Betpanda.io | Anonymous Crypto Casino | Welcome Bonus Up to 1BTC

[rat03gopoh]

Do you really think it’s possible to compromise an account with 2FA and SMS if you’re still holding your phone? If that’s possible, then nothing is safe anymore.

You must ensure that your device is always safe from trojans, spyware, etc., and that your number has never been SIM-swapped by someone else. Keep in mind that 2FA codes can be sent not only via SMS but also via messaging apps, which generally allow for extended login sessions across multiple devices simultaneously. So, you still own your device, but you're not the only one in control.

[EarnOnVictor]

Casinos does not allow users to register using any random name or other data, if there are people who uses such random data is not because the casino gave them the permission to but because the casino does not no what there real information are but however the place were everything will be resected and transparent is when the use of Kyc will be mandatory to all the users before they can do anything

You are right, but for the record, I remember some casino representatives (not talking about BetPanda) saying that it was ok to provide random information in the registration form, especially when it comes to the phone number.
Now, if you ask me whether that’s ok, I will tell you with total certainty that it is not. Do not do that. If you do not want to reveal your identity then just look for a casino that does not require kyc.

I love the advice you issued, as it could only be interpreted as a trap if any casino representative advice that, people should avoid it. This verification of a thing must be sincere and thorough, in case you want to do it, so that it will not cause issues for you (that will favour the casino) in the future. KYC casinos are not by force, so anyone who is not willing to reveal their true identity should avoid them for many reasons.

Shortly after your post, I read from some users who claimed that those who wanted to verify a phone number but still want privacy should use a burner phone. Is that even wise? Fine, many might be using it, but this is not without consequences entirely if you want to stay long with the casino. I am sure that it has put some people in trouble of the 2FA access, VoIP detection that could cause the account to be flagged, etc.

[Questat]

I don’t see it as a major factor, that’s more about carelessness, and carelessness always comes with consequences.

As long as you’re fine with the current setup, there’s really nothing to worry about. At the end of the day, it’s just a casino account. You’re usually in and out of funds pretty fast, so hackers probably aren’t that interested anyway.

It’s different if we’re talking about wallets or exchange accounts, that’s where the risk is much higher. But based on my experience, as long as 2FA is enabled, that’s already good enough to secure an account. Even better if your number is SIM-based and fully under your control.

[dwyane36]

I don’t see it as a major factor, that’s more about carelessness, and carelessness always comes with consequences.

As long as you’re fine with the current setup, there’s really nothing to worry about. At the end of the day, it’s just a casino account. You’re usually in and out of funds pretty fast, so hackers probably aren’t that interested anyway.

It’s different if we’re talking about wallets or exchange accounts, that’s where the risk is much higher. But based on my experience, as long as 2FA is enabled, that’s already good enough to secure an account. Even better if your number is SIM-based and fully under your control.

If you deposit funds for a short period of time, for example, only for a gaming session, then yes, there is nothing to worry about. However, it's worth noting that some users keep considerable amounts of money in their gambling accounts for a longer period of time in order to benefit from promotions, and on some platforms, from staking. In such cases, you should secure your account on a gambling platform as reliably as you would with a wallet or exchange account.

[Shishir99]

Submitting a random phone number is way riskier, you're basically enabling a backdoor there, plus you're giving the casino a reason to start bullying you, you provided fake data so now they can abuse it the other way and ask you for everything they want to verify you before allowing you to cash out!

Yeah, so I don't actually understand why a casino representative would suggest that people to use a random phone number. I think we all know how Satoshi's gmx email was compromised. It had expired, and someone else registered using the same name as satoshi. I'm not sure if other email services automatically delete emails if they're not used for a while. I noticed Gmail started sending emails saying some email accounts will be deleted, but I am not sure if someone else will be able to register with the same email later. That will enable the backdoors for bad peoples as well.

[Russlenat]

Do you really think it’s possible to compromise an account with 2FA and SMS if you’re still holding your phone? If that’s possible, then nothing is safe anymore.

