♻️ CCE.Cash - Instant & Automatic Exchange ♻️ Fees 0.4 - 0.8%!

[SamReomo]

Overall the raffle, this time, the prize was too small with 50 slots available. For example, if someone takes 50 slots, it means that they need 5000$ with a cost of 20$, then win then only 10$ is left. It is not worth the risk if the swapped coin suddenly drops.

This time I played it safe first. 

You're good at math buddy, so it means that now the raffle is somehow tough to play with a strategy but rather almost everyone gets chance to win it by trading on CCE.CASH by sharing their trades and taking 1 to few slots. Only those who're addicted to winning will spend $5k to win the raffle each round but if things go still $10 isn't a bad amount to win if things go well.

[Chikito]

I detected an error on ccecash on Tor. If I check my transaction ID in the Tor browser and enter my receiving address (for CCECash to verify that I'm the owner of the transaction), the page displays the transaction details for about 1 second, but then reloads the page and asks for the address again, with my address filled in.

There's just one detail: it won't reproduce this bug if the transaction has already been completed.

That always happens on Tor Browser, not only happens on ccecash, but also happens when I try to open the Bitcointalk forum. That happens because Tor browser always changes the circuit. The server forces you to re-verification. I always click the circuit and change to a new circuit to fix the problem, and make sure also you not block the cookie.

[hugeblack]

Only those who're addicted to winning will spend $5k to win the raffle each round but if things go still $10 isn't a bad amount to win if things go well.

it turns challenges from something fun into a system where whoever makes more trades has a greater chance of winning. It would be more enjoyable if there were two competitions, one for traders and another with simple tasks where luck determines the winner, or alternate between the two.

I've given this topic a bump, let's see how long it will remain first.

[ArielRod20]

Overall the raffle, this time, the prize was too small with 50 slots available. For example, if someone takes 50 slots, it means that they need 5000$ with a cost of 20$, then win then only 10$ is left. It is not worth the risk if the swapped coin suddenly drops.

This time I played it safe first. 

You're good at math buddy, so it means that now the raffle is somehow tough to play with a strategy but rather almost everyone gets chance to win it by trading on CCE.CASH by sharing their trades and taking 1 to few slots. Only those who're addicted to winning will spend $5k to win the raffle each round but if things go still $10 isn't a bad amount to win if things go well.

If you exchange $5k and fees are already deducted, even a $10 gain isn't enough they don't make a profit.

[zasad@]

Overall the raffle, this time, the prize was too small with 50 slots available. For example, if someone takes 50 slots, it means that they need 5000$ with a cost of 20$, then win then only 10$ is left. It is not worth the risk if the swapped coin suddenly drops.

This time I played it safe first. 

You're good at math buddy, so it means that now the raffle is somehow tough to play with a strategy but rather almost everyone gets chance to win it by trading on CCE.CASH by sharing their trades and taking 1 to few slots. Only those who're addicted to winning will spend $5k to win the raffle each round but if things go still $10 isn't a bad amount to win if things go well.

If you exchange $5k and fees are already deducted, even a $10 gain isn't enough they don't make a profit.

I think that such lotteries are wrong, and the number of slots per participant should be limited.
The bonus should be received by those who use the project for exchange, and not by those who use the project for a guaranteed win.

[ArielRod20]

Overall the raffle, this time, the prize was too small with 50 slots available. For example, if someone takes 50 slots, it means that they need 5000$ with a cost of 20$, then win then only 10$ is left. It is not worth the risk if the swapped coin suddenly drops.

This time I played it safe first. 

You're good at math buddy, so it means that now the raffle is somehow tough to play with a strategy but rather almost everyone gets chance to win it by trading on CCE.CASH by sharing their trades and taking 1 to few slots. Only those who're addicted to winning will spend $5k to win the raffle each round but if things go still $10 isn't a bad amount to win if things go well.

If you exchange $5k and fees are already deducted, even a $10 gain isn't enough they don't make a profit.

I think that such lotteries are wrong, and the number of slots per participant should be limited.
The bonus should be received by those who use the project for exchange, and not by those who use the project for a guaranteed win.

I agree  cap slots per user at 8–10 so active exchangers benefit; prevents whales buying guaranteed wins and keeps odds fair.

[AakZaki]

If you exchange $5k and fees are already deducted, even a $10 gain isn't enough they don't make a profit.

Even you don't have a count and immediately say you won't make a profit. Use your common sense before posting.

I think that such lotteries are wrong, and the number of slots per participant should be limited.

If it's restricted, would you like to see the other lottery that is also posted by inspace here, although not restricted there are still very few participants.

The bonus should be received by those who use the project for exchange, and not by those who use the project for a guaranteed win.

Then why do you yourself, never take that slot? even CCECash has done it a few times, as a reminder inspace already posts it in this Thread every time there is a lottery.

This is not a raffle that does not involve fees, which should be limited. Unless raffles such as guess Price or guess the new score should be restricted.
If this kind of raffles are restricted, we will see fewer enthusiasts and it will probably take days to fill slots.

