do anyone have done this? with gambling platforms

[redsun114]

Talking about betting or gambling generally without mentioning Casinos, it has happened severally, making such Xs are possible and withdrawal with it. I can't speak for Casinos but most of them don't care about kyc to give you your wins and they allow you withdraw it but it varies with Casinos anyways.

But something like this will never happen in large popular casino because when large popular casino does this it can have a bad impact damaging the reputation and trust of gamblers in the casino itself.
Maybe for most small casinos or new casinos that are more dominant there is chance of problems like this because they don't have large bankroll to pay for the big wins that gamblers get, especially if the big wins are obtained from relatively small bets the casino team will actually suspicious of gamblers and worse, they will freeze the account or make withdrawals difficult by asking for several requirements to be fulfilled.

It is not surprising that there are several small casinos or new casinos that disappoint their customers, but this is all done because the casino does not want a loss from paying every customer winnings.

So far I have always given advice and input to everyone to be more careful in choosing casino, especially for small casinos that are still relatively new.

Whether you will be asked to complete KYC verification or not is totally dependent on the amount of money you are trying to withdraw and also the amount of money you've deposited. If you have made a deposit of $200 and trying to withdraw maybe about $500 that too after completing all the wagering requirements and stuff, I don't think you will be asked to complete KYC verification for that even if the platform is big, trusted, and reputable because the amount is not that high.

So it's always possible for a person to win a certain amount and then be able to withdraw it without being questioned about it or asked to complete any extra verification and stuff as long as the amount they are trying to withdraw is not significantly higher than the amount they have deposited initially.

[LUCKMCFLY]

When we are in a casino where things are obvious in this way, we can sense that the pressure is not ours, and that is a plus, why? Because there is a lot of competition in the casinos, it is known that if they try to demand a lot from us, well, if we don't want to, we don't give orders, and we leave it like that, we look for another casino that doesn't bother us so much and we try it, there must be someone who doesn't. It bothers so much, that's how it is, the competition is the only thing, for that reason I recommend doing it, I clarify, this KYUC thing is not something that I like, I think that many do not like it, but it is something that is why we fight Against the grain, if there is a caisno that we like a lot, we can do that test, of course it is not that it is done with everyone, that is only with some in particular, obviously the corresponding research has to be done.

Yeah!  It’s true that many people don’t like KYC verification. 
When I am faced with such a need to undergo verification according to the KYC procedure, I just begin to get nervous and swear to myself because I have gone through this process more than a dozen times.  And it definitely gets boring and annoying.  Moreover, there are also different confirmation options, for example, including video images of faces.  And all this data is transferred to someone unknown. 
And they may well be used for some bad purposes.  If there is even the slightest possibility of doing without KYC, I never go through this check again.

Yes, it is true that most gamblers who really prioritize the anonymity of personal data will refuse to be asked to do KYC because for them it is not only annoying but it is a very complicated process and is considered unsafe which makes them always refuse when asked for KYC.
But most of today's reputable gambling sites always ask for KYC before making a deposit or placing a bet and maybe this annoys someone but for me as long as the casino has high trustworthiness I will do KYC rather than lose huge amounts of money in a casino that doesn't have any reputation.

If they refused to complete any of their KYC request that means they are going to be frustrated while using the casino because they will be deprived of some benefits and functions, isn't it more better if a gambler feels like he cannot cope with having kyc challenges to go for the kind of casino categories that does not require kyc althrough, without filling in for kyc then you may not be able to make withdrawals and other things you would have been having access to.

I know that many may think that when it comes to improving things when it comes to not doing KYC, people seeking their anonymity and privacy is something that can give us better security, according to what we think when we have to comply Some KYC is difficult to make a reality because we rely on playing and in order to withdraw we do it without any problems.

To be clearer in what I mean, that now all casinos want to require KYC, and the best way is to comply with it from the beginning, I have said a lot that the things that casinos should do is look for the warning that the KYC is fulfilled before making a deposit to play, otherwise it is not good that for any reason people have to do the KYC at the time of withdrawing, because it is annoying, it bothers me personally, and like the boom KYC is a fact and it is done, because they should require it for a reason, some say that people will be scared, but I think it won't be like that, because it will be something that can generate more confidence, if you leave other casinos will find themselves with the same system but if they do it here, he is a safe customer, because he will play, then it could be said that the casino's motto is that they are honest and transparent from the beginning, and that they do nothing but speak the truth, this is what That can make them generate more confidence, and that they speak with confidence.

