do anyone have done this? with gambling platforms

[bitterguy28]

My question was about casinos that runs doing fishy things like after someone wins big from their casinos they would not easily allow the winner to withdraw that winning amount.
They ask for whole lot of documents which are very difficult to arrange for one person, like I made an account on a site and they asked for my passport, to refund my not arrived deposit.
So how will I send them my passport copy when I don't even have a passport. so make account on trusted casinos and play on less casinos, Do KYC after making an account so it will be easier to deposit and withdraw regualrly.

Yeah, they tend to do that, hassling you so you don't have to bother claiming your wins outside of their casinos which makes you just use that money to play again until you lose all of it. Besides your suggestion, I would also add that try to be content with where you're going to spend your money, don't go looking for other fishy casinos because you're tired of playing in the regular but legitimate one. But of course there's some that don't like the idea of KYC, the only problem with this is that if they don't mind you not doing KYC then you're risking your possible wins to be put on hold because they have to make sure you're not cheating and it's rare to find a legit no KYC casinos, that offer is just too good now and scammers are using this opportunity to scam people because they like to be anonymous when gambling.

we have seen this happening to some gamblers here , there is even 6-7 digits amount of funds that had been locked for a certain reason and cannot
be withdrawn so the owner continues to gamble until she losses everything , specially that the system can evaluate those addicted gamblers that
they cannot  resist to gamble not until their funds goes zero.
and I hate this kind of taking advantage and it seems to be their strategy to not let us take money outside their casino,all they wanted is for us to
deposit and gamble and not to take our winning.
sorry but this is normal in some shady casinos.

[1715669184]

1715669184

[1715669184]

1715669184

[1715669184]

1715669184

[slapper]

~snip~

Its strange how the places we go to find safety and excitement can sometimes let us down. Thats clear from your story. Even though gambling can make you feel good for a short time, it can often end badly, especially in new casinos that havent been tried yet. Even though big wins are exciting, they can quickly turn bad when you realise they're built on shaky ground. Putting your money and dreams in newer casinos, as you said? Not a good idea.

Now, when choosing a casino, how well-known it is and how long its been open are important. Its not just the lights, the mood, or the feeling of being at home. Not at all. Its about reliability. Trust is an important part of gaming. Always be careful and critical, and always question and doubt what you see. Brand new? They need to be even more careful. There are a lot of reviews, comments, and stories from experienced players. Doing something without first getting this information? Being stupid. A disappointing first experience can, in fact, turn people off from playing. Not only does that person lose, but the whole gambling business does too.

I have been saying this for a very long time: trust, excitement, and safety are the cornerstones of online gambling. The problem is that not every casino is made equal. No, gentleman! Some are outstanding, the finest of the best. Others, though? Not in that way

New casinos? They resemble unknown territory. Exciting? Yes. Dangerous? Certainly. You must exercise extreme caution. It's about the core of trust, the foundation, not just the gloss and glamour. And how would one quantify that? Reputation, history, and reviews. Do your research - always and everywhere. Take a deep dive into the realm of player experiences and internet reviews. Going in blind? Not smart. Not smart at all

Keep in mind that a negative experience affects the entire business, not just one participant. That being said, people should always play with their eyes wide open and remain observant and critical. Because trust is just as important in the realm of online gambling as the game itself. And faith? It's not something you can take a chance on

[VFalcon]

Oh yeah, I won 200$ at the last tournament, it's not a lot of money but it came very easily to me. So if you don't know what to do in the cryptocurrency market, try to participate in a Fairspin tournament, play their games or bet on TFS it's a great chance to win some extra money.

[krava22]

Oh yeah, I won 200$ at the last tournament, it's not a lot of money but it came very easily to me. So if you don't know what to do in the cryptocurrency market, try to participate in a Fairspin tournament, play their games or bet on TFS it's a great chance to win some extra money.

200$ just for entering a tournament?? sounds interesting, I'll have to try it out

[goxcraft]

Maybe this could have been possible years ago but this is not possible now, casinos like any business have to follow the law and the regulations the governments put in place, and while they can let their customers to make small withdrawals without identifying themselves, if they are lucky enough to get a big win then they will have to go through the KYC process.

And while gamblers will obviously not like this and even consider those policies to be unfair, if they want their money they will have to follow those policies whether they like them or not.

