rby alternative account KingsDen?

[NotATether]

I can't speak about the alt account connection but I believe KingsDen to be a trustworthy user. He once worked for me on NotATether.com, for curating articles.

[JollyGood]

One member curating articles for another does not make someone trustworthy. If a newbie came along and wanted some articles curated, do you think the rby/KingsDen account farmer would have jumped at the chance to help? I doubt it.

Account farmers want  to monetise their accounts either via bounties/campaigns or via defaulting on loans. If they can infiltrate DT in the process or become merit source then they will not decline the opportunity. If they have to assist reputable members on some occasions in some capacity in order to create a smokescreen, it is nothing more than is to be expected.

I can't speak about the alt account connection but I believe KingsDen to be a trustworthy user. He once worked for me on NotATether.com, for curating articles.

[PrivacyG]

I am having a deja vu.  Again.  And no matter how I spin it, every time I have this deja vu things only get more dubious.

Back in 2021, KingsDen was suspected by The Sceptical Chymist, nutildah and philipma1957 of being the same person as Magicalking (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3344622),

The thread is locked and I'm too tired and lazy to quote the posts properly.  But the jist of it is that both nutildah and philipma1957 accused KingsDen and Magicalking of being alt accounts, and after that it seems like it was just forgotten about.  The reason why I've started this thread is because I got requests by both KingsDen and Magicalking via PM for post history reviews, and they came about 2.5 hours apart.  I'm reluctant to post the PMs here, so I'll just add that both started off their request with "sir" and both used the world "humbly".

I'm happy to do post history reviews, but there's no way in hell I'm doing it for a pair of alt accounts.  Does anyone have solid evidence that these two accounts are connected?  I'd like to hear opinions, thoughts, anything, including what Magicalking and KingsDen have to say about this.

But this was after Ratimov suspected him of belonging to a RainbowKun alternative accounts farm as seen in this deleted post (https://loyce.club/archive/posts/5778/57781126.html),

Also, the cheater sometimes likes to communicate with himself and mention his accounts. In the history of his posts, you can see the citation of responses from his own accounts. It's funny.  Cheesy

Add another
kxwhalexk
His stats- https://public.tableau.com/shared/WQD8J7T3H?:display_count=n&:origin=viz_share_link

Correct link

RainbowKun
His stats- https://public.tableau.com/shared/JQ8PJ5NQW?:display_count=n&:origin=viz_share_link

Kaggie
His stats- https://public.tableau.com/shared/T7X7PTYPQ?:display_count=n&:origin=viz_share_link

KingsDen
His stats- https://public.tableau.com/shared/BHPWKHG4M?:display_count=n&:origin=viz_share_link

One year later, I suspected KingsDen of being an alternative account to GeorgeJohn (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2817036),

R

R

These two weirdly similar posts, the usernames, the structure of threads you write, subjects of your threads like unintentional plagiarism.  There is something in the air that tells me these two accounts may be related.  May be just me making too many links though.

Edit.  GeorgeJohn even received 9 merits from KingsDen in the last 120 days.  KingsDen suggested Ratimov to help GeorgeJohn get to Hero: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5345240.msg59011076#msg59011076.

Two weeks later, BlackHatCoiner thinks there may be a connection between KingsDen and GeorgeJohn after a connection between GeorgeJohn and Ebede was found in the past,

In the past, some connection was found between users GeorgeJohn and Ebede.

Coincidences:

• Ebede had submitted their application using GeorgeJohn's credentials: https://ninjastic.space/post/56688056
• Their writing style is very similar.
• They both used the uncommon delta character "∆".
• They both have created motivational threads of how to be a quality poster.

GeorgeJohn has responded that Ebede was a friend of him from University. (Check the connection above)

So, to sum up. We have a GeorgeJohn, who's been caught to have a weird connection with Ebede. He denied the account was his. Then, we have a large account farming from RainbowKun, in which KingsDen is included. Then, we see GeorgeJohn and KingsDen, who also write similarly, make an "R" post in the ChipMixer thread at the same time, one of which, by the way, wants to help the other rank up.

And now you are suspecting KingsDen and rby are connected.

Excuse me.  But how damn unlucky can KingsDen be to be mistakenly connected to one more account per year at this pace?  How does this never happen to any of the rest of us?  I can not recall ONE single time I have been mistaken for another member in all those years!