KYC is now very necessary in casinos so that they can generate trust in companies, supposedly that is what it is for, of course I don't think it is like that, it is just an excuse for governments to have people's data so that they can request it later, That's why KYCs do them, to generate more control over people, the rest is simply a cliché that they invented, I'm a true believer in those things, therefore KYCs are not what people believe. or they make them believe.

[Blitzboy]

`

I know that many may think that when it comes to improving things when it comes to not doing KYC, people seeking their anonymity and privacy is something that can give us better security, according to what we think when we have to comply Some KYC is difficult to make a reality because we rely on playing and in order to withdraw we do it without any problems.

To be clearer in what I mean, that now all casinos want to require KYC, and the best way is to comply with it from the beginning, I have said a lot that the things that casinos should do is look for the warning that the KYC is fulfilled before making a deposit to play, otherwise it is not good that for any reason people have to do the KYC at the time of withdrawing, because it is annoying, it bothers me personally, and like the boom KYC is a fact and it is done, because they should require it for a reason, some say that people will be scared, but I think it won't be like that, because it will be something that can generate more confidence, if you leave other casinos will find themselves with the same system but if they do it here, he is a safe customer, because he will play, then it could be said that the casino's motto is that they are honest and transparent from the beginning, and that they do nothing but speak the truth, this is what That can make them generate more confidence, and that they speak with confidence.

KYC is now very necessary in casinos so that they can generate trust in companies, supposedly that is what it is for, of course I don't think it is like that, it is just an excuse for governments to have people's data so that they can request it later, That's why KYCs do them, to generate more control over people, the rest is simply a cliché that they invented, I'm a true believer in those things, therefore KYCs are not what people believe. or they make them believe.

There does seem to be a real desire to make sure that these places are safe and trustworthy, but I also get the feeling that there is a deeper, more controlling goal at play. People say that the need to collect data is a way to build trust, but it really seems more like a way to spy on people. There is a strong case to be made that KYC helps build trust in gambling. But lets look into it more.

When KYC is thrown at players at withdrawal time, though, its hard to ignore how frustrated they are. What was once joy turns into anger. I agree that being honest from the start can make people feel like you're being honest and loyal. But the real reason for the monitoring cant be ignored. More oversight and control are being added under the idea of protecting players.

[Hirose UK]

~snip~

But something like this will never happen in large popular casino because when large popular casino does this it can have a bad impact damaging the reputation and trust of gamblers in the casino itself.
Maybe for most small casinos or new casinos that are more dominant there is chance of problems like this because they don't have large bankroll to pay for the big wins that gamblers get, especially if the big wins are obtained from relatively small bets the casino team will actually suspicious of gamblers and worse, they will freeze the account or make withdrawals difficult by asking for several requirements to be fulfilled.

It is not surprising that there are several small casinos or new casinos that disappoint their customers, but this is all done because the casino does not want a loss from paying every customer winnings.

So far I have always given advice and input to everyone to be more careful in choosing casino, especially for small casinos that are still relatively new.

Whether you will be asked to complete KYC verification or not is totally dependent on the amount of money you are trying to withdraw and also the amount of money you've deposited. If you have made a deposit of $200 and trying to withdraw maybe about $500 that too after completing all the wagering requirements and stuff, I don't think you will be asked to complete KYC verification for that even if the platform is big, trusted, and reputable because the amount is not that high.

So it's always possible for a person to win a certain amount and then be able to withdraw it without being questioned about it or asked to complete any extra verification and stuff as long as the amount they are trying to withdraw is not significantly higher than the amount they have deposited initially.

For large casinos that do have KYC provisions the answer is yes, I was reminded to carry out KYC verification to be able to continue gambling with comfort.
The casino will even offer a bonus for completing verification and this message will be sent via email.
Moreover, when the casino has set KYC it is better to complete it at the beginning even if you only withdraw a small amount KYC is not problem, but when you win big and want to withdraw it KYC is definitely needed and this is why it is important to complete it from the start.
Anyone does not want to have problems when making withdrawals and must also provide what is needed so that any such problems can be avoided.

I understand what you mean but the question is will you only get small wins continuously?
Don't you want to get big win and we don't know that maybe in the near future you can get big win so you will withdraw a bigger amount too, so there no harm in completing verification from the start of registering.

