🔥 No KYC Crypto Casinos & Sites | NoToKYC.com | 💸 500$ Wagering Contest 💸

[Mr Reporter]

Casinos need to check for case of cheating and that could be the reason why they often ask for KYC when you win big amount of money. Some also will want to cheat you looking for any tangible reason they can disqualify you so that you can not withdraw your money.
These are done often by potentially known scam casinos with the mindset to ban you so you don't have the liberty to withdraw or charge them for unlawful ban. The good casinos can will have nothing in mind to make you lose your money.

Casinos should have a better way to identify scammers and fraudsters using their  platform they cannot force anyone to do kyc after winning big money because they want to be sure that those winners did not cheat on the site, if it is only big wins that draws their attention to impose Kyc on their customers that means they do not want their customers to win at all.
I think the main reason why some casinos decide to impose a law to their customers after big wins is because they do not want to pay their customers so they can not be trusted as they are the real scammers.

I don't think that casinos demand KYC after big wins because they want to cheat players.

I think they are forced by regulations to identify the person who is receivinga high  amount of money.  This is important for many reasons, including taxes and regulations.

Ofc some casinos may try to find a reason not to pay, but I dont think this is the most common situation.

I think this point Exactly most of the time it’s the law, not a shady plot. Casinos have to flag big payouts for AML and tax reasons, so KYC is just part of the compliance checklist. Sure, a bad actor might try to dodge a win, but that’s the exception, not the rule.

the KYC push is mostly a regulatory hoop, not a sneaky pay‑us‑later scheme.That they said, the process can feel like a pain when you’re just trying to cash out.

[arwin100]

Casinos need to check for case of cheating and that could be the reason why they often ask for KYC when you win big amount of money. Some also will want to cheat you looking for any tangible reason they can disqualify you so that you can not withdraw your money.
These are done often by potentially known scam casinos with the mindset to ban you so you don't have the liberty to withdraw or charge them for unlawful ban. The good casinos can will have nothing in mind to make you lose your money.

Casinos should have a better way to identify scammers and fraudsters using their  platform they cannot force anyone to do kyc after winning big money because they want to be sure that those winners did not cheat on the site, if it is only big wins that draws their attention to impose Kyc on their customers that means they do not want their customers to win at all.
I think the main reason why some casinos decide to impose a law to their customers after big wins is because they do not want to pay their customers so they can not be trusted as they are the real scammers.

I don't think that casinos demand KYC after big wins because they want to cheat players.

I think they are forced by regulations to identify the person who is receivinga high  amount of money.  This is important for many reasons, including taxes and regulations.

Ofc some casinos may try to find a reason not to pay, but I dont think this is the most common situation.

This situation also happen on scam casino since they used that KYC reason to invalidate or deny the winnings of their players.

But for proven reputable casino I think its not really a problem since provably those KYC things is just for verification purposes.

Regulation also push crypto casino to imposed KYC that's why we have seen those reputable casino which didn't offer KYC suddenly have an update and make it a mandatory requirements in their platform.

[gunhell16]

Casinos need to check for case of cheating and that could be the reason why they often ask for KYC when you win big amount of money. Some also will want to cheat you looking for any tangible reason they can disqualify you so that you can not withdraw your money.
These are done often by potentially known scam casinos with the mindset to ban you so you don't have the liberty to withdraw or charge them for unlawful ban. The good casinos can will have nothing in mind to make you lose your money.

Casinos should have a better way to identify scammers and fraudsters using their  platform they cannot force anyone to do kyc after winning big money because they want to be sure that those winners did not cheat on the site, if it is only big wins that draws their attention to impose Kyc on their customers that means they do not want their customers to win at all.
I think the main reason why some casinos decide to impose a law to their customers after big wins is because they do not want to pay their customers so they can not be trusted as they are the real scammers.

Not all casinos do things that way, right? Especially those casinos that are truly non-KYC, and if they do demand KYC, it's probably because they noticed suspicious activity from a user trying to withdraw a large amount.

And there are other casinos that immediately create solutions to problems whenever they find bugs on their own casino website. In my opinion, the casinos that have been running for a long time in this forum don't have any problems that they didn't immediately resolve; rather, everything has been resolved.

