do anyone have done this? with gambling platforms

[khaled0111]

^^
Guys, you need to understand that casinos will not ask you to pass kyc only when you try to withdraw a huge amount. Many of them randomly pick some gamblers on a regular basis and ask them to submit their documents (Random cross checking), just like that without any reason.
So, if you think you are safe just because you withdraw small amounts, think again.
Besides, what are you going to do if you get lucky and hit the jackpot? You will tell them: thank you, I don't want it!

[1715680777]

1715680777

[1715680777]

1715680777

[slapper]

Unbeknownst to many, this topic leans more towards the realm of KYC requisites for facilitating substantial fund withdrawals. In my view, this tilts the scales unfairly, although equity would prevail if the casino assures that winnings can be withdrawn seamlessly. It remains paramount to consistently opt for services from reputable gambling platforms to avert falling prey to deceitful schemes.

In instances of platform malfeasance, we possess the avenue to initiate discussions or broadcast our experiences across social media platforms, effectively casting a ripple effect upon the concerned casino.

My personal experience has yet to yield substantial victories from modest wagers. Should such an occurrence transpire, I'd willingly undergo the KYC protocol when prompted, all in the pursuit of claiming my rightful winnings.

Heavy words my brother. But in simple terms, just comply with the KYC requirements as much as you can. Because if you don't, regardless if your withdrawal is small or big amount, you might still get a problem getting it out.

Kyc is to protect both the user, player, and the gambling conpany. The account is much sexure and the company knows who plays for them.

Honestly, I find it funny that you think it will work. Look, KYC is as much about "protecting the player" as it is about "covering the company's backside." Now, don't get me wrong. Everyone should follow the rules. Not doing so would be a rookie mistake. But,  it's not nearly as secure as you're making it sound

Yes, in the strange game of internet gambling, KYC can make it seem like things are safer than they really are. Still, even though we're playing with words, know that nothing in gambling is ever really safe. Still, if giving your information will give you peace of mind, dance that dance. Just keep in mind that even if a door has two locks, it can still be broken into. So, KYC might be "necessary trash," but don't trick yourself into thinking it's the answer to all your gaming problems

[Aanuoluwatofunmi]

^^
Guys, you need to understand that casinos will not ask you to pass kyc only when you try to withdraw a huge amount. Many of them randomly pick some gamblers on a regular basis and ask them to submit their documents (Random cross checking), just like that without any reason.

A gambler can be subjected to passing through kyc when he's being suspected of engaging in unacceptable acts on the gambling platform he's using, in other for them to clarify their doubts, they subject him to some certain level of kyc to know his true identity, also when a casino is the type that accepts kyc as their requirements for using their platform, they will either ask right at the point of registration or later place demand on it, if we also make a huge win with them, they may subject another level of kyc to the gambler as part of their protocols.

[8rch7]

^^
Guys, you need to understand that casinos will not ask you to pass kyc only when you try to withdraw a huge amount. Many of them randomly pick some gamblers on a regular basis and ask them to submit their documents (Random cross checking), just like that without any reason.
So, if you think you are safe just because you withdraw small amounts, think again.
Besides, what are you going to do if you get lucky and hit the jackpot? You will tell them: thank you, I don't want it!

Depend with gambling platform target with their user, when getting abnormal activities like huge amount withdrawing and if got jackpot in short time that user will be target for passing KYC. Actually is randomly targeted with user have to pass KYC but become general if gambling user withdrawing huge amount in gambling platform. Usually with small deposit fund and immediately got max win and that user without waiting for long time withdraw all amount from max win.

Its make gambling platform detected as abnormal activities and less wager before freezing account for passing KYC if want available for withdrawing. For protecting KYC problem when withdrawing fund, its not bad ideas pass all KYC and uploaded document required when withdrawing not face problem yet.

