bitmarket.io
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1204
Merit: 1001
|
 |
July 04, 2014, 04:45:30 AM |
|
You are has'nt cameout the closet yet  what did you eat for dinner today? Was that question intended for me, or for @bitmarket.io?  I maybe wrong, but you ain't right…..right? YES ? |
|
|
|
|
|
JorgeStolfi
|
|
July 04, 2014, 04:51:04 AM |
|
I maybe wrong, but you ain't right…..right? YES ?Is "Yes?" your question about "what did you eat for dinner today?"? |
Academic interest in bitcoin only. Not owner, not trader, very skeptical of its longterm success.
|
|
|
btcton
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1302
Merit: 1007
|
|
July 04, 2014, 04:52:56 AM |
|
I maybe wrong, but you ain't right…..right? YES ?Is "Yes?" your question about "what did you eat for dinner today?"? Why are you guys not even answering each other's questions? |
The signature campaign posters adding useless redundant fluff to their posts to reach their minimum word count are lowering my IQ.
|
|
|
|
JorgeStolfi
|
|
July 04, 2014, 05:02:22 AM |
|
Why are you guys not even answering each other's questions?
Uh - right, I had gnocchi (potato dumplings) stuffed with mozzarella, gratinated with funghi and tomato sauce; why the curiosity? |
Academic interest in bitcoin only. Not owner, not trader, very skeptical of its longterm success.
|
|
|
taylortyler
Member
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
|
|
July 04, 2014, 06:06:30 AM |
|
I had chicken...you had gnocchi?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tritonio
|
|
July 04, 2014, 06:33:30 AM |
|
Sorry, is it better now?
Nothing changed for me, as I don't have the problem; did things change for you? Why would I want things to change? |
|
|
|
|
|
Nik1ab
|
|
July 04, 2014, 09:19:20 AM |
|
Sorry, is it better now?
Nothing changed for me, as I don't have the problem; did things change for you? Why would I want things to change? Because anarchy is the future, who wouldn't agree with that? |
No signature ad here, because their conditions have become annoying.
|
|
|
|
JorgeStolfi
|
|
July 04, 2014, 10:53:51 AM |
|
Sorry, is it better now?
Nothing changed for me, as I don't have the problem; did things change for you? Why would I want things to change? Because anarchy is the future, who wouldn't agree with that? No one, except perhaps 99.99% of mankind? |
Academic interest in bitcoin only. Not owner, not trader, very skeptical of its longterm success.
|
|
|
|
LostDutchman
|
|
July 04, 2014, 12:17:24 PM |
|
Sorry, is it better now?
Nothing changed for me, as I don't have the problem; did things change for you? Why would I want things to change? Because anarchy is the future, who wouldn't agree with that? No one, except perhaps 99.99% of mankind? But could not .01% control the world just as easily as the 1% does now? |
|
|
|
|
JorgeStolfi
|
|
July 04, 2014, 02:43:45 PM |
|
Sorry, is it better now?
Nothing changed for me, as I don't have the problem; did things change for you? Why would I want things to change? Because anarchy is the future, who wouldn't agree with that? No one, except perhaps 99.99% of mankind? But could not .01% control the world just as easily as the 1% does now? Wouldn't that be ironic, the world under tyrannical rule of a small oligarchy of anarchists? |
Academic interest in bitcoin only. Not owner, not trader, very skeptical of its longterm success.
|
|
|
|
LostDutchman
|
|
July 04, 2014, 03:06:40 PM |
|
Sorry, is it better now?
Nothing changed for me, as I don't have the problem; did things change for you? Why would I want things to change? Because anarchy is the future, who wouldn't agree with that? No one, except perhaps 99.99% of mankind? But could not .01% control the world just as easily as the 1% does now? Wouldn't that be ironic, the world under tyrannical rule of a small oligarchy of anarchists? It already is, isn't it? |
|
|
|
|
JorgeStolfi
|
|
July 04, 2014, 03:12:14 PM |
|
Why would I want things to change?
Because anarchy is the future, who wouldn't agree with that? No one, except perhaps 99.99% of mankind? But could not .01% control the world just as easily as the 1% does now? Wouldn't that be ironic, the world under tyrannical rule of a small oligarchy of anarchists? It already is, isn't it? And aren't you right on spot? |
Academic interest in bitcoin only. Not owner, not trader, very skeptical of its longterm success.
|
|
|
|
LostDutchman
|
|
July 04, 2014, 03:14:37 PM |
|
Why would I want things to change?
Because anarchy is the future, who wouldn't agree with that? No one, except perhaps 99.99% of mankind? But could not .01% control the world just as easily as the 1% does now? Wouldn't that be ironic, the world under tyrannical rule of a small oligarchy of anarchists? It already is, isn't it? And aren't you right on spot? I think so but what do others think? |
|
|
|
|
bitcoinforhelp
|
|
July 04, 2014, 03:25:29 PM |
|
Why would I want things to change?
Because anarchy is the future, who wouldn't agree with that? No one, except perhaps 99.99% of mankind? But could not .01% control the world just as easily as the 1% does now? Wouldn't that be ironic, the world under tyrannical rule of a small oligarchy of anarchists? It already is, isn't it? And aren't you right on spot? I think so but what do others think? Disagree, but im open for suggestions aren't i? |
|
|
|
|
|
LostDutchman
|
|
July 04, 2014, 03:29:19 PM |
|
Why would I want things to change?
Because anarchy is the future, who wouldn't agree with that? No one, except perhaps 99.99% of mankind? But could not .01% control the world just as easily as the 1% does now? Wouldn't that be ironic, the world under tyrannical rule of a small oligarchy of anarchists? It already is, isn't it? And aren't you right on spot? I think so but what do others think? Disagree, but im open for suggestions aren't i? God that you are because if you wern't, you should be and so should others, don't you think? |
|
|
|
|
(oYo)
|
|
July 04, 2014, 09:22:28 PM |
|
Why would I want things to change?
Because anarchy is the future, who wouldn't agree with that? No one, except perhaps 99.99% of mankind? But could not .01% control the world just as easily as the 1% does now? Wouldn't that be ironic, the world under tyrannical rule of a small oligarchy of anarchists? It already is, isn't it? And aren't you right on spot? I think so but what do others think? Disagree, but im open for suggestions aren't i? God that you are because if you wern't, you should be and so should others, don't you think? What do you think of this suggestion?  |
|
|
|
|
LostDutchman
|
|
July 04, 2014, 09:56:17 PM |
|
Why would I want things to change?
Because anarchy is the future, who wouldn't agree with that? No one, except perhaps 99.99% of mankind? But could not .01% control the world just as easily as the 1% does now? Wouldn't that be ironic, the world under tyrannical rule of a small oligarchy of anarchists? It already is, isn't it? And aren't you right on spot? I think so but what do others think? Disagree, but im open for suggestions aren't i? God that you are because if you wern't, you should be and so should others, don't you think? What do you think of this suggestion? Flibberrty-Jibberty is what I think and why should I not? |
|
|
|
|
Initscri
|
|
July 04, 2014, 10:08:42 PM |
|
Who is to ask why you should not?
|
----------------------------------
Web Developer. PM for details.
----------------------------------
|
|
|
|
LostDutchman
|
|
July 04, 2014, 10:50:30 PM |
|
Who is to ask why you should not?
Well, I do not make decisions for nor control others so I don't know and why should I? |
|
|
|
|
bitgeek
|
|
July 05, 2014, 12:12:07 AM |
|
Who is to ask why you should not?
Well, I do not make decisions for nor control others so I don't know and why should I? How can one even attempt to answer this? |
|
|
|
|
