✅ b1exch.to - Instant Auto Exchange | NO KYC | Escrow 0.2 BTC

[examplens]

Can we report a scam or suspiciously active address using B1exch AmlChecker tool?

If I may ask, to whom do you want to report such addresses?
Here on the forum, the authorities? Who exactly do you think should receive such a report, and what do you expect to happen as a result of that report?
If you can check an address for free, why do you think that others to whom you would report it can't do the same?

[icopress]

Can we report a scam or suspiciously active address using B1exch AmlChecker tool?

Could you please describe the situation you're referring to in more detail? If you're wondering whether fraudulent addresses are added to the database after a check, the answer is no. As always, the project maintains a zero-logs policy. In the Terms and Privacy, you can find more details about the project's infrastructure, as well as the reasons why b1eXch is (objectively) considered one of the most reliable instant exchanges in the niche.

[internetional]

I recently recommended the AML check feature on b1exch.to to my acquaintance.

He went there, checked the address from which he had received USDT, and b1exch flagged it with a 100% risk score. It claimed that the address belonged to ChangeHero, categorizing it as a mixer.


The address did indeed belong to ChangeHero, but my acquaintance knew this service as an exchange platform, not a mixer. Because of this, he concluded that b1exch was simply using its AML checker to intentionally tag competitors' addresses as high-risk, aiming to deter people from using rival services and push them toward b1exch instead.

Just to be safe, he verified the exact same address using the BitOK AML checker. It also recognized that the address belonged to ChangeHero, but flagged it as safe and zero-risk.



My acquaintance felt reassured and sent the USDT to a payment service (crypto card provider).

The service refused to accept the deposit.

[Numeral]

[...]

The service refused to accept the deposit.

So we can conclude that the AML check feature on b1exch works effectively and is trustworthy. In general, however, economic and various other sanctions have led to complications for AML checkers, different services are producing different results, and things are likely to get worse from here.

As for the payment service simply refusing to accept a deposit - that’s no big deal at all; it would have been much worse if the funds had been frozen with no clear prospect of being unfrozen. 

[PrivacyG]

So we can conclude that the AML check feature on b1exch works effectively and is trustworthy.

Here is a plot twist, the Crypto card provider used the b1exch Anti Money Laundering tool to check the deposit!

[PX-Z]

So we can conclude that the AML check feature on b1exch works effectively and is trustworthy.

Here is a plot twist, the Crypto card provider used the b1exch Anti Money Laundering tool to check the deposit!

That's good plot twist, b1exch is offering api for its AML checking as well. But talking about practicality, b1exch aml checker is just new, considering the card provider is old and is using other different aml checker. Its also good to mention if whats the card provider used.

[TryNinja]

Since yesterday I can't swap BTC -> USDC (erc20) or USDT (erc20)

This swap direction is currently unavailable. Please try again later. [Q009]

Any ETA?

Update: Looks like everything is working again and I can swap btc > usdc.

[cygan]

hello fellas!
now that the winner of the sixth card was announced yesterday, we're continuing right away today with the seventh free raffle and another chance to get this awesome b1exch.to card:
[FREE RAFFLE #7] b1eXch x Icarus Custom Card✅🔐🎰

[icopress]

Hey! 

✅ XMR > Stable coins pairs are enabled.
✅ API is available directly now on API page or you can request an free api key by contacting support.

Because of this, he concluded that b1exch was simply using its AML checker to intentionally tag competitors' addresses as high-risk, aiming to deter people from using rival services and push them toward b1exch instead [...] My acquaintance felt reassured and sent the USDT to a payment service (crypto card provider). The service refused to accept the deposit.

b1exch has invested heavily in its AML checker to make it free for everyone, and frankly, they don't consider anyone their competitor, as they're always one step ahead.

Here's another example... I know that MixTum uses the best AML provider for internal tests (the same one used by top centralized exchanges). Recently, one user complained that after mixing, the AML threshold was 50% (verified with getblock). But after checking the same address with b1exch AML Checker, the results were completely different (the same as MixTum's internal tests).

[internetional]

And this is where the question arises: is it worth investing a serious amount of money and bringing in the best AML provider used by the market's biggest players, if someone checks their crypto in your checker and then sends it to a platform that uses Getblock or a similar service, only to have the transfer blocked based on that service's data?

Chainalysis is right: investigators need a transparent, verifiable methodology. Only then will all this AML commotion truly make sense.

[hellohellohellooo]

did a $50 USDT -> SOL swap, went thru smoothly.

i like the concept of this site, transparent liquidity pool, probably fast support.

Sure would try this site again!

[Forsyth Jones]

And this is where the question arises: is it worth investing a serious amount of money and bringing in the best AML provider used by the market's biggest players, if someone checks their crypto in your checker and then sends it to a platform that uses Getblock or a similar service, only to have the transfer blocked based on that service's data?

Chainalysis is right: investigators need a transparent, verifiable methodology. Only then will all this AML commotion truly make sense.

That's the problem, you cannot rely 100% on the AML checking algorithms that centralized services use. Some may vary in their final results, but we know that nowadays their use is unavoidable for us users.

I myself have a Mixer deposit address that was the subject of theft/fraud (reumix), I sent funds and was robbed, and to this day no service has flagged, added a tag to that address in their databases, even though I reported that address to known services that provide this type of service.

[TryNinja]

I did a BTC -> USDC (ERC20) swap.

Coins arrived correctly and in time, but the swap page shows as if the exchange isn't complete yet because the output is waiting for confirmation.



Let me know if you guys need the order ID to verify everything in your system.

[The Cryptovator]

Can we report a scam or suspiciously active address using B1exch AmlChecker tool?

Could you please describe the situation you're referring to in more detail? If you're wondering whether fraudulent addresses are added to the database after a check, the answer is no. As always, the project maintains a zero-logs policy. In the Terms and Privacy, you can find more details about the project's infrastructure, as well as the reasons why b1eXch is (objectively) considered one of the most reliable instant exchanges in the niche.

Probably he is referring to adding them to the blacklist on b1exch. Because his sentence is incomplete, so it's hard to understand what exactly he wants to express, I am saying what I got from his post. I think it doesn't necessarily add any list for low-score addresses. So reporting such an address doesn't make sense at all. It's fine; there are free AML checkers, so we can check our or the sender's address and take appropriate action based on the AML report.

[SamReomo]

b1exch has invested heavily in its AML checker to make it free for everyone, and frankly, they don't consider anyone their competitor, as they're always one step ahead.

Here's another example... I know that MixTum uses the best AML provider for internal tests (the same one used by top centralized exchanges). Recently, one user complained that after mixing, the AML threshold was 50% (verified with getblock). But after checking the same address with b1exch AML Checker, the results were completely different (the same as MixTum's internal tests).

Very true, we're lucky to have such an amazing tool free of cost and all thanks goes to b1exch team. Although, creating such a tool isn't an easy thing, it requires so much time and money to build a useful tool like this one, and when you invest such much in a tool and give it for free then that shows how much you care for your users.

We understand that b1exch truly care for its users and that's the main reason why they made this AML checking tool free for everyone. The example you showed makes things much clear, sometimes many AML score checking tools can give false percentage and that could cause huge fear in mind of people who use such tools. I suggest everyone to avail this opportunity and use b1exch AML score checking tool instead of relying on other tools.