🔵1win | Crypto Casino & Sportsbook | Win the Lamborghini with 1st deposit 🔵

[BigBos]

I wouldn't even give 50/50 odds between a win and a loss, I'd put lower odds for a win. That way I'm more in control because I'm aware of the odds.

It's not bad to hope that luck is in your favor, but lowering your expectations will ease our anxiety. I have mine at 50/50, though I know the house edge has better odds.

This is my way of staying responsible when gambling, because when I don't apply such methods, then maybe I will go overboard when gambling.

Every gambler should have one, so they can keep their feet on the ground, so they will not go to their limit

I think 3 or 4 times a day is also excessive when gambling, I myself apply a maximum of 2 times a day I deposit when I lose.

I also think it's excessive; if you have an office job, you will suffer because you can hardly concentrate. 2 times a day is already moderate, but 3 to 4 times a day could lead to neglecting your job.

Yes, it's not wrong to give a 50/50 chance as long as we can still be responsible for what we do. The real problem is when we can't be responsible, because there are people who even think they don't expect to win but after losing they will deposit again. This is strange, how can they say they don't expect to win but after losing they deposit again?

That's what I mean, we must have a job that must always be prioritized. When we focus too much on gambling by depositing many times it will make our focus distracted at work. It's best to avoid things like this.

[Haunebu]

I don't think I've read or come across anything like that here on this forum where an account was banned and then the ban was lifted for a gambler who violated a casino's Terms of Service. Has there ever been a scenario like this on this forum where someone created
a topic about it?

I have seen some gamblers whose accounts were unbanned and they got a chance through this forum or Casino Guru etc though they are extremely rare cases as some other posters above already pointed out. Sites basically admit their fault in such cases which is not good for theie reputation.

This stuff adds more risk to the already risky nature of gambling which is why it's a high risk, high reward game overall.

[Agbe]

This stuff adds more risk to the already risky nature of gambling which is why it's a high risk, high reward game overall.

If they found out that the fault is from them, and they unbanned the user then it is okay. And it is good they have to investigate thoroughly before banning someone and when they do, they have to state it clear to the use the reason why is ban. Many users who were banned didn't know the reason so they claimed to be innocent of the alleged crime. Casinos should tell the user in a pop up message on the user's profile about the offense he has committed for the ban. So if he denied, the message is there for him to see with the clear violation of the ToS.

[Vaculin]

I don't think I've read or come across anything like that here on this forum where an account was banned and then the ban was lifted for a gambler who violated a casino's Terms of Service. Has there ever been a scenario like this on this forum where someone created
a topic about it?

I have seen some gamblers whose accounts were unbanned and they got a chance through this forum or Casino Guru etc though they are extremely rare cases as some other posters above already pointed out. Sites basically admit their fault in such cases which is not good for theie reputation.

This stuff adds more risk to the already risky nature of gambling which is why it's a high risk, high reward game overall.

This only proves that casinos can also make mistakes in their decisions, and sometimes they’re willing to correct them.

If you think about it in real life, it’s similar to a case where someone is already convicted, but on appeal the higher court finds them not guilty and reverses the decision.

As long as a party is willing to fight for what’s right, there’s still a chance the correct decision gets handed down.
Of course, cases like this are rare, but they do happen.

[Fivestar4everMVP]

This stuff adds more risk to the already risky nature of gambling which is why it's a high risk, high reward game overall.

If they found out that the fault is from them, and they unbanned the user then it is okay. And it is good they have to investigate thoroughly before banning someone and when they do, they have to state it clear to the use the reason why is ban. Many users who were banned didn't know the reason so they claimed to be innocent of the alleged crime. Casinos should tell the user in a pop up message on the user's profile about the offense he has committed for the ban. So if he denied, the message is there for him to see with the clear violation of the ToS.

You are right though, cus on several occasions and situations on this forum involving a user getting banned by a casino, the major reason why some users end up creating a scam accusations against the casino is often because the user doesn't know why his account got banned or restricted - if restriction was the case.

Casinos can do much better in this area, I don't see any reason why they will ban a user of their platform and don't tell him why, are they expecting the user to simply accept the ban and move on?
Even in the real world, one can't just walk up to another person and slap the person without any reason, you have to let the person know what he or she did to deserve a slap else, you are only inviting war.

[Pmalek]

You are right though, cus on several occasions and situations on this forum involving a user getting banned by a casino, the major reason why some users end up creating a scam accusations against the casino is often because the user doesn't know why his account got banned or restricted - if restriction was the case.

You can also see the exact opposite. Even though the casino didn't tell the user why they were banned, or they did but the player pretends they didn't, they will go to the Scam Accusation board, create a topic, and act innocent. The story is that they followed all the rules, didn't do anything wrong, and were banned all of a sudden. It's an attempt to put pressure on the platform, paint a bad picture of them, and make them change their mind. It's also payback. If it doesn't work and the casino clearly presents its case against the player, the guilty party goes silent and disappears.

[coupable]

This stuff adds more risk to the already risky nature of gambling which is why it's a high risk, high reward game overall.

If they found out that the fault is from them, and they unbanned the user then it is okay. And it is good they have to investigate thoroughly before banning someone and when they do, they have to state it clear to the use the reason why is ban. Many users who were banned didn't know the reason so they claimed to be innocent of the alleged crime.

I think the opposite. The casino should investigate carefully before taking the decision to permanently ban a user for whatever reason. And for whatever cause, the reason to ban should be valid. It would harm the reputation of any casino if decided to ban a user then later decided to lift the ban. This is a clear proof of unprofessionalism.

I remember see many cases of banned user, whose most of them knew the reasons behind the decision. Few others found themselved kicked out overnight without notification/explanation. I think the user should have the right to know the reasons behind the decision to ban him.

[Mahiyammahi]

This december 1win gave bunch of bonus code, which was cash gifts on it. Everytime I received $3 worth of cash on my local currency. But could not increase it towards my minimum withdrawal limit. This was fun while getting a bonus from 1win and making some free bets with it. Ig luck was not with me , that's why could not make it big enough.

Anyone else have turned his bonus into big sack of cash?
I did not withdraw the bonus amount so I don't know if any wageing requirements required or not. But at first glace it was cash voucher like any other cash voucher