[Westinhome]

^^
Guys, you need to understand that casinos will not ask you to pass kyc only when you try to withdraw a huge amount. Many of them randomly pick some gamblers on a regular basis and ask them to submit their documents (Random cross checking), just like that without any reason.
So, if you think you are safe just because you withdraw small amounts, think again.
Besides, what are you going to do if you get lucky and hit the jackpot? You will tell them: thank you, I don't want it!

Some gamblers thought the gambling sites ask the kyc only for the withdrew of big winning or to withdrew the money.But the fact is,they will have a set of rules.In that rule,they may compulsory the kyc verification to use the gambling site in full features.Some gambling site as to verify kyc for the big money alone.For those gambling,you can withdrew the money with some minor parts.Then you no need to submit any kyc to the gambling site.This is better way of withdrew without kyc,only you need some time to withdraw.You no need to worry about kyc in this process of multiple withdrawal of less money.

[EarnOnVictor]

Unbeknownst to many, this topic leans more towards the realm of KYC requisites for facilitating substantial fund withdrawals. In my view, this tilts the scales unfairly, although equity would prevail if the casino assures that winnings can be withdrawn seamlessly. It remains paramount to consistently opt for services from reputable gambling platforms to avert falling prey to deceitful schemes.

In instances of platform malfeasance, we possess the avenue to initiate discussions or broadcast our experiences across social media platforms, effectively casting a ripple effect upon the concerned casino.

My personal experience has yet to yield substantial victories from modest wagers. Should such an occurrence transpire, I'd willingly undergo the KYC protocol when prompted, all in the pursuit of claiming my rightful winnings.

Heavy words my brother. But in simple terms, just comply with the KYC requirements as much as you can. Because if you don't, regardless if your withdrawal is small or big amount, you might still get a problem getting it out.

Kyc is to protect both the user, player, and the gambling conpany. The account is much sexure and the company knows who plays for them.

Honestly, I find it funny that you think it will work. Look, KYC is as much about "protecting the player" as it is about "covering the company's backside." Now, don't get me wrong. Everyone should follow the rules. Not doing so would be a rookie mistake. But,  it's not nearly as secure as you're making it sound

Yes, in the strange game of internet gambling, KYC can make it seem like things are safer than they really are. Still, even though we're playing with words, know that nothing in gambling is ever really safe. Still, if giving your information will give you peace of mind, dance that dance. Just keep in mind that even if a door has two locks, it can still be broken into. So, KYC might be "necessary trash," but don't trick yourself into thinking it's the answer to all your gaming problems

What I could say is that people are naive about KYC, thinking it's what will give them the security of account or some kind of peculiar rights, but that is not true. I first knew this in trading, for companies to collect your details doesn't mean they will not scam you, and for companies not to collect your details doesn't mean they will scam you. And especially in gambling, I don't see how registration and regulators are currently helping people out when they face issues with their casinos aside from their own pocket, tax, proper recording and all that. As a gambler, you must accept you are doing things at your own risk, KYC should have helped if regulators were truly up and doing, but they are not, and KYC will not make your casino unhackable, so what?

Quite frankly, KYC is another issue on its own in case people don't know, many companies and their employees who have access to such data are using it without our knowledge and permission. That is the true fact. It's such a way to leak our data and privacy in many ways and I have many ugly experiences about that in person. As much as most of the good casinos are forcing it nowadays, we should do it but make sure we do our research before joining any of them.

[Weawant]

Heavy words my brother. But in simple terms, just comply with the KYC requirements as much as you can. Because if you don't, regardless if your withdrawal is small or big amount, you might still get a problem getting it out.

Kyc is to protect both the user, player, and the gambling company. The account is much secure and the company knows who plays for them.

Your gambling account isn't more secure when you pass KYC verification, KYC doesn't protect the gambler but it protects the casino as they have been asked to make all their costumers to verify their information so it'll be easier for the government to track and prevent frauds.

