♻️ CCE.Cash - Instant & Automatic Exchange ♻️ Fees 0.4 - 0.8%!

[icopress]

So we are free to remove the no-KYC badge next to your name?
In this case, is there a possibility of at least a refund without the KYC procedure? This would be the best way out of the situation without negatively affecting your no-KYC reputation.

This user is a hacker, and their funds are related to a recent case where Tether froze 70 million USDT.

Over the past few months, I've exchanged about $150,000 on CCE, and in some cases, (AML 50%) and everything went smoothly at every stage. Furthermore, there have been previous cases where frozen funds were returned without any conditions, so I don't think this is a ploy.

Here is also a quote from CCE

We have been summoned by law enforcement, and the funds cannot be refunded or exchanged normally. We hope the user can understand! Previously, we had been processing refunds for this user without any restrictions! However, now that law enforcement is involved, there's nothing we can do.

[examplens]

This user is a hacker, and their funds are related to a recent case where Tether froze 70 million USDT.

Over the past few months, I've exchanged about $150,000 on CCE, and in some cases, (AML 50%) and everything went smoothly at every stage. Furthermore, there have been previous cases where frozen funds were returned without any conditions, so I don't think this is a ploy.

Here is also a quote from CCE

We have been summoned by law enforcement, and the funds cannot be refunded or exchanged normally. We hope the user can understand! Previously, we had been processing refunds for this user without any restrictions! However, now that law enforcement is involved, there's nothing we can do.

This is otherwise the main problem with no-kyc exchanges. eXch is the best example of a victim in similar cases.
Regardless, such examples should perhaps be emphasized in the terms of service, if only to discourage bad actors from abusing a legitimate service.

[icopress]

This is otherwise the main problem with no-kyc exchanges. eXch is the best example of a victim in similar cases.
Regardless, such examples should perhaps be emphasized in the terms of service, if only to discourage bad actors from abusing a legitimate service.

The difference is that this user has previously received a refund without having to undergo KYC. CCE is happy to compromise, but this compromise must, of course, also include the project's interests, as they are currently under pressure from the authorities, which is why they mentioned that a refund might require a little more effort this time.

[examplens]

The difference is that this user has previously received a refund without having to undergo KYC. CCE is happy to compromise, but this compromise must, of course, also include the project's interests, as they are currently under pressure from the authorities, which is why they mentioned that a refund might require a little more effort this time.

It is remarkable that something is happening these days. I saw that another exchanger (known here on the forum) stopped processing coins with a high AML score. Unfortunately, we get very little information about what happens behind the scenes.

[bitmover]

The difference is that this user has previously received a refund without having to undergo KYC. CCE is happy to compromise, but this compromise must, of course, also include the project's interests, as they are currently under pressure from the authorities, which is why they mentioned that a refund might require a little more effort this time.

It is remarkable that something is happening these days. I saw that another exchanger (known here on the forum) stopped processing coins with a high AML score. Unfortunately, we get very little information about what happens behind the scenes.

This happened to me twice in another service, when sending coins from a mixer. I just got the refund without problems or kyc.

I agree that the compromise with no kyc must include project interests and the law. As we learned from eXch, just refusing to cooperate with the law enforcement agents basically mean the end of the project.

[morfeojm]

So we are free to remove the no-KYC badge next to your name?
In this case, is there a possibility of at least a refund without the KYC procedure? This would be the best way out of the situation without negatively affecting your no-KYC reputation.

This user is a hacker, and their funds are related to a recent case where Tether froze 70 million USDT.

Over the past few months, I've exchanged about $150,000 on CCE, and in some cases, (AML 50%) and everything went smoothly at every stage. Furthermore, there have been previous cases where frozen funds were returned without any conditions, so I don't think this is a ploy.

Here is also a quote from CCE

We have been summoned by law enforcement, and the funds cannot be refunded or exchanged normally. We hope the user can understand! Previously, we had been processing refunds for this user without any restrictions! However, now that law enforcement is involved, there's nothing we can do.

Here is another ass licker account just trying to earn from signature campaigns while partnering with liars. Also using multiple alt accounts.

It’s funny how they act like a “here responder” with no real sense first of all, I’m not a hacker, and I have no connection to what they’re claiming.

Basically, I think CCE is working with law enforcement and is being used as a honeypot to collect information. Bitcointalk users seem to not know much and only care about getting weekly payments from signature campaigns, making random comments just to follow rules and waiting for campaign payment.

My focus is privacy so don’t use CCE what they saying is all lie. I believe it could be run by LE.

Please note. We have made it clear that if the client does not want to reveal his identity for any reason and refuses to provide documents, the KYC/AML process will be considered a failed transaction and the deposited funds will be returned to the deposit address within 24 hours, minus the network fee. CCE Cash reserves the right to blacklist this address, thereby disqualifying it from online deposits.

