No KYC Crypto Casinos & Sites | NoToKYC.com | 100$ BTC GIVEAWAY

[Synchronice]

-snip

I answered it many times now, the casinos have to include KYC TERMS if they have a license even if they will never do KYC! Not the government, the casinos is the one who has the decision of require KYC from a User. My KYC levels are dicussed with the casino teams!

What about to really update statistics on your website? Do you randomly read comments here? Am I wasting my time?
On your website we read: KYC level 0 - The site's Terms Of Service (ToS) do not mention any requirement for KYC verification. Now, double check your website.Justabit and Jackbit are entitled as KYC level 0 while both of them mention requirements for KYC verification. How is that? It's simple, right? You don't even check websites that you add in your list, why should someone use that? I shouldn't be the one to correct you.

[1715122039]

1715122039

[3kpk3]

Respond to what? Is this an IA generated post? What did they respond to?
They didn't do anything aside from promoting one more of their links.. They didn't adreess any of the above concerns, which I conside shady as hell.

Lol. Agreed. It's pretty evident that op is basically ignoring most criticism since he has no proper response.

I answered it many times now, the casinos have to include KYC TERMS if they have a license even if they will never do KYC! Not the government, the casinos is the one who has the decision of require KYC from a User. My KYC levels are dicussed with the casino teams!

Stop acting innocent. You know damn well that any of these sites can enforce KYC whenever they want to using the TOS as their shield, but you aren't willing to admit that for reasons that only you are aware of.

[dimonstration]

I answered it many times now, the casinos have to include KYC TERMS if they have a license even if they will never do KYC! Not the government, the casinos is the one who has the decision of require KYC from a User. My KYC levels are dicussed with the casino teams!

Stop acting innocent. You know damn well that any of these sites can enforce KYC whenever they want to using the TOS as their shield, but you aren't willing to admit that for reasons that only you are aware of.

I think it’s obvious what’s his reason. His website profitability depends on the user that doesn’t prerred KYC when playing in a casino somhe will surely stick to even if he mislead someone that casino doesn’t apply KYC since this is what his service offered.

In reality, Casino with Curacao license will always require KYC at any point of the user game. I believe the should start listing on Decentralized casino and forget Centralized Casino since there’s always a threat for license for them.

[Mahdirakib]

I answered it many times now, the casinos have to include KYC TERMS if they have a license even if they will never do KYC! Not the government, the casinos is the one who has the decision of require KYC from a User. My KYC levels are dicussed with the casino teams!

Casino team says various things to the casino promoters for marketing purpose. Do you know any Curacao licensed casino which haven't asked their user to complete the KYC verification (except the newly launched casino). You have given '0' ratings for the JustBit KYC verification requirement. I think these two threads are enough to prove your rating as wrong.
• justbit.io asks for KYC (their site say NO KYC) then confiscates my winnings
• justbit.io scam, refuse to pay me out

Don't take the casino terms very lightly. You won't be able to deny the KYC verification if a licensed casino enforce you to do that based on the terms. There are a small number of casinos left without the KYC verification requirement. You will find some of them here: Information of Crypto Casinos License and KYC requirements

[Cling18]

I answered it many times now, the casinos have to include KYC TERMS if they have a license even if they will never do KYC! Not the government, the casinos is the one who has the decision of require KYC from a User. My KYC levels are dicussed with the casino teams!

Stop acting innocent. You know damn well that any of these sites can enforce KYC whenever they want to using the TOS as their shield, but you aren't willing to admit that for reasons that only you are aware of.

I think it’s obvious what’s his reason. His website profitability depends on the user that doesn’t prerred KYC when playing in a casino somhe will surely stick to even if he mislead someone that casino doesn’t apply KYC since this is what his service offered.

In reality, Casino with Curacao license will always require KYC at any point of the user game. I believe the should start listing on Decentralized casino and forget Centralized Casino since there’s always a threat for license for them.