Your KYC mightn't be safe with the casino you just verified in because if they're scammers they can sell your information to other scammers that'll use them for illegal activities in the internet and for the legit casino, their server can be hacked and your details are stolen.

We still have some casino that can be trusted that don't make it compulsory to pass full KYC that'll request you give them all your personal information, you can use this casino for gambling to avoid giving our your private information as the risk are too many like i just said.

[piebeyb]

We still have some casino that can be trusted that don't make it compulsory to pass full KYC that'll request you give them all your personal information, you can use this casino for gambling to avoid giving our your private information as the risk are too many like i just said.

Usually, large casinos only ask you to complete the information data form at Level 1 and don't have to complete it by sending identification documents by increasing KYC at level 2, because these are all casino requirements that must be complied with, even though you don't have to complete KYC at level 2. 2 does not mean that we are free to withdraw money easily because keep in mind that if the casino system detects something strange for example a large deposit or withdrawal, they will check whether it is safe from money laundering.

I think we also know that small gamblers will never have problems with KYC and their withdrawals are all processed safely without having to fill in KYC level 2, with just level 1 you can gamble and make withdrawals easily, when discussing KYC issues it will never end and it is true that many of the big casinos on this forum are trusted and do not require their users to complete KYC.

[danadc]

We still have some casino that can be trusted that don't make it compulsory to pass full KYC that'll request you give them all your personal information, you can use this casino for gambling to avoid giving our your private information as the risk are too many like i just said.

Usually, large casinos only ask you to complete the information data form at Level 1 and don't have to complete it by sending identification documents by increasing KYC at level 2, because these are all casino requirements that must be complied with, even though you don't have to complete KYC at level 2. 2 does not mean that we are free to withdraw money easily because keep in mind that if the casino system detects something strange for example a large deposit or withdrawal, they will check whether it is safe from money laundering.

I think we also know that small gamblers will never have problems with KYC and their withdrawals are all processed safely without having to fill in KYC level 2, with just level 1 you can gamble and make withdrawals easily, when discussing KYC issues it will never end and it is true that many of the big casinos on this forum are trusted and do not require their users to complete KYC.

These are things that don't make any sense to me, because only if I want to make a big deposit in a casino can I do it, why do I trust a casino more than a bank? can't they understand that? I know that when depositing money in any platform, that no longer belongs to us but to the casino, and to remove it, all those KYC processes have to be complied with, but I do not agree , because as you say, what divides the KYC on many levels that is something that will bother any player, and especially those who are more active, so these things do not make sense , Hopefully they will start to Remove that , because KYC is something that not Everyone the players block them , some have Left.

[Westinhome]

These are things that don't make any sense to me, because only if I want to make a big deposit in a casino can I do it, why do I trust a casino more than a bank? can't they understand that? I know that when depositing money in any platform, that no longer belongs to us but to the casino, and to remove it, all those KYC processes have to be complied with, but I do not agree , because as you say, what divides the KYC on many levels that is something that will bother any player, and especially those who are more active, so these things do not make sense , Hopefully they will start to Remove that , because KYC is something that not Everyone the players block them , some have Left.

The bank had their own benefits,if you keep the money in the bank you get some interest for it.If you use the same money in the casino and you had luck at that time.You can multiple the money by the winnings from the casino.But the gamblers should take the responsibility,because their is the possibilities of losing the holding money.If you made the background verification of the bank before making the deposit.Your money is safe like the money in the bank.You can use the same money whenever you need to play the game.Because the money was safe in trusted gambling sites and you no need to spend time for the deposit from the bank account.

[Lanatsa]

Unbeknownst to many, this topic leans more towards the realm of KYC requisites for facilitating substantial fund withdrawals. In my view, this tilts the scales unfairly, although equity would prevail if the casino assures that winnings can be withdrawn seamlessly. It remains paramount to consistently opt for services from reputable gambling platforms to avert falling prey to deceitful schemes.

