✅ b1exch.to - Instant Auto Exchange | NO KYC | Escrow 0.2 BTC

[SamReomo]

The good thing is b1exch has been using their own liquidity. As long as they refill their liquidity from the legit source and funds are clean, then it isn't necessary to reveal the source. They might even refill from the centralised exchange to get clean funds. It fully depends on how they are going to refill, but we just need fresh funds. Otherwise we might face issues when using these funds in any centralised exchange.

I also believe that b1exch will refill their liquidity from legit sources because they're going to be part of the market for long term and that's why they'll do everything in the best way possible.

I believe so far everyone who had traded on b1exch have got fresh funds with low aml and that means they also fill their liquidity pools from centralized exchanges. I even believe that we're lucky to have a platform like b1exch that cares about their users.

[uchegod-21]

I also believe that b1exch will refill their liquidity from legit sources because they're going to be part of the market for long term and that's why they'll do everything in the best way possible.

I believe so far everyone who had traded on b1exch have got fresh funds with low aml and that means they also fill their liquidity pools from centralized exchanges. I even believe that we're lucky to have a platform like b1exch that cares about their users.

Why are you believing? We don't actually need to believe. In this industry, we don't believe, we don't trust, we simply verify.
Have you swapped recently with b1exch? If yes, did you check the AML score and what was it?

If you haven't tested the exchange, please just do it and show the AML score here, it will do the exchange more nice than just believing and believing.

[joker_josue]

If you haven't tested the exchange, please just do it and show the AML score here, it will do the exchange more nice than just believing and believing.

Performing AML analyses is always very subjective; it's difficult to say whether certain coins fall under AML or not.
An analyzer might say yes, but then in day-to-day use, no platform indicates it, or vice versa.

You might say there's no signage today, and then there might be tomorrow.

Sure, if at least something signals the potential for AML, it's because it could happen. But even without any warning signs, it could still happen.

[TokenTikas]

Both platforms has a different purpose, binance has a mandatory KYC which is we dont want because this it removes the anonimity, and the b1exch of course a No KYC so its the users preferences if they wanted to try these platform both or chooses one, for the beginners they would like to stick with the well known exchange because its the most of the users preferred, now sooner or later they will realize the importance of privacy so for sure they will push next step of security.

From personal preference, everyone will naturally have different goals but from the beginning of its journey till now, the progress of b1exch has been moving smoothly. For beginners, it is normal to first prefer well-known exchanges that are considered secure and you made a very valid point about that. As they gain more experience, compare platforms and understand crypto transactions better, they too will start thinking more about privacy and protecting their personal information. Still, from what I have noticed on the forum, even many newcomers are showing good interest in using b1exch.

It seems the b1exch still have a good run with their services and new users so the reputation speaks itself.

Overall, it is safe to say that b1exch will grow even more in the near future and their services will continue to work more smoothly and efficiently.

[examplens]

If you haven't tested the exchange, please just do it and show the AML score here, it will do the exchange more nice than just believing and believing.

Performing AML analyses is always very subjective; it's difficult to say whether certain coins fall under AML or not.
An analyzer might say yes, but then in day-to-day use, no platform indicates it, or vice versa.

Maybe you took a little out of context what @uchegod-21 wants to say here.
Criticism was directed at the "I believe" argument, and I completely agree that such sweeping claims are unfounded and completely irrelevant.
However, a concrete AML analysis gives much more than an "I believe" analysis and will probably be much closer to a final outcome.

Imagine if you send coins to Bybit and someone from there says, "Hey, these are joker_josue coins, he's a nice guy, and We believe that they must be clean." - Ok, approve and process them further.

[internetional]

Performing AML analyses is always very subjective; it's difficult to say whether certain coins fall under AML or not.
An analyzer might say yes, but then in day-to-day use, no platform indicates it, or vice versa.

You might say there's no signage today, and then there might be tomorrow.

Sure, if at least something signals the potential for AML, it's because it could happen. But even without any warning signs, it could still happen.

I think that pretty soon, most cryptocurrencies will be flagged in AML scorings as linked to illegal activity. So, it's time to start learning to ignore this and try to avoid scenarios where these scorings actually matter.

If someone doesn't know what to do with crypto they're afraid to show anyone, one may send it to b1exch and get something in return that is easy to hide in an untraceable environment.

[Lakai01]

I think that pretty soon, most cryptocurrencies will be flagged in AML scorings as linked to illegal activity.
[...]