[GiftedMAN]

`

I know that many may think that when it comes to improving things when it comes to not doing KYC, people seeking their anonymity and privacy is something that can give us better security, according to what we think when we have to comply Some KYC is difficult to make a reality because we rely on playing and in order to withdraw we do it without any problems.

To be clearer in what I mean, that now all casinos want to require KYC, and the best way is to comply with it from the beginning, I have said a lot that the things that casinos should do is look for the warning that the KYC is fulfilled before making a deposit to play, otherwise it is not good that for any reason people have to do the KYC at the time of withdrawing, because it is annoying, it bothers me personally, and like the boom KYC is a fact and it is done, because they should require it for a reason, some say that people will be scared, but I think it won't be like that, because it will be something that can generate more confidence, if you leave other casinos will find themselves with the same system but if they do it here, he is a safe customer, because he will play, then it could be said that the casino's motto is that they are honest and transparent from the beginning, and that they do nothing but speak the truth, this is what That can make them generate more confidence, and that they speak with confidence.

KYC is now very necessary in casinos so that they can generate trust in companies, supposedly that is what it is for, of course I don't think it is like that, it is just an excuse for governments to have people's data so that they can request it later, That's why KYCs do them, to generate more control over people, the rest is simply a cliché that they invented, I'm a true believer in those things, therefore KYCs are not what people believe. or they make them believe.

There does seem to be a real desire to make sure that these places are safe and trustworthy, but I also get the feeling that there is a deeper, more controlling goal at play. People say that the need to collect data is a way to build trust, but it really seems more like a way to spy on people. There is a strong case to be made that KYC helps build trust in gambling. But lets look into it more.

When KYC is thrown at players at withdrawal time, though, its hard to ignore how frustrated they are. What was once joy turns into anger. I agree that being honest from the start can make people feel like you're being honest and loyal. But the real reason for the monitoring cant be ignored. More oversight and control are being added under the idea of protecting players.

KYC should be compulsory since not everyone like to drop their credentials online because they want to use a casino to bet. I frown at KYC Casinos especially those ones that take KYC compulsory before their customers make any withdrawal. Nit everyone is comfortable with that information to be left on a casino. Casinos supposed to have an option that would delete our KYC credentials whenever we are not ready to use there platform again. I think this will be mostly appreciate so that we are going to feel safe from intruders that could sell our information to third parties.

[Onyeeze]

`

I know that many may think that when it comes to improving things when it comes to not doing KYC, people seeking their anonymity and privacy is something that can give us better security, according to what we think when we have to comply Some KYC is difficult to make a reality because we rely on playing and in order to withdraw we do it without any problems.

To be clearer in what I mean, that now all casinos want to require KYC, and the best way is to comply with it from the beginning, I have said a lot that the things that casinos should do is look for the warning that the KYC is fulfilled before making a deposit to play, otherwise it is not good that for any reason people have to do the KYC at the time of withdrawing, because it is annoying, it bothers me personally, and like the boom KYC is a fact and it is done, because they should require it for a reason, some say that people will be scared, but I think it won't be like that, because it will be something that can generate more confidence, if you leave other casinos will find themselves with the same system but if they do it here, he is a safe customer, because he will play, then it could be said that the casino's motto is that they are honest and transparent from the beginning, and that they do nothing but speak the truth, this is what That can make them generate more confidence, and that they speak with confidence.

KYC is now very necessary in casinos so that they can generate trust in companies, supposedly that is what it is for, of course I don't think it is like that, it is just an excuse for governments to have people's data so that they can request it later, That's why KYCs do them, to generate more control over people, the rest is simply a cliché that they invented, I'm a true believer in those things, therefore KYCs are not what people believe. or they make them believe.

There does seem to be a real desire to make sure that these places are safe and trustworthy, but I also get the feeling that there is a deeper, more controlling goal at play. People say that the need to collect data is a way to build trust, but it really seems more like a way to spy on people. There is a strong case to be made that KYC helps build trust in gambling. But lets look into it more.

When KYC is thrown at players at withdrawal time, though, its hard to ignore how frustrated they are. What was once joy turns into anger. I agree that being honest from the start can make people feel like you're being honest and loyal. But the real reason for the monitoring cant be ignored. More oversight and control are being added under the idea of protecting players.

