Betpanda.io | Anonymous Crypto Casino | Welcome Bonus Up to 1BTC

[danadc]

[Slots generate more revenue due to the nature of the game, not simply player behavior. After all, sportbettings don't play against pure mathematical odds, so it's like a magnet that most bettors think they're accurate with their predictions. So, anyone can potentially bet more sometimes (if we also include betting irl).

Yes, and those who bet on sports have great advantages because this is something they can take advantage of based on their knowledge Betting on sports is not the same as betting on slots. With slots, the big advantage is that with little money you can have a big win, whereas with sports betting, you don't many details have to be met to win big Everything has its complications.

[Renampun]

I don't agree with you guys on the risk part. Gambling might look easy in learning, but it's tough in winning, and even the risk might look the same for the two categories at the surface, but handing and management still matter. The risk presented to the beginners and experienced gamblers by the bookie are naturally the same, but the approach of both gamblers may not be the same. We can't undermine experience for anything, so it's riskier for those who are just being introduced to gambling than those who already know the nitty-gritty of it. Gambling is no child's play and needs a lot to learning than the playing of the game itself. This needs time.

It is true that even though the risks are the same for experienced or newbies, the approach can be different, experienced people can manage risks better through mature strategies, better emotional control, and also their experience in gambling which makes them can be calmer in facing losses. while for newbies, they are more at risk because their lack of experience makes them panic easily and chase losses so easily and often overconfidence after winning a little, their control and understanding of gambling is still so limited that they are often caught in such big losses. and that's why newbies are more vulnerable when they are first starting out in gambling.

[Distinctin]

I don't agree with you guys on the risk part. Gambling might look easy in learning, but it's tough in winning, and even the risk might look the same for the two categories at the surface, but handing and management still matter. The risk presented to the beginners and experienced gamblers by the bookie are naturally the same, but the approach of both gamblers may not be the same. We can't undermine experience for anything, so it's riskier for those who are just being introduced to gambling than those who already know the nitty-gritty of it. Gambling is no child's play and needs a lot to learning than the playing of the game itself. This needs time.

It’s riskier, yes, no question about that. But whether someone is new or old to gambling, there’s still no guarantee that the risk is being controlled. Some old gamblers have already learned their lessons, but some didn’t. I know a friend who’s been gambling 5 years or more and still keeps losing money. He still spends a lot on gambling. Good thing he’s not bankrupt yet, but he’s already living under addiction and can’t go a day without it.

So you see, there’s no guarantee. A newbie can also be responsible. They know the risks and they know how to manage it, so they shouldn’t be underestimated.

I believe it’s not just about how people are educated, but how they handle their emotions. There are educated people who still make bad decisions because they’re emotionally weak when it comes to gambling.

[EarnOnVictor]

-Snip-

It’s riskier, yes, no question about that. But whether someone is new or old to gambling, there’s still no guarantee that the risk is being controlled. Some old gamblers have already learned their lessons, but some didn’t. I know a friend who’s been gambling 5 years or more and still keeps losing money. He still spends a lot on gambling.

I don't think we want to go that lane, my friend, we are only establishing the "risk" distinctions between the beginners and experienced gamblers, and of course, there will be exceptions, which is what you are talking about, but this doesn't stop the fact that experience can't be taken for granted. Don't forget that some experienced gamblers could be challenged emotionally and behave even worse than beginners, but their lapses shouldn't be used to judge most experienced gamblers.

Yes, and those who bet on sports have great advantages because this is something they can take advantage of based on their knowledge Betting on sports is not the same as betting on slots.

That is a fact because in sports betting, no one has the advantage over another. People gamble slots in a bid to be lucky and win, so skills are almost totally insignificant. But in sports betting, you get to enjoy the dividend of your skills, even though luck is also needed.

