Updates from the COPA v Craig Wright trial

[DooMAD]

*image containing lies removed*

You'd have to be delusional to think that was an "early victory" for the con-man.  I would suggest that you find a new source for your "articles" (in the loosest possible sense of the word), but I suspect your choices are deliberate at this point.  It seems some people are determined to support this crook until the bitter end.

Don't embarrass yourself please .

I can't personally think of anything more embarrassing than being a self-professed BSV supporter, so I'll find it difficult to top that. 

[1714754530]

1714754530

[hilariousetc]

Day three.

More of the same from the second half of the day, but today was the first time I've seen Craig get visibly flustered. He'd presented a notepad as evidence that pre-dated the release of bitcoin allegedly containing the minutes of a meeting where they discussed the things relating to the creation of bitcoin in 2007. The only issue was the manufacturer of the notepad had confirmed that particular item wasn't even released until 2012  . Craig also irrelevantly boasted about his 4000 patents. Maybe one of them is a time machine he used to collect the notepad from the future and bring it back to 2007. Not only does Craig try - and fail - to forge digital documents but now physical ones are proven as nonsense. COPA's lawyer asked Craig why he seems to be more knowledgeable than someone who actually works for the manufacturer. He waffled on about some nonsense. Caught out again.

So far so good, the case has had its first hearing and as it is, the case has been adjourned till further notice as new evidences is expected to surface.
I don't see any reason for the case to even hold in the first place, but one fact is that the case would help enthusiast of BTC gain better insight into why and how the come about of BTC idea and the brains behind it.
I don't want to believe that Dr. Wright is Nakamoto Satoshi because it would sure dent the believe of many of us who have come to believe that Satoshi Nakamoto is just a pseudonym for the original founder of the popular and top cryptocurrency, Bitcoin.
 

See. This is how Coingeek spin the narrative. Craig is sitting there getting called a liar after every piece of info presented to him. He's not winning here; he's getting embarrassed continually.

Does he owe something to the community to do it the way community wants if he is satoshi ?

Well he owes a pretty good explanation for his lies. Pretty much everyone in the crypto community would be instantly silenced by a signing. He tried to do this behind the scenes to hoodwink Gavin so I'm not sure why he can't do it for everyone else. Well, we do know, because he can't do it and his excuse after that was the bonded courier and then that he stamped on the hard drives in a rage. One excuse after the other to cover lies built upon more lies.

Not ownership , but possession . There is a huge difference in between .
If i steal your keys am i the owner of your coins ? Or am i a thief who illegally posses your coins ? And more importantly , if i steal your keys am i you ?

Then at least prove possession. If Satoshi came back and signed the genesis block would you not believe that? This is all we require. I would be instantly silenced if Craig could sign anything belonging to Satoshi. What Craig does it pure distraction and misdirection with nonsense analogies. He says things like house keys don't mean you own the house, the deeds do, and then hands you a bad photocopy of a forged deed he's edited to have his name on it and go see, I own your house. People laugh at this nonsense then he says well I'll try to prove it in court and doesn't prove anything just has more forgeries to try claim he does actually own your house in a poor attempt to try fraudulently steal it from you. He doesn't own anything.
 

Well , from what i see in the court things might not be as how Arthur Van Pelt wants to be . We will see if judge decides these are forged . I guess he will know better than you and me .  

Well, the documents have already been accepted as forgeries by all parties involved including Craig's own witnesses and the court process is for Craig to provide his excuses/reasoning to try dispute that and he's not doing a good job so far. He hasn't said anything that is a viable excuse.



https://twitter.com/CryptoDevil/status/1755215312851537938

Nonsense , i laughed on that part . Are you living in the real world or at some fantasy island ? That's not how you prove identity .

I'm living in the real world. Craig is living in a fantasy land where he thinks he created bitcoin and here's some nonsense documents to prove it. You don't prove you invented bitcoin with forged documents. You know how to prove it, but when you're not Satoshi you're going to have to invent a fantasy world to live in.