Why do you think that?
In my opinion, there are hardly any reasons to block a Bitcoin transaction for anti-money laundering (AML) purposes, for example. Bitcoin is, for instance, much easier to trace than a traditional cash transaction (and there’s no question that cash transactions are also becoming increasingly restricted).

However, this certainly applies to privacy coins. European exchanges, for example, delisted privacy coins like Monero not too long ago; you can no longer deposit or trade Monero there either.

[joker_josue]

I think that pretty soon, most cryptocurrencies will be flagged in AML scorings as linked to illegal activity.
[...]

Why do you think that?
In my opinion, there are hardly any reasons to block a Bitcoin transaction for anti-money laundering (AML) purposes, for example. Bitcoin is, for instance, much easier to trace than a traditional cash transaction (and there’s no question that cash transactions are also becoming increasingly restricted).

However, this certainly applies to privacy coins. European exchanges, for example, delisted privacy coins like Monero not too long ago; you can no longer deposit or trade Monero there either.

It's not because of bitcoin or another crypto, but because of the laws of governments, as happens in the EU.

In fact, things are getting to a level, that few companies will accept currencies that may have an unknown origin.

[uchegod-21]

If you haven't tested the exchange, please just do it and show the AML score here, it will do the exchange more nice than just believing and believing.

Performing AML analyses is always very subjective; it's difficult to say whether certain coins fall under AML or not.
An analyzer might say yes, but then in day-to-day use, no platform indicates it, or vice versa.

You might say there's no signage today, and then there might be tomorrow.

Sure, if at least something signals the potential for AML, it's because it could happen. But even without any warning signs, it could still happen.

You took me a little bit out of context, but examplens has addressed it above.

I agree with you about a particular analyzer being accurate or not. Or producing a result different from the real life condition of the coin. Meanwhile, AML score check is the only option for now. Ignoring it isn't an option. In the early days of bitcoin, there was nothing like AML score, dirty or clean coin or tainted coin or whatever. We just met these conditions and we are struggling with them, not to think what the future holds for us.

[b1ack]

We'd like to announce that raffles with physical Icarus prizes will soon be available.

We're also happy to share with you a truly wonderful piece of art by a user who participated in one of the events we're sponsoring. 

[notocactus]

After visiting the exchange, using it several times, today I just noticed that by an exchange default settings, when a user visits the exchange site, the main page is for a swap from XMR to BTC.
https://b1exch.to/

I know that it is possible to choose the swap flow from BTC to XMR easily but the default setting makes me thinking like was it done by intention. Just my thinking, it can be set default by BTC to XMR, then anyone want to have an opposite swap flow, they can change it as XMR to BTC.

Like in the FAQ page, with this following question, the answer begins with Bitcoin, not with Monero.
https://b1exch.to/Faq

What cryptocurrencies do you support?

We currently support Bitcoin, Litecoin, Ethereum, Monero, Bitcoin Cash, Solana, USDT (TRC-20), USDT (ERC-20), and DAI (ERC-20).

[Lakai01]

It's not because of bitcoin or another crypto, but because of the laws of governments, as happens in the EU.

You're probably referring to the AML, Travel Rule, and CFT regulations?

These generally target money flows and are only indirectly related to crypto. However, due to these regulations, you already have to prove that the wallets you use to deposit funds on an exchange actually belong to you... which has been an issue here in this thread several times already.

Why do you think these regulations could lead to a ban on BTC and the like?

[cygan]

We'd like to announce that raffles with physical Icarus prizes will soon be available.
✂️

thanks for the mention and of course, for our current collaboration!
i hope we can launch the free raffles this week or next week at the latest.
in any case, i’ll be back here to let you know when the cards are ready to be raffled & sent out around the world

[internetional]

I think that pretty soon, most cryptocurrencies will be flagged in AML scorings as linked to illegal activity.
[...]

Why do you think that?

Because more and more law enforcement agencies investigating illicit activities are turning to blockchains. They constantly report transactions they find suspicious to blockchain analytics companies that tag addresses. Any address located within a few hops of these transactions gets flagged too. All cryptocurrency that has passed or will pass through these addresses gets tainted as well. Consequently, anyone who received or sent this cryptocurrency falls under suspicion.

In addition, more and more crypto services are being accused of helping to evade sanctions. Among them are platforms used by thousands and millions of clients. The addresses of these platforms also get flagged. And everyone who received cryptocurrency from these platforms, or sent it there, gets caught in the crossfire.