[Rockson1]

Casinos should have a better way to identify scammers and fraudsters using their  platform they cannot force anyone to do kyc after winning big money because they want to be sure that those winners did not cheat on the site, if it is only big wins that draws their attention to impose Kyc on their customers that means they do not want their customers to win at all.
I think the main reason why some casinos decide to impose a law to their customers after big wins is because they do not want to pay their customers so they can not be trusted as they are the real scammers.

I will want to agree with your first point, but the thing here is, not all casinos that introduce KYC whenever are doing that to do away or deprive gamblers there payout, casinos due to government regulations can change their terms and conditions at anything, although I understand what you meant but where I blame most of those casinos that did not start with KYC but later introduce it as a must for withdrawal of any one that luck shines on with substantial winning is that, as customers our right and interest should be protected, even if these casinos hands are tied sometimes because of the power that plays around, I think customer should be briefed for extensive understanding and comprehensive knowledge about the new update so that they will not feel betrayed. You should also understand that KYC does a lot for casinos, your suggestions that casinos should have good approach that will help them to figure out people of diverse intentions is nice but you can also suggest a method for them if you have any.

[LeyMonte]

Not all casinos do things that way, right? Especially those casinos that are truly non-KYC, and if they do demand KYC, it's probably because they noticed suspicious activity from a user trying to withdraw a large amount.

And there are other casinos that immediately create solutions to problems whenever they find bugs on their own casino website. In my opinion, the casinos that have been running for a long time in this forum don't have any problems that they didn't immediately resolve; rather, everything has been resolved.

I don't know if all casinos solve their problems so seriously but the casino sites that solve any kind of problem very quickly are very aware of good customer service. Yes, the casino sites that I see on the forum are doing a very good job in customer service. If a customer faces any kind of problem, if he immediately posts it on their ANN thread then it is solved very quickly. In fact, casino sites should be like that which provide service with awareness and achieve something good.

[Odohu]

Casinos should have a better way to identify scammers and fraudsters using their  platform they cannot force anyone to do kyc after winning big money because they want to be sure that those winners did not cheat on the site, if it is only big wins that draws their attention to impose Kyc on their customers that means they do not want their customers to win at all.
I think the main reason why some casinos decide to impose a law to their customers after big wins is because they do not want to pay their customers so they can not be trusted as they are the real scammers.

I don't think that casinos demand KYC after big wins because they want to cheat players.

I think they are forced by regulations to identify the person who is receivinga high  amount of money.  This is important for many reasons, including taxes and regulations.

Ofc some casinos may try to find a reason not to pay, but I dont think this is the most common situation.

Lets say I deposited $100 in a casino and lost 50% of that while playing, there will be no problem. Assuming I get lucky to turn the balance of $50 to $500k, then casinos will suddenly demand for KYC, does this make any sense? They know the source of the fund so what are they trying to protect or know when they know I won the money genuinely from their platform. The only thing they do this is mostly to buy time and see if the player will gamble the money away. Another reason may also be to find a reason not to pay the player.

[GiftedMAN]

Lets say I deposited $100 in a casino and lost 50% of that while playing, there will be no problem. Assuming I get lucky to turn the balance of $50 to $500k, then casinos will suddenly demand for KYC, does this make any sense? They know the source of the fund so what are they trying to protect or know when they know I won the money genuinely from their platform. The only thing they do this is mostly to buy time and see if the player will gamble the money away. Another reason may also be to find a reason not to pay the player.

I think Casinos should be more concerned about the amount deposited in their platform to gamble than the amount won and how to withdraw it, the illustration you gave is a good way to show how much wrongs the Casinos have done to players and what they are still doing which is not fair if we are being honest as players. They know the amount you deposited in their site before playing yet they will not ask for any verification before allowing you to deposit but when you have used the same amount you deposited to win huge amount they will start demanding for KYC like they are not aware of where the winning is coming from, your point is valid they just want to buy time to see if gamblers will be motivated to keep playing so that they will end up not paying them or they want to log them out and scam them of the amount won.