KYC should be compulsory since not everyone like to drop their credentials online because they want to use a casino to bet. I frown at KYC Casinos especially those ones that take KYC compulsory before their customers make any withdrawal. Nit everyone is comfortable with that information to be left on a casino. Casinos supposed to have an option that would delete our KYC credentials whenever we are not ready to use there platform again. I think this will be mostly appreciate so that we are going to feel safe from intruders that could sell our information to third parties.

The purpose of having KYC in a casino platform and even in any other platform is to ensure that the platform knows their clients, sometimes why some people don't want to their credentials to be review online is because of the level of illegality they commit, actually we need to be documented in anything concerning monetary transactions so that when thing's goes wrong from the transaction they will be easy access to know exactly the person that's responsible for the act, but many people do not like to document their accounts because they are sacred of being hold responsible in anything, kyc should be necessary because its a safety both the platform and also a patronised.

[Hamphser]

`

I know that many may think that when it comes to improving things when it comes to not doing KYC, people seeking their anonymity and privacy is something that can give us better security, according to what we think when we have to comply Some KYC is difficult to make a reality because we rely on playing and in order to withdraw we do it without any problems.

To be clearer in what I mean, that now all casinos want to require KYC, and the best way is to comply with it from the beginning, I have said a lot that the things that casinos should do is look for the warning that the KYC is fulfilled before making a deposit to play, otherwise it is not good that for any reason people have to do the KYC at the time of withdrawing, because it is annoying, it bothers me personally, and like the boom KYC is a fact and it is done, because they should require it for a reason, some say that people will be scared, but I think it won't be like that, because it will be something that can generate more confidence, if you leave other casinos will find themselves with the same system but if they do it here, he is a safe customer, because he will play, then it could be said that the casino's motto is that they are honest and transparent from the beginning, and that they do nothing but speak the truth, this is what That can make them generate more confidence, and that they speak with confidence.

KYC is now very necessary in casinos so that they can generate trust in companies, supposedly that is what it is for, of course I don't think it is like that, it is just an excuse for governments to have people's data so that they can request it later, That's why KYCs do them, to generate more control over people, the rest is simply a cliché that they invented, I'm a true believer in those things, therefore KYCs are not what people believe. or they make them believe.

There does seem to be a real desire to make sure that these places are safe and trustworthy, but I also get the feeling that there is a deeper, more controlling goal at play. People say that the need to collect data is a way to build trust, but it really seems more like a way to spy on people. There is a strong case to be made that KYC helps build trust in gambling. But lets look into it more.

When KYC is thrown at players at withdrawal time, though, its hard to ignore how frustrated they are. What was once joy turns into anger. I agree that being honest from the start can make people feel like you're being honest and loyal. But the real reason for the monitoring cant be ignored. More oversight and control are being added under the idea of protecting players.

KYC should be compulsory since not everyone like to drop their credentials online because they want to use a casino to bet. I frown at KYC Casinos especially those ones that take KYC compulsory before their customers make any withdrawal. Nit everyone is comfortable with that information to be left on a casino. Casinos supposed to have an option that would delete our KYC credentials whenever we are not ready to use there platform again. I think this will be mostly appreciate so that we are going to feel safe from intruders that could sell our information to third parties.

The purpose of having KYC in a casino platform and even in any other platform is to ensure that the platform knows their clients, sometimes why some people don't want to their credentials to be review online is because of the level of illegality they commit, actually we need to be documented in anything concerning monetary transactions so that when thing's goes wrong from the transaction they will be easy access to know exactly the person that's responsible for the act, but many people do not like to document their accounts because they are sacred of being hold responsible in anything, kyc should be necessary because its a safety both the platform and also a patronised.

Not only on the purpose on knowing their clients but rather these rules or terms had been asked out or imposed by some regulation been set out for them to follow. If they wont then for sure their business wouldnt really be that operation on which they would really be needing to follow a certain law for them to have that license on which we know that having this would really be something significant on gambling industry.
This is why as a gambler then it would really be that always better that you should really be reading up sites terms and conditions so that you would really be that wary or simply aware on what are the
limitations and possible situation you would be able to encounter in case you do win up big. In overall it would really be that wise that you should really be making that in depth
research about on a certain platform and see it if there are really some shady stuffs or things that do happen which its better to know it early than on knowing it later when
issues had already arise.

[Dunamisx]

KYC should be compulsory since not everyone like to drop their credentials online because they want to use a casino to bet. I frown at KYC Casinos especially those ones that take KYC compulsory before their customers make any withdrawal. Nit everyone is comfortable with that information to be left on a casino. Casinos supposed to have an option that would delete our KYC credentials whenever we are not ready to use there platform again. I think this will be mostly appreciate so that we are going to feel safe from intruders that could sell our information to third parties.