Edit . I have to mention that i think he should sign from an early block , just do it after proving his identity the legal way and not the other way .

Well yeah, everyone would love that, but the he's only sat in court right now because fake documents are the only cards he has in his deck. If Craig could sign he would have done it years ago, but it's literally impossible for him to do so s he has to resort to fakery.

[franky1]

Day three.

More of the same from the second half of the day, but today was the first time I've seen Craig get visibly flustered. He'd presented a notepad as evidence that pre-dated the release of bitcoin allegedly containing the minutes of a meeting where they discussed the things relating to the creation of bitcoin in 2007.

gotta laugh how CSW is trying to act like bitcoin was some "business" thing from 2007 ("minutes of meeting")
everyman and his dog can see real satoshi was a solo guy patchworking idea's together from the cypherpunks idea's of digital money as a hobby that grew into an invention. and not some business product with employees

the real satoshi putting it into MIT open licence. yet CSW trying to corporate patent/licence it is another bit of comedy

overall i think the just will just say "bitcoin was put under MIT open licence, so CSW can just go F**K himself" (**= uc/or, you choose)
as for the forgeries.. well CSW is digging himself a hole and his sponsors seem to not want to bail him out when he falls this time, literally this could be his latch ditch effort(unless he finds new sponsors to scam money out of)

[LeezHamilton]

According to the Lord Grabiner statement,

His arguments include that he had a unique set of skills, knowledge and qualification to come up with bitcoin - and his opponents do not propose an alternative candidate for 'Satoshi'.

As the real Satoshi Nakamoto has not come forward to claim his Bitcoin stash and credential or may be a Nobel Prize on economic science, so Craig Wright is a good candidate. Lord Grabiner does not understand that the real Satoshi knows and own his Bitcoin stash. I am confused, why the COPA has not found the real Satoshi Nakamoto and request him to come to the Court to prove that Craig Wright is just a fraud or liar or something else. If the real Satoshi stand up and gives his evidence then the matter could be solved  without further wasting court's time.

The twist is, if whether this Australian man is '' the real Craig Steven Wright ? '' who is gentle and wise, but  I think he is just a look alike of the real Craig Steven Wright the computer hacker, who was spotted by the real Satoshi Nakamoto in IRC Channel back in 7th May 2007. It is the same story to the MT. Gox real CEO, Mark Karpeles,  who went to a Japanese Island back in the year 2013 for a holiday but never returned to Tokyo. So the MT. Gox few officials found a look alike of the real Mark Karpeles and hired him to assumed the CEO position of the MT. Gox. The real Mark Karpeles was a honest geek but the fake Mark Karpeles is dishonest who really mismanaged the MT. Gox fund. Now if the real Craig Wright come forward ad tell the court that man COPA is suing is not the real Craig Wright, who has disappeared after he went for a holiday in Hawaii. Then the case   could be dismissed. Other wise the real Satoshi Nakamoto has to come forward either to debunk CSW claims or bail him out.

But if this whole  case has been setup and orchestrated by Jack Dorsey, COPA team and Craig Wright together mutually just to bank on Satoshi's Stash of Bitcoin then there is another story. Journalists must dig out the truth.  

[franky1]

woah.. i need to make a new category just for insane idiots..
just to have somewhere to put people like leezhamilton into

[LeezHamilton]

I am an economic  journalist by profession.  I will be happy to interview him with 1000 questions and dig out the truth.  

he is not very smart, he is just conniving enough to know how to scam people and use the scams as drama to scam others in a snowball effect

if you were to interview him you will just get 1000 bull crap answers that play into his drama.. wasting your time
unless you have a hammer in one hand and his fingers viced in another hand you wont get any good answers out of him
so dont waste your time our anyone elses.

Well he look like too smart.


Is there a livestream Link of COPA trial  ?

Why some one cannot broadcast ?

What is the news today ?

