♻️ CCE.Cash - Instant & Automatic Exchange ♻️ Fees 0.4 - 0.8%!

[Forsyth Jones]

What do you think of this news?

The percentage of Bitcoin currently held in exchanges has fallen to its lowest level since November 2017. https://t.co/TUmBMGVfMV

This is not a bad news i suppose. If the supply of BTC in exchanges is shrinking to as low as hasn't been seen in nearly a decade, then one angle to look at it is that more people have been taking the 'not your keys, not your coins' axiom very seriously. So i believe BTC's are moving off of exchanges and into self custodial cold wallets, which is good.

Another angle is that U.S. spot etf's are also eating into the supply of BTC on exchanges, as institutional investors may prefer custody of their BTC's in etf's, rather than on exchanges.

The intense pressure for KYC in CEXs has contributed to this reduction in liquidity for exchanges.

A day will come when the pursuit of privacy will become a means of survival.

Everything is going according to what Satoshi proposed, more and more people will practice P2P and use never-KYC services...

[bitmover]

The intense pressure for KYC in CEXs has contributed to this reduction in liquidity for exchanges.

A day will come when the pursuit of privacy will become a means of survival.

Everything is going according to what Satoshi proposed, more and more people will practice P2P and use never-KYC services...

Although there is  a significant volume in kyc free exchanges  (basically crypto x crypto swaps), people still use a lot more cex.

And there is no good way to buy crypto using fiat without kyc. I know bisq exists,  which is a good p2p platform , but the volume is ridiculously low.

And fiat x crypto is necessary

[DireWolfM14]

Another angle is that U.S. spot etf's are also eating into the supply of BTC on exchanges, as institutional investors may prefer custody of their BTC's in etf's, rather than on exchanges.

This is what I attribute the news to.  I don't see Joe Sixpack as having changed his habits significantly.  CEXs are still the most convenient for on/off ramping and convenience will always win.

The intense pressure for KYC in CEXs has contributed to this reduction in liquidity for exchanges.

I really don't see this as a significant factor.  In the bubble of the BitcoinTalk community it may be easy to say this has affect, because this community tends to value privacy, but the general public don't put nearly as much stock in privacy as we do.  The conditioning of years of using banks makes it seem absolutely normal, even when dealing with cryptocurrency.  Despite bitcoin's original intent to decentralize currency and make it private, most people don't care about those aspects of it.  They just care about the alure of it as an investment.

A day will come when the pursuit of privacy will become a means of survival.

Yes, I believe that as well.  However, like every zombie movie, the majority fall within the first few weeks because they trust the system.  Financial privacy will essentially have an equal ratio of survivors to zombies.

Everything is going according to what Satoshi proposed, more and more people will practice P2P and use never-KYC services...

I think we're still far from that.  It's going to take a huge financial collapse before the majority realize that the current system is rigged against them.  Not until it's too late will the learn their mistake, and adjust accordingly.

[Z-tight]

The intense pressure for KYC in CEXs has contributed to this reduction in liquidity for exchanges.

I understand that there are so many people in the industry who do not care about passing kyc in centralized services. I mean, some people even send their personal data to receive certain shitty airdrops. We have a good culture in this forum, were we advocate that people take their privacy seriously, but i cannot say the same about the majority out there.

I think we're still far from that.  It's going to take a huge financial collapse before the majority realize that the current system is rigged against them.  Not until it's too late will the learn their mistake, and adjust accordingly.

People learn things like this very slow. I know someone who moved their funds from one exchange (because there were rumours of insolvency) into another exchange, that's how crazy it is. Then there is the government actively fighting no-kyc services and even punishing developers for creating self custodial software. We're indeed very far from that.

[Yamane_Keto]

Completed my new order, everything went well, and I left a review on Bitlist.
https://bitlist.co/service/cce-cash
Order ID: AXXX-XXXX-XXXD

human verification took too long; I waited for more than 5 minutes. I hope it will be improved in the future.

[Chikito]

What do you think of this news?

That bullish news when people were withdrawing their BTC from the exchange and keeping it on a non-custody wallet. But, it's not good news if people think bitcoin is not safe asset, then exit from the exchange. But, I don't know how much fiat and USDT are circulating on the exchange?, if it’s large and hasn’t moved yet, that potential they buy BTC in future.

[CCECash]

We're happy to share another mini-report!

Circle USYC's market capitalization has increased by over 41% in the past 30 days, making it the world's largest tokenized US Treasury fund. https://t.co/r8hSSw8zAq

With best wishes, ♻️ CCE.Cash

[inspace]

🎉 The series of events continues! The latest raffle has just started — hurry up and secure your slot!

♻️ CCE.Cash 🎀 SWAP RAFFLE 🎀 $30 in BTC

➥ The winner will receive a prize of $30 in BTC 🎁
➥ Publish proof - for every $100 exchanged, you receive 1 slot.



♻️ Stay tuned for the latest news.

[zasad@]

🎉 The series of events continues! The latest raffle has just started — hurry up and secure your slot!

..

AakZaki has hacked this system again. This is the second time I've seen this happen

[AakZaki]

AakZaki has hacked this system again. This is the second time I've seen this happen

At first I thought I was too late, because I didn't know it. however after I saw that only Forsyth Jones did the swap, so I decided to spend the rest of the slots.

I also think that if someone wants to get ahead of me it's because of the consideration of the prize, which will be left a little after the fee is deducted. The 30$ prize - the 13$ fee is only 17$ left. Since it's still wort-it so I'm still doing it.
Maybe it would be different if the prize was like a raffle, at that time it was 60$, maybe I didn't get a part of the slot, because I didn't see that at first.