Isn't it very simple if we make resea about any casino and discover that they require KYC then we can take a leave to look for such that does not require kyc, we also can take a look into the requirements they ask for, if they are informations we can afford to provide or not, all this should be our first target before making decision in using a casino because when we don't supply every necessary kyc requirements, we may not enjoy any of their services because we are going to be denied of them, especially the most important ones like making withdrawal and so on.

[LUCKMCFLY]

anyone deposited very less amount and luckily won a big jackpot like a 100x or 500x or 1000x of base bet and withdrawn without kyc or without facing any problem from the platform?

if yes, how much was that amount? and what was the casino?

i seen many people complaining about they don't give big wins easily or just don't give by making unanswerable queries like very hard KYC, freezing accounts, etc. this problem is very common with trusted casino's also/

do anyone withdrawn successfully the winning amount and if yes what was the process, it was seamless or you need to pass a hard kyc?

Ive experience just only twice i made a bet of only 500$ for a capital make a continuously run for 10$ every game and i didn't expect that i will get a huge amount of wins just around 1k usd only even tho its 1k usd still a large amount for me that can sustain my gambling activity for a over a month but after that wins i didnt take any risk anymore due to economic crisis needs  for funds, but i keep seeing streamers have this large profit but we cannot deny sometimes its not their money so its hard to trust they didnt spend alot of money on these casino.

There are live experience from gamblers history whereby they have won continuously but not as steady experience like that, these are occasional or once in a lifetime experience, many people never have thesame privilege of gambling and win as well, despite their several years of attempts to make something worthwhile in their gambling experience, i think we are so in a lucky mode finding ourselves on a top notch, with gambling experience.

There are cases where people Who have very little money and can do that, in fact something like this happened to me a long time ago, and then the casino became a scam, things that really surprised me, but well that's how it happens, but less than 10usd I managed to reach 1400usd, which seemed like a unique piece of Luck to me, so in this order of ideas things can be seen as Victorious but at the same time with a bitter taste, this is something that I do not always Recommend trusting in casinos that are relatively new ones, because they are the ones that bring the most danger to do this type of practices, so it is something that is not usually the best thing to do, this is good that the People who are starting out in the world of casinos also know it. Personally, I agree that I do not recommend other casinos but the oldest ones because that way they are the ones with the most confidence, the best Reputation they have , that seems to me to be the most important thing in a casino.

Many look for Comfort and to have a casino Where they Understand everything better, because the atmosphere and everything they feel good, and simprotnate, but what do we do in a casino where it does not offer us the security we deserve? That is Something that we cannot allow, and that is why newbies must see a way to look for those Threads from the forum reviewers so that they can go smoothly, and of course, depending on the person's tastes in the game , they can go for a specific casino, this can occur as a scenario that they must find the best way to Avoid having their money stolen, it is very unpleasant that someone who is entering the world of casinos and is scammed, because it is a client, possibly potential, who does not like the experience because it went badly at first and may not play again, then it is a loss for the casinos, and for the entire industry, because that person has advantages that perhaps They can also be Potential Clients.

Its strange how the places we go to find safety and excitement can sometimes let us down. Thats clear from your story. Even though gambling can make you feel good for a short time, it can often end badly, especially in new casinos that havent been tried yet. Even though big wins are exciting, they can quickly turn bad when you realise they're built on shaky ground. Putting your money and dreams in newer casinos, as you said? Not a good idea.

Now, when choosing a casino, how well-known it is and how long its been open are important. Its not just the lights, the mood, or the feeling of being at home. Not at all. Its about reliability. Trust is an important part of gaming. Always be careful and critical, and always question and doubt what you see. Brand new? They need to be even more careful. There are a lot of reviews, comments, and stories from experienced players. Doing something without first getting this information? Being stupid. A disappointing first experience can, in fact, turn people off from playing. Not only does that person lose, but the whole gambling business does too.

You are right, I don't see that it is a good idea that some of the things like that may be, the choice of a casino is crucial for me, some players may not have reached that level where one prefers to play in well-known casinos, before when I started in This is the casino, bitcoin, all this, what I did was register in every casino that came out, of course I didn't know Well about the security, I thought that all the new casinos that came out were reliable, and you could make deposits without suffer risks of scam, which in truth I was very naive, so in this order of ideas I can say and give basically the option that when it comes to how to do to establish a better casino is when something is fixed, be it a casino that can give a sample that is good Looking , of great quality in its support, that has a very good trust, an unsurpassed reputation, in the world there are, and it is something that we can all realize when we review the thread ann, that is a way of giving.