I don't need hammer, I can pinpoint questions that
he won't be able to answer. well he is playing a good drama.
the news of Bitcoin is reaching to lots of people particularly the
Bankers and Politicians will know few thing about digital currency market.  

woah.. i need to make a new category just for insane idiots..
just to have somewhere to put people like leezhamilton into

Hello franky1,

what do you exactly mean ?

[franky1]

Well he look like too smart.


Is there a livestream Link of COPA trial  ?

Why some one cannot broadcast ?

What is the news today ?

I don't need hammer, I can pinpoint questions that
he won't be able to answer. well he is playing a good drama.

UK courts dont like camera/media in court.
also you have not researched CSW you just sound like a fan that has fallen for his BS already..  that wants him to be satoshi rather than realise that he never was
he is not smart. many people have revealed he uses assistants to ghost write his papers and 400 patents and crap he declares as is own work 2015+
he was not even buying bitcoin until 2013. and not involved before it. so try to learn he is a scammer and stop sounding like a fan

your words of "gentle and wise" and "looks too smart" shows you are an idiot fangirl of him. thus you fit into a new category of insane idiot

[Kakmakr]

I think, if your legal team starts proceedings with explanations of their clients mental conditions, then you should understand the peculiar position that they are in.

Two of his Autism symptoms does make sense, namely taking longer to understand that he is not Satoshi Nakamoto and also thinking and doing the same thing over and over again. ( I know many people who has autism and I understand their struggles... and I see none of that in him)  Do they have medical proof of his diagnosis?

I just hope the Judge understand the technical aspects of the evidence and see right through all his lies.  

[franky1]

I just hope the Judge understand the technical aspects of the evidence and see right through all his lies.  

i think the forensics of people that manufactured things like notepad saying that their product was not even available pre 2012 is proof even a judge can understand
other software engineers have said how certain fonts and certain software and cryptography versions were not around in the dates CSW suggests. even a judge can understand this.

the judge doesnt need to know the minutia of cryptography. but can find easy understanding if certain cryptographic versions/features did not exist to be used before they were invented

judges in ALL cases have to base it on the merit of evidence provided. which if shown as fraudulent then get thrown out as evidence
they dont assume emotions or personality or peoples thoughts as things to justify fraudulent documents should be treated as fact

(its why sexual crimes dont get convictions if there is no factual evidence(DNA/video/witness). they cant just base crimes on someones mental state)

previous cases CSW relied on "witnesses" (paid for buddies). but this case seems to want real original documents.. which CSW lacks

[HmmMAA]

@OP i think that you too biased to listen what he says . That's why you and others laughing with what he says . That's the reason most of the community thinks he's an incompetent liar . He might be a liar but he's not incompetent . As i said in an earlier post he is one of the people with the deeper knowledge about bitcoin . But no one wants  to hear what he says . Try to be unbiased and you will understand that he has right in many spots .
As you know his opponents ( AVP , Lopp etc ) were saying that he doesn't even have diplomas . Does he give you that impression ? Do you think he is/was a forensics expert? Do you think he lies about his contribution of CHFI book written in 2007 ? Did the lawyer question his diplomas ? Has he debunk the blacknet project that AVP says is imaginary ?
What i mean is that the guy is not someone incompetent as presented by his enemies . He is a knowledgeable guy in many fields . Is he a liar ? Well , that's what courts are for .

I agree that some times he moves in muddy waters , but that doesn't necessarily means he's lying . My knowledge is limited and that's why i wait for the outcome of the trial . There are some points though that he questions the expertise of the experts . Like how do you explain the part that copa lawyer says that whitepaper was written in open office and calls him a liar when he says it was written in latex while if you do a search for the term "transactions" in the online pdf version the word is highlighted also in pictures ? From what i know you can't do that with an image . That means copa's expert has made a mistake that whitepaper isn't written in latex . And if an expert has made such a serious error doesn't that question his expertise ? If you have any other explanation for this kindly let me know . Maybe i get it wrong .

