, the Nikolaev and Kherson regions.

Thus, Russia has once again committed a terrorist attack, and also continues to do everything to ensure that those countries that are sorely lacking in food suffer from hunger.

Due to blows Russian, wheat prices in Chicago jumped 6.5%. Traders are again concerned about what is happening in Ukraine. Ukrainian farmers are already feeling how the strikes of the Russian Armed Forces affect the global food market.

Sources :
https://24tv.ua/ru/ataka-dronami-rossija-atakovala-portovuju-infrastrukturu-izmaile_n2364347

https://focus.ua/economics/583056-sereznyy-ushcherb-iz-za-ataki-vs-rf-na-izmail-ceny-na-prodovolstvie-v-mire-vyrosli-smi

Using the same logic you used regarding the Crimea bridge attack - sea ports are "military infrastructure" and "legitimate target" for Russia.  

Btw, these were probably just another "legitimate targets" right?  

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-65683374

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-66368016

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/jul/30/moscow-buildings-damaged-in-overnight-drone-attacks-that-russia-blames-on-kyiv

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/07/31/world/europe/ukraine-drone-strikes-russia.html

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2022/5/12/ukraine-accused-of-deadly-cross-border-attack-on-russian-village  

From a terrorist's point of view - fighting terrorism, it's illegal

But the reality is this:
1. The Crimean Bridge is a structure built illegally, without the approval of the country on the part of whose territory the construction was carried out.
This object is used for supplying weapons and holding occupied territories, in violation of international treaties.
This territory is temporarily occupied by a strange international terrorist (its head is wanted by the International Tribunal in The Hague).
2. Ukraine is a country subjected to aggression and attack by Russia. Ukraine has the right to defend itself and destroy any facilities used to support aggression against a sovereign state. This is outlined in the international legal framework. Ukraine has never violated any of its commitments, unlike an international terrorist country.

So the mantras of the Kremlin's handmaidens of propagandists, of course, "warm the soul" to some, but for all will have to pay and be punished !

[be.open]

From a terrorist's point of view - fighting terrorism, it's illegal

But the reality is this:
1. The Crimean Bridge is a structure built illegally, without the approval of the country on the part of whose territory the construction was carried out.
This object is used for supplying weapons and holding occupied territories, in violation of international treaties.
This territory is temporarily occupied by a strange international terrorist (its head is wanted by the International Tribunal in The Hague).
2. Ukraine is a country subjected to aggression and attack by Russia. Ukraine has the right to defend itself and destroy any facilities used to support aggression against a sovereign state. This is outlined in the international legal framework. Ukraine has never violated any of its commitments, unlike an international terrorist country.

So the mantras of the Kremlin's handmaidens of propagandists, of course, "warm the soul" to some, but for all will have to pay and be punished !

Your wet fantasies are very preachy, but the reality is that European and American taxpayers have to pay for everything right now. Ukrainian Prime Minister Shmyhal recently stated that Ukraine's spending on combat operations exceeds the revenue side of Ukraine's budget. And in order to present an account to Russia, you will first have to inflict a military defeat on it, and Ukraine has some difficulties with this. And it seems that these difficulties are quite significant.

Meanwhile, the head of European democracy, Borrell, is indignant - they say Russia is treacherously offering grain at reduced prices to needy countries so that they become dependent on the vile totalitarian regime. How long can this be tolerated?

[Ozero]

Using the same logic you used regarding the Crimea bridge attack - sea ports are "military infrastructure" and "legitimate target" for Russia.  

You are missing a very important and essential detail. It is Russia that attacked Ukraine and is a military aggressor. Therefore, in Russia there is no legal right to attack any territory of Ukraine. But in Ukraine, according to the UN Charter, there is a legal right to defend itself, which it does by striking back, including on the territory of Russia.
Ukraine has already documented over 232,000 war crimes committed against it by Russian invaders. Sooner or later, but the terrorist camp will still have to pay for it.