This is only for some small AML cases, and it seems like a tactic to attract customers they claim they’ll refund.

[hugeblack]

If you believe you are innocent and unrelated to this case, we suggest you provide the necessary information. We will do our best to handle this matter to unfreeze your funds and better assist you in dealing with this case. We hope you understand!

I'm wondering what will happen to these deposits if the user refuses to complete the KYC process? Will you keep them or send them to the authorities, and how will completing KYC resolve this situation?

It might be best to send them to the authorities and ask the user to complete the KYC process with them.

[CCECash]

If you believe you are innocent and unrelated to this case, we suggest you provide the necessary information. We will do our best to handle this matter to unfreeze your funds and better assist you in dealing with this case. We hope you understand!

I'm wondering what will happen to these deposits if the user refuses to complete the KYC process? Will you keep them or send them to the authorities, and how will completing KYC resolve this situation?

It might be best to send them to the authorities and ask the user to complete the KYC process with them.

If the user proves their innocence, the funds will be refunded to the original payment method. If the user cannot prove their innocence but has solid evidence, the case will be transferred to the judicial authorities. It is certain that we ourselves cannot access these funds. They will remain stored in a cold wallet address!

[Faisal2202]

This happened to me twice in another service, when sending coins from a mixer. I just got the refund without problems or kyc.

I agree that the compromise with no kyc must include project interests and the law. As we learned from eXch, just refusing to cooperate with the law enforcement agents basically mean the end of the project.

So far, the CCE team is doing nothing wrong here, the person who still has not provided any essential data means something is really shady in this person. He thought he could launder money through CCE but now he got caught and is frustrated about it haha.

I am so glad that we have a platform like this in the field. I know what others will say, but that does not change the fact. If he has already been refunded once, why did he make the same transaction twice? Calling names to the manager haha, what an idiot he (morfeojm) is.

[ZAINmalik75]

If the user proves their innocence, the funds will be refunded to the original payment method. If the user cannot prove their innocence but has solid evidence, the case will be transferred to the judicial authorities. It is certain that we ourselves cannot access these funds. They will remain stored in a cold wallet address!

That's great, every detail has been shared with complete transparency. Now nothing remains, securing the funds is a better choice. But I thought maybe the authorities will ask you to give the funds to them.

This happened to me twice in another service, when sending coins from a mixer. I just got the refund without problems or kyc.

I agree that the compromise with no kyc must include project interests and the law. As we learned from eXch, just refusing to cooperate with the law enforcement agents basically mean the end of the project.

He already got refunded so he should have stopped and inquired about it. CCE Cash has previously mentioned a case in which they mentioned the same thing, that they received high AML coins which could cause them problems, so they refunded them back.

Refusing them means more problems. A successful business doesn't want that.

[SamReomo]

If the user proves their innocence, the funds will be refunded to the original payment method. If the user cannot prove their innocence but has solid evidence, the case will be transferred to the judicial authorities. It is certain that we ourselves cannot access these funds. They will remain stored in a cold wallet address!

it's more than enough for everyone to know @morfeojm if you haven't done any stealing and you are not a hacker then you should prove your innocence. The funds that you sent to CCE.Cash are safely stored in a cold wallet address and that means the funds won't be touched by CCE.Cash team, and in time if you prove your innocence then you'll get your funds most probably. After that Exch case now the authorities are strict about wrong funds and any reputed exchange like CCe.Cash will do their best to be on safe end.

[CCECash]

The news bulletin is already here! We actually wanted to add more, but we decided not to overload you with information!

Bitcoin Mining Difficulty Drops Over 20% from All-Time High, Largest Decline Since 2021 https://t.co/oiG13KH9TB

With best wishes, ♻️ CCE.Cash

[hugeblack]

it's more than enough for everyone to know @morfeojm if you haven't done any stealing and you are not a hacker then you should prove your innocence. The funds that you sent to CCE.Cash are safely stored in a cold wallet address and that means the funds won't be touched by CCE.Cash team

I don't know, but it wouldn't be difficult for a hacker to create fake KYC data or to ask someone in one of those countries to complete the KYC process for $1,000 or $10,000. I know it sounds crazy, but it's a small thing compared to what these people are capable of.

[ZAINmalik75]

a hacker to create fake KYC data or to ask someone in one of those countries to complete the KYC process for $1,000 or $10,000. I know it sounds crazy, but it's a small thing compared to what these people are capable of.

If he tries to use fake KYC, then he will be charged more, of course. But all they must be asking for is an ID, so the authorities could start their legal process against them and investigate the income. But if the ID is fake, the person on that ID will be contacted and will be notified accordingly.

This could become a serious problem for that person who has lost their identity, because recently a hospital in the US got breached by hackers and people lost their identities in it. Anyone could be there. This is not the first time too. Your point is solid here, hugeblack.