@LeezHamilton You can send an email to have live access through a unique link , broadcasting isn't allowed , you will find the necessary info here https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/crypto-open-patient-alliance-v-dr-craig-steven-wright-and-dr-wright-v-various/

Another thing i'd like to point is that meta/facebook was a part of copa . Did that sound right for you ? Was zuck/facebook interested for the good of bitcoin ? Jack/ex twitter too ? These two guys are the real form of "big brother" of the internet and suddenly decided to "help" bitcoin , hooray . At least zuck decided to move back 1 year before his platinum membership expires and leave copa . Strange coincidence .

[ABCbits]

@OP i think that you too biased to listen what he says . That's why you and others laughing with what he says . That's the reason most of the community thinks he's an incompetent liar . He might be a liar but he's not incompetent . As i said in an earlier post he is one of the people with the deeper knowledge about bitcoin . But no one wants  to hear what he says . Try to be unbiased and you will understand that he has right in many spots .

There are many instance where he lacks technical knowledge though. For example, proving he can code by copy-paste hello world[1]. And in his settlements offer, he even mistook name of full node software as name of crypotcurrency[2].

Another thing i'd like to point is that meta/facebook was a part of copa . Did that sound right for you ? Was zuck/facebook interested for the good of bitcoin ? Jack/ex twitter too ? These two guys are the real form of "big brother" of the internet and suddenly decided to "help" bitcoin , hooray . At least zuck decided to move back 1 year before his platinum membership expires and leave copa . Strange coincidence .

That's weird. I digged a bit and it's true until recently Meta was part of their platinum member[3]. But i disagree about your speculation since when COPA it's created, it state goal about shared patent for defensive purpose[4].

[1] https://web.archive.org/web/20181110091329/https://toshitimes.com/craig-wright-proves-he-can-code-by-copy-pasting-hello-world-program/
[2] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5413844.msg63565854#msg63565854
[3] https://web.archive.org/web/20231111171804/https://www.opencrypto.org/members/
[4] https://www.linux.com/news/getting-to-know-the-cryptocurrency-open-patent-alliance-copa/

[LeezHamilton]

Well he look like too smart.


Is there a livestream Link of COPA trial  ?

Why some one cannot broadcast ?

What is the news today ?

I don't need hammer, I can pinpoint questions that
he won't be able to answer. well he is playing a good drama.

UK courts dont like camera/media in court.
also you have not researched CSW you just sound like a fan that has fallen for his BS already..  that wants him to be satoshi rather than realise that he never was
he is not smart. many people have revealed he uses assistants to ghost write his papers and 400 patents and crap he declares as is own work 2015+
he was not even buying bitcoin until 2013. and not involved before it. so try to learn he is a scammer and stop sounding like a fan

your words of "gentle and wise" and "looks too smart" shows you are an idiot fangirl of him. thus you fit into a new category of insane idiot

I am not a uncivilised person, so I use word like of those politicians.  I am not a a fan of Craig Wright neither I hate him. I am here in this forum acting as a neutral person to gather information only.  

[HmmMAA]

There are many instance where he lacks technical knowledge though. For example, proving he can code by copy-paste hello world[1].

I don't think that Charles Sturt University was also a part of the conspiracy to let a guy who can't even code hello world be a lecturer of them on a class about supercomputers https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ybvQ1YwcF-0&list=PLGB2uErtks4o-fJdoe1ZX3HXl_A69Sbsv

[hilariousetc]

@OP i think that you too biased to listen what he says . That's why you and others laughing with what he says . That's the reason most of the community thinks he's an incompetent liar . He might be a liar but he's not incompetent . As i said in an earlier post he is one of the people with the deeper knowledge about bitcoin . But no one wants  to hear what he says . Try to be unbiased and you will understand that he has right in many spots .

I was neutral to Craig being Satoshi until he continually proves he's not time and time again. Currently there's zero verifiable evidence of Craig being Satoshi yet hundreds of documents proving he's a fraud. You seem to want me to remain neutral despite the overwhelming evidence that suggest otherwise. Should I remain neutral to Craig having a time machine to collect a notepad proven to be from the future?