There are really people who prefer putting profit on top of everything than thinking of other's welfare. It is their main goal to make a profit rather than to spread legit reliable information. If this information misleads lots of gamblers who are expecting non-KYC casinos, they might face hardships in the future. Most licensed casinos nowadays usually require KYC and I don't see anything wrong with that because it's goal is also to protect their site as well as their players from fraudulent activities. Better comply with it rather than risk in untrusted casinos.

[Onyeeze]

I answered it many times now, the casinos have to include KYC TERMS if they have a license even if they will never do KYC! Not the government, the casinos is the one who has the decision of require KYC from a User. My KYC levels are dicussed with the casino teams!

Stop acting innocent. You know damn well that any of these sites can enforce KYC whenever they want to using the TOS as their shield, but you aren't willing to admit that for reasons that only you are aware of.

I think it’s obvious what’s his reason. His website profitability depends on the user that doesn’t prerred KYC when playing in a casino somhe will surely stick to even if he mislead someone that casino doesn’t apply KYC since this is what his service offered.

In reality, Casino with Curacao license will always require KYC at any point of the user game. I believe the should start listing on Decentralized casino and forget Centralized Casino since there’s always a threat for license for them.

There are really people who prefer putting profit on top of everything than thinking of other's welfare. It is their main goal to make a profit rather than to spread legit reliable information. If this information misleads lots of gamblers who are expecting non-KYC casinos, they might face hardships in the future. Most licensed casinos nowadays usually require KYC and I don't see anything wrong with that because it's goal is also to protect their site as well as their players from fraudulent activities. Better comply with it rather than risk in untrusted casinos.

KYC should be one of the priorities of any gambling websites or a platform, because if a casino platform is being operate with a license their is nothing will make them not to request for KYC to any of their customers, if they customers verify their account and it happens that their customers is not reliable base what it does in their platform, with the KYC verification the customer can be fish out, I don't know why some of the customers doesn't agree to verify their account in some of this casino or gambling platforms, I don't know some people plans and thinking over not to be done their KYC

[Fivestar4everMVP]

KYC should be one of the priorities of any gambling websites or a platform, because if a casino platform is being operate with a license their is nothing will make them not to request for KYC to any of their customers, if they customers verify their account and it happens that their customers is not reliable base what it does in their platform, with the KYC verification the customer can be fish out, I don't know why some of the customers doesn't agree to verify their account in some of this casino or gambling platforms, I don't know some people plans and thinking over not to be done their KYC

One thing you must understand is that, how you undervalue your privacy is not how other persons undervalue their privacy, there are some who will not want to share their personal information to third parties for the fear of the unknown, which most of the time is as a result of the fact that some of this casinos end up selling those documents to hackers or other bad actors in or on the dark web for money.

Regardless of the fact that most gambling casinos have started requiring their customers and potential customer to pass kyc verification for the best casino experience, it is still very important for we; the gamblers to be very careful and mindful of the type of casinos we are sharing our personally information with, because sometimes, this action may come back to hurt us if the wrong people get hold of our private and personal details .

[Odusko]

-snip

I answered it many times now, the casinos have to include KYC TERMS if they have a license even if they will never do KYC! Not the government, the casinos is the one who has the decision of require KYC from a User. My KYC levels are dicussed with the casino teams!

Nice to read this replies from the the admin and this attests to the fact that the casino is a KYC compliant and that it shouldn't have carried the latter boldly stated on the domain that no KYC, this could breed a lot of misconceptions and misunderstandings within the community who may not take the time to read through this entire thread may fall into it by registering thinking that it a KYC free casino since it looks mentioned so in the title.

[AmoreJaz]

-snip

I answered it many times now, the casinos have to include KYC TERMS if they have a license even if they will never do KYC! Not the government, the casinos is the one who has the decision of require KYC from a User. My KYC levels are dicussed with the casino teams!

Nice to read this replies from the the admin and this attests to the fact that the casino is a KYC compliant and that it shouldn't have carried the latter boldly stated on the domain that no KYC, this could breed a lot of misconceptions and misunderstandings within the community who may not take the time to read through this entire thread may fall into it by registering thinking that it a KYC free casino since it looks mentioned so in the title.

well, at the end of the day, it is still the responsibility of the gambler to check the site's terms by himself. as like with other review or listing sites, you can't guarantee that their information is also up-to-date and legit. so before registering to any casino, make sure you've done your due diligence and not relying the information from someone else's site. they can serve as a guide, but you still have the job to verify such info.