Yeah, we have to abide by the rules and regulations imposed by both gambling sites and the government. I don't complain about them. They have every right to demand KYC. As we all know, betting sites are used as a medium for money laundering. In order to determine the source of the money, black or white, one has to go through the KYC process. It will ensure that those funds are not obtained through illegal means. Nobody is forcing anybody to gamble or deposit anything. If you don't want to do KYC, then that's fine. Choose a site that doesn't require KYC. Simple as that. I'm sure there are many sites.

[Ojima-ojo]

Maybe this could have been possible years ago but this is not possible now, casinos like any business have to follow the law and the regulations the governments put in place, and while they can let their customers make small withdrawals without identifying themselves, if they are lucky enough to get a big win then they will have to go through the KYC process.

And while gamblers will obviously not like this and even consider those policies to be unfair, if they want their money they will have to follow those policies whether they like them or not.

Yeah, we have to abide by the rules and regulations imposed by both gambling sites and the government. I don't complain about them. They have every right to demand KYC. As we all know, betting sites are used as a medium for money laundering. To determine the source of the money, black or white, one has to go through the KYC process. It will ensure that those funds are not obtained through illegal means. Nobody is forcing anybody to gamble or deposit anything. If you don't want to do KYC, then that's fine. Choose a site that doesn't require KYC. Simple as that. I'm sure there are many sites.

It is what it is regardless of the outcome of the event in the long run, this is because, you must have to accept whatever rules that come along with it and as long as you choose to sign up on a centralized licensed casino, you have to abide with the rules and regulation and if mentioned innthe T&C of the casino, that means you have to follow them up by all means, and KYC is one of those demands that casino have in place to protect both the gambler and the casino at the same time.


Is it negotiable on what the level of KYC the casino could demand for, as long as it is mentioned in their Term and conditions, most times, those acceptable documents are mentioned on the T&C to get the gamblers updated with what may come along the line.

[wallet4bitcoin]

Talking about betting or gambling generally without mentioning Casinos, it has happened severally, making such Xs are possible and withdrawal with it. I can't speak for Casinos but most of them don't care about kyc to give you your wins and they allow you withdraw it but it varies with Casinos anyways.

[LUCKMCFLY]

When we are in a casino where things are obvious in this way, we can sense that the pressure is not ours, and that is a plus, why? Because there is a lot of competition in the casinos, it is known that if they try to demand a lot from us, well, if we don't want to, we don't give orders, and we leave it like that, we look for another casino that doesn't bother us so much and we try it, there must be someone who doesn't. It bothers so much, that's how it is, the competition is the only thing, for that reason I recommend doing it, I clarify, this KYUC thing is not something that I like, I think that many do not like it, but it is something that is why we fight Against the grain, if there is a caisno that we like a lot, we can do that test, of course it is not that it is done with everyone, that is only with some in particular, obviously the corresponding research has to be done.

Yeah!  It’s true that many people don’t like KYC verification. 
When I am faced with such a need to undergo verification according to the KYC procedure, I just begin to get nervous and swear to myself because I have gone through this process more than a dozen times.  And it definitely gets boring and annoying.  Moreover, there are also different confirmation options, for example, including video images of faces.  And all this data is transferred to someone unknown. 
And they may well be used for some bad purposes.  If there is even the slightest possibility of doing without KYC, I never go through this check again.

Yes, it is true that most gamblers who really prioritize the anonymity of personal data will refuse to be asked to do KYC because for them it is not only annoying but it is a very complicated process and is considered unsafe which makes them always refuse when asked for KYC.
But most of today's reputable gambling sites always ask for KYC before making a deposit or placing a bet and maybe this annoys someone but for me as long as the casino has high trustworthiness I will do KYC rather than lose huge amounts of money in a casino that doesn't have any reputation.

If they refused to complete any of their KYC request that means they are going to be frustrated while using the casino because they will be deprived of some benefits and functions, isn't it more better if a gambler feels like he cannot cope with having kyc challenges to go for the kind of casino categories that does not require kyc althrough, without filling in for kyc then you may not be able to make withdrawals and other things you would have been having access to.