In instances of platform malfeasance, we possess the avenue to initiate discussions or broadcast our experiences across social media platforms, effectively casting a ripple effect upon the concerned casino.

My personal experience has yet to yield substantial victories from modest wagers. Should such an occurrence transpire, I'd willingly undergo the KYC protocol when prompted, all in the pursuit of claiming my rightful winnings.

Heavy words my brother. But in simple terms, just comply with the KYC requirements as much as you can. Because if you don't, regardless if your withdrawal is small or big amount, you might still get a problem getting it out.

Kyc is to protect both the user, player, and the gambling conpany. The account is much sexure and the company knows who plays for them.

Honestly, I find it funny that you think it will work. Look, KYC is as much about "protecting the player" as it is about "covering the company's backside." Now, don't get me wrong. Everyone should follow the rules. Not doing so would be a rookie mistake. But,  it's not nearly as secure as you're making it sound

Yes, in the strange game of internet gambling, KYC can make it seem like things are safer than they really are. Still, even though we're playing with words, know that nothing in gambling is ever really safe. Still, if giving your information will give you peace of mind, dance that dance. Just keep in mind that even if a door has two locks, it can still be broken into. So, KYC might be "necessary trash," but don't trick yourself into thinking it's the answer to all your gaming problems

What I could say is that people are naive about KYC, thinking it's what will give them the security of account or some kind of peculiar rights, but that is not true. I first knew this in trading, for companies to collect your details doesn't mean they will not scam you, and for companies not to collect your details doesn't mean they will scam you. And especially in gambling, I don't see how registration and regulators are currently helping people out when they face issues with their casinos aside from their own pocket, tax, proper recording and all that. As a gambler, you must accept you are doing things at your own risk, KYC should have helped if regulators were truly up and doing, but they are not, and KYC will not make your casino unhackable, so what?

Quite frankly, KYC is another issue on its own in case people don't know, many companies and their employees who have access to such data are using it without our knowledge and permission. That is the true fact. It's such a way to leak our data and privacy in many ways and I have many ugly experiences about that in person. As much as most of the good casinos are forcing it nowadays, we should do it but make sure we do our research before joining any of them.

The main reason on wh crypto based casinos had become that popular is that because of the anonymity that it gives and there's no sense that you would really be needing to comply some KYC whether its mandated or not depending on the platform that you are playing. Some are still not asking some KYC but on the time that you would be violating some of their terms or regulations then for sure you would really be asked out something but if not then you could continue to play without being asked. There are some which would really be having that withdrawal or deposit threshold and on the time that you do hit up those lines then you are really that obliged on complying on whats been asked.

Its not really that shocking that these platforms would really be asking about this, knowing that these places are centralized then it is really understandable that they are getting in line with government
rules and regulations which would be needing for them to comply and would be apply and be thrown out into its users. There's nothing we can do about it because it would
really be definitely the thing we would be encountering unless if you do go into those DEX casinos which arent that commonly existing or simply there are new or close to none.

[borovichok]

^^
Guys, you need to understand that casinos will not ask you to pass kyc only when you try to withdraw a huge amount. Many of them randomly pick some gamblers on a regular basis and ask them to submit their documents (Random cross checking), just like that without any reason.
So, if you think you are safe just because you withdraw small amounts, think again.
Besides, what are you going to do if you get lucky and hit the jackpot? You will tell them: thank you, I don't want it!

Casino gambling is a thing of choice, we can either embrace it or abandoned it. One thing is being able to gamble, and another is learning the manner in which the entire system works. Of course, if I hit the jackpot, I'll be overjoyed to initiate arrangements for the enormous breakthrough in wagering. Casino is a designated system that is governed by the same people who possess unparalleled comprehension. We must ensure that we are unrestricted operating in compliance with the terms and conditions indicated. Priority is given to timely verification of our casino accounts over all else.