You must ensure that your device is always safe from trojans, spyware, etc., and that your number has never been SIM-swapped by someone else.

What do you mean by SIM swap? Do you mean someone physically taking my SIM from my phone? I think I’d notice that right away. I understand how important a SIM card is since it’s often used to recover passwords.

Just to share my experience today, I was traveling and brought a laptop that doesn’t have my important files, so I had to log in again to some accounts. I didn’t even remember my password, so I used the “log in another way” option and entered my phone number. I received the SMS code, entered it, but that still wasn’t enough. I had to confirm it through my Gmail account as well. They sent another code there, which I could see on my phone, and only then was I able to log in.

So having the SIM alone doesn’t really work anymore. If someone wanted access, they’d need my actual phone with the SIM inside it. And even then, opening my phone would still be a problem since it’s protected by facial verification,

[mitchr4]

What do you mean by SIM swap? Do you mean someone physically taking my SIM from my phone? I think I’d notice that right away. I understand how important a SIM card is since it’s often used to recover passwords.

Just to share my experience today, I was traveling and brought a laptop that doesn’t have my important files, so I had to log in again to some accounts. I didn’t even remember my password, so I used the “log in another way” option and entered my phone number. I received the SMS code, entered it, but that still wasn’t enough. I had to confirm it through my Gmail account as well. They sent another code there, which I could see on my phone, and only then was I able to log in.

So having the SIM alone doesn’t really work anymore. If someone wanted access, they’d need my actual phone with the SIM inside it. And even then, opening my phone would still be a problem since it’s protected by facial verification,

SIM-swapping is a fraud technique where attackers take over or transfer your phone number by requesting the mobile operator to move it to their SIM card, claiming they lost their phone or their SIM card is damaged, so they can receive all SMS messages (including 2FA codes) and phone calls that should be coming to you.

So scammers don't need to touch your phone at all because they've already transferred your number to their own SIM card. They only need your personal information to pull off the SIM-swap. This is why it's so important to protect your personal data and not be careless about sharing it on social media or anywhere else.

[OcTradism]

SIM-swapping is a fraud technique where attackers take over or transfer your phone number by requesting the mobile operator to move it to their SIM card, claiming they lost their phone or their SIM card is damaged, so they can receive all SMS messages (including 2FA codes) and phone calls that should be coming to you.

With that SIM-swapping attack risk, if understand it well, people will not set up SMS as a chosen 2FA for their accounts. There are applications, 2 factor authenticators, that can provide better security. There are open source and close source 2FAs, and to have best security, choose open source 2FA. There are close-source 2FA used by many people, but in cryptocurrency, open-source is like a gold standard as community can verify the code and detect backdoors if any was set up by programmers.

Security and Privacy Encylopedia.

[DYING_S0UL]

SIM-swapping is a fraud technique where attackers take over or transfer your phone number by requesting the mobile operator to move it to their SIM card, claiming they lost their phone or their SIM card is damaged, so they can receive all SMS messages (including 2FA codes) and phone calls that should be coming to you.

So scammers don't need to touch your phone at all because they've already transferred your number to their own SIM card. They only need your personal information to pull off the SIM-swap. This is why it's so important to protect your personal data and not be careless about sharing it on social media or anywhere else.

Requesting how exactly? The way you described it sounded too easy for this thing to happen. Like anyone can request their sim to be swaped if they had the right information about the owner. There are no KYC checks or 2FA or thumbprint or anything?

Assuming I lost my sim somehow and wanted to reclaim it, I need to physically go to the nearest customers care of that sim operator. There they'll check my KYC info (NID) and verify my thumbprints, if that checks out, only then they'll replace it, otherwise they'll say bring the original owner whom this sim was registered with. There are no online replacemnet/swap process here, no thumbprint = no swap.

