Old Accounts That Have Likely Been Hacked/Traded

[stompix]

What part didn't you understand? You just proved you don't actually read or comprehend things.

Lol, you actually expect me to remove the tag with this attitude and those moronic threats?
You must be out of your fucking mind!

Go outside, take a deep breath, take another one, count to 1000, then come back to your desk, think about how you ask people to do something you NEED while they really DON'T give a fuck about, and then start typing!

[nutildah]

For users who know nothing about cricket to pass judgment and mock me was ridiculous, and then to hand out a tag without even checking the facts was just absurd.

You're right, I don't know anything about cricket, but that doesn't mean that your posts aren't exactly like thousands of others.

The Scotland vs. Sri Lanka women's match is underway. Scotland scored 151 runs and I was expecting Sri Lanka Women to chase this target as their captain Chamari Athapaththu was in great form and scored a century in her last match. With the way things are going, Sri Lanka lost their 6th wicket and they still need 33 runs from 26 balls to win the match.

This is basically all you do. You don't really contribute to anything but the huge pile of SEO spam that is the Gambling section. I guess that's your right. I apologize for confusing you with a complete shitposter. You can't blame me because the differences are indistinguishable to the untrained eye.

[7788bitcoin]

What part didn't you understand? You just proved you don't actually read or comprehend things.

Lol, you actually expect me to remove the tag with this attitude and those moronic threats?
You must be out of your fucking mind!

Go outside, take a deep breath, take another one, count to 1000, then come back to your desk, think about how you ask people to do something you NEED while they really DON'T give a fuck about, and then start typing!

Where are these imaginary, moronic threats? Why do you want to invent things out of thin air? Are you smoking something or what?
 
Go back and look at what you accused me of. You are threatening me with keeping the tag and then telling me to relax. .

To be frank, I hate hypocrites, governments, and authority figures—that's exactly why I got into Bitcoin. You might be used to throwing your weight around and threatening newbies who feel they have to rely on you to survive here or bow down for your merits.

You are just proving that you cannot make a fair assessment of things. All you did was jump on the bandwagon with what @nutildah said, take a random post that you don't have a clue about, post a lame picture as if you found something incredible, and slap a tag on me. That is the current level of DT nowadays.

I’m not running around begging anyone for a loan like some of these so-called 'OG' accounts do . If you want to abuse your power by leaving an unfair tag just to kick me out of a signature campaign, go ahead. You clearly have the power to do it, so congratulations on that.

For users who know nothing about cricket to pass judgment and mock me was ridiculous, and then to hand out a tag without even checking the facts was just absurd.

You're right, I don't know anything about cricket, but that doesn't mean that your posts aren't exactly like thousands of others.

I cannot post hundreds or thousands of times like others do. I post on topics I actually want, even if not everyone wants me to.

This is basically all you do. You don't really contribute to anything but the huge pile of SEO spam that is the Gambling section. I guess that's your right. I apologize for confusing you with a complete shitposter. You can't blame me because the differences are indistinguishable to the untrained eye.

1) You initially accused me of being someone who purchased this account
2) Then you said I am not the original owner of the account, claiming the original owner was a native English speaker, most likely from the USA.
3) Then you accused me of not being a native English speaker.
4) Then you accused me of getting dumber with age. I am not young either, but that does not mean I am 60 and have dementia.
5) Then you changed your mind and claimed to believe I have owned this account for a long time.
6) Then the accusation shifted to: my older English was still better than my current English.
7) Then you started mocking my merit history and complaining that I don't post things that are interesting enough for users like you.
 Then you changed my red tag to neutral, and now you are accusing me of being an account farmer.

You went through all these contradictions in less than 24 hours. Yet, someone who just copy-pasted your accusations is adamant that he won't change his tag, expecting me to beg for mercy as if I am asking for a loan.

I am not having any issues with your questioning and the effort to catch account traders or sold accounts. But dragging my name into this to create cheap drama is ridiculous—especially since I haven't changed my password or registered email in ages.

[stompix]

If you want to abuse your power by leaving an unfair tag just to kick me out of a signature campaign, go ahead. You clearly have the power to do it, so congratulations on that.