[ethereumhunter]

The main reason on wh crypto based casinos had become that popular is that because of the anonymity that it gives and there's no sense that you would really be needing to comply some KYC whether its mandated or not depending on the platform that you are playing. Some are still not asking some KYC but on the time that you would be violating some of their terms or regulations then for sure you would really be asked out something but if not then you could continue to play without being asked. There are some which would really be having that withdrawal or deposit threshold and on the time that you do hit up those lines then you are really that obliged on complying on whats been asked.

Its not really that shocking that these platforms would really be asking about this, knowing that these places are centralized then it is really understandable that they are getting in line with government
rules and regulations which would be needing for them to comply and would be apply and be thrown out into its users. There's nothing we can do about it because it would
really be definitely the thing we would be encountering unless if you do go into those DEX casinos which arent that commonly existing or simply there are new or close to none.

Because crypto casinos have become popular, the government feels the need to supervise crypto casinos especially with the anonymity offered by crypto casinos, making the government even more aware of illegal activities using these crypto casinos. And finally, the regulator asked crypto casinos to carry out KYC on their members, especially those who want to withdraw large amounts of money. When someone wants to withdraw their money, which is almost past the withdrawal threshold, they must be ready to be asked by the casino to do KYC because that is the casino's regulations. And we, as crypto casino users, must also comply with these regulations, especially those who play gambling using big money.

However, many crypto users still gamble and do not understand that crypto casino platforms have now implemented regulations regarding carrying out KYC for those who want to withdraw large amounts of money. They feel this is inconsistent with the anonymity that crypto casinos provide. And indeed, this is not in line but everything has changed with the regulator's intervention. Crypto users must see this through the exchange, where exchange users must also carry out KYC before using all the exchange facilities. And this has finally been implemented in the casinos, and we can't do anything but obey it. Although crypto casinos still have not implemented it strictly, this will likely happen in the future when regulators require all casinos and businesses to ask their users to do KYC. And that's when there is no longer anonymity for crypto users.

[Blitzboy]

`

Because crypto casinos have become popular, the government feels the need to supervise crypto casinos especially with the anonymity offered by crypto casinos, making the government even more aware of illegal activities using these crypto casinos. And finally, the regulator asked crypto casinos to carry out KYC on their members, especially those who want to withdraw large amounts of money. When someone wants to withdraw their money, which is almost past the withdrawal threshold, they must be ready to be asked by the casino to do KYC because that is the casino's regulations. And we, as crypto casino users, must also comply with these regulations, especially those who play gambling using big money.

However, many crypto users still gamble and do not understand that crypto casino platforms have now implemented regulations regarding carrying out KYC for those who want to withdraw large amounts of money. They feel this is inconsistent with the anonymity that crypto casinos provide. And indeed, this is not in line but everything has changed with the regulator's intervention. Crypto users must see this through the exchange, where exchange users must also carry out KYC before using all the exchange facilities. And this has finally been implemented in the casinos, and we can't do anything but obey it. Although crypto casinos still have not implemented it strictly, this will likely happen in the future when regulators require all casinos and businesses to ask their users to do KYC. And that's when there is no longer anonymity for crypto users.

Good point. Crypto casinos have altered due to government oversight. The conflict between cryptocurrency anonymity and KYC regulations is this. Its complicated: anonymity attracts users, but government action is necessary to maintain order. From an online gambling expert, KYC preparation is smart gambling, not compliance. After all, you're dealing with big money. A background check is expected, not feared. Remember that crypto casinos will soon impose KYC. Being prepared now is better than being unprepared later. Alluring anonymity should not trump regulatory compliance.

[Odohu]

^^
Guys, you need to understand that casinos will not ask you to pass kyc only when you try to withdraw a huge amount. Many of them randomly pick some gamblers on a regular basis and ask them to submit their documents (Random cross checking), just like that without any reason.
So, if you think you are safe just because you withdraw small amounts, think again.
Besides, what are you going to do if you get lucky and hit the jackpot? You will tell them: thank you, I don't want it!