As you know his opponents ( AVP , Lopp etc ) were saying that he doesn't even have diplomas . Does he give you that impression ? Do you think he is/was a forensics expert? Do you think he lies about his contribution of CHFI book written in 2007 ? Did the lawyer question his diplomas ? Has he debunk the blacknet project that AVP says is imaginary ?
What i mean is that the guy is not someone incompetent as presented by his enemies . He is a knowledgeable guy in many fields . Is he a liar ? Well , that's what courts are for .

His qualifications seem to either be non-existent or at best obtained via plagiarism, so therefore his qualifications are useless, not that qualifications mean anything anyway. The real Satoshi could be a high school drop out for all we know. Craig seems to get these qualifications purely as a way to bolster his credibility, when in fact they do the opposite when he's obtained them through fraud.

Another thing i'd like to point is that meta/facebook was a part of copa . Did that sound right for you ? Was zuck/facebook interested for the good of bitcoin ? Jack/ex twitter too ? These two guys are the real form of "big brother" of the internet and suddenly decided to "help" bitcoin , hooray . At least zuck decided to move back 1 year before his platinum membership expires and leave copa . Strange coincidence .

Shouldn't you be remaining neutral to Meta/Facebook's involvement. I'm sure Meta's involvement is financial to ensure bitcoin and blockchain tech remains free to use, but I don't care either way. I'm just glad someone with very deep pockets is involved so COPA can afford to keep Craig in court for as long as it takes.

There are many instance where he lacks technical knowledge though. For example, proving he can code by copy-paste hello world[1].

I don't think that Charles Sturt University was also a part of the conspiracy to let a guy who can't even code hello world be a lecturer of them on a class about supercomputers https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ybvQ1YwcF-0&list=PLGB2uErtks4o-fJdoe1ZX3HXl_A69Sbsv

Charles Sturt University has confirmed they never handed Craig a PHD:

Reports that Australian Dr Craig Steven Wright is probably Satoshi Nakamoto, the creator of Bitcoin, now appear less than convincing. This is thanks to inconsistencies that may have have been perpetuated by the man himself, as well as proof of technical fakery linked to Wright or someone trying to concoct a remarkable hoax.

Indeed, Wright may be no Dr at all. His now-wiped LinkedIn page (you can still read the extensive profile here) suggested he had a PhD in computer science with Sydney's Charles Sturt University (CSU). But a statement sent to FORBES today from the university said it had never handed Wright any PhD. "Mr Wright has not been awarded a PhD from CSU," the statement read.

That might not seem crucial, but when one looks at what Wright claimed to have studied as part of that PhD - economics, financial modelling - it becomes a lot more suspicious. Did Wright want to make it appear that he had a strong background in computing and finance, two areas that certainly would have helped him come up with ideas for a cryptocurrency?

The statement confirmed Wright was handed three qualifications from the university: Master of Networking and Systems Administration, Master of Management (Information Technology), and Master of Information Systems Security.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/thomasbrewster/2015/12/11/bitcoin-creator-satoshi-craig-wright-lies-hoax/

Not to mention he's also been caught plagiarising content from his degrees obtained from CSU:

https://medium.com/@paintedfrog/craig-wright-plagiarized-significant-portions-of-his-phd-thesis-and-tried-to-hide-it-80cd8f01459

And also Northumbria University:

https://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2020/05/11/craig-wrights-doctoral-thesis-being-investigated-for-plagiarism/

The second time was to highlight Wright as the poster child for cryptocurrency’s plagiarism problem. There, we highlighted how Wright, despite making strong stands against plagiarism in the past, has faced nearly a dozen allegations of plagiarism in his work, including his dissertation that earned him his Master of Laws degree from Northumbria University.

Craig is the very definition of a charlatan. He cannot achieve anything so resorts to fantasy and fraud.

@OP i think that you too biased to listen what he says . That's why you and others laughing with what he says . That's the reason most of the community thinks he's an incompetent liar . He might be a liar but he's not incompetent . As i said in an earlier post he is one of the people with the deeper knowledge about bitcoin . But no one wants  to hear what he says . Try to be unbiased and you will understand that he has right in many spots .