[lovesmayfamilis]

Excuse me.  But how damn unlucky can KingsDen be to be mistakenly connected to one more account per year at this pace?  How does this never happen to any of the rest of us?  I can not recall ONE single time I have been mistaken for another member in all those years!

Just because you have one account and it is unique. You can be recognized without reading your nickname. But in the case of KingsDen, there is a proverb that says that there is no smoke without fire. Which means that just like that, no one will suspect the other without reason. And yes, the whole story with the Nigerian FBI  and so on only makes his story even more confusing, because there are no coincidences. They happen, but in his case, the story of changing the password is not accidental. Many Nigerian accounts have purchased other people's accounts.. In Kingsden's case, yes, he is unlucky in terms of coming across an unlucky sold account that has attracted attention for its past deeds.

[Lucius]

This is already evidently becoming the systematic behavior of a part of the members on this forum who belong to a certain local board. I wonder if that board has more than a third of unique members and all the rest are alts who from time to time end up as subjects of discussion in the Reputation board.

I can only say that recognition should be given to all those (including the OP) who have been successfully finding all these alts for years, and they must be wondering why they do it when no one pays them for it nor do they have any other benefits from it.

[KingsDen]

Excuse me.  But how damn unlucky can KingsDen be to be mistakenly connected to one more account per year at this pace?  How does this never happen to any of the rest of us?  I can not recall ONE single time I have been mistaken for another member in all those years!

You can say that again. I agree that I have been so unlucky but I am not ignorant to why I have been this unlucky. I will not totally say I am unluck because in those cases people also understood and came through for me. I think there are two other accusations you missed out. One RajaKing that was linked to me and another user so.
I have been in two weeks April retreat. I was still focusing to finish the church program, but now I can no longer focus, so I had to excuse the church environment, got a reservation to put myself together.
The reasons I got into much problems are two;

• My welcome post in the forum
• My rapid growth in the forum.

My welcome post:

I made this post in two categories; first to encourage the newbie and second to advice the old members.

For the newbie, I believe most of us are sharing in my wish. My wish to become a legend, a legend with so much merits and positive trust.  But dreams do not come true without hardwork.
First we must appreciate and accept our newbie status by showing the inclination to learn.
We should learn by keen observations, by reading through the posts of the old members, this will help pattern our attitude in the forum, it will also help us to grow with the norms and ethics of the forum.
By so doing our passion for the forum will be high, it is the passion that creates the way to success.

For the Old members, I will liken the forum to a building from foundation to roofing.
The building at the foundation stage does not make it less building, but it is the stage at which the engineer puts much efforts and expertise. Take the newbie as the foundation, help us grow, for if the foundation is wrongly laid, it will have a significant negative effects at the completion stage.

Congratulations to me for having an account in this forum, I am looking forward to a rapid and sustainable growth with your help.

This post exposed me to danger, because it got a few older members upset but I learnt a lot from it. They either misunderstood the post or it was so early to make such a post.  At this point, I received advice from two users; One said I should avoid quoting and replying to legendary members, while the other said I should develop a thick skin.

My Rapid Growth:
I can boldly say that I was one of the non-technical newbies that experienced rapid growth in the forum.
The future of Bitcointalk: Low Ranking Top Merit earners in the past 30 days
This became a disadvantage because my fellow low-ranking members were amazed at my growth and were sending me pm. Some decided to study my posting pattern in order to be like me, but I rather advised them to learn from the Legendary members instead.
Some established members who earlier thought I wasn’t a newbie became confident of their doubt. It was on this premise the then Ratimov mentioned my name.
To clear the air, he didn’t mention me as a member of his 60+ alt farm, he only placed me on the watch list because of my merit count. He later removed my name from his watch list.

The case of Kaggie and RainbowKun
If you ask me, I would say we lost good members of the forum because of unnecessary attacks or bullying. The RainbowKun of a guy who was nick named “The Bitcoin Prophet” was on a different level as a newbie. He was writing bitcoin articles that would be suspected in today’s world to be written by AI. He earned so much merits until someone created a thread that suggested that people should stop sending merits to him. It was LoyceV who intervened that no matter how much merits he earned, in as much as he continued to produce quality, people shouldn’t stop meriting him.
Check the profile of both RainbowKun and Kaggie and see their activity to merit ration. But they unfortunately left the forum after much pressure.
PrivacyG, you might not have received these backlashes because you likely grew from the technical side of the forum. I noticed we registered here the same year, but we did not cross much paths in our early forum days.