[adaseb]

I dont think the amount of years you are gambling have anything to do with how much risk you take. Like you said your friend which has gambled 5 years, supposedly he has lots of experience already but he still loses money, so obviously he doesnt manage risk correctly. Sure gambling is against you but most gamblers lose because they go on tilt and they don't control their emotions.

Many gamblers would be better off if they had a manager that would watch how they gamble and when they are starting to get emotional and go on tilt, they would be forced to quit playing and come back the next day. However this is why you have so many that gamble for decades and yet they still keep losing money.

[Futurexxx]

. Sure gambling is against you but most gamblers lose because they go on tilt and they don't control their emotions.

Controlling of your emotions have nothing to do with your winnings or losing when gambling, it only helps you to have a grip of your self, and using an amount you can afford to lose, is the best way to gamble, since it's not a do or die affair.

Many gamblers would be better off if they had a manager that would watch how they gamble and when they are starting to get emotional and go on tilt, they would be forced to quit playing and come back the next day.

It's very funny that someone will go as far as hiring a manager that will manage his gambling habit, is that not madness?

However this is why you have so many that gamble for decades and yet they still keep losing money.

It doesn't matter how long you have been gambling, since it's a game of luck, you will be losing money regardless of how long you have been gambling, so thinking that because you have been gambling for long, you will not be losing money again, that's wrong.

[The Cryptovator]

I dont think the amount of years you are gambling have anything to do with how much risk you take. Like you said your friend which has gambled 5 years, supposedly he has lots of experience already but he still loses money, so obviously he doesnt manage risk correctly. Sure gambling is against you but most gamblers lose because they go on tilt and they don't control their emotions.

Losing money on gambling isn't related to experience. Do you believe an experienced gambler would never lose on the gambling? Unless it's betting, experience wouldn't help you win much; rather, the experience would help you reduce the risk and losses. Because experienced gamblers should know where he has to stop and when he has to start. If they can't control emotions, then how are they experienced, really?

Many gamblers would be better off if they had a manager that would watch how they gamble and when they are starting to get emotional and go on tilt, they would be forced to quit playing and come back the next day. However this is why you have so many that gamble for decades and yet they still keep losing money.

What have you referred to as manager? Is it a person or referring to any tools? If a gambler can't control himself and is addicted to gambling, then how would the manager help him? Experienced gamblers don't always win; they can manage their gamble risk. Winnings fully depend on luck. The experience sometimes works on the betting; an experienced gambler would predict who is going to win or lose based on their past experience, though it won't always turn out right. But don't think managers would keep any rules on the gambling at all.

[Distinctin]

-Snip-

It’s riskier, yes, no question about that. But whether someone is new or old to gambling, there’s still no guarantee that the risk is being controlled. Some old gamblers have already learned their lessons, but some didn’t. I know a friend who’s been gambling 5 years or more and still keeps losing money. He still spends a lot on gambling.

I don't think we want to go that lane, my friend, we are only establishing the "risk" distinctions between the beginners and experienced gamblers, and of course, there will be exceptions, which is what you are talking about, but this doesn't stop the fact that experience can't be taken for granted. Don't forget that some experienced gamblers could be challenged emotionally and behave even worse than beginners, but their lapses shouldn't be used to judge most experienced gamblers.

I agree that old gamblers know how to control the risk better since they’ve made mistakes many times already. But what I was talking about is that gambling risk isn’t always that extreme to the point it will kill you or completely destroy a gambler. Yes, there are people who get addicted, but those are isolated cases. If the problem was that huge, casinos would already be banned.

So we shouldn’t exaggerate the word “risk” when it comes to beginners. As long as they’re responsible and mature, they’re expected to manage themselves properly. We shouldn’t treat them like kids who are immature. There’s no babysitting in gambling, that’s what I mean.

[avp2306]

I dont think the amount of years you are gambling have anything to do with how much risk you take. Like you said your friend which has gambled 5 years, supposedly he has lots of experience already but he still loses money, so obviously he doesnt manage risk correctly. Sure gambling is against you but most gamblers lose because they go on tilt and they don't control their emotions.