But for me, this KYC refusal has disadvantages with several other features, namely the maximum betting limit is only small and if there is an account hack it will be very difficult to restore the account but it all depends on each person's opinion because we cannot go against other people's thoughts because I really understand gamblers who always look for casinos without KYC to prioritize his anonymity and they feel comfortable with the establishment he has planned to always refuse KYC.
However, for me, as long as I send KYC at a trusted casino, I will do KYC at least past KYC 1 just in case it is really needed one day.

It is that one of the things why I see why it is necessary to do a KYC is because the person has decided to do the KYC in a very reliable casino, because they can have a lot of trust, a high reputation and pleasant comments , This is what I call a trustworthy casino, of course these things are quite good when it comes to doing things to be able to establish a motto of always providing the best service and having the best trust system, otherwise no, because there are casinos that appear in the forum, they can even pay for good marketing, but they can still become scams, I have seen casinos that have everything under control, and comply with all the regulations, which is with the licenses and everything that the players have to demand, even so, this does not prevent that if they want to return to Sam they can do it, this type of thing is what we must take care of at all times, I have done KYC but in few places, in which I consider good and that they can't steal from me.

The oldest casinos are those that have a greater degree of trust to be Able to make a better option to be safe, for me the safest ones on the forum are few, but I can highlight bitcasino.io, stake.com, Duelbits, among others that They are very good, but mostly the first two are the ones that I consider the safest, in fact not everyone knows, but recently they hacked a part of the stake.com casino, where they stole a significant amount of money and that assumed that at the moment The fact that they did it put everyone on alert, obviously they suspended the games in the club for a few moments, then they began to look for a way to recover their money, but yes , they did not compromise the clients' money, something very significant and that gave I will speak very highly of the day, other casinos suspend activities and people's balances remain frozen and without being able to withdraw them, this is something that can be very good and gives a lot to Speak highly of stake.com.

[Dunamisx]

Talking about betting or gambling generally without mentioning Casinos, it has happened severally, making such Xs are possible and withdrawal with it. I can't speak for Casinos but most of them don't care about kyc to give you your wins and they allow you withdraw it but it varies with Casinos anyways.

That's possible and you're right about it, everyone of the gambling platforms has their own good and side effects on gamblers and when it comes to kyc related issues, gamblers always try to play smart over the casinos but things don't really work out such way, assuming everyone are making deposit and have been unable to make withdrawals, then people would have stopped gambling, those that lack the normal proceedings are the ones complaining about it, if you comply you don't need to complain.

[Hirose UK]

Talking about betting or gambling generally without mentioning Casinos, it has happened severally, making such Xs are possible and withdrawal with it. I can't speak for Casinos but most of them don't care about kyc to give you your wins and they allow you withdraw it but it varies with Casinos anyways.

But something like this will never happen in large popular casino because when large popular casino does this it can have a bad impact damaging the reputation and trust of gamblers in the casino itself.
Maybe for most small casinos or new casinos that are more dominant there is chance of problems like this because they don't have large bankroll to pay for the big wins that gamblers get, especially if the big wins are obtained from relatively small bets the casino team will actually suspicious of gamblers and worse, they will freeze the account or make withdrawals difficult by asking for several requirements to be fulfilled.

It is not surprising that there are several small casinos or new casinos that disappoint their customers, but this is all done because the casino does not want a loss from paying every customer winnings.

So far I have always given advice and input to everyone to be more careful in choosing casino, especially for small casinos that are still relatively new.

[wiss19]

My question was about casinos that runs doing fishy things like after someone wins big from their casinos they would not easily allow the winner to withdraw that winning amount.
They ask for whole lot of documents which are very difficult to arrange for one person, like I made an account on a site and they asked for my passport, to refund my not arrived deposit.
So how will I send them my passport copy when I don't even have a passport. so make account on trusted casinos and play on less casinos, Do KYC after making an account so it will be easier to deposit and withdraw regualrly.

The very first step for a gambler before joining a platform should be to make sure that it is trusted so that they can do KYC verification without worrying about it not getting approved or accepted for any reason. If the platform is trusted, there would be no issues in verifying your account with any document they ask you for no matter how big or small your withdrawal is, however, they ask for more verification for much larger amounts like funds proof, etc.

Applying for KYC verification at the beginning of your gambling career with a platform has it's advantages and disadvantages. One of the advantages of doing that is that you won't need to worry about it later on, and the main disadvantage is that you might not win anything significant and you will just give them your private information and documents.