The case of MagicalKing:
There was when Scyptical chemist created a thread for people to pm him for post review. I believed his pm should be flooded then. He created a thread that Myself and MagicalKing sent him pm 2.5 hrs apart by calling him “sir” and using the word “humbly”. I was confused and also felt unlucky because growing up I was taught to use the word “sir” to an adult responsible man. I maintained it in the forum until I was told people don’t like it here. The word humbly is always used in requesting formerly or semi-formerly. Someone applying to receive 50 merits should naturally be humble.
I didn’t know the way about of the MagicalKing because I stopped seeing him around in the forum, maybe he lost interest in the forum.

The GeorgeJohn case:
The accusation was as a result of coincidence in reserving a slot in chipmixer campaign. It was BlackHatCoiner that called us out then. I remember that Lovesmafamilies lent her voice then in the matter.

Can I give my opinion on these two accounts?
I am well acquainted with Ratimov's topic of exposing RainbowKun. I can say with confidence that neither one nor the other account belonged to this farm. The RainbowKun farm consisted of persons or persons of Chinese origin, as proven by their plagiarisms translated using Google Translate.
And your suspect accounts belong to the Nigerian section, and it's not surprising to see their mutual support.

I had some connections with each of these two accounts. And as for the similarity of these accounts, I would highly doubt it.
KingsDen from the first days tried to stand out and quickly get a rank, from this we see its "lessons", which, however, all newcomers have been doing lately. His texts are more connected, and more understandable, which cannot be said about the posts of George John. I also often reproached GeorgeJohn for not using punctuation marks. He probably started using them after all.

What more can be said? I'm seeing a lot of support from the Nigerian section, and they might likely be familiar with each other. But I would hardly say that these two accounts belong to the same person.

Side note 1:
Some BTT members from the Nigerian local have some whatsApp groups where they share opportunities off and on the forum. Sometimes when a campaign is opened, someone might decide to share the information which could lead to rush in application.

Side note 2:
Most Nigerians don’t take privacy seriously. So, when the idea of the forum being a privacy forum occurred to the early users of this forum from Nigeria, they mis-interpreted it for us. So, that made it difficult for a Nigerian to come public and say he introduced someone to the forum. They only come up when there is trouble, which then makes it unbelievable. It was just like a secrete affair, mistaken as privacy.
GeorgeJohn was actually the person that introduced me to this forum. I am grateful to him to the extent that I couldn’t hold it back, I had to let it out when zasad@ asked a related question years back in his interview. If anyone cares to read, I exposed some percentage of my personal life there.

My Plea:
John had been in this forum since 2020, a year before he introduced me. I wasn’t happy that it seemed I was growing more than him, the reason why I was suggesting him to Ratimov.  This is his 6th year in the forum but he is yet to hit the legendary rank. It took me far lesser time. John has about 114 merits to hit the legendary rank, if some merit sources can do it for me, I will be very happy.

I have been avoiding to write wall of texts, I am sorry if I had stretched anyone that cares to read to this stage. I value the forum and her members. I had a rough start in the forum but I learnt too many things in this forum. BTT was able to teach me what the university could not teach me. I value and learn from most users here even when I don’t have personal contact with you.

[JollyGood]

And now you are suspecting KingsDen and rby are connected.

Excuse me.  But how damn unlucky can KingsDen be to be mistakenly connected to one more account per year at this pace?  How does this never happen to any of the rest of us?  I can not recall ONE single time I have been mistaken for another member in all those years!

I will probably tag all of the accounts after I manage to look through the posting history.

Whether there is any connection between the rby/KingsDen account to the others you have mentioned or not, there is absolutely no doubt in my mind that the rby/KingsDen puppeteer is controlling more accounts.

Also, whether the rby account was hacked or purchased is irrelevant, what matters is that ownership was transferred in an attempt to monetise the account. If money was the main motive then why stop at just the rby account?

But in the case of KingsDen, there is a proverb that says that there is no smoke without fire.