Losing money on gambling isn't related to experience. Do you believe an experienced gambler would never lose on the gambling? Unless it's betting, experience wouldn't help you win much; rather, the experience would help you reduce the risk and losses. Because experienced gamblers should know where he has to stop and when he has to start. If they can't control emotions, then how are they experienced, really?

They provably still lose their money since having great experience does not give those people a higher chance to win. Since what they do still doesn't offer them any guarantee to earn profit. But the only advantage those experience gamblers have is they know how to manage their bankroll and also can able to set their expectation without asking to much unrealistic things that's why usually they avoid those destructive losses.

Experience gamblers provably know when to stop because usually they already have an idea that game will end up badly if they decide to push more harder even if they are already winning or already losing big figures.

[examplens]

Many gamblers would be better off if they had a manager that would watch how they gamble and when they are starting to get emotional and go on tilt, they would be forced to quit playing and come back the next day. However this is why you have so many that gamble for decades and yet they still keep losing money.

What have you referred to as manager? Is it a person or referring to any tools? If a gambler can't control himself and is addicted to gambling, then how would the manager help him? Experienced gamblers don't always win; they can manage their gamble risk. Winnings fully depend on luck. The experience sometimes works on the betting; an experienced gambler would predict who is going to win or lose based on their past experience, though it won't always turn out right. But don't think managers would keep any rules on the gambling at all.

It seems that he expects the manager to take over the role of his parents and control his bad habits. If someone sees the solution as there will be a person in charge of turning off the electricity when he gambles too much, he is quite mistaken. These are more serious matters and are not solved by managers but by professionals whose primary activity is working with addicts.

[Promocodeudo]

I dont think the amount of years you are gambling have anything to do with how much risk you take. Like you said your friend which has gambled 5 years, supposedly he has lots of experience already but he still loses money, so obviously he doesnt manage risk correctly. Sure gambling is against you but most gamblers lose because they go on tilt and they don't control their emotions.

Many gamblers would be better off if they had a manager that would watch how they gamble and when they are starting to get emotional and go on tilt, they would be forced to quit playing and come back the next day. However this is why you have so many that gamble for decades and yet they still keep losing money.

First of, gambling is an emotional thing, that's already a fact, since we know that, we should learn how to curtail and control our emotions, it will help us a lot if we do, I think for me, a gambler years of gambling does not have any effect on such gambler having more winning or winning per say, luck is what make gamblers win especially sports bettors.

When I read the part where you said something about how some gamblers can stay safe if they hire manager for themselves to oversee their gambling habit when they are attaching emotions and everything is getting out hand, I laugh because that's funny, the truth is, for any gambler to get to this stage, it means they are into the shit already but am very much concerned and will support any move by any gambler to help them stay safe while gambling.

[katanic97]

Also, because for games like slots, where you can play at any time, you may be spending more than for sports, where you can only play when there is a game to bet on.

Slots generate more revenue due to the nature of the game, not simply player behavior. After all, sportbettings don't play against pure mathematical odds, so it's like a magnet that most bettors think they're accurate with their predictions. So, anyone can potentially bet more sometimes (if we also include betting irl).

We don’t have data for that so we can’t really conclude anything. But based on my own analysis, slots can create a big volume of bets because the results are fast, but the wagers are small. In sports betting, the wagers are usually bigger. Someone can easily put $100 on a sports bet, but in slots, an ordinary gambler won’t risk that much knowing the house edge is high/ RTP is low.

What I see is that casinos that added sports betting boosted their revenue. Gamblers don’t need to look for other sites anymore since it’s like shopping in one place. Everything they want is already there.

I don’t know about you, but lately i’ve been seeing the opposite situation. Some players are investing more in slots than in sports betting. Usually, sports bets are tickets with many matches, good odds, and a small stake. But in slots, i’ve seen single spins go even over $5. Of course, many players play slots just for fun, but those who take big risks definitely have large amounts to bet, regardless of what you said about the "house" edge being high.