[Wakate]

I fully support your opinion, as making claims of a casino that does not have any KYC would be seriously misleading, and the users would need to send identification at a later time. One of the most significant aspects as far as trust in the gambling industry is concerned is transparency, particularly, in crypto casinos. Players should be informed in advance of the fact of the existence of KYC, and in which circumstances. Most platforms promote no KYC only to verify the user later on, when they are about to make withdrawals or higher sums of money, which is misleading.

No KYC means players using the casino will not be ask for verification of their personal identity which is what most of the casinos are always after when you are registering on them or when you want to make withdrawals. It is the obligation of the casino team to make this comprehensive for their players without no plan of hiding anything from their current and further users. If there will be minimal verification from players, it is meant to be understood on their marketing ads clearly.

[ZekiBeyy]

Lets say I deposited $100 in a casino and lost 50% of that while playing, there will be no problem. Assuming I get lucky to turn the balance of $50 to $500k, then casinos will suddenly demand for KYC, does this make any sense? They know the source of the fund so what are they trying to protect or know when they know I won the money genuinely from their platform. The only thing they do this is mostly to buy time and see if the player will gamble the money away. Another reason may also be to find a reason not to pay the player.

I think Casinos should be more concerned about the amount deposited in their platform to gamble than the amount won and how to withdraw it, the illustration you gave is a good way to show how much wrongs the Casinos have done to players and what they are still doing which is not fair if we are being honest as players. They know the amount you deposited in their site before playing yet they will not ask for any verification before allowing you to deposit but when you have used the same amount you deposited to win huge amount they will start demanding for KYC like they are not aware of where the winning is coming from, your point is valid they just want to buy time to see if gamblers will be motivated to keep playing so that they will end up not paying them or they want to log them out and scam them of the amount won.

Every casino needs to have a good liquidity. To do this it is necessary to have a lot of players. But many people prefer to play in casino with no kyc.

People may want to keep their identities hidden when it comes to gambling or betting, but many casinos will require KYC (Know Your Customer) processes, especially when it comes to withdrawals or similar actions, even if they don't ask for it initially. Sometimes, KYC is also requested to prevent the same individuals from taking advantage of promotions multiple times.

[MainIbem]

I will want to agree with your first point, but the thing here is, not all casinos that introduce KYC whenever are doing that to do away or deprive gamblers there payout, casinos due to government regulations can change their terms and conditions at anything, although I understand what you meant but where I blame most of those casinos that did not start with KYC but later introduce it as a must for withdrawal of any one that luck shines on with substantial winning is that, as customers our right and interest should be protected, even if these casinos hands are tied sometimes because of the power that plays around, I think customer should be briefed for extensive understanding and comprehensive knowledge about the new update so that they will not feel betrayed.

Yeah it's true they can change their policy at anytime, if you read some of their TOS you'll see that some platforms have the right to modify or change their mode of operation without giving notice to the customers, but I don't think it's fair cause customers decision matters too and some customers use non kyc platforms for a reason most especially for privacy so just can't suddenly request kyc from such customers without including giving them prior notice about a change of policy in their TOS.

[khaled0111]

This situation also happen on scam casino since they used that KYC reason to invalidate or deny the winnings of their players.

As some of the members above have said, just because you were asked to pass kyc doesn’t mean the casino is a scam.
Well, many casinos use the excuse that they have to comply with regulations and are that they are forced to ask users to pass kyc in order to deny customers their winnings, but this doesn’t mean that all casinos that do this are scams.
If you read in their ToS that they reserve the right to ask you for verification and you agree to that, then in this case, you can only call them a scam if you provide legitimate documents and they do not to approve them.

[Joy- maker]

Casinos need to check for case of cheating and that could be the reason why they often ask for KYC when you win big amount of money. Some also will want to cheat you looking for any tangible reason they can disqualify you so that you can not withdraw your money.
These are done often by potentially known scam casinos with the mindset to ban you so you don't have the liberty to withdraw or charge them for unlawful ban. The good casinos can will have nothing in mind to make you lose your money.