I only have the power to leave a rating, your campaign manager or another campaign manager can easily ignore this if it wants, or it might not even see it if he has me on ~trust.
I already said I would consider removing it since I don't do neutral tags as I find them useless, (quite funny a neutral tag calling your account hacked doesn't bother you at all) , lol, if you would change your attitude and if nutildah agrees that there are reasons to believe you might actually be the initial owner.

Once you want to get down from your throne, your majesty, and actually learn how to talk to people, I will consider it, with a piece of shit acting like he is entitled to order people around, nope, not going to happen!

[yahoo62278]

If you want to abuse your power by leaving an unfair tag just to kick me out of a signature campaign, go ahead. You clearly have the power to do it, so congratulations on that.

I only have the power to leave a rating, your campaign manager or another campaign manager can easily ignore this if it wants, or it might not even see it if he has me on ~trust.
I already said I would consider removing it since I don't do neutral tags as I find them useless, (quite funny a neutral tag calling your account hacked doesn't bother you at all) , lol, if you would change your attitude and if nutildah agrees that there are reasons to believe you might actually be the initial owner.

Once you want to get down from your throne, your majesty, and actually learn how to talk to people, I will consider it, with a piece of shit acting like he is entitled to order people around, nope, not going to happen!

His/her attitude should have nothing to do with your decision on whether to remove or keep a tag. You either believe it's a hacked/bought account or it isn't. Has nothing to do with you liking or disliking anything. If you were being accused of something you felt was unjust, would you sit back and keep your mouth shut or have an attitude? I think the latter.

FYI I have no idea if it's a bought or hacked account, just giving my opinion on what I am reading.

[nutildah]

His/her attitude should have nothing to do with your decision on whether to remove or keep a tag. You either believe it's a hacked/bought account or it isn't. Has nothing to do with you liking or disliking anything. If you were being accused of something you felt was unjust, would you sit back and keep your mouth shut or have an attitude? I think the latter.

FYI I have no idea if it's a bought or hacked account, just giving my opinion on what I am reading.

Yahoo makes a good point... Honestly its fair if people want to poke around into my forum activities. 7788bitcoin could have chosen their words better but that's not a valid reason for me to keep up a red tag on them, because the two things aren't really related to each other.

[AB de Royse777]

Once you want to get down from your throne, your majesty, and actually learn how to talk to people, I will consider it, with a piece of shit acting like he is entitled to order people around, nope, not going to happen!

You are abusing your power. The DT power is not to school people with handing over tags. It's either hacked/bought account or not. There are nothing in the middle.

[eternalgloom]

Yahoo makes a good point... Honestly its fair if people want to poke around into my forum activities. 7788bitcoin could have chosen their words better but that's not a valid reason for me to keep up a red tag on them, because the two things aren't really related to each other.

Once you want to get down from your throne, your majesty, and actually learn how to talk to people, I will consider it, with a piece of shit acting like he is entitled to order people around, nope, not going to happen!

You are abusing your power. The DT power is not to school people with handing over tags. It's either hacked/bought account or not. There are nothing in the middle.

The environment looks quite nice, we've finally reached some common ground, and I am glad to see that.

If I had more merits to spare, I'd definitely send a few more to Yahoo's post.

<>

<>

Anyway, I don't see either of these guys as scammers. If you can't prove someone acted dishonestly, a neutral tag or even just keeping a personal note is the better approach. Red trust should be reserved for cases where there's clear evidence. I expect stompix doesn't turn into another stomfan44  

[stompix]

I only have the power to leave a rating, your campaign manager or another campaign manager can easily ignore this if it wants, or it might not even see it if he has me on ~trust.
I already said I would consider removing it since I don't do neutral tags as I find them useless, (quite funny a neutral tag calling your account hacked doesn't bother you at all) , lol, if you would change your attitude and if nutildah agrees that there are reasons to believe you might actually be the initial owner.

His/her attitude should have nothing to do with your decision on whether to remove or keep a tag. You either believe it's a hacked/bought account or it isn't. Has nothing to do with you liking or disliking anything. If you were being accused of something you felt was unjust, would you sit back and keep your mouth shut or have an attitude? I think the latter.

Casually missing the important part!
The first condition is there to actually engage in a discussion; if the discussion starts with I will show you what I can do the discussion is over!

I expect stompix doesn't turn into another stomfan44 

Then everyone could exclude me from their trust lists, maybe even red tag me for being a moron and that's it!
Isn't that how trust was supposed to work?