[Russlenat]

I don’t know about you, but lately i’ve been seeing the opposite situation. Some players are investing more in slots than in sports betting. Usually, sports bets are tickets with many matches, good odds, and a small stake. But in slots, i’ve seen single spins go even over $5. Of course, many players play slots just for fun, but those who take big risks definitely have large amounts to bet, regardless of what you said about the "house" edge being high.

You have a point too. In casinos, if you lose, they take your entire bet. But in sports betting, if you lose, they only take around 10% since the other 90% goes to the winning bettor through the 1.90 odds. But depending on the casino, if their sportsbook is popular, they can still make a lot of money from sportsbook operations. Though considering how popular slots are right now, maybe I’d agree that slots are probably more profitable for them.

[aylabadia05]

Some players are investing more in slots than in sports betting. Usually, sports bets are tickets with many matches, good odds, and a small stake. But in slots, i’ve seen single spins go even over $5. Of course, many players play slots just for fun, but those who take big risks definitely have large amounts to bet, regardless of what you said about the "house" edge being high.

Maybe they haven't enjoyed sports betting so they spend more time on slots.
Slots are a very challenging type of gambling. If you don't have enough money, you won't be able to enjoy the game as expected, not to mention having to lose all your money if you lose.
In sports betting, $5 can create a betting list with many match options that can be selected to pursue high odds.

Slots and sports betting are two different forms of gambling. That is, slots are elite gambling which is dominated by people with money, while sports betting at all financial levels can be enjoyed.

[tabas]

I don’t know about you, but lately i’ve been seeing the opposite situation. Some players are investing more in slots than in sports betting. Usually, sports bets are tickets with many matches, good odds, and a small stake. But in slots, i’ve seen single spins go even over $5. Of course, many players play slots just for fun, but those who take big risks definitely have large amounts to bet, regardless of what you said about the "house" edge being high.

This got has a sense to be honest and it's true, I've been noticing lately as well that there are more slots players and they're playing it. I'm not sure how it goes with that shift but gamblers seem to have that change due to the speed of the game and how quick they'd win/lose. The quick phasing of slots makes them more attractive than of the sports betting. The traditional sports bettor will remain in the game but both players won't be stopped if they want to go where the other gambler goes. This is what's good in gambling, no one can stop us whichever we want to gamble with.

[notocactus]

This got has a sense to be honest and it's true, I've been noticing lately as well that there are more slots players and they're playing it. I'm not sure how it goes with that shift but gamblers seem to have that change due to the speed of the game and how quick they'd win/lose. The quick phasing of slots makes them more attractive than of the sports betting. The traditional sports bettor will remain in the game but both players won't be stopped if they want to go where the other gambler goes. This is what's good in gambling, no one can stop us whichever we want to gamble with.

There are different people with different feelings about different games. Slot games and sports betting are different types of gambling and there are gamblers who love slot games while surely there are other gamblers who like sports betting. About gambling, it's a risky activity with your money spent for risky bets which can end as win or lose and you can not decide the bet result.

Both gambling types are attractive with gamblers who love it so if they are addictive with bets, can not manage their finance and gambling capital well, it's very easily to lose control, then lose money, and draw their lives to something more difficult financially. With whatever gambling type, when you play, do it responsibly.

[notblox1]

It seems that he expects the manager to take over the role of his parents and control his bad habits. If someone sees the solution as there will be a person in charge of turning off the electricity when he gambles too much, he is quite mistaken. These are more serious matters and are not solved by managers but by professionals whose primary activity is working with addicts.

People now need special manager for gambling?! 
Why stopping there, he can hire a manager for eating, sleeping, crossing the street and everything else.
No manager cant help someone with a gambling addiction problem, and no manager should decide how you are spending your money.