In his case, I see a lot of different fires with a lot of smoke  

My Plea: I had a rough start in the forum but I learnt too many things in this forum. BTT was able to teach me what the university could not teach me. I value and learn from most users here even when I don’t have personal contact with you.

I cannot be the only one that simply does not believe you.

[nutildah]

The case of Kaggie and RainbowKun
If you ask me, I would say we lost good members of the forum because of unnecessary attacks or bullying. The RainbowKun of a guy who was nick named “The Bitcoin Prophet” was on a different level as a newbie. He was writing bitcoin articles that would be suspected in today’s world to be written by AI.

I don't remember your connection to this account at the time but I do find it weird that you would stand up for them when they were clearly combining text-spun text from different articles and claiming the work as their own. RainbowKun & his army of shitposters were exposed as a total fraud.

As for everything else you have to say, of course I don't believe it. I think you have several other accounts on this forum, some of which have already been busted. I'm withholding from leaving a tag until I have some more time to really look into all of it.

[PrivacyG]

The reasons I got into much problems are two;

• My welcome post in the forum
• My rapid growth in the forum.

Debatable.  I never saw your welcome post and many members had a rapid growth.  A lot of the most recognized members of Bitcoin Talk had a very rapid growth and it did not look suspicious to any of us.

Rapid growth does not automatically make you suspicious.  I never suspected you for any of the two reasons you mentioned.  Unless my mind is playing games on me, my suspicions on you were caused by a weirdly coincidental behavior between you and the other account.  When time stamps are similar, the same subjects are debated and discussed by both around the same time frame with identical opinions, when a signature campaign application is identically different from the rest as in a simple 'R' posted from two different accounts in under one minute difference and now even addresses connect, something is weird.

I do not know.  All these accounts may be alts of the same person or they may be accounts owned by a group of people who meet up to spam Bitcoin Talk for signature campaign quotas.  I vaguely remember there was something even about the way posts were written.  They were suspiciously similar.

-----

Edit.  I removed the rest of my post after reading the reply KingsDen posted for the second time and realizing I missed out on the part where he says George introduced him.  I saved it in my private messages however until I do more research on my own.

Edit 2.  KingsDen, how do you explain that I randomly checked the post history of you and George between 8th and 17th of January 2022 and your posting time stamps seem often suspiciously related?  He sits on Bitcoin Talk for an hour or two, then one hour later you are here all day long while he is gone, then when you are gone he is back.  When you have little activity he is inactive, when he has little activity you are inactive instead.  There are days where one went inactive less than 30 minutes before the other one of you woke up on Bitcoin Talk.

This went on for many days straight.  At least, for all days I checked until I got bored and tired out.  If you open both post history pages and put them side by side, it looks exactly like someone was switching accounts.

[lovesmayfamilis]

This went on for many days straight.  At least, for all days I checked until I got bored and tired out.  If you open both post history pages and put them side by side, it looks exactly like someone was switching accounts.

You're missing another important point. The fact that you want to combine these two accounts must be paired with another account, which also has irrefutable evidence that George has another account. And he also, coincidentally, brought this man to the forum; moreover, he gave him the opportunity to use his laptop.

2 Accounts Connected: (Note: Banned shown in red / Inactive in Blue)

1. GeorgeJohn
2. Ebede

Considering that it was an April Fool's joke, then probably Ebede also joked with GeorgeJohn's account. Although yes, it is not clear why this should be done. It looks strange.
GeorgeJohn has had a lot of enemies lately. Maybe he himself will answer why it happened?

Thank you for understanding that some persons  developed enemies with me just like that, and they want my account to be ban, which i don't know their reason, yes of course i know the know vividly the owner of ebede account, and it's my course mate in University, the same course and the same department, and i introduced him to bitcointalk community then before we separated, the ebede normally use my system to do almost his academic work both graphics design and other works, so on that day of April fool he used my laptop to login bitcointalk community, before i could notice he has dropped a Post that contains all my information..so when i noticed i deleted it. I'm not denying the fact that i don't know the user ebede i know him in person and is a course mate. I want to know if i will be penalize because of a newbie mistake using my laptop do work. I know many some people want to kick me out from bestchange signature campaign i join.

If you take into account all your found facts, then you can put together a good story about "friends" writing from the same laptop.

One could also ask about the Facebook account where high-quality posts were written by the hero of this topic himself, after which he was invited to this forum.

