Ratimov, may I ask why the new feedback while on the previous [removed] post you said you tried to do everything you could to resolve this conflict by removing the tag? Was it because the deal is off the table, because Gazeta refuses to remove his tag? Thus, what Gazeta said somewhat contain some degree of truth in it, that what you tried to do was to deal yourself out of a stuation?
I hope you already know the answers to your questions, right?
In case you did not notice,
Ratimov deleted also all his posts where he insulted Learn Bitcoin, during his futile attempt to derail the thread and distract readers' attention from him, as he usually does. After I exposed him for doing that (once again), he deleted all those posts. Not just for being caught again while trying to distract readers' attention, but also for covering again the evidence incriminating him of insulting people on the forum on for the reason of confronting him. So once again, those which have no idea about
ninjastic.space will not see how he calls Learn Bitcoin as "
two-faced", "
two-faced hypocrite with double standards" and so on. So the insults are deleted, Ratimov is once again a user which talks very politely, all good.
@holydarkness (this is also addressed to all other users interested about this topic), here's a list of other rhetorical questions you can ask (and be sure that Ratimov will never answer to them):
1. Why did he
delete all his posts (together with OP's content) from the topic where he was hunting airfinex (after airfinex exposed his plagiarism)? Furthermore, why did he do it only after (1) The Pharmacist
threatened him that he will distrust him and others will do the same; (2) DireWolf
called him out for his miserable attacks toward
anyone daring to state the truth about him; (3) LoyceV
dotted the I once again, stating that if someone says a truth about Ratimov, then
Ratimov gives him a negative feedback?
2. Why did he try to hide this topic in Archival board for years?
3. Why, after hiding this thread in Archival board for years, last week he managed to convince a mod to delete he thread? (For those unaware, I created a topic in Archival board containing all Ratimov's insults just after the mess he did inside AOBT thread. The date of that topic was September 28th. Is it only a coincidence the fact that Ratimov managed to have his tracks deleted just after I created that topic in Archival board? Lol! Or did he anticipate that I'll create this topic and I'll be thorough enough to find also all his hidden evidence incriminating him, thus he started begging mods to delete that thread from Archival board?)
4. Why do you think that he never justified how, in his opinion, the feedbacks he leaves while he is in rage / dementia state respect the
correct use of Trust system? Example of such feedbacks (most are negative - attention! - not neutral and without ref link):
Stupid degenerate, liar and shitposter.
annoying cretin who will write all sorts of nonsense [...] absolutely incompetent moron [...]
Liar and provocateur [...] creates conflicts out of nowhere [...] Shitposter and collector of various rumors [...]
^Does the above feedback remind you of
TimeLord's feedbacks?
Let's go on with the examples:
My personal dog
Useless dumb hysterical bitch
A fuckhead with a broken head. After being raped by all the WEX employees, taking all his mother's money [...]
So yeah, I wonder what is the connection between such feedbacks and financial deals (the purpose of
Marketplace Trust system). Don't you? Especially the rape part.
5. Why did he delete all those feedbacks and / or replaced them (with some which contain less insults but are still insulting) after DT's eyes were on him?
6. Why, based on his "rational" mind, was it needed to give me not just 1 negative feedback, but 2 (!!!), just one after the other, plus a neutral one immediately after, all without ref link and all stating words like "degenerate", "cretin" etc.?
7. Why did he delete all his posts from AOBT thread + the ones from this thread (+ probably hundreds of other similar posts) where he insulted all those people? (Could it be only for looking like a hypocrite
nice guy, which always talks politely? -- wink wink).
8. Why did he stop using his miserable introduction ("
In this article I would like to touch upon such a theme [...]") after he was exposed for plagiarism? If he was not banned then it meant he did not plagiarize anything, right? So why did he stop using that sentence through which
he stole other authors' work and presented it like it was his? Again, wink wink.
9. Why does he always accuse someone of same things that are exposed from his miserable character? Example: BitcoinGirl.Club
leaves him a feedback reminding of his plagiarism and immediately after Ratimov leaves a retaliatory feedback to BircoinGirl.Club stating that
BitcoinGirl.Club is a plagiarist (LOL!) --
again, without presenting any evidence for this claim. Example 2: inside AOBT thread I remind him of his ol' good plagiarism & copy-pasting era, which brought him zillions of merits for stealing someone else's work and then he immediately calls me "
GazetaCopyPasteWhoreBitShitcoin", accusing me of "
eternal copy-paste of other people's works". Excepting that such reactions look like the ones of a 3 years old child, the question still stands.
Should I continue?
So, in case you want to ask some more questions while you already know the answers, feel free to ask the above ones. If needed, I can come up with more questions like these.
as I said before, since both of you are on DT, negotiation is the way to go
I have nothing to negotiate with a thief. He, instead, had something to negotiate (in a manner which
can be easily seen as extortion attempt).
According to screenshots, he seems to be mature enough to apologize and move past this situation while you are not.
Of course he can move past his theft. Any thief can do it. But I can't go past his theft.
Talking about abuse, don't stick to one abuser, call them all out.
I did it with various occasions (see my
earlier post -- the part where I replied to yahoo by quoting LV).
Btw, was there an issue about your email address? I say this because you have changed it recently. Just curious, maybe it was due to security concerns.
It was no issue, just a personal decision.
Ah, the post is too long. I'm too lazy to read it. But perhaps from the title and tags I read from the OP and Ratimov, it is most likely that this thread was created to question someone's reputation
Actually, it's
not about reputation. And, if you'd read the OP, you'd understand.
If it's a matter of plagiarism, just report it
It's
not a matter of plagiarism either.
Every idea or article has a meaning and purpose behind it, so OP definitely has a goal by creating this thread
Yes, the goal is preserving DT at a fair and decent level + protecting users from Ratimov's constant abuses.