Meanwhile, I wonder why a neutral tag stating that this account was hacked/boiught is ok, but a red tag is not, but really not important let's ignore that for a while!

I see 7788bitcoin on a quest to make nutildah prove he is the same owner, pretty understandable demand, especially since nutildah posted that message about selling his account, a signed message with an address should clear things up, so....why is he not doing the same? 

While at it, can he explain why his posts from a signature campaign from 2015 have been edited to remove the address in 2017:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=907271.msg12681157#msg12681157
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=907271.msg12514743#msg12514743
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=907271.msg17013090#msg17013090
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=907271.msg17779211#msg17779211



And this was done exactly when there was a hiatus in his posts, probably the second time the account changed hands!

Reasonable demand?
And to show what a lovely and caring person I am, I even accept the answer if it starts with " Fuck you stompix, you degenerate piece of shit, this is the reason why (insert reason or signed address here)"

[AB de Royse777]

stomfan44  

Satofan44 is the "Biggest moron on the forum" according to Free Market Capitalist. So don't mind the guy. besides you will find untrusted feedback like his in many legit users profile which actually means nothing for anyone even if Satofan44 continues updating the feedback all the time. Visit his feedback page sent feedback section, you will understand what I meant.
https://talkimg.com/images/2026/07/11/UcFix9.png
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=3704391;dt

Reasonable demand?
And to show what a lovely and caring person I am, I even accept the answer if it starts with " Fuck you stompix, you degenerate piece of shit, this is the reason why (insert reason or signed address here)"

I believe you, but in this case, your ego is overriding your principles..

[7788bitcoin]

I only have the power to leave a rating, your campaign manager or another campaign manager can easily ignore this if it wants, or it might not even see it if he has me on ~trust.
I already said I would consider removing it since I don't do neutral tags as I find them useless, (quite funny a neutral tag calling your account hacked doesn't bother you at all) , lol, if you would change your attitude and if nutildah agrees that there are reasons to believe you might actually be the initial owner.

His/her attitude should have nothing to do with your decision on whether to remove or keep a tag. You either believe it's a hacked/bought account or it isn't. Has nothing to do with you liking or disliking anything. If you were being accused of something you felt was unjust, would you sit back and keep your mouth shut or have an attitude? I think the latter.

Casually missing the important part!
The first condition is there to actually engage in a discussion; if the discussion starts with I will show you what I can do the discussion is over!

I expect stompix doesn't turn into another stomfan44  

Then everyone could exclude me from their trust lists, maybe even red tag me for being a moron and that's it!
Isn't that how trust was supposed to work?

Meanwhile, I wonder why a neutral tag stating that this account was hacked/boiught is ok, but a red tag is not, but really not important let's ignore that for a while!

I see 7788bitcoin on a quest to make nutildah prove he is the same owner, pretty understandable demand, especially since nutildah posted that message about selling his account, a signed message with an address should clear things up, so....why is he not doing the same?  

While at it, can he explain why his posts from a signature campaign from 2015 have been edited to remove the address in 2017:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=907271.msg12681157#msg12681157
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=907271.msg12514743#msg12514743
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=907271.msg17013090#msg17013090
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=907271.msg17779211#msg17779211



And this was done exactly when there was a hiatus in his posts, probably the second time the account changed hands!

Reasonable demand?
And to show what a lovely and caring person I am, I even accept the answer if it starts with " Fuck you stompix, you degenerate piece of shit, this is the reason why (insert reason or signed address here)"

I can give you the same reason. You deleted all your past wallet addresses. If you can provide one of those wallet addresses, and if it is not an exchange address, I will sign the message.

Since you want to go down that route, can you do the same with your deleted wallet addresses? You are the one who came up with the demand for a deleted wallet address.

Screenshot of your deleted wallet address



Post from your edited profile, a post between post 16362 and 16363

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=164749;sa=showPosts;start=16360



This was a public post that had been deleted by a forum personality, so no copyright claims should arise. !!!!! I will wait here

I was the least bothered to participate in any forum drama. However, since you are dragging me into this, I am forced to post these FYI.

[Free Market Capitalist]

Satofan44 is the "Biggest moron on the forum" according to Free Market Capitalist.

I don't think I'm the only one who thinks that. I haven't heard from him in a while—I've got him on ignore—but since you brought him up, I went to his sent trust feedback and I'll let you see this small sample:



If anyone still doubts whether this guy is a moron, just go and see his trust feedback sent.