[CCECash]

Friends, the new tweet is already here! We'd love to hear from you!

Vietnam plans to ban its citizens from using overseas exchanges and promote a pilot program for domestically licensed cryptocurrency platforms. https://t.co/z4slpaG3yp

With best wishes, ♻️ CCE.Cash

[Forsyth Jones]

Friends, the new tweet is already here! We'd love to hear from you!

Vietnam plans to ban its citizens from using overseas exchanges and promote a pilot program for domestically licensed cryptocurrency platforms. https://t.co/z4slpaG3yp

Code:

[img width=680]https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HDsQq60aAAA2A0X.jpg[/img]

With best wishes, ♻️ CCE.Cash

I don't know much about Vietnam, I just think that any government that believes it has the right to collect taxes and at the same time prohibit people from doing business with certain individuals or companies, practically thinks they own the taxpayers of that country.

Prohibiting people from exchanging currencies or crypto in foreign exchanges is practically exchange control which only exists in third-world dictatorships. I hope the people there don't let that happen.

This kind of news makes me lose faith in humanity. How many people will have to suffer because of these shitty governments?

[r_victory]

I don't know much about Vietnam, I just think that any government that believes it has the right to collect taxes and at the same time prohibit people from doing business with certain individuals or companies, practically thinks they own the taxpayers of that country.

Prohibiting people from exchanging currencies or crypto in foreign exchanges is practically exchange control which only exists in third-world dictatorships. I hope the people there don't let that happen.

This kind of news makes me lose faith in humanity. How many people will have to suffer because of these shitty governments?

Promoting local businesses is always a great initiative, as long as it doesn't deprive people of their freedom of choice. Vietnam is a communist country, but with a certain degree of economic openness to foreign capital; in any case, maintaining control over the people is essential for these regimes to stay in power, so it's no surprise that they want to do something like this.

[SamReomo]

Prohibiting people from exchanging currencies or crypto in foreign exchanges is practically exchange control which only exists in third-world dictatorships. I hope the people there don't let that happen.

This kind of news makes me lose faith in humanity. How many people will have to suffer because of these shitty governments?

Well, that thing happens in many countries because they want to take tax in any type of trade and that's the reason why they have such policies. Don't lose faith in humanity my friend because it's still there, however we all know that everything is controlled by the governments and that's the bitter trust. The tax payers will have to do anything government wants them to do. That's the reason why Bitcoin was created to work as decentralized system but unfortunately because of governments it's now hard for many people in different areas of the world to trade Bitcoin to local currencies.

[Forsyth Jones]

Promoting local businesses is always a great initiative, as long as it doesn't deprive people of their freedom of choice. Vietnam is a communist country, but with a certain degree of economic openness to foreign capital; in any case, maintaining control over the people is essential for these regimes to stay in power, so it's no surprise that they want to do something like this.

Socialist countries need to allow a certain degree of market openness to prevent the complete collapse of dictatorships.

Well, that thing happens in many countries because they want to take tax in any type of trade and that's the reason why they have such policies. Don't lose faith in humanity my friend because it's still there, however we all know that everything is controlled by the governments and that's the bitter trust. The tax payers will have to do anything government wants them to do. That's the reason why Bitcoin was created to work as decentralized system but unfortunately because of governments it's now hard for many people in different areas of the world to trade Bitcoin to local currencies.

Nowadays, it's much more practical for someone dissatisfied with their country to move to a freer country with a better market economy than for the people themselves to change the country through democracy. This process can take several generations.

There are already countries preventing people from withdrawing certain amounts in fiat, pushing people to use centralized payment systems for greater control of financial flows.

[CCECash]

Guys, we've published a new tweet!

HyperEVM's stablecoin supply has surpassed $1 billion, surging 96% since February. https://t.co/K3E4vY9ujT

With best wishes, ♻️ CCE.Cash

[zasad@]

I recently made an exchange and everything went very quickly.

___
I don't want to participate in these contests because the published ID reveals which wallet I received my funds to. This is unsafe.
Can you implement an additional internal ID for the exchange, so that only you can access information about the exchange?
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5577630.msg66519208#msg66519208

[hugeblack]

I don't want to participate in these contests because the published ID reveals which wallet I received my funds to. This is unsafe.
Can you implement an additional internal ID for the exchange, so that only you can access information about the exchange?

I noticed once when I visited order ID via a different IP address, it asked me to enter the receiving address before revealing the transaction details. Try visiting order ID using a different IP address and take a screenshot of the result.

[zasad@]

I don't want to participate in these contests because the published ID reveals which wallet I received my funds to. This is unsafe.
Can you implement an additional internal ID for the exchange, so that only you can access information about the exchange?

I noticed once when I visited order ID via a different IP address, it asked me to enter the receiving address before revealing the transaction details. Try visiting order ID using a different IP address and take a screenshot of the result.

You're right. The system asks for receiving wallet address

[SamReomo]

Nowadays, it's much more practical for someone dissatisfied with their country to move to a freer country with a better market economy than for the people themselves to change the country through democracy. This process can take several generations.

Leaving your land is the worst mistake in my opinion unless you have no other choice. Moving to another country isn't worth it, it's better to live in your own country and overtime things will change but if you've to move to another country then for that decisions you'll have to do many sacrifices. In new country you'll have no relatives and you'll have to do extra hard work to make new friends and relations and it'll take so much time.