[mitchr4]

Requesting how exactly? The way you described it sounded too easy for this thing to happen. Like anyone can request their sim to be swaped if they had the right information about the owner. There are no KYC checks or 2FA or thumbprint or anything?

Assuming I lost my sim somehow and wanted to reclaim it, I need to physically go to the nearest customers care of that sim operator. There they'll check my KYC info (NID) and verify my thumbprints, if that checks out, only then they'll replace it, otherwise they'll say bring the original owner whom this sim was registered with. There are no online replacemnet/swap process here, no thumbprint = no swap.

Each SIM operator has different ways to recover a lost SIM, but from my experience I had to go to their office and meet customer care in person. Like you said, they check your KYC and fingerprints to make sure you're the real owner.

I think SIM swap fraud is rare now. It's an old trick that scammers used to steal authentication codes. Since this scam happened a lot before, operators now require face to face meetings with KYC verification for any SIM swap.

[katanic97]

~ snip
Cardiff vs Chelsea in the EFL Cup.
Chelsea will definitely field their second squad and rotate a lot of core players while Cardiff is a league one team that is currently doing quite well... You need to be wary of Chelsea's play sometimes for them it's not passionate.

You were right, they fielded a completely different lineup, and the substitute Garnacho scored two goals, just enough to boost his confidence a bit . The odds for Chelsea were 1.50, while for "both teams to score" it was 1.64. Not bad odds if you added some other matches and increased your stake

[tabas]

Do you really think it’s possible to compromise an account with 2FA and SMS if you’re still holding your phone? If that’s possible, then nothing is safe anymore.

You must ensure that your device is always safe from trojans, spyware, etc., and that your number has never been SIM-swapped by someone else. Keep in mind that 2FA codes can be sent not only via SMS but also via messaging apps, which generally allow for extended login sessions across multiple devices simultaneously. So, you still own your device, but you're not the only one in control.

You're right, there goes the messaging apps nowadays where the 2FA code is also being sent. I think that despite that they only want to increase the security for most 2FA's required by websites, allowing a messaging app even with encryption makes a gateway for the intruders that they can also look for some holes with it for them to abuse if they can't do sim swap. But as said, just always think none is safe 100% and that's why we have to be vigilant at all times.

[mikel_012]

Do you really think it’s possible to compromise an account with 2FA and SMS if you’re still holding your phone? If that’s possible, then nothing is safe anymore.

If what you mean is it only happens when the phone is lost and someone else gets access to it, then yeah, that’s the price we pay. But that happens very rarely. Losing your phone is almost the same as losing access to your accounts anyway. I don’t see it as a major factor, that’s more about carelessness, and carelessness always comes with consequences.

There are many cases of SIM swap with SMS 2fa and every time you only need a employee from the telephone company with access to leak your number.

You need to use the 2FA that does not use any phone number and is only generated on your phone. This way you only get hacked if someone gets your phone and unlocks it or if you have a virus but this is more unlikely.

[leonair]

Do you really think it’s possible to compromise an account with 2FA and SMS if you’re still holding your phone? If that’s possible, then nothing is safe anymore.

You must ensure that your device is always safe from trojans, spyware, etc., and that your number has never been SIM-swapped by someone else. Keep in mind that 2FA codes can be sent not only via SMS but also via messaging apps, which generally allow for extended login sessions across multiple devices simultaneously. So, you still own your device, but you're not the only one in control.

You're right, there goes the messaging apps nowadays where the 2FA code is also being sent. I think that despite that they only want to increase the security for most 2FA's required by websites, allowing a messaging app even with encryption makes a gateway for the intruders that they can also look for some holes with it for them to abuse if they can't do sim swap. But as said, just always think none is safe 100% and that's why we have to be vigilant at all times.

Google Authenticator is much more effective for 2FA because someone can swap their SIM for any reason but someone does not delete their Gmail or even if they use a new Gmail, they still have their old Gmail credentials. And that Gmail being safe means their 2FA code will be safe. However. I don't think SMS authentication can face any problem for anyone because every SIM has to be registered with its legal document so no one can take that SIM or if it is lost, they can replace it. So no one should have any problem with 2FA if they are careful and do not let any malware enter their device.