[LUCKMCFLY]

That is one of the rarest cases for gambling sites. I have encountered it once. Just once. It wasn't a huge win. But you could think of it as a mid range win. Most of the time, the opposite happens. Recently I saw a similar case with a gambler. For the first few wins, he could withdraw without issue. Immediately after a big win, he tried to withdraw. Guess who happened? His account got locked up, and they started asking for KYC. He had to finish his KYC, and only after that did the site let him withdraw his wins. You will see a lot of cases where people are complaining about this, but you won't see anyone saying they won big and withdrew without KYC. Maybe in rare lifetime cases.

I see that things in casinos are very Mixed , when there are winnings that are not so big, I think that the casino does not bother much with the KYC, it can allow there to be a large withdrawal, and this can cause certain inconveniences , who cares ? Do you like to receive a message telling you that your account is blocked because you have to do a KYC ? I think that's not nice for Andie, because for the deposits they don't tell them: Before making a deposit, verify and enforce your KYC, so that you don't have problems withdrawing the money if you win, ahh but they don't do that , they give buts to withdraw, but they do not have any type of problem for them to make deposits, this is something that cannot be or look at all good, at least or I see it that way, if from the beginning they warn and say that they have to comply with the KYC to be able to make a withdrawal , Everything is fine, you see if it is done or not, in the same way if a game leaves another casino, that other casino will still require the KYC, so I think that all casinos should take as a precaution to do and before each deposit to users who have not complied with that, it is a responsible gesture and one that will be appreciated in the future.

The casinos or the majority of casinos , only make a lot of Difference here that they have to deposit because they do not rule out the Possibility that they will lose the money, and it is normal, it is their business, it is their company and the people put their businesses to gain, especially with the industry of the entertainment that is based on it in order to be able to do the best they can and win so consistently, this is only what is sought, now for those who have an advantage of the upper house, well, it is quite a thing, however in the Tos , the eprosnas accept all this and that's it, by accepting it means that the rules are the rules and that things are done that way, that there is no reason to complain, but I consider that all casinos Should be made or take that Priority in order to avoid Anger for the sake of it. of the players, since it is Unpleasant.

[Fivestar4everMVP]

Talking about betting or gambling generally without mentioning Casinos, it has happened severally, making such Xs are possible and withdrawal with it. I can't speak for Casinos but most of them don't care about kyc to give you your wins and they allow you withdraw it but it varies with Casinos anyways.

That's possible and you're right about it, everyone of the gambling platforms has their own good and side effects on gamblers and when it comes to kyc related issues, gamblers always try to play smart over the casinos but things don't really work out such way, assuming everyone are making deposit and have been unable to make withdrawals, then people would have stopped gambling, those that lack the normal proceedings are the ones complaining about it, if you comply you don't need to complain.

KYC is no longer something gamblers can do without, when some reputable casinos that have never really bothered or disturbed their users about KYC now turn around to inform their users that they now might for whatever reason, ask for KYC verification whenever they deem it fit, this should tell every one of us that KYC with gambling casinos is not something to joke with any longer.

With crypto currency regulations coming hard on centralized platforms, this is very much expected with gambling casinos that deal in crypto currencies as well for their business. Personally, i also do feel that casinos on their own do not want any of this for their users, but unfortunately, they must comply to laws if they must continue to run their business without problems.

And yeah, if gamblers are still winning and withdrawing money from casinos, it simply means that they are complying to whatever requirements placed before them, those who are complaining will still have to do same, or forfeit their money back to the casino, there is no two ways about it.

[LUCKMCFLY]

When we are in a casino where things are obvious in this way, we can sense that the pressure is not ours, and that is a plus, why? Because there is a lot of competition in the casinos, it is known that if they try to demand a lot from us, well, if we don't want to, we don't give orders, and we leave it like that, we look for another casino that doesn't bother us so much and we try it, there must be someone who doesn't. It bothers so much, that's how it is, the competition is the only thing, for that reason I recommend doing it, I clarify, this KYUC thing is not something that I like, I think that many do not like it, but it is something that is why we fight Against the grain, if there is a caisno that we like a lot, we can do that test, of course it is not that it is done with everyone, that is only with some in particular, obviously the corresponding research has to be done.