Also something that is very nice is when you have the objective of being clear that the best casinos are the ones that have the most history, the ones that are oldest and the ones that can basically attest that they can do things well, then this has a lot of influence. In general, based on this, we can attest that when it comes to how to establish a better service, the most reliable, for me it is that, taking into consideration that the tastes for games are the same, in Yes, they bring the same games as almost everyone, only some casinos have their own development and can change in terms of the setting of their games, but they are still under the same tone and can give the same results, that is why now with everything What has been presented about the common problem of KYC is that it is Preferable to leave the KYCe in the most reliable casinos than in the newer ones, because the new ones always have the risk of Scams.

[khaled0111]

Casinos supposed to have an option that would delete our KYC credentials whenever we are not ready to use there platform again. I think this will be mostly appreciate so that we are going to feel safe from intruders that could sell our information to third parties.

This is a very good point!
In fact, this isn't or shouldn't be just an option as there are many laws and regulations which aim to protect users and customers' privacy.
For example, in Europe there is the GDPR (general data protection regulation). According to GDPR, any company or service provider who operate in the EU or provide its services to one of its countries is obliged to delete the user/customer's data or personal information they have collected when the customer asks them to do so.

[dezoel]

there no harm in completing verification from the start of registering.

There is no harm in doing that as long as the platform you are using is trusted and has a good reputation among the gamblers' community because then you will have peace of mind that your personal details and documents won't be misused or sold since these things happen nowadays where new platforms collect such information from their users and then sell them to third-party service providers in return for money which is obviously a bad thing for the customer.

Therefore, it's not advisable to complete KYC verification at casinos or platforms that are relatively new and don't have much trust and reputation among gamblers. Even if you are asked to do it before you have made any deposits, but if the platform isn't trusted, you should avoid doing that and look for a better place to continue your activities.

[Fivestar4everMVP]

Casinos supposed to have an option that would delete our KYC credentials whenever we are not ready to use there platform again. I think this will be mostly appreciate so that we are going to feel safe from intruders that could sell our information to third parties.

This is a very good point!
In fact, this isn't or shouldn't be just an option as there are many laws and regulations which aim to protect users and customers' privacy.
For example, in Europe there is the GDPR (general data protection regulation). According to GDPR, any company or service provider who operate in the EU or provide its services to one of its countries is obliged to delete the user/customer's data or personal information they have collected when the customer asks them to do so.

In as much as this is a great idea, and a good law for the jurisdiction that already have such laws in place like the EU.

But to be honest, I do not think this to be really feasible, I believe that we all must have come across this adage that states that the internet never forgets, and of a truth, the internet indeed never forgets.

Any platform like a gambling casino or an exchange can tell the customer that they have deleted the customer's kyc data, meanwhile, they still have the same data in their system, and since there is no way for the customer to verify if this claim is true, the customer will have no choice but to simply believe.

I do not see this as something to be considered as a major development if at all it gets implemented.

[Doan9269]

Gambling platforms are customers friendly but when we are not giving them the necessary attention on what they request from us, this cause the beginning of a bridge between them, if we ar doing our oart then they will also not hesitate to do the needful we expect drom them, but why have we always wanted to do the wrong thing and yet expect to have their best offers, we will be the one to comply to their terms and not them to ours.

[cafter]

Talking about betting or gambling generally without mentioning Casinos, it has happened severally, making such Xs are possible and withdrawal with it. I can't speak for Casinos but most of them don't care about kyc to give you your wins and they allow you withdraw it but it varies with Casinos anyways.

You have a point in your statement,  I think the reason why most licensed casinos ask for KYC is host to fulfil their licensing demands this is so because, at some point,  we have hard highly reputable casinos not really bordering their clients for KYC verification for some winning even if it is above their free withdrawal threshold of $5k for none KYC and $5k+ withdrawal must be verified users of the casino.