[tabas]

You're right, there goes the messaging apps nowadays where the 2FA code is also being sent. I think that despite that they only want to increase the security for most 2FA's required by websites, allowing a messaging app even with encryption makes a gateway for the intruders that they can also look for some holes with it for them to abuse if they can't do sim swap. But as said, just always think none is safe 100% and that's why we have to be vigilant at all times.

Google Authenticator is much more effective for 2FA because someone can swap their SIM for any reason but someone does not delete their Gmail or even if they use a new Gmail, they still have their old Gmail credentials. And that Gmail being safe means their 2FA code will be safe. However. I don't think SMS authentication can face any problem for anyone because every SIM has to be registered with its legal document so no one can take that SIM or if it is lost, they can replace it. So no one should have any problem with 2FA if they are careful and do not let any malware enter their device.

We're different kinds of users and some will choose the SMS and will activate it with their accounts. Betpanda has two 2FA and that's with email and app authentication like with Google Authenticator. While there have been some controversy that google auth's been in. Try to check the other 2FA apps like Aegis if you feel not good about them. There are always risk in either of them because if your email gets hacked, you're easily intruded by the hacker and that's a bingo for them if you've got funds in your balance which they can withdraw easily if you're using the email auth.

[vanesha]

~ snip
Cardiff vs Chelsea in the EFL Cup.
Chelsea will definitely field their second squad and rotate a lot of core players while Cardiff is a league one team that is currently doing quite well... You need to be wary of Chelsea's play sometimes for them it's not passionate.

You were right, they fielded a completely different lineup, and the substitute Garnacho scored two goals, just enough to boost his confidence a bit . The odds for Chelsea were 1.50, while for "both teams to score" it was 1.64. Not bad odds if you added some other matches and increased your stake

Let's bet again and challenge the adrenaline, whatever the result we will be satisfied, there are 3 bets that I made today 1 parlay bet on the live match watching PSG against Flamengo, PSG will win without conceding a goal, let's see, the first half has ended PSG is ahead by 1 goal, Flamengo is having difficulty attacking PSG

[bettercrypto]

Do you really think it’s possible to compromise an account with 2FA and SMS if you’re still holding your phone? If that’s possible, then nothing is safe anymore.

You must ensure that your device is always safe from trojans, spyware, etc., and that your number has never been SIM-swapped by someone else. Keep in mind that 2FA codes can be sent not only via SMS but also via messaging apps, which generally allow for extended login sessions across multiple devices simultaneously. So, you still own your device, but you're not the only one in control.

You're right, there goes the messaging apps nowadays where the 2FA code is also being sent. I think that despite that they only want to increase the security for most 2FA's required by websites, allowing a messaging app even with encryption makes a gateway for the intruders that they can also look for some holes with it for them to abuse if they can't do sim swap. But as said, just always think none is safe 100% and that's why we have to be vigilant at all times.

Google Authenticator is much more effective for 2FA because someone can swap their SIM for any reason but someone does not delete their Gmail or even if they use a new Gmail, they still have their old Gmail credentials. And that Gmail being safe means their 2FA code will be safe. However. I don't think SMS authentication can face any problem for anyone because every SIM has to be registered with its legal document so no one can take that SIM or if it is lost, they can replace it. So no one should have any problem with 2FA if they are careful and do not let any malware enter their device.

In my experience in terms of using 2FA in casinos, so far I haven’t had any problems. But I’ve never tried using a code that comes from a SIM card number if that’s the type of security we choose in a casino we’re using.

Most of the time, I only use email/Gmail for this, and in more than a year of gambling, the result has been good because I haven’t encountered any problems, as long as we’re careful
and aware of the suspicious things hackers do, like using phishing links.