Yeah!  It’s true that many people don’t like KYC verification. 
When I am faced with such a need to undergo verification according to the KYC procedure, I just begin to get nervous and swear to myself because I have gone through this process more than a dozen times.  And it definitely gets boring and annoying.  Moreover, there are also different confirmation options, for example, including video images of faces.  And all this data is transferred to someone unknown. 
And they may well be used for some bad purposes.  If there is even the slightest possibility of doing without KYC, I never go through this check again.

Yes, it is true that most gamblers who really prioritize the anonymity of personal data will refuse to be asked to do KYC because for them it is not only annoying but it is a very complicated process and is considered unsafe which makes them always refuse when asked for KYC.
But most of today's reputable gambling sites always ask for KYC before making a deposit or placing a bet and maybe this annoys someone but for me as long as the casino has high trustworthiness I will do KYC rather than lose huge amounts of money in a casino that doesn't have any reputation.

Yes, in fact when we do Many things in a casino, what we are looking for is to win, we have been given the idea that when we want to try to win we can do it, and it is not anything easy, it is difficult, what we do is not just any It does, some people take Years to Win in a casino, sometimes they take risks and what they do is lose and that is normal, the house advantage, the complexity of the game, all that affects us as players, We have something in mind when we play , and Assuming that the pertinent measures are taken to be able to Play , such as establishing the budget and everything that implies having the best vision, then we have to see that the most unpleasant thing at the time of playing and playing, is counting We are going to withdraw and they tell us that we cannot withdraw because we must comply with the KYC, or worse still, they Block our account until we comply with the KYC, Really that is something very unpleasant, and quite out of the Ordinary , we do not We can Allow something like that.

If we put into Context that things with the KYC can be fast like the brokers when we register, then it can be something great, it is the best, for me at the moment of entering a casino and deciding to play there before doing each deposit, what I recommend is to comply with the KYC and always ask how much money we must put in to be able to Withdraw , According to this because we have to do many things that can benefit us, because having a bad experience is something that I do not recommend, then you have to do that, now, if the casinos had another way of seeing things, then before making each deposit they should not allow it until they comply with at least level 1 of KYC, so that there are no Unpleasant surprises, that is What we have to see, of course this is just what I think, but I know that no casino will do it, it would be excellent but it is not Like that.

[Wiwo]

Talking about betting or gambling generally without mentioning Casinos, it has happened severally, making such Xs are possible and withdrawal with it. I can't speak for Casinos but most of them don't care about kyc to give you your wins and they allow you withdraw it but it varies with Casinos anyways.

You have a point in your statement,  I think the reason why most licensed casinos ask for KYC is host to fulfil their licensing demands this is so because, at some point,  we have hard highly reputable casinos not really bordering their clients for KYC verification for some winning even if it is above their free withdrawal threshold of $5k for none KYC and $5k+ withdrawal must be verified users of the casino.

We have seen a fair number of casinos not paying any serious attention to this and at some point pay a deaf ear to such things as withdrawals and go ahead to process their customer withdrawal demand.

[Slow death]

Talking about betting or gambling generally without mentioning Casinos, it has happened severally, making such Xs are possible and withdrawal with it. I can't speak for Casinos but most of them don't care about kyc to give you your wins and they allow you withdraw it but it varies with Casinos anyways.

That's possible and you're right about it, everyone of the gambling platforms has their own good and side effects on gamblers and when it comes to kyc related issues, gamblers always try to play smart over the casinos but things don't really work out such way, assuming everyone are making deposit and have been unable to make withdrawals, then people would have stopped gambling, those that lack the normal proceedings are the ones complaining about it, if you comply you don't need to complain.

many new and even old casinos when they realize that the customer deposited little money but was lucky enough to win a lot of money, then the casino asks the customer for kyc and after the customer does kyc, then the casino accuses the customer of having too many accounts, this is one This is a strategy that many casinos have started to do to avoid paying players who were lucky enough to make a profit at the casino, which is why in my opinion kyc is being used as a weapon by some casinos. and see that there are cases where it is even obvious. for example, a casino accuses a customer that the customer has many accounts, but the same casino does not show proof that the customer has many accounts and the same casino asks all customers for kyc

in other words, all customers do kyc, they play for a long time and the casino does not detect any suspicious activity, but after someone wins a lot of money, then the casino accuses the customer of having too many accounts, see that if that customer has too many accounts so how did he kyc with many accounts at the same casino? and when the casino is asked to show proof that the customer has many accounts, the casino refuses to show and uses the argument that this could expose the methods the casino uses to detect cheaters. But we have to ask ourselves the following: would posting a photo with the same usernames and deposit addresses to prove that they are the same users expose the methods that casinos use to detect cheaters? I think not!