[examplens]

Guys, you're making too much drama around a contest. Whether the rules are fair or not depends on how someone looks at the whole thing. Participation is still not mandatory.
I assume that the owner of the campaign and the one who started it are following what is happening and, certainly, the results of this campaign. If they are satisfied, they have little reason to change the rules and vice versa.

[Forsyth Jones]

That always happens on Tor Browser, not only happens on ccecash, but also happens when I try to open the Bitcointalk forum. That happens because Tor browser always changes the circuit. The server forces you to re-verification. I always click the circuit and change to a new circuit to fix the problem, and make sure also you not block the cookie.

Thanks for the explanation man, next time I'll try to do that, it's not urgent and can be bypassed using a browser like Brave or Firefox.

Guys, you're making too much drama around a contest. Whether the rules are fair or not depends on how someone looks at the whole thing. Participation is still not mandatory.
I assume that the owner of the campaign and the one who started it are following what is happening and, certainly, the results of this campaign. If they are satisfied, they have little reason to change the rules and vice versa.

From a marketing standpoint, it seems to be working, look at all the fokls, almost an entire page talking about these contests (and it's not the first time, lol), keeping the ANN topic frequently at the top of discussions (since I'm not a marketing expert, I don't know if these conversations have positive effects and bring more customers to ccecash).

But I put myself in your shoes and imagine it might not be cool to spend almost an entire page reading about the same subject. Most people who follow  this ANN like to see new things and more exciting topics, so to speak.

I hope to beat @AakZaki in the next raffle. 

[kawetsriyanto]

Guys, you're making too much drama around a contest. Whether the rules are fair or not depends on how someone looks at the whole thing. Participation is still not mandatory.
I assume that the owner of the campaign and the one who started it are following what is happening and, certainly, the results of this campaign. If they are satisfied, they have little reason to change the rules and vice versa.

Agree. We shouldn't make it to be too complicated. The contest has its own rules, everything will depend on the rules. Also, we must realize that the contest creator has the right to decide anything he/she wants. Sure, joining isn't mandatory, everyone can join or not. If someone isn't satisfied with the rules, he/she can ignore the participation. Anyway, I see the contest is quite fair, we should accept the result.

I hope to beat @AakZaki in the next raffle. 

Well, the point isn't beating him, but winning the reward.

[inspace]

🎉 The series of events continues! The latest raffle has just started — hurry up and secure your slot!

♻️ CCE.Cash 🎀 SWAP RAFFLE 🎀 $30 in BTC

➥ The winner will receive a prize of $30 in BTC 🎁
➥ Publish proof - for every $100 exchanged, you receive 1 slot.



♻️ Stay tuned for the latest news.

[sokani]

Hello CCECash!

Here's a translation I did a few weeks ago in my local language. I noticed it hasn't been updated on the front page.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5577230.0

[CCECash]

Friends, the new tweet is already here! We'd love to hear from you!

For the first time, the Central Bank of Cuba has authorized ten domestic companies to use cryptocurrency for international payments. These ten companies include nine small and medium-sized private enterprises and one joint venture. https://t.co/YcLnZaIxul

With best wishes, ♻️ CCE.Cash

[ArielRod20]

🎉 The series of events continues! The latest raffle has just started — hurry up and secure your slot!

♻️ CCE.Cash 🎀 SWAP RAFFLE 🎀 $30 in BTC

➥ The winner will receive a prize of $30 in BTC 🎁
➥ Publish proof - for every $100 exchanged, you receive 1 slot.

https://www.talkimg.com/images/2025/05/22/UaYjBv.gif

♻️ Stay tuned for the latest news.

I couldn't even join    I just watched while everything was taken.

[SamReomo]

I think that such lotteries are wrong, and the number of slots per participant should be limited.
The bonus should be received by those who use the project for exchange, and not by those who use the project for a guaranteed win.

There's nothing wrong in such type of raffles, the ones who take more slots will have higher chance of winning and if someone is capable to occupy more slots by trading at the exchange then what's wrong in such approach?

Most members who apply in the raffle already use the exchange and if they win something by doing high value trades then there's nothing wrong in that approach I guess and that's why there are no such rules to limit a member who participate in such raffle.

[examplens]

I think that such lotteries are wrong, and the number of slots per participant should be limited.
The bonus should be received by those who use the project for exchange, and not by those who use the project for a guaranteed win.

There's nothing wrong in such type of raffles, the ones who take more slots will have higher chance of winning and if someone is capable to occupy more slots by trading at the exchange then what's wrong in such approach?

Most members who apply in the raffle already use the exchange and if they win something by doing high value trades then there's nothing wrong in that approach I guess and that's why there are no such rules to limit a member who participate in such raffle.

Exactly.
If you participate by taking one slot in the raffle, your chances remain the same, regardless of whether the remaining 29 slots were occupied by one person or 29 different ones.