On the other hand, the other day I was reading about this controversy surrounding 7788bitcoin, and to be honest, these topics are starting to bore me. Although I do think it makes more sense that, if you believe he bought the account, the tag should be negative in this case.

I think what happened to me is similar to what happened to The Sceptical Chymist—there was a time when he was very active in the Reputation section, and I think he became well-known on the forum because of it, but you hardly ever see him in those threads anymore.

Although I can’t say for sure whether I’ll be more active around here again in the near or distant future.

[stompix]

Since you want to go down that route, can you do the same with your deleted wallet addresses? You are the one who came up with the demand for a deleted wallet address.

See, now we're talking, and we have a discussion like mature people!

You demand that I sign a message from my old address; I demand you sign a message from an old address. We have a mutual understanding here, I demand that you sign a message from an old address to prove you're still the owner; you demand the same. I obviously demanded that you sign a message to prove who you are since you claim you're still the same guy and you want to undo the red tag!

Perfect gentleman's agreement!  

Satofan44 is the "Biggest moron on the forum" according to Free Market Capitalist.

I don't think I'm the only one who thinks that. I haven't heard from him in a while—I've got him on ignore—but since you brought him up, I went to his sent trust feedback and I'll let you see this small sample:

Lol, I wonder what took him so long to tag me!
Oh yeah, never mind, I asked him to stop quoting me cause I have him on ignore; he got triggered!

[7788bitcoin]

Since you want to go down that route, can you do the same with your deleted wallet addresses? You are the one who came up with the demand for a deleted wallet address.

See, now we're talking, and we have a discussion like mature people!

You demand that I sign a message from my old address; I demand you sign a message from an old address. We have a mutual understanding here, I demand that you sign a message from an old address to prove you're still the owner; you demand the same. I obviously demanded that you sign a message to prove who you are since you claim you're still the same guy and you want to undo the red tag!

Perfect gentleman's agreement!  

Satofan44 is the "Biggest moron on the forum" according to Free Market Capitalist.

I don't think I'm the only one who thinks that. I haven't heard from him in a while—I've got him on ignore—but since you brought him up, I went to his sent trust feedback and I'll let you see this small sample:

Lol, I wonder what took him so long to tag me!
Oh yeah, never mind, I asked him to stop quoting me cause I have him on ignore; he got triggered!

Fair enough. Provide me a wallet address linked to my account, and you can pick which one I should sign.

[stompix]

Fair enough. Provide me a wallet address linked to my account, and you can pick which one I should sign.

For god's sake, I am going insane on this one...

Why do we come back to the first thing in this discussion? This is exactly the only thing I asked you a week ago, are we going in fucking circles here while claiming we don't have time for this?
 I can't ask you to sign from a specified address because you have edited them all I don't know a single one of your addresses!!!!!
How can I demand of you to sign from 1xxxxx when you haven't used 1xxxx? This would be insane even by my standards!

Seriously, at this point I don't even care anymore, seem like we speak different languages!

[7788bitcoin]

Fair enough. Provide me a wallet address linked to my account, and you can pick which one I should sign.

For god's sake, I am going insane on this one...

Why do we come back to the first thing in this discussion? This is exactly the only thing I asked you a week ago, are we going in fucking circles here while claiming we don't have time for this?
 I can't ask you to sign from a specified address because you have edited them all I don't know a single one of your addresses!!!!!
How can I ask you to sign from 1xxxxx when you haven't used 1xxxx?

Seriously, at this point I don't even care anymore, seem like we speak different languages!

I asked you to chose a wallet address of your liking, you need to understand my frustration.

Here is a wallet address staked here

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=996318.msg51874820#msg51874820

-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
I am 7788bitcoin, and I am signing this message because Nutildah raised an accusation and Stompix wanted me to sign a message from a staked address.

Date: July 12, 2026
-----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----
bc1qncyd7h7tcvyqe4448j5huwxwxduwwgd7teenga
IEisvXwHXDLqjVt+hbnSuTnFeGx1lYrFtuGQTiek4aO1AfY7pqtdBy+X3caGeBPZvv5MwD6L9plZddCkXbQt1sE=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----

[stompix]

-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
I am 7788bitcoin, and I am signing this message because Nutildah raised an accusation and Stompix wanted me to sign a message from a staked address.