We have seen a fair number of casinos not paying any serious attention to this and at some point pay a deaf ear to such things as withdrawals and go ahead to process their customer withdrawal demand.

the question is for small or new casinos for them $5k or $20k is a reasonable amount hey want to save for that they ask winning user to complete very complicated and hard KYC procedure.
and in last they ban that user from playing on their casino because he is winning, the new casino want losing players so they get rid of winners by blocking their account or doing things like that.
the reputable and big casinos who have huge amount of liquid money and players doesn't care about even $50k we can withdraw without KYC

[goxcraft]

KYC should be compulsory since not everyone like to drop their credentials online because they want to use a casino to bet. I frown at KYC Casinos especially those ones that take KYC compulsory before their customers make any withdrawal. Nit everyone is comfortable with that information to be left on a casino. Casinos supposed to have an option that would delete our KYC credentials whenever we are not ready to use there platform again. I think this will be mostly appreciate so that we are going to feel safe from intruders that could sell our information to third parties.

You can't just make KYC compulsory. Don't register at those casinos that require KYC as a mandatory thing. I don't know if you'll get one. All the big and reputed casinos must follow the rules and regulations imposed by the government, and KYC is one of them. I'm sure there are many casinos that don't specifically require KYC. But I'm unsure if they are real or fake. You might end up losing all your money. Using illegal, unregulated casinos is a risk that one shouldn't take. If a person is really concerned about his identity, then he shouldn't register. Another thing is that if your money is legal, obtained, or earned through valid sources, then KYC won't matter. You are good to go.

[jordanw21]

I won in Btikong's Keno smth like x200 and I even didn't know about it.

That was the first time i was playing keno, i just pushed Play with autoselect (i guess) and saw that my balance was x3 from the deposit.

Then I just withdrew money without any KYC. But I dont know whethere this platform can be called a casino in classic understanding.

Also, had success in LTC Casino's live roulette, in my birthday I selected 5 numbers (just repeated the last 5 winning numbers) with $20 bet per each (total deposit of $100) and I got lucky (only one time in my whole gambling history). No KYC, but I had to play x5 wager there.

[Fivestar4everMVP]

I won in Btikong's Keno smth like x200 and I even didn't know about it.

That was the first time i was playing keno, i just pushed Play with autoselect (i guess) and saw that my balance was x3 from the deposit.

Then I just withdrew money without any KYC. But I dont know whethere this platform can be called a casino in classic understanding.

Also, had success in LTC Casino's live roulette, in my birthday I selected 5 numbers (just repeated the last 5 winning numbers) with $20 bet per each (total deposit of $100) and I got lucky (only one time in my whole gambling history). No KYC, but I had to play x5 wager there.

Well, you did have had some good luck in gambling afterall, for me, I've played keno for quite some time on stake, had a couple of good winnings but never up to 50x, and I don't bet large sum, so the winning amount weren't always that significant or something to write home about.

And speaking about kyc again, there are actually alot of casinos out there that do not request kyc verification from their users before processing a withdrawal request, but the problems with this casinos is that, they are mostly unknown, and most are not even registered, which is why they don't request kyc from customer's in the first place.

I mostly avoid casinos that are not known, irrespective of kyc or not, because some of this casinos may turn out to be a scam, and we never can tell who the scape goat would be.

[goxcraft]

You have a point in your statement,  I think the reason why most licensed casinos ask for KYC is host to fulfil their licensing demands this is so because, at some point,  we have hard highly reputable casinos not really bordering their clients for KYC verification for some winning even if it is above their free withdrawal threshold of $5k for none KYC and $5k+ withdrawal must be verified users of the casino.

Casinos have to follow the rules and regulations if they wanna keep their platform open and running. If they break any terms their license might be void and they won't be able to run their business legally. I think that's the reason.
Casinos and betting sites are being as a money lundering medium for years. When the amount is high, it will create suspicion no matter what and to ensure the legality of the money, KYC is required. So it is fair enough for casinos to demand for KYC above 5k +. But below 5k a average person can efford that.

[Wiwo]

You have a point in your statement,  I think the reason why most licensed casinos ask for KYC is host to fulfil their licensing demands this is so because, at some point,  we have hard highly reputable casinos not really bordering their clients for KYC verification for some winning even if it is above their free withdrawal threshold of $5k for none KYC and $5k+ withdrawal must be verified users of the casino.

Casinos have to follow the rules and regulations if they wanna keep their platform open and running. If they brake any terms their license might be void and they won't be able to run their business legally. I think that's the reason.
Casinos and betting sites are being as a money lundering medium for years. When the amount is high, it will create suspicion no matter what and to ensure the legality of the money, KYC is required. So it is fair enough for casinos to demand for KYC above 5k +. But below 5k an average person can afford that.

