Oh no.. when i saw you writing and texting earlier it gave the impression that there might be a intelligent person and a proper english speaking person in the company.. but
now i start to think you are the guy from the chat which i believe is owner Youssef himself.. and that you are using an AI to clean your answer.. I do the same so no problem. I wont accept that you start to lie.
I run Limbo with 2000x multipler maybe 200 times with a 1$ stake.. i have maybe during the period wagered max 20-25k on that shit.. so dont start to lie. You can publish the stats if you even have them. 80% of those "spamming bets" as you call it was made BEFORE YOU PROMO EVEN STARTED. Because i like to play the game. Im also huge down on limbo on your anyway.. so dont start to lie now.. 100% if you post stats that says i did not wager 100k on slots.. then you are manipulating the stats.
Even on the last day of your poor poor leaderboard weekly tournament i decided to try and go for a second place i think and i wagered almost 50-60k oly on slots that day..
Listen dude.. i would never try to wager 100k on 1$ limbo spins with 2000x.. That would maybe have made lose 100k.. You ignore the fact that slots was wagered for over 100k totally. So stop the BS
I dont say he/you changed the rules mid-promo... YOU CHANGED THE RULES 3 TIMES DURING THE CHAT. You even offered me the 5k, and suddenly changed your mind again.
Listen.. if 5k is enough to ruin your reputation then go ahead. You are a scammer.. and people start to see it now.. Your fake odds during the world cup Messi to score odds 8.. 5k max stake.. haha.. You are just lucky he didnt cause they would have been voided and then this thread would have been on FIRE.
You are a liar and are not trustworthy at all. I gave you so many chances but you keep playing me with all your crazy lies.. like you think im stupid? THERE IS ONLY 1 GUY IN THIS CASINO and i promise all of you.. This site dont exist in 2 years. Maybe 3 months is enough.. Just read how the guy text to people in the chat and lies EVERY DAY.. i posted screenshots in the other thread.. totally strange messages. " WE ARE 11 VIP HOSTS " - YOU STAY WITH ME BECAUSE I AM THE BEST..
Every question where i am looking for facts are being replied to with nonsense messages.. I did not get a weekly bonus.. oh okay he add 50$.. and lets the real issue slide..
So crazy.. If they just paid the 5k at least, they would somehow have won my trust a bit.. but now i just this site is going straight down to where they belong.
On the "just pay the $5k and I'd trust you a bit" line ; that's a negotiation, not a grievance.
If the wager genuinely hit $100k through legitimate play, it gets paid, full stop, no negotiating needed.
If it didn't, because Originals were excluded and that's where the majority of the volume came from ; then "pay me anyway and I'll ease up on the accusations" isn't a claim, it's leverage.
We don't set policy based on who's loudest in a thread.
And sure , since we're apparently doing headcounts now: yes, one person here is the dev, the designer, runs social media and marketing, manages the ad campaigns, handles the affiliate program, and yes ; is also the one replying to you in this thread.
Congratulations, you've cracked the case

. Feel free to add "does everything and still finds time to reply to Bitcointalk threads" to your list of grievances.
Here's the part that doesn't change no matter how many people run this casino:
whether it's 1 person or 100, that doesn't create a loophole to cheat the system and then play victim when it's caught.
We've dealt with plenty of players trying to take advantage of promos, leaderboard rules, and wager mechanics
and every time it's caught, it's the same script: "this site is run by one guy," "this is a scam," "watch it die in 3 months."
Meanwhile the players who play straight get paid, on time, every time
as shown by every single case in this thread, including yours, with real numbers and real transaction hashes.
Play fair, get paid. Try to farm the rules, expect the T&Cs to apply.
That part isn't changing regardless of the org chart.