A number of persons have actually complained about this and it is rather unfortunate. While this may appear entirely bad on the side of the casinos, it is possible those actions were necessitated by government regulations of which the casinos are really helpless( just my views). Whichever case, the casinos can do better by making these conditions known from the very beginning instead of waiting till there is a huge withdrawal request by a user.

[LUCKMCFLY]

What you say is very true, self-control is something that we all must have very carefully before doing any activity, not only that of a casino, but for everything, we have to have good self-control to do sports betting activities, and if we are in a country with a relative prohibition, because the use of VPN can solve things, as long as the caisnos do not have problems due to the use of mdmo, until now I have visited a few casios that do accept the use of VPN, of course the centralized caisnos , because decentralized casinos things are different, in the case of centralized casinos when they accept this from the VPN or something like that, for me they have more clients, more success apart from that they have a great way of doing and seeing things, as far as Personally, I have always thought that when it comes to online casinos, you have to have certain rules. but due to the regulations and laws that some countries and government entities implement, they do not occur.


When a person enters a casino, the first thing that must be clear is that it is a company that will not lose large amounts of money with a player who bets with little money, in addition, all this has caused the effect and impact worldwide with With respect to casinos and the way in which they have grown is impressive, there are more and more casinos, more casino projects that are relatively very good, obviously there are always some people who seek peropium profit by doing things to make people fall in scams, but for that the pertinent investigation is good to avoid these things, the casinos with a good reputation are the ones that mainly focus on doing and continuing to do a great job due to the great competition that exists, for me things can happen In various ways, a new casino that wants to emerge has to be honest from the start and will attract players with contests where they show that they are and are at the level of the best, thus building a community.

And if you're using a VPN to visit a casino and deposit a small amount of money and manage to win a big win, maybe the casino wants to verify your gambling account first, especially if they find out that you're using a VPN at the time of the big win. And it is the concern of casinos to carry out checks before they process withdrawing your winnings and you may be required to verify your account especially if you are using a VPN. The casino wants to make sure that you are entirely safe and not involved in any illegal activities. Since you are using a VPN, other questions or personal documents may be included during the verification process.

Obviously the company doesn't want to lose large amounts of money especially if we are new people playing gambling at their casino so they want to make sure everything by asking you to do KYC. And now it's rare that a casino will allow someone who wins big to withdraw their winnings without going through the verification process because this involves the big money that person has won. The casino may allow the person to withdraw the winnings if it is not too big and still within the minimum limit that is in the casino. But if it is above 100x, there may be a check on that person from the casino to confirm everything before the casino processes the withdrawal. But a trusted casino will continue the withdrawal process after verification and usually, if there is no excessive suspicion from the casino, the casino will complete the withdrawal process.

Yes, eventually things can happen differently, when we play in a casino, we always have to try to know that KYC is a requirement that must be met, for everything you have to do it, now the casino that did not ask for it already do KYC, which makes it a nuisance for regular players, we have clear examples like the one on the freebitco.in site, where due to demands they have to enforce that for players, it's a shame, but these are things that happen. Now if a person uses the games of a casino and it goes well, it is his right to withdraw dsub money, I do not see that the use of the VPN implies a very harsh violation, to comply with a government? It does not seem to me, tomorrow if the government wants to take away the concession of the site and leave it there with nothing to do, then do you have loyalty to your clients or to a government? I think that if a player is already with a KYC and plays from a site x, they can do their reitr without complaints, I don't see suspicious activity there, because suspicious activity is making an exploit or having won thanks to a vulnerability in the game, and that It's something that rarely happens, that's why I think a player who has complied with his kyc and wants to play from another place can do it with or without KYC.