At this rate, sooner or later, the only cryptocurrency considered "clean" will be the one received on a completely fresh address from another brand-new address, a miner, a licensed exchange, or a government entity.

That is why I believe that even now, we need to get used to exchanging cryptocurrency through services like b1exch. They already understand the situation and ignore the abuses of transparency that are becoming increasingly widespread in current AML systems.

[examplens]

After visiting the exchange, using it several times, today I just noticed that by an exchange default settings, when a user visits the exchange site, the main page is for a swap from XMR to BTC.
https://b1exch.to/

I know that it is possible to choose the swap flow from BTC to XMR easily but the default setting makes me thinking like was it done by intention. Just my thinking, it can be set default by BTC to XMR, then anyone want to have an opposite swap flow, they can change it as XMR to BTC.

Like in the FAQ page, with this following question, the answer begins with Bitcoin, not with Monero.
https://b1exch.to/Faq

What cryptocurrencies do you support?

We currently support Bitcoin, Litecoin, Ethereum, Monero, Bitcoin Cash, Solana, USDT (TRC-20), USDT (ERC-20), and DAI (ERC-20).

I didn't quite understand what you were aiming for here, but the default pair BTC to XMR was definitely set on purpose. Broadly speaking, whatever pair is set by default, there will always be those who are for and those who are against.
Given that b1exch is a privacy and no-KYC oriented exchange, it is quite logical that the primary emphasis is on maximum anonymization, conversion to XMR.

[cLoazyL]

I’ve been thinking about the recent change to the description on Monerica regarding b1exch.

Why do you think the owner of b1exch wanted to delist his service from Monerica to hide his ties to carding, paid reviews, and the fact that he’s a thief?

I don’t know, though I have my suspicions…

[joker_josue]

Why do you think these regulations could lead to a ban on BTC and the like?

I don't think it will lead to a ban, but it will make it difficult to move in the second market, outside of exchanges and centralized services.

In other words, it will become increasingly difficult to convert crypto into fiat, when the origin of this crypto is not from a centralized exchange.

Basically what these laws are trying to do, is to try to control the movement of bitcoin, even though it is decentralized.

[SamReomo]

Why are you believing? We don't actually need to believe. In this industry, we don't believe, we don't trust, we simply verify.
Have you swapped recently with b1exch? If yes, did you check the AML score and what was it?

I believe in it because I've used it myself and it the output coins were okay without any issue. I forgot to test the AML score but I'm sure it would also be okay because I later converted those coins to XMR and that's why I didn't performed any AML test. If I'm not wrong then most AML tests of b1exch will be low not high.

[uchegod-21]

We'd like to announce that raffles with physical Icarus prizes will soon be available.

We're also happy to share with you a truly wonderful piece of art by a user who participated in one of the events we're sponsoring.  

This is great that you loved it. It's a beautiful art and I wish he win the contest. I've checked the voting thread and he seems to be getting good number of votes.

Why are you believing? We don't actually need to believe. In this industry, we don't believe, we don't trust, we simply verify.
Have you swapped recently with b1exch? If yes, did you check the AML score and what was it?

I believe in it because I've used it myself and it the output coins were okay without any issue. I forgot to test the AML score but I'm sure it would also be okay because I later converted those coins to XMR and that's why I didn't performed any AML test. If I'm not wrong then most AML tests of b1exch will be low not high.

Good to know you have used it. If you have used the service, you should be using more affirmative phrase than believe. We use believe when we don't verify. Glad to know you used the exchange

[The Cryptovator]

After visiting the exchange, using it several times, today I just noticed that by an exchange default settings, when a user visits the exchange site, the main page is for a swap from XMR to BTC.
https://b1exch.to/

I know that it is possible to choose the swap flow from BTC to XMR easily but the default setting makes me thinking like was it done by intention. Just my thinking, it can be set default by BTC to XMR, then anyone want to have an opposite swap flow, they can change it as XMR to BTC.

I think this isn't a serious issue, and b1exch hasn't thought about it in a deep way. Users will never follow their direction; rather, users often will swap what they need exactly. You might be right; they probably did it intentionally, but I don't think there is a big reason behind that. Probably the owner thinks most of the time users want to hold Bitcoin, and they might exchange XMR for Bitcoin as well.

It would be possible the owner noticed the most demanding direction is XMR to BTC, and that's why they keep it as the default direction. So users may choose according to their needs.