There are many instance where he lacks technical knowledge though. For example, proving he can code by copy-paste hello world[1]. And in his settlements offer, he even mistook name of full node software as name of crypotcurrency[2].

I just wish COPA would pull out a laptop, sit it in front of Craig and tell him to code bitcoin from scratch and see what he comes up with. I'd be very surprised if he could come up with something even remotely feasible.

[franky1]

As you know his opponents ( AVP , Lopp etc ) were saying that he doesn't even have diplomas . Does he give you that impression ? Do you think he is/was a forensics expert?

he wasnt a forensics expert
heck he cant even forge his own documents correctly so doesnt know much about forensics to cover his own lies
also when he created companies like "info defense"/"hotwire" he was not actually offering any real services. didnt even have a server farm of super computers, he was just creating shell companies scamming both the australian and american governments for R&D grants/tax rebates.. the american gov never gave him any money and his partner seen early the scam and stepped away. but he did manage to scam the australian government and got caught(and ran off)

..
added note of future prospects of CSW drama
CSW filed forged documents to australian gov over years and got caught.., however CSW and his then team then tried to suggest the documents he filed with australians gov were THEN edited where he blamed the australian government for falsifying/editing the documents..
so as i said in earlier post i expect him to later suggest he will say(probably, as its his style) that he had originals, but at filing someone else edited the files either an assistant of his at filing or the UK courts edited it at receipt and presented him at court with edited documents

[hilariousetc]

Day four

Day four has now concluded. As usual Craig has been blaming everyone but himself for the forgeries. He admitted today that several documents are in fact fraudulent, but passed the buck onto disgruntled ex-employees who are trying to make him look "incompetent". No Craig, you make yourself look incompetent. Not sure why he's using these documents as part of his defence but I guess he needs to backtrack once they get exposed as faked. They also went into the Tulip Trust nonsense and brought up his ATO tax issues.

Craig has also claimed the Kleiman court case where he was ordered to pay billions was one of the best things that happened to him as his outburst lead him to seek anger management. Craig will take very opportunity to grab some sympathy.

Also of note some BSV-tard shared a screenshot of holdnaut attending proceedings on twitter, thus being in contempt of court. The judge warned that access to the live stream may be cut if it happens again. Seems like it would be in the interest of BSV-ers to have the stream terminated so I'm not sure why one bad actor should penalise everyone else. Hopefully the person is prosecuted.

As you know his opponents ( AVP , Lopp etc ) were saying that he doesn't even have diplomas . Does he give you that impression ? Do you think he is/was a forensics expert?

he wasnt a forensics expert
heck he cant even forge his own documents correctly so doesnt know much about forensics to cover his own lies
also when he created companies like "info defense"/"hotwire" he was not actually offering any real services. didnt even have a server farm of super computers, he was just creating shell companies scamming both the australian and american governments for R&D grants/tax rebates.. the american gov never gave him any money and his partner seen early the scam and stepped away. but he did manage to scam the australian government and got caught(and ran off)

..
added note of future prospects of CSW drama
CSW filed forged documents to australian gov over years and got caught.., however CSW and his then team then tried to suggest the documents he filed with australians gov were THEN edited where he blamed the australian government for falsifying/editing the documents..
so as i said in earlier post i expect him to later suggest he will say(probably, as its his style) that he had originals, but at filing someone else edited the files either an assistant of his at filing or the UK courts edited it at receipt and presented him at court with edited documents

Another note: Craig has literally claimed to be one of the world's leading IT security experts, yet he's been hacked more times than I can count. Some of the excuses he comes up with to explain the hacks are also fanciful. See the Pineapple hack:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=10PAgBTPt60
https://mylegacykit.medium.com/will-craig-wrights-purchase-order-forgery-blow-up-the-pineapple-hack-lawsuit-8ae4da6fffdb
https://fullycrypto.com/craig-wright-ordered-to-pay-430000-in-pineapple-case

Wright claims that in February 2020 an Oceans 11-style team broke into his house, planted a pineapple WiFi device and stole access to Bitcoin and Bitcoin Cash wallets holding billions in bitcoin and BSV, as well as wiping 50GB of cloud data for no readily apparent reason.