Casinos should have a better way to identify scammers and fraudsters using their  platform they cannot force anyone to do kyc after winning big money because they want to be sure that those winners did not cheat on the site, if it is only big wins that draws their attention to impose Kyc on their customers that means they do not want their customers to win at all.
I think the main reason why some casinos decide to impose a law to their customers after big wins is because they do not want to pay their customers so they can not be trusted as they are the real scammers.

I was thinking about same thing too for casino's to have more effective methods to detect scammers in their platforms, because requesting of KYC from casinos when someone want to withdraw his or her win's is already getting annoying, and my win's are already trapped in some gambling platforms just because the name I used in opening my accounts on those platforms didn't correspond with name on the account I want  use to withdraw those win's, and what is even provoking me is that, I contacted their customer service and they said they can't help me on that, while I already I everything to prove that am the owner of the account. Please and please casinos should look into this aspect and look for a reasonable way to detect scammers and not this wey they are using.

[mirakal]

This situation also happen on scam casino since they used that KYC reason to invalidate or deny the winnings of their players.

As some of the members above have said, just because you were asked to pass kyc doesn’t mean the casino is a scam.
Well, many casinos use the excuse that they have to comply with regulations and are that they are forced to ask users to pass kyc in order to deny customers their winnings, but this doesn’t mean that all casinos that do this are scams.
If you read in their ToS that they reserve the right to ask you for verification and you agree to that, then in this case, you can only call them a scam if you provide legitimate documents and they do not to approve them.

It’s really necessary to read the TOS because that’s where all the info is. There’s no such thing as a real “no-KYC” casino if they’re licensed. Some casinos just get licenses from providers that aren’t that strict, but even those can eventually ask for KYC whenever they need to. We should keep that in mind so we understand how this business actually works.

[Fivestar4everMVP]

This situation also happen on scam casino since they used that KYC reason to invalidate or deny the winnings of their players.

As some of the members above have said, just because you were asked to pass kyc doesn’t mean the casino is a scam.
Well, many casinos use the excuse that they have to comply with regulations and are that they are forced to ask users to pass kyc in order to deny customers their winnings, but this doesn’t mean that all casinos that do this are scams.
If you read in their ToS that they reserve the right to ask you for verification and you agree to that, then in this case, you can only call them a scam if you provide legitimate documents and they do not to approve them.

It’s really necessary to read the TOS because that’s where all the info is. There’s no such thing as a real “no-KYC” casino if they’re licensed. Some casinos just get licenses from providers that aren’t that strict, but even those can eventually ask for KYC whenever they need to. We should keep that in mind so we understand how this business actually works.

Personally, when ever I come across centralized casinos claiming to be a strictly a No-KYC casino, I conclude that the casinos isn't registered and licensed, but if I check and see that the casino in question is actually registered and licensed, then there are two things involved..
1. Either the casino's registeration and license is fake, or...
2. The casino is lying about being a no-kyc casino..

It's impossible to find a casino that is legitimately registered and licensed by the government that won't be requiring kyc verification from their users, how the casino chooses to who to request kyc verification from is actually their business, they know who when to ask for the verification, and the fact they haven't ask a certain gambler does not mean such one should start believing the casino is kyc free.

[Bushdark]

Casinos need to check for case of cheating and that could be the reason why they often ask for KYC when you win big amount of money. Some also will want to cheat you looking for any tangible reason they can disqualify you so that you can not withdraw your money.
These are done often by potentially known scam casinos with the mindset to ban you so you don't have the liberty to withdraw or charge them for unlawful ban. The good casinos can will have nothing in mind to make you lose your money.

Casinos should have a better way to identify scammers and fraudsters using their  platform they cannot force anyone to do kyc after winning big money because they want to be sure that those winners did not cheat on the site, if it is only big wins that draws their attention to impose Kyc on their customers that means they do not want their customers to win at all.
I think the main reason why some casinos decide to impose a law to their customers after big wins is because they do not want to pay their customers so they can not be trusted as they are the real scammers.