By the way, history is full of repetitions; the one who has already been mentioned several times in this topic and who is the direct instigator of invitations to this forum, seeing high-quality posts from Facebook, "humbly" keeps silent.🤭

[GeorgeJohn]

 I think this year 2026 made me 6 years in the forum, and up till now we can't differentiate KingsDen with my account, this has happened years back that KingsDen is a me, but after investigations lovesmayfamilis come up with conclusions that I'm different person from KingsDen, because she has corrected me like twice if I'm not mistaken, that i should be using neither punctuation mark when making a posts which I adhere with her opinion...

I'm surprised that such issues is repeating itself again, even though forum members can't differentiate the difference between I and KingsDen, we should evaluate our post and cross check our English language expressions of KingsDen and of myself...I know very well that even though someone is emulating your writing styles it can be same as your own....but in this case you see if you read our posts thoroughly

It's surprised me that my name is been mentioned in a case that i don't know about, so I will like us to evaluate my post properly...I would have responded to this thread yesterday but I was in political function..let everybody hear me very clear, I'm different body from KingsDen, I don't like a situation whereby I will be mentioning because of KingsDen...This is making it twice someone is mistaken me with KingsDen in this forum...

By the way, history is full of repetitions; the one who has already been mentioned several times in this topic and who is the direct instigator of invitations to this forum, seeing high-quality posts from Facebook, "humbly" keeps silent.🤭

It's not that i have not seen this post...This is the time of party politics in my country, and I was out for political functions, which i returned late hours, I'm not the one the name will be mentioned without responding..my country people knows very well that I'm different person from the accused person, you can verify by yourself....

[KingsDen]

Hello, everyone following this case.

I lost my backups from 2017 to whatsapp few months ago.
I have seen some forum pms needed for this case. One of the pm also contains something I wouldn't like to come public.

I request to give a reputable forum member a temporary access to my account, in order to take a look.
Or is there any other way to go round this?

[nutildah]

Why is this guy still on DT?

[logfiles]

Why is this guy still on DT?

Perhaps members who are still trusting his judgment did not get a memo or don't know about the new developments regarding the user in question so let me tag them so they can make a decision on whether to remove the trust, distrust him or not

Personally there is no way I am trusting an account that is linked to another scam account, so I am distrusting him.

KingsDen's judgement is Trusted by:
1. Fivestar4everMVP (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (911 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
2. igebotz (Trust: +15 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (11) 2296 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
3. CryptopreneurBrainboss (Trust: +18 / =0 / -0) (5134 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
4. Charles-Tim (Trust: +5 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (4) 6405 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
5. Wiwo (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (1104 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
6. Agbe (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (1449 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
7. Asiska02 (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (875 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
8. SirJohnVonSlotty (Trust: +9 / =0 / -0) (1004 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
9. Floxynice (Trust: +1 / =2 / -0) (345 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)

[SirJohnVonSlotty]

Personally there is no way I am trusting an account that is linked to another scam account, so I am distrusting him.

Yeah, but I've worked with him for 3 months, he delivered on everything 3 months in a row, no issues at all. That's why I left him positive feedback. I had no clue about any of this happening. I adjusted the score. 

[nutildah]

Personally there is no way I am trusting an account that is linked to another scam account, so I am distrusting him.

Yeah, but I've worked with him for 3 months, he delivered on everything 3 months in a row, no issues at all. That's why I left him positive feedback. I had no clue about any of this happening. I adjusted the score. 

In the interest of fairness and so you understand why I excluded you from my trust list, I will explain the difference between leaving a feedback and including/excluding an account on your trust list.

- When you leave a positive trust rating, you are indicating you think this account is safe to trade with.

- When you add an account to your trust list, you are indicating you agree with their use of the trust system.

When I look at your current trust list, its evident you included most users because they left a positive trust for you. In my opinion, this is incorrect use of the trust system, which is why I excluded you.

Everyone else I just excluded should know better by now.

[SirJohnVonSlotty]

Thanks for the explanation, I rarely used the trust feature and didn't know how it's used efficiently. I already edited it this morning during our PM conversation, but now I fully understood how it works and will re-work it again soon.

With that said, KingsDen has been adjusted from my end. Sad to hear about him.