[lienfaye]

Hi, i visited your site and and skimmed the casinos you are claiming to have no kyc. Quotes i am adding next to Casino names are directly from these sites.

-SNIP

Hello,
all KYC levels are determined together with the casino teams.
Licensed casinos have to include kyc terms to comply with the license laws, this does not mean they will do KYC!
The KYC levels are defined if KYC is needed and when.

You can't be so certain that the casino will not really ask KYC on their users since they're regulated. It's still on their discretion and can be asked at anytime, maybe if the time comes you win a decent amount on their platform.

Anyway, I appreciate the effort for making these lists. However, those casinos are not really a no kyc platform. Therefore gamblers must read the ToS (especially the kyc section) before considering to try playing.

[Apocollapse]

well, at the end of the day, it is still the responsibility of the gambler to check the site's terms by himself. as like with other review or listing sites, you can't guarantee that their information is also up-to-date and legit. so before registering to any casino, make sure you've done your due diligence and not relying the information from someone else's site. they can serve as a guide, but you still have the job to verify such info.

It's true, but if those review sites are not updated or giving false information, that's mean better to not read those review sites as we need to check every sites to validate the information. So the question is, why need to have a review sites when the owner isn't capable to update the information?

Review site is important because it make me no need to check one by one site.

[3kpk3]

There are really people who prefer putting profit on top of everything than thinking of other's welfare. It is their main goal to make a profit rather than to spread legit reliable information.

Most people are like this sadly thanks to the money factor. One big example in this forum is the 1xbit fiasco where a shit-ton of shills are involved who promote that scam site just for quick bucks.

Review site is important because it make me no need to check one by one site.

Such review sites are pointless if the information that they are sharing isn't 100% accurate.

[Crypt0Gore]

Hi friend, do you know that some casinos don't ask for KYC for gambling?

My Ans: it's only a matter of time, leave them be for now, when the time is right they will be the one asking, they will be forced to ask KYC because success can't be hidden from the authorities, they will come for every successful casinos, unless they want to get shut down.

It's easier for a brand new casino with zero to no reputation at all keep their No-KYC policy alive, because no one will bother them, but as they maintain the business for a long time and many new customers keep onboarding the platform, the authorities will be alerted and they will either fine you or warn you to start asking for KYC, if your casino is really registered you can't escape the necessity of KYC requirements, it's inescapable.

OP, I really appreciate the effort you put into this, but many online casinos have erased every no-KYC policy that they started at the very beginning of their early lives, it's a good way to attract new people to the platform since so many still want a no KYC casino, but they don't always last long.

[piebeyb]

well, at the end of the day, it is still the responsibility of the gambler to check the site's terms by himself. as like with other review or listing sites, you can't guarantee that their information is also up-to-date and legit. so before registering to any casino, make sure you've done your due diligence and not relying the information from someone else's site. they can serve as a guide, but you still have the job to verify such info.

Yes, because it is impossible for this third party site to continue to update every update that you make, so it is a waste of time for other gamblers to access this site to see the updated requirements, let alone see the requirements which can sometimes change at any time, it is best to read directly from the official site to make it easier. , after all it would be impossible for large casinos to change their terms without notifying customers.

Always check emails and anything on their site because reading doesn't cost us time because it's all for our convenience in gambling, I know not everyone likes KYC but there are also some big sites that don't ask for full KYC to withdraw thousands of dollars, so it's best to use the forum this and do your own research in depth so that you don't have problems in the future. after all it doesn't take hours to check it.

[livingfree]

I think that I have seen a thread that has listed no-kyc casinos I just can't remember it now. But having this list will help someone who's looking for the non-kyc casinos but we have to be aware that it could change any moment.