Like all normal people, rather than appealing for public assistance in tracking down the gang, Wright sued the developers of the chains involved, saying that they had a duty to give him back the coins. This is despite there being ample evidence that the coins were never Wright’s to begin with.

You can even read the ridiculous story on Coingeek:

https://coingeek.com/dr-craig-wright-stolen-bitcoin-heres-what-went-down/

Access to Tulip Trading’s coins was controlled using keys stored on Dr. Wright’s home computer in Surrey. The keys were contained in encrypted wallet.dat files, which were contained within a password-protected RAR file. The wallet.dat files themselves were also protected by an algorithmic masking scheme as a layer of added protection.

Dr. Wright discovered that there had been a hack on Saturday, February 8, 2020, when he noticed three transactions (‘two of them substantial’) transferring Bitcoin out of a wallet unrelated to the 1Feex and 12ib7 addresses. This led him to find that the RAR file was also missing, together with 37GB of files which had been wiped from cloud storage and which contained ‘approximately 50’ white papers and associated research data. £1.1 million worth of BSV, held in a separate wallet, had also been drained, and a further 0.333 BTC held on a popular exchange had been taken, too. Crucially, by losing the RAR file, Dr. Wright had lost any means to control the enormous holdings in the 1Feex and 12ib7 addresses.

Dr. Wright maintains that he can’t be sure how the hack happened, but intriguingly, says that he believes the hack was in part effected via a mysterious wireless router which he had subsequently found in his home and which no one in his family recognize:

“I believe that it must have been planted there by the hackers, either when tradesmen were in our home or by breaking in. This is being considered by the Police and me in the context of the ongoing investigation.”

The hacks are obviously convenient excuses to cover up lies he made up to cover up previous lies.

[NeuroticFish]

He admitted today that several documents are in fact fraudulent, but passed the buck onto disgruntled ex-employees who are trying to make him look "incompetent". No Craig, you make yourself look incompetent.

I fear that CSW somehow prepares himself for a next step. I don't know if that's possible, but maybe he just tries to find out all the "problems" his "doctored" "evidence" documents have so he can make better ones next time, under the next jurisdiction.
At least this is my conclusion from what I've read on the matter until now.

[LeezHamilton]

 
 This is very simple, if is real Satoshi and started mining bitcoin since January 2009 and he is continuously mining Bitcoin then what are the odd ?  Why he is trying to become Japanese pseudonym ?  I gave him a pseudonym Professor Faustus.  or Dr Faustus in the Twitter. 

He should be happy with that pseudonym and conduct business to help the crypto community. Instead, he cited hate to the Satoshi Nakamoto when he first time created his internet blog back in 2016. I have not forgotten that.  This case is highly a orchestrated Bitcoin saga drama regarding a man's pseudonym  who created the Bitcoin Decentralised financial service industry. 

Satoshi is not hiding at all, he is watching and thinking what is his next  move. He is the chess master. If craig stop his crusade and become an ally top the bitcoin community then things will good for him and for every ones else.

He should be grateful to Satoshi Nakamoto who planned to invite him back in 2007 to work with Satoshi.

[franky1]

Day four

Day four has now concluded. As usual Craig has been blaming everyone but himself for the forgeries. He admitted today that several documents are in fact fraudulent, but passed the buck onto disgruntled ex-employees who are trying to make him look "incompetent".

not surprised at all, not first time he played this trick
knowing that millions of legal costs are at risk. i would not even be surprised if he paid off a loyal fan girl to play disgruntled to later say they messed with CSW files. again not first time he pays people to play act a bit of drama to push his agenda

[LeezHamilton]

 The UK Court should have allowed relaying the full livestream for media coverage. Why the court has taken such decision is confusing, may be not for others but is for myself.  Ultimately COPA will win the case.