[suzanne5223]

Talking about betting or gambling generally without mentioning Casinos, it has happened severally, making such Xs are possible and withdrawal with it. I can't speak for Casinos but most of them don't care about kyc to give you your wins and they allow you withdraw it but it varies with Casinos anyways.

You have a point in your statement,  I think the reason why most licensed casinos ask for KYC is host to fulfil their licensing demands this is so because, at some point,  we have hard highly reputable casinos not really bordering their clients for KYC verification for some winning even if it is above their free withdrawal threshold of $5k for none KYC and $5k+ withdrawal must be verified users of the casino.

We have seen a fair number of casinos not paying any serious attention to this and at some point pay a deaf ear to such things as withdrawals and go ahead to process their customer withdrawal demand.

I believe the majority of experienced gamblers once had huge wins before, I have done that with Roobet, Royalstarscasino, etc.
Having said that, it's hard to find a reputable casino that won't request KYC before the initial deposit and I believe this is the reason why they never request for KYC after the huge winning.

[Dunamisx]

Talking about betting or gambling generally without mentioning Casinos, it has happened severally, making such Xs are possible and withdrawal with it. I can't speak for Casinos but most of them don't care about kyc to give you your wins and they allow you withdraw it but it varies with Casinos anyways.

That's possible and you're right about it, everyone of the gambling platforms has their own good and side effects on gamblers and when it comes to kyc related issues, gamblers always try to play smart over the casinos but things don't really work out such way, assuming everyone are making deposit and have been unable to make withdrawals, then people would have stopped gambling, those that lack the normal proceedings are the ones complaining about it, if you comply you don't need to complain.

many new and even old casinos when they realize that the customer deposited little money but was lucky enough to win a lot of money, then the casino asks the customer for kyc and after the customer does kyc, then the casino accuses the customer of having too many accounts, this is one This is a strategy that many casinos have started to do to avoid paying players who were lucky enough to make a profit at the casino, which is why in my opinion kyc is being used as a weapon by some casinos. and see that there are cases where it is even obvious. for example, a casino accuses a customer that the customer has many accounts, but the same casino does not show proof that the customer has many accounts and the same casino asks all customers for kyc

in other words, all customers do kyc, they play for a long time and the casino does not detect any suspicious activity, but after someone wins a lot of money, then the casino accuses the customer of having too many accounts, see that if that customer has too many accounts so how did he kyc with many accounts at the same casino? and when the casino is asked to show proof that the customer has many accounts, the casino refuses to show and uses the argument that this could expose the methods the casino uses to detect cheaters. But we have to ask ourselves the following: would posting a photo with the same usernames and deposit addresses to prove that they are the same users expose the methods that casinos use to detect cheaters? I think not!

This is two different case scenario we are considering here, the first is when the casino is not reliable enough to be trusted, while the second is the moment a gambler refuses to complete the casino KYC requirements either intentionally or not intentionally, in the first example mentioned above, the gambler has to be responsible because it is always required that we make research well about the reputation of any gambling platform before using them, if the first conditions is meant then the second one should also be dependents on the gambler if he was able to provide all necessary informations for kyc or not, else we revert to the first conditions that he was unaware the gambling had a bad reputation.

[Wiwo]

Talking about betting or gambling generally without mentioning Casinos, it has happened severally, making such Xs are possible and withdrawal with it. I can't speak for Casinos but most of them don't care about kyc to give you your wins and they allow you withdraw it but it varies with Casinos anyways.

That's possible and you're right about it, everyone of the gambling platforms has their own good and side effects on gamblers and when it comes to kyc related issues, gamblers always try to play smart over the casinos but things don't really work out such way, assuming everyone are making deposit and have been unable to make withdrawals, then people would have stopped gambling, those that lack the normal proceedings are the ones complaining about it, if you comply you don't need to complain.