They could become a compliant casino that only follows the orders of their regulatory body that they're subject for an approval for their license or anything sort of that stuff that affects their operation.

well, at the end of the day, it is still the responsibility of the gambler to check the site's terms by himself. as like with other review or listing sites, you can't guarantee that their information is also up-to-date and legit. so before registering to any casino, make sure you've done your due diligence and not relying the information from someone else's site. they can serve as a guide, but you still have the job to verify such info.

I agree, there can be some reviews that have been outdated already and that's why some info are no longer accurate. That's it's still us that will have to check them out as the typical suggestion of many, DYOR.

[NoToKYC]

We have released our first gambling script. Check it out here: Dice Gambling Script

[ChuckBuck]

How generous of NoToKYC.com to present such an "exclusive" platform. But here's some free advice: don't get too comfortable. I've seen countless platforms promising no KYC and then turning their backs on players when they win bick. Time will, inevitably, reveal the truth about your venture. And for all the gamblers there: Do your research, be skeptical, and for heaven's sake, gamble responsibly.  
To NoToKYC: hope that you will keep the promises

[Ojima-ojo]

Does it mean that the ops did not take the time to read through the terms of service before promoting the casino,  and even from the title of this thread one can easily see the point that makes the title to state no KYC.


Between we have to apply caution when dealing with the new casinos that promised some kind of services that look unrealistic and not clearly stated in their terms of service.

-snip

I answered it many times now, the casinos have to include KYC TERMS if they have a license even if they will never do KYC! Not the government, the casinos is the one who has the decision to require KYC from a User. My KYC levels are discussed with the casino teams!

What about to really update statistics on your website? Do you randomly read comments here? Am I wasting my time?
On your website we read: KYC level 0 - The site's Terms Of Service (ToS) do not mention any requirement for KYC verification. Now, double-check your website.Justabit and Jackbit are entitled to KYC level 0 while both of them mention requirements for KYC verification. How is that? It's simple, right? You don't even check websites that you add to your list, why should someone use that? I shouldn't be the one to correct you.

Most of the gambling sites that require both level 0 of 1 kyc always state them clearly in the terms and conditions so that they can keep the customers informed about the casino stances on kyc and what customers can expect when dealing with the site.

[khaled0111]

Most of the gambling sites that require both level 0 of 1 kyc always state them clearly in the terms and conditions so that they can keep the customers informed about the casino stances on kyc and what customers can expect when dealing with the site.

Personally, I have no problem with casinos or any other services that enforce kyc, be it level 1 or complete verification, as long as they are being transparent and don't try to hide it. What am against is those who claim they don't require it but will ask you to verify your identity and freeze your account as soon as you make a big win or try to cash out.
If you are not going to comply with the Curaçao license terms then why having it in first place!

[Odusko]

-snip

I answered it many times now, the casinos have to include KYC TERMS if they have a license even if they will never do KYC! Not the government, the casinos is the one who has the decision of require KYC from a User. My KYC levels are dicussed with the casino teams!

Nice to read this replies from the the admin and this attests to the fact that the casino is a KYC compliant and that it shouldn't have carried the latter boldly stated on the domain that no KYC, this could breed a lot of misconceptions and misunderstandings within the community who may not take the time to read through this entire thread may fall into it by registering thinking that it a KYC free casino since it looks mentioned so in the title.

well, at the end of the day, it is still the responsibility of the gambler to check the site's terms by himself. as like with other review or listing sites, you can't guarantee that their information is also up-to-date and legit. so before registering to any casino, make sure you've done your due diligence and not relying the information from someone else's site. they can serve as a guide, but you still have the job to verify such info.

The primary responsibility of every gambler is to first of all check and read through the casinos terms and conditions, checking to see if the term go in line with their desire and what they can afford to bear, more also most casinos that attract customers always have a system that is highly flexible on the customers and can allow them to deposits and withdraws without KYC demands.
Where KYC is only demanded when a gambler wants to make a withdrawal above the minimum amount set by the casino for unverified accounts, At that point the customer may be asked to go through KYC, another time KYC can also be demanded is when your account is suspected to have exhibited suspension activities kyc can also be demanded that.