[bettercrypto]

I dont think the amount of years you are gambling have anything to do with how much risk you take. Like you said your friend which has gambled 5 years, supposedly he has lots of experience already but he still loses money, so obviously he doesnt manage risk correctly. Sure gambling is against you but most gamblers lose because they go on tilt and they don't control their emotions.

Many gamblers would be better off if they had a manager that would watch how they gamble and when they are starting to get emotional and go on tilt, they would be forced to quit playing and come back the next day. However this is why you have so many that gamble for decades and yet they still keep losing money.

First of, gambling is an emotional thing, that's already a fact, since we know that, we should learn how to curtail and control our emotions, it will help us a lot if we do, I think for me, a gambler years of gambling does not have any effect on such gambler having more winning or winning per say, luck is what make gamblers win especially sports bettors.

When I read the part where you said something about how some gamblers can stay safe if they hire manager for themselves to oversee their gambling habit when they are attaching emotions and everything is getting out hand, I laugh because that's funny, the truth is, for any gambler to get to this stage, it means they are into the shit already but am very much concerned and will support any move by any gambler to help them stay safe while gambling.

I believe that gambling is really an emotional thing. What we need as gamblers is to use or control our emotions properly when we play gambling on any platform here in the crypto casino industry. And if we get carried away by our emotions leading to a bad outcome in our game, it's because in gambling, players usually end up losing.

As long as we can properly control our own emotions, we can surely also control the amount of funds we might lose. Because if we can't control our emotions properly, especially when we're losing, then for sure, in the end, we won't be able to control the amount of money we lose in our gambling either.

[tabas]

This got has a sense to be honest and it's true, I've been noticing lately as well that there are more slots players and they're playing it. I'm not sure how it goes with that shift but gamblers seem to have that change due to the speed of the game and how quick they'd win/lose. The quick phasing of slots makes them more attractive than of the sports betting. The traditional sports bettor will remain in the game but both players won't be stopped if they want to go where the other gambler goes. This is what's good in gambling, no one can stop us whichever we want to gamble with.

There are different people with different feelings about different games. Slot games and sports betting are different types of gambling and there are gamblers who love slot games while surely there are other gamblers who like sports betting. About gambling, it's a risky activity with your money spent for risky bets which can end as win or lose and you can not decide the bet result.

Both gambling types are attractive with gamblers who love it so if they are addictive with bets, can not manage their finance and gambling capital well, it's very easily to lose control, then lose money, and draw their lives to something more difficult financially. With whatever gambling type, when you play, do it responsibly.

I totally agree, either of the two must be done responsibly. Enjoy it for as long as we can and with the amount of money we can gamble with and fair to lose it. That's what gambling is all about, we do it to have fun and if some profits are there then that's adding the fun we're looking for. Slots and sportsbetting are very addictive to be honest and if someone losses themselves through it and it's no longer about having fun anymore, I can understand but still, do it with discipline and avoid going to that point of being addicted to it. We know ourselves better if we're already like that.

[ginsan]

I dont think the amount of years you are gambling have anything to do with how much risk you take. Like you said your friend which has gambled 5 years, supposedly he has lots of experience already but he still loses money, so obviously he doesnt manage risk correctly. Sure gambling is against you but most gamblers lose because they go on tilt and they don't control their emotions.

Many gamblers would be better off if they had a manager that would watch how they gamble and when they are starting to get emotional and go on tilt, they would be forced to quit playing and come back the next day. However this is why you have so many that gamble for decades and yet they still keep losing money.

But isn't gambling where we spend our money? Instead of exchanging it for the fun we have when gambling.

I feel that we need to understand the meaning of risk from another point of view, such as limiting the losses that we can get, so it is better if most people lose on average in gambling, because gambling is not a business for gamblers to get financial benefits, this is also current in understanding.

I mean losses can't be denied, it may not be a risk, but the price you have to pay for your activity in gambling.