Date: July 12, 2026
-----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----
bc1qncyd7h7tcvyqe4448j5huwxwxduwwgd7teenga
IEisvXwHXDLqjVt+hbnSuTnFeGx1lYrFtuGQTiek4aO1AfY7pqtdBy+X3caGeBPZvv5MwD6L9plZddCkXbQt1sE=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----

There were 28 minutes between the two messages, after which you posted this!
Was it worth it? Like seriously? You complained for hours after hours while you could have done just this? That easily???
And people are still mad at me for prolonging this?

As I said, unlike nutildah, I will remove the red tag as neutral is just a waste of time and irrelevant here!

[7788bitcoin]

-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
I am 7788bitcoin, and I am signing this message because Nutildah raised an accusation and Stompix wanted me to sign a message from a staked address.

Date: July 12, 2026
-----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----
bc1qncyd7h7tcvyqe4448j5huwxwxduwwgd7teenga
IEisvXwHXDLqjVt+hbnSuTnFeGx1lYrFtuGQTiek4aO1AfY7pqtdBy+X3caGeBPZvv5MwD6L9plZddCkXbQt1sE=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----

There were 28 minutes between the two messages, after which you posted this!
Was it worth it? Like seriously? You complained for hours after hours while you could have done just this? That easily???
And people are still mad at me for prolonging this?

As I said, unlike nutildah, I will remove it as neutral is just a waste of time!

The reason I blamed you for never checking my account is that I am using the same wallet address that I used earlier to join the current signature campaign, and my password and email address have not been changed for over a decade.

@nutildah said in an earlier message that he was not going to ask for a signed message, and you only asked me to sign one today; hence, I posted a signed message. You were just blaming me without providing any evidence, but now since you asked, I have signed a message from a wallet that I am using here.

Are you still keeping the gentleman's agreement by signing yours  
@nutildah, can you just remove my name from your investigation as a hacked account?

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5506921.msg66915686#msg66915686

You can do any investigation you want since the profile is public; until then, refrain from tagging anyone for that matter without any evidence. I suggest you do the same for every other user rather than throwing dirt initially and then asking them to clear their names.

[nutildah]

@nutildah, can you just remove my name from your investigation as a hacked account?

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5506921.msg66915686#msg66915686

You can do any investigation you want since the profile is public; until then, refrain from tagging anyone for that matter without any evidence. I suggest you do the same for every other user rather than throwing dirt initially and then asking them to clear their names.

You're asking me to edit a post for you? No, I'm not gonna do that.

[eternalgloom]

@nutildah, can you just remove my name from your investigation as a hacked account?

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5506921.msg66915686#msg66915686

You can do any investigation you want since the profile is public; until then, refrain from tagging anyone for that matter without any evidence. I suggest you do the same for every other user rather than throwing dirt initially and then asking them to clear their names.

Don't make a fool of yourself. I don't see any need for Nutildah to do that. You can keep it and carry on with completely normal activity on forum.

Focus on making solid contribution and genuinely engage in discussions with everyone. Build your reputation yourself. When you start adding real value to the forum, you won't have to ask anyone to remove the tag, they'll do it on their own.

Then everyone could exclude me from their trust lists, maybe even red tag me for being a moron and that's it!
Isn't that how trust was supposed to work?

No, nobody is going to do that. Everyone respects your judgment and your contributions here. What people don't like is when ego takes over and clouds things.

Meanwhile, I wonder why a neutral tag stating that this account was hacked/boiught is ok, but a red tag is not.

Because they are not scammer. There is no proof that they have scammed anyone or encouraged others to do so. It's not like they are promoting scam casinos for money.

I see 7788bitcoin on a quest to make nutildah prove he is the same owner, pretty understandable demand, especially since nutildah posted that message about selling his account, a signed message with an address should clear things up, so....why is he not doing the same?  

He hasn't proven anything. Nutildah simply believes he doesn't deserve the red tag, thats all.

<>

Anyway, I don't see either of these guys as scammers. If you can't prove someone acted dishonestly, a neutral tag or even just keeping a personal note is the better approach. Red trust should be reserved for cases where there's clear evidence.

Can't you treat this poor guy the same way? When there's no proven scandal against him, and unlike others he doesn't even go around criticizing people.