Personally there is no way I am trusting an account that is linked to another scam account, so I am distrusting him.

Yeah, but I've worked with him for 3 months, he delivered on everything 3 months in a row, no issues at all. That's why I left him positive feedback. I had no clue about any of this happening. I adjusted the score. 

In the interest of fairness and so you understand why I excluded you from my trust list, I will explain the difference between leaving a feedback and including/excluding an account on your trust list.

- When you leave a positive trust rating, you are indicating you think this account is safe to trade with.

- When you add an account to your trust list, you are indicating you agree with their use of the trust system.

When I look at your current trust list, its evident you included most users because they left a positive trust for you. In my opinion, this is incorrect use of the trust system, which is why I excluded you.

Everyone else I just excluded should know better by now.

[KingsDen]

Personally there is no way I am trusting an account that is linked to another scam account, so I am distrusting him.

Yeah, but I've worked with him for 3 months, he delivered on everything 3 months in a row, no issues at all. That's why I left him positive feedback. I had no clue about any of this happening. I adjusted the score. 

I have worked with you for 3 months and I delivered everything and no issues all. That is why you left me a positive feedback. You actually used the feedback correctly, no mistakes. Now someone asked why you included me in your trust list and you removed the feedback, that is a wrong way to use the feedback. You do not make hasty decisions because you are compelled to

- The question is, did I actually delivered, the answer is Yes! If there's anytime you need to defend your decision on me, it is now.
- Another question, do you think I leave correct feedbacks? If yes, I deserve to be included (you can check my feedbacks)
- You leave a positive feedback is you worked with the person and believe they are likely not to scam anyone.
- You include someone in your trust list if you feel they send accurate feedbacks
- I will recommend that you read this at your leisure - LoyceV's Beginners guide to correct use of the Trust system. I have worked with you, you are a very smart human being so take your time and understand how the trust system works.

-

With that said, KingsDen has been adjusted from my end. Sad to hear about him.

Don't be sad please and it depends on what you heard. I had a one time Blockchain connection with rby which I explained the purpose for it. It was a one time mistake which I sent him because he needed the pay in bitcoin and the payment was the exact amount, so I repaid him through a review campaign. That was what happened.

- I haven't scammed before and I cannot scam anyone since I didn't do it 2021 that I was scammed
- I haven't cheated in the forum (ie joining same campaign or sending merit to my alt). I seriously preach against this. But for months now, I have carried the tag Campaign cheater. You know how it feels carrying the ply card of what you haven't done. Even in the rby case, I discovered that coincidentally I didn't also join same campaign with rby. But I am called a campaign cheater - that is a wrong use of the feedback system.
- I haven't put up any drama because I don't like it, I am just calm and will reach out to people that left the tag because they are the ones to delete or change it, that is how the system works.
- This matter was also brought out in the Altcoinstalks talk forum where the admins and judges looked into the matter and didn't find me guilty - https://www.altcoinstalks.com/index.php?topic=343646.0
So, moving forward understand how the system works and make your independent decisions to help the community because you are a very smart person, we have brainstormed together. Thanks!

[nutildah]

I had a one time Blockchain connection with rby which I explained the purpose for it. It was a one time mistake which I sent him because he needed the pay in bitcoin and the payment was the exact amount, so I repaid him through a review campaign. That was what happened.

Its overwhelmingly obvious you are the new owner of the rby account. Not just the address slip-up and the password changes, but your words and actions are remarkably similar. Not to mention you stopped posting so much when rby starting posting more. Its not all a giant coincidence.

Continuing to lie about it even after getting caught doesn't help with your "I'm still trustworthy" case.

[SirJohnVonSlotty]

You do not make hasty decisions because you are compelled to

I feel your pain bro, but you guys figure out what's happening here, give some proper evidence and a conclusion off it, and then I might get back to everything. Today it's easy to compare and see these things with AI so whoever opened up this thread must commit and post proper evidence.

I am one of the few on this forum who is actively hiring people for various campaigns, I am not the one being hired, so I don't particularly care who likes me or doesn't. What I do care is not being involved in any forum dramas. I just have no time for it neither do I enjoy it particularly.

So, you guys deal with it, come back with a conclusion.

In the meantime the decision to remove you from my trust settings stays. I'll read Loyce's guide later and see how to improve it further.