Do not forget that casino is also a limited liability company that is operated by a team of people to make sure that bad people do not use their knowledge to cheat and make the effort of the team useless. If their are non KYC and KYC casinos, people should use the one they like and they can commit with so they don't complain later of the casino asking them for KYC information.
The KYC requirement is to check if a player is not cheating the system by creating multiple accounts and leveraging the instant deposit bonus and free spins that can be use to get profit.

[PrivacyG]

Usually casino with kyc has less fraud that the casino without kyc. Passing kyc preventing the fraud.

Do you have any proof that Know Your Customer reduces fraud?  Know Your Customer is now an almost global procedure for many services.  Yet I still have not seen any statistics on the News showing it led to any statistically significant reduction of fraud, Money Laundering et cetera.

[Eternad]

Usually casino with kyc has less fraud that the casino without kyc. Passing kyc preventing the fraud.

Do you have any proof that Know Your Customer reduces fraud?  Know Your Customer is now an almost global procedure for many services.  Yet I still have not seen any statistics on the News showing it led to any statistically significant reduction of fraud, Money Laundering et cetera.

Agreed, all casino has the standard procedure of requiring KYC to customers but fraudsters knew how to circumvent this already by availing KYC services to 3rd party that offer KYC verification.

Most of the casino still confiscates user funds when they violate the casino ToS after the KYC because they have different basis on how to check fraud aside from KYC which they know that fraudster already can fake it using other people legal KYC documents.

[khaled0111]

Do you have any proof that Know Your Customer reduces fraud?  Know Your Customer is now an almost global procedure for many services.  Yet I still have not seen any statistics on the News showing it led to any statistically significant reduction of fraud, Money Laundering et cetera.

I'm not aware of any official statistics or studies proving that kyc has helped reduce fraud. However, although I understand why so many customers do not like verifying their identity, I still think kyc has some advantages. For example, it can help service providers/companies identify and profile cheaters. For customers, if a customer has verified his identity, it will be easier for him to recover his hacked/lost accounts as all he has to do is to re-submit his documents to prove he is the real owner of the account.

[Gentle_Soul]

Do you have any proof that Know Your Customer reduces fraud?  Know Your Customer is now an almost global procedure for many services.  Yet I still have not seen any statistics on the News showing it led to any statistically significant reduction of fraud, Money Laundering et cetera.

I'm not aware of any official statistics or studies proving that kyc has helped reduce fraud. However, although I understand why so many customers do not like verifying their identity, I still think kyc has some advantages. For example, it can help service providers/companies identify and profile cheaters. For customers, if a customer has verified his identity, it will be easier for him to recover his hacked/lost accounts as all he has to do is to re-submit his documents to prove he is the real owner of the account.

Me I really don't know to what extent kyc can be of  a security but however  I know it might be some sought of security system but the level to which it is secured is what I don't know of . And secondly if the details and informations provided upon kyc verification can not be said to be secured and free from random and public access then it can be said to be risky but i

[mirakal]

It’s really necessary to read the TOS because that’s where all the info is. There’s no such thing as a real “no-KYC” casino if they’re licensed. Some casinos just get licenses from providers that aren’t that strict, but even those can eventually ask for KYC whenever they need to. We should keep that in mind so we understand how this business actually works.

Personally, when ever I come across centralized casinos claiming to be a strictly a No-KYC casino, I conclude that the casinos isn't registered and licensed, but if I check and see that the casino in question is actually registered and licensed, then there are two things involved..
1. Either the casino's registeration and license is fake, or...
2. The casino is lying about being a no-kyc casino..

It's impossible to find a casino that is legitimately registered and licensed by the government that won't be requiring kyc verification from their users, how the casino chooses to who to request kyc verification from is actually their business, they know who when to ask for the verification, and the fact they haven't ask a certain gambler does not mean such one should start believing the casino is kyc free.

Just my personal opinion....

No, even if they’re legitimate with their license and registration, they can still market themselves as “no KYC” if they want. It might look misleading, but it’s our responsibility to read the TOS before signing up. They use the “no KYC” tag as a marketing strategy, but in the end it’s the confirmation that matters because we tick the “I agree” box when we register.

These casinos have licenses, but their implementation is lax.
Most of them are probably under providers like Curaçao, which is what we usually see in a lot of online casinos.