We all know that a government is the one that makes preventive measures so that currencies can be controlled more through casinos and it is something that cannot be left to what anyone wants, when it comes to KYC it is a total nuisance , even for people who do not stop or give it importance that they follow them, or that the government, banks and third parties know that they interact with crypto, what is more angry is that these people reject their KYC and demand many documents, They are practically new, and the ones that annoy the most are those that say that they are valid for 3 months, that is the bad thing and what should be avoided, anyway they have to be withdrawn, or something like that. As long as they are withdrawals, it is to withdraw money.

[danadc]

^^
Guys, you need to understand that casinos will not ask you to pass kyc only when you try to withdraw a huge amount. Many of them randomly pick some gamblers on a regular basis and ask them to submit their documents (Random cross checking), just like that without any reason.
So, if you think you are safe just because you withdraw small amounts, think again.
Besides, what are you going to do if you get lucky and hit the jackpot? You will tell them: thank you, I don't want it!

A number of persons have actually complained about this and it is rather unfortunate. While this may appear entirely bad on the side of the casinos, it is possible those actions were necessitated by government regulations of which the casinos are really helpless( just my views). Whichever case, the casinos can do better by making these conditions known from the very beginning instead of waiting till there is a huge withdrawal request by a user.

The truth is, I don't think there are so many desires for a person to leave their deinro on a casino platform, let alone leave if it's a little or a lot, more than anything if it's a lot with more Reason they are capable of complying with any KYC guy, but when the casino gets funny , and that they don't accept the documents as they are, it's a reason to complain , I've seen how some complain because they don't Accept the kyc and since they are somewhat compulsive players they begin to contribute much more money and that what they Achieve is that they can lose all that money , so a Casino should not be so demanding, but for money the KYC of whatever it is has to be met, the casinos that are intense in the kyc well have to Start telling them or complaining , because it is not that they only Admit Immediate deposits, but a problem for Withdrawals.

[Webetcoins]

KYC will always be annoying for all gamblers, but even so, not all casinos ask for KYC with big bets either, usually if the casino system detects cheating and something that violates maybe they will ask the user for KYC, but just in case something bad happens. It's not desirable, my suggestion is that it's a good idea to do KYC at the start, if you really want to be a gambler with big bets, but gamblers with small bets will definitely be safe and won't be asked for KYC.

That's right, make a KYC decision at the beginning if someone is not willing to limit their account for deposit or withdrawal, because he always use a big amount on gambling is the best decisions. Because, when carrying out KYC after winning, there may be reasons for the provider to delay withdrawals. But, if someone has done KYC, there are no indications of cheating with betting activities with high stakes, then when they win, they should be able to make withdrawals immediately without having to wait for a longer process.

Well, that might be a good idea for a lot of situations since if you have already completed your KYC verification before making a relatively higher deposit or ask for a higher withdrawal than your usual withdrawal requests, you might not be asked for any verification. However, if your deposit is very high which crosses the limit for their suspicion meter, then you might be asked for extra verification, and the same would probably apply for your withdrawal requests.

Personally, I don't find KYC being an issue at all. If I have the guts to gamble with a lot of money, I should also be able to complete the KYC verification if asked if the money that I'm about to gamble is clean and I don't have any evil intentions. I would only be worried if I know I'm involved in something illegal.

[Salahmu]

KYC will always be annoying for all gamblers, but even so, not all casinos ask for KYC with big bets either, usually if the casino system detects cheating and something that violates maybe they will ask the user for KYC, but just in case something bad happens. It's not desirable, my suggestion is that it's a good idea to do KYC at the start, if you really want to be a gambler with big bets, but gamblers with small bets will definitely be safe and won't be asked for KYC.

That's right, make a KYC decision at the beginning if someone is not willing to limit their account for deposit or withdrawal, because he always use a big amount on gambling is the best decisions. Because, when carrying out KYC after winning, there may be reasons for the provider to delay withdrawals. But, if someone has done KYC, there are no indications of cheating with betting activities with high stakes, then when they win, they should be able to make withdrawals immediately without having to wait for a longer process.