Yes as part of the licensing agreement,  casinos have to follow every single rule that the government put up to them as part of their anti-money laundering laws,  and as a guideline to operating centralized licensed casinos,  and if any casino fails to meet that guideline in the cause of their operations,  they may be sanction for that and which in most cases their license may be seized.

Or being banned from operation for a specific amount of time in between,  so to avoid such harsh realities of events,  casinos tend to do everything within them to comply with those regulations.

[LUCKMCFLY]

When we are in a casino where things are obvious in this way, we can sense that the pressure is not ours, and that is a plus, why? Because there is a lot of competition in the casinos, it is known that if they try to demand a lot from us, well, if we don't want to, we don't give orders, and we leave it like that, we look for another casino that doesn't bother us so much and we try it, there must be someone who doesn't. It bothers so much, that's how it is, the competition is the only thing, for that reason I recommend doing it, I clarify, this KYUC thing is not something that I like, I think that many do not like it, but it is something that is why we fight Against the grain, if there is a caisno that we like a lot, we can do that test, of course it is not that it is done with everyone, that is only with some in particular, obviously the corresponding research has to be done.

Yeah!  It’s true that many people don’t like KYC verification. 
When I am faced with such a need to undergo verification according to the KYC procedure, I just begin to get nervous and swear to myself because I have gone through this process more than a dozen times.  And it definitely gets boring and annoying.  Moreover, there are also different confirmation options, for example, including video images of faces.  And all this data is transferred to someone unknown. 
And they may well be used for some bad purposes.  If there is even the slightest possibility of doing without KYC, I never go through this check again.

Yes, it is true that most gamblers who really prioritize the anonymity of personal data will refuse to be asked to do KYC because for them it is not only annoying but it is a very complicated process and is considered unsafe which makes them always refuse when asked for KYC.
But most of today's reputable gambling sites always ask for KYC before making a deposit or placing a bet and maybe this annoys someone but for me as long as the casino has high trustworthiness I will do KYC rather than lose huge amounts of money in a casino that doesn't have any reputation.

If they refused to complete any of their KYC request that means they are going to be frustrated while using the casino because they will be deprived of some benefits and functions, isn't it more better if a gambler feels like he cannot cope with having kyc challenges to go for the kind of casino categories that does not require kyc althrough, without filling in for kyc then you may not be able to make withdrawals and other things you would have been having access to.

But for me, this KYC refusal has disadvantages with several other features, namely the maximum betting limit is only small and if there is an account hack it will be very difficult to restore the account but it all depends on each person's opinion because we cannot go against other people's thoughts because I really understand gamblers who always look for casinos without KYC to prioritize his anonymity and they feel comfortable with the establishment he has planned to always refuse KYC.
However, for me, as long as I send KYC at a trusted casino, I will do KYC at least past KYC 1 just in case it is really needed one day.

Yes, it is always good to ask carefully if the KYC is necessary to withdraw until you play at the casino in particular, when we have been in a casino for a long time, for example at stake.com, if you have been there for years it is easier for them to Make an exception with the KYC and if you need to withdraw a lot, but they know that you must comply with the KYC, then is it necessary to do the KYC that is necessary to be able to withdraw, the level? It is not known, but it is up to them to decide, but that is already on another level, because it is obviously known that things have happened in a place where the casino knows the client but this time it does so so that everything can be kept well in the record. To comply with the regulations, is it necessary to do so? Yes, that is why it is good to do it only in the most reliable casinos, of all, in the new casinos, with different games, or well at least I do not recommend that they do it, in my opinion it is something that should not be done.

Now, as I have been saying throughout all this time, I am a person who always looks for the best, that is why I will always be in stake.com, bitcasino.io, duelbits, roobet, rollbit, they are casinos that I think have very good reputation, they are constantly growing, some older than others, and well in the global selection of what players prefer, these sometimes appear as among the most favorites, and this is something that can be very good, apart from that there are also players who They have to laugh at what they like the most, and they are the games, for me in particular playing dice I really like primedice and freebitco.in, they are the platforms that give me the most excitement, maybe because that's when I played pro first time and it meets my expectations when it comes to craps, when it comes to poker, I'm waiting to see what stake.com is going to come up with to surprise us, I'm sure it will leave us all shocked with the quality of the game and platform that it you will have, this is something that can be very good.