[Lakai01]

[...]
Google Authenticator is much more effective for 2FA because someone can swap their SIM for any reason but someone does not delete their Gmail or even if they use a new Gmail, they still have their old Gmail credentials. And that Gmail being safe means their 2FA code will be safe. However. I don't think SMS authentication can face any problem for anyone because every SIM has to be registered with its legal document so no one can take that SIM or if it is lost, they can replace it. So no one should have any problem with 2FA if they are careful and do not let any malware enter their device.

That's not 100% correct. In the country where I live, you can buy so-called disposable SIM cards in almost every supermarket. These are not registered to a specific name and are simply topped up with credit, which you can then use to make calls or send messages, for example. However, online services are not possible with such cards.

There are occasional discussions about discontinuing the sale of these SIM cards, but nothing has happened in this direction yet.

Otherwise, I agree with you: I personally also like to use the authenticator and have already needed the restore feature due to damage to my cell phone.

[EarnOnVictor]

Do you really think it’s possible to compromise an account with 2FA and SMS if you’re still holding your phone? If that’s possible, then nothing is safe anymore.

You must ensure that your device is always safe from trojans, spyware, etc., and that your number has never been SIM-swapped by someone else. Keep in mind that 2FA codes can be sent not only via SMS but also via messaging apps, which generally allow for extended login sessions across multiple devices simultaneously. So, you still own your device, but you're not the only one in control.

You're right, there goes the messaging apps nowadays where the 2FA code is also being sent. I think that despite that they only want to increase the security for most 2FA's required by websites, allowing a messaging app even with encryption makes a gateway for the intruders that they can also look for some holes with it for them to abuse if they can't do sim swap. But as said, just always think none is safe 100% and that's why we have to be vigilant at all times.

Google Authenticator is much more effective for 2FA because someone can swap their SIM for any reason but someone does not delete their Gmail or even if they use a new Gmail, they still have their old Gmail credentials. And that Gmail being safe means their 2FA code will be safe. However. I don't think SMS authentication can face any problem for anyone because every SIM has to be registered with its legal document so no one can take that SIM or if it is lost, they can replace it. So no one should have any problem with 2FA if they are careful and do not let any malware enter their device.

Wait a minute, you need to clarity things here. For the 2FA, are you referring to the Google Authenticator or the mere Gmail OTP? If I were you, I will prioritize the Google Authenticator, or better still, use the two together.

As for the SMS option, well, you have a good point, especially if the person do it rightly. Unfortunately, many do not do it rightly. Some use burner phones, and many others use alternative phone numbers, which they later misplaced and becomes an issue. I am guilty of the latter.

While this last likely issue could innocently occur, it's equally important to consider. Imagine that you traveled abroad, or relocated altogether and the SIM/Phone number issue that can only be fixed back home happened? For sure, you will get stuck. Even professionals advice against SIM 2FA now, not because it's entirely bad, but it has some issues of its own, which includes security.

[katanic97]

~ snip
Cardiff vs Chelsea in the EFL Cup.
Chelsea will definitely field their second squad and rotate a lot of core players while Cardiff is a league one team that is currently doing quite well... You need to be wary of Chelsea's play sometimes for them it's not passionate.

You were right, they fielded a completely different lineup, and the substitute Garnacho scored two goals, just enough to boost his confidence a bit . The odds for Chelsea were 1.50, while for "both teams to score" it was 1.64. Not bad odds if you added some other matches and increased your stake

Let's bet again and challenge the adrenaline, whatever the result we will be satisfied, there are 3 bets that I made today 1 parlay bet on the live match watching PSG against Flamengo, PSG will win without conceding a goal, let's see, the first half has ended PSG is ahead by 1 goal, Flamengo is having difficulty attacking PSG

Today there are many Conference League matches. There are exactly 18 games today and I will definitely place a bet. For now, i have three matches that i will put on my ticket AEK, AEK Larnaca, and Dynamo Kiev. They are the main favorites and the odds are quite solid- 1.45, 1.65, and 2.10