Yeah your right is always advisable to complete kyc at the beginning of the registration even though you could be allowed to withdraw some certain amount won from the bet without completing kyc because in most betting platform when you won a big money that requires you to finish kyc before withdrawing that amount you will see that it takes longer time for verification to be completed because the platform maybe thinking is because of the withdrawal that makes you want to verified the account

[ethereumhunter]

Good point. Crypto casinos have altered due to government oversight. The conflict between cryptocurrency anonymity and KYC regulations is this. Its complicated: anonymity attracts users, but government action is necessary to maintain order. From an online gambling expert, KYC preparation is smart gambling, not compliance. After all, you're dealing with big money. A background check is expected, not feared. Remember that crypto casinos will soon impose KYC. Being prepared now is better than being unprepared later. Alluring anonymity should not trump regulatory compliance.

That will happen from now on, as many crypto casinos have started implementing KYC on their users. But let's hope it doesn't affect the little gamblers who just want to get the fun out of gambling so they don't have to do KYC like big gamblers. If that can be maintained, I think crypto gamblers can still get their anonymity and even enjoy gambling as entertainment. And it is true that we have to be prepared for everything that can happen later so that we are not surprised and will only complain about why it happened to us. And let's hope those gamblers stick to their limits on gambling and don't use big bucks. Otherwise, they should be prepared to do KYC if asked by the casino.

Yes, eventually things can happen differently, when we play in a casino, we always have to try to know that KYC is a requirement that must be met, for everything you have to do it, now the casino that did not ask for it already do KYC, which makes it a nuisance for regular players, we have clear examples like the one on the freebitco.in site, where due to demands they have to enforce that for players, it's a shame, but these are things that happen. Now if a person uses the games of a casino and it goes well, it is his right to withdraw dsub money, I do not see that the use of the VPN implies a very harsh violation, to comply with a government? It does not seem to me, tomorrow if the government wants to take away the concession of the site and leave it there with nothing to do, then do you have loyalty to your clients or to a government? I think that if a player is already with a KYC and plays from a site x, they can do their reitr without complaints, I don't see suspicious activity there, because suspicious activity is making an exploit or having won thanks to a vulnerability in the game, and that It's something that rarely happens, that's why I think a player who has complied with his kyc and wants to play from another place can do it with or without KYC.

We all know that a government is the one that makes preventive measures so that currencies can be controlled more through casinos and it is something that cannot be left to what anyone wants, when it comes to KYC it is a total nuisance , even for people who do not stop or give it importance that they follow them, or that the government, banks and third parties know that they interact with crypto, what is more angry is that these people reject their KYC and demand many documents, They are practically new, and the ones that annoy the most are those that say that they are valid for 3 months, that is the bad thing and what should be avoided, anyway they have to be withdrawn, or something like that. As long as they are withdrawals, it is to withdraw money.

KYC has now become an obligation, especially for big players who gamble frequently. However, many of them reject it because they feel that they are gambling at a crypto casino and a crypto casino means there is anonymity while they play. But the reality is that casinos also have to comply with government regulations so they apply KYC to their customers. Customers can see that KYC is still applied to big players or players suspected of carrying out suspicious activities so casinos feel the need to ask them to carry out KYC. And that's what causes many gamblers to complain and don't want to do KYC. It's a choice and they don't have to do it if they don't want to but there are consequences if they don't want to do KYC. They are worried that after doing KYC later, they will still be asked to do other verifications but if they don't do something that the casino suspects, they will not be asked to do other verifications. And they can even make large transactions smoothly.

That is why each user must be able to choose a casino that makes them comfortable even when gambling at the casino so that they will not mind if asked to do KYC by the casino. They will not consider this a nuisance but rather as one of the facilities provided by the casino so that they can transact with big money. We know that the gambling business is a business with a lot of money and the turnover of the money is very fast so casinos want to make sure that their members don't get involved in illegal activities. And that makes casinos comply with government regulations by asking their customers to do KYC.