Well I won't likely say that the gambler wants to play smart with the casino when it comes to the issues with KYC,  but then we have to realize that one of the basic goals of crypto gamblers is to achieve privacy and for that, they try as much as possible to look out for casinos that are less strict with their KYC demands and sometimes only look out for a casino that will give them the free hands to gamble without being demanded to hand out their documents for verifications.

So instead he looking at it as if the gambler is deliberately avoiding KYC,  we should also look at it from the angle of them trying to protect their privacy,  even though it likely becoming impossible to remain anonymous in casinos lately due to KYC mandates and it relevant in operating a licensed casino.

[LUCKMCFLY]

When we are in a casino where things are obvious in this way, we can sense that the pressure is not ours, and that is a plus, why? Because there is a lot of competition in the casinos, it is known that if they try to demand a lot from us, well, if we don't want to, we don't give orders, and we leave it like that, we look for another casino that doesn't bother us so much and we try it, there must be someone who doesn't. It bothers so much, that's how it is, the competition is the only thing, for that reason I recommend doing it, I clarify, this KYUC thing is not something that I like, I think that many do not like it, but it is something that is why we fight Against the grain, if there is a caisno that we like a lot, we can do that test, of course it is not that it is done with everyone, that is only with some in particular, obviously the corresponding research has to be done.

Yeah!  It’s true that many people don’t like KYC verification. 
When I am faced with such a need to undergo verification according to the KYC procedure, I just begin to get nervous and swear to myself because I have gone through this process more than a dozen times.  And it definitely gets boring and annoying.  Moreover, there are also different confirmation options, for example, including video images of faces.  And all this data is transferred to someone unknown. 
And they may well be used for some bad purposes.  If there is even the slightest possibility of doing without KYC, I never go through this check again.

Yes, it is true that most gamblers who really prioritize the anonymity of personal data will refuse to be asked to do KYC because for them it is not only annoying but it is a very complicated process and is considered unsafe which makes them always refuse when asked for KYC.
But most of today's reputable gambling sites always ask for KYC before making a deposit or placing a bet and maybe this annoys someone but for me as long as the casino has high trustworthiness I will do KYC rather than lose huge amounts of money in a casino that doesn't have any reputation.

KYC? It's not just a procedure; it's a declaration. Gamblers value their privacy greatly. They are so fond of it. But KYC exists for a purpose. There's a very, very good rationale for its presence. The top-tier gambling sites, the finest ones, are all about KYC procedures. They are obsessed with it! It's about trust, it's about safety, and it's about reputation

When gambling, money is at risk. This is your hard-earned cash. So why would you want to risk your wellbeing at a location that does not care? Why? It makes zero sense whatsoever. KYC is similar to a stamp of approval. This is the casino's way of expressing, "We care about you, and we value you." And if they are reputable and the finest, you conduct the KYC. You simply do it. It is a nominal cost to pay for peace of mind. It's a comprehensive win-win situation

Well, it is already known that these things when dealing with KYC, well it is something that can be taken as if it were a Business, first the Governments extort the casinos so that they can somehow generate some money for them , when they do not like them. They ask for money, because they ask for KYC registration because with the KYC Registration they can do a lot in a time, they have all the data so they can do a lot of things, then they win the casino + govern us, because in the Future when they implement the regulations as they are, well, the people who want to declare crypto will be able to do other things like passing on that KYC, then there you go and that's where privacy ends, well these things are already practically well covered, so in this order of ideas we when we talk About KYC there is a lot of Material to cut from , this is something that is supposed to be Beneficial for the governments, I do not see any other way to be able to manifest a benefit for us, oh no yes, say the KYC experts that it is useful for any registration and Recovery I'll give it in case they lose it in a casino.

So the Defenders of KYC is the best selling thing that can exist, you cannot agree when something ends your Privacy , never in life, because it is something that has no place, it is something that some do not see, but that in The future yes, then for now the adoption of crypto and bitcoin, well there may be many things in Favor , but just as Adoption Wxists, there may be Certain Conditions, and well it is good that they want to make their regulations, but consider that getting into casinos, in exchanges it is already a violation of the Same , then these things are the ones that we See , the ones that are very visible and from which we must protect ourselves, in addition to the bad times that many players have had to go through after they fulfill the KYC and they have to do more, or those who want to make a Withdrawal and then are told no, until they Comply with the Kyc.