🚀 Kikabet.com 👑 No KYC 💸 100% BONUS 20K USDT⚡ 50% Instant Rakeback 💸

[kikabet]

We need to ask why they decided to block my account.

That is a good question so that you will know the reason and if you are okay with their reason, you bow down for them but casinos use to hide that part I till now we don't know why. If they can tell the gambler the break down reasons of blocking and restricting accounts, most of these dramas would not display.

And agreed on Godenkor, the $12 refund offer has been open for days. Be good to see that closed out.

I think to solve the long lasting problem here. GODENKOR is saying that he wants to know why the account was blocked. I think that shall be a fair hearing.

Fair question, and we're happy to answer it directly rather than leave it vague.

Godenkor's account was flagged by Betby's sportsbook risk team for targeting stale/mispriced lines on low-liquidity markets...
The same documented pattern already covered in this thread for other accounts (jonmaster4's four bet IDs were posted above, for example).
It's not a mystery reason we're withholding; it's a specific, provider-identified pattern, and we've been consistent about naming it every time it comes up.

We agree hidden reasoning helps no one ; that's exactly why we've posted bet IDs, deposit/withdrawal numbers, and on-chain transaction hashes throughout this thread instead of just saying "trust us."
Godenkor's $12 deposit refund has been open for days regardless of the flag;
that's not in dispute.

[mikel_012]

Fair question, and we're happy to answer it directly rather than leave it vague.

Godenkor's account was flagged by Betby's sportsbook risk team for targeting stale/mispriced lines on low-liquidity markets...
The same documented pattern already covered in this thread for other accounts (jonmaster4's four bet IDs were posted above, for example).
It's not a mystery reason we're withholding; it's a specific, provider-identified pattern, and we've been consistent about naming it every time it comes up.

We agree hidden reasoning helps no one ; that's exactly why we've posted bet IDs, deposit/withdrawal numbers, and on-chain transaction hashes throughout this thread instead of just saying "trust us."
Godenkor's $12 deposit refund has been open for days regardless of the flag;
that's not in dispute.

This is not the first time Betby risk team is flagging accounts because of "mispriced lines"

They keep offering lines like this and then flagging bets and making casinos block funds. Why?

They can keep offering lines and just deny the wins when they want, saying its a stale and mispriced line, and you think this is all fine?

If the user lost the bet would Betby and Kikabet refund because it was mispriced? I don't think so, so you all just use this to prevent losses and increase the house edge?

[kikabet]

Fair question, and we're happy to answer it directly rather than leave it vague.

Godenkor's account was flagged by Betby's sportsbook risk team for targeting stale/mispriced lines on low-liquidity markets...
The same documented pattern already covered in this thread for other accounts (jonmaster4's four bet IDs were posted above, for example).
It's not a mystery reason we're withholding; it's a specific, provider-identified pattern, and we've been consistent about naming it every time it comes up.

We agree hidden reasoning helps no one ; that's exactly why we've posted bet IDs, deposit/withdrawal numbers, and on-chain transaction hashes throughout this thread instead of just saying "trust us."
Godenkor's $12 deposit refund has been open for days regardless of the flag;
that's not in dispute.

This is not the first time Betby risk team is flagging accounts because of "mispriced lines"

They keep offering lines like this and then flagging bets and making casinos block funds. Why?

They can keep offering lines and just deny the wins when they want, saying its a stale and mispriced line, and you think this is all fine?

If the user lost the bet would Betby and Kikabet refund because it was mispriced? I don't think so, so you all just use this to prevent losses and increase the house edge?

YES, this is standard across the industry, not something unique to us.

Here's why it's not asymmetric the way you're framing it: if a bet loses, there's nothing to flag or dispute
the operator already won fairly, no review is triggered because there's no payout being requested.
The risk review only happens at the point a payout is being processed on flagged patterns, which is when providers like Betby check whether a line was mispriced at the time it was taken.
This is exactly the same principle sportsbooks worldwide use for stale-line/latency arbitrage detection
 it's not a Kikabet invention and it's not designed to "increase house edge," it's designed to prevent exploiting pricing errors at scale.

To your point about "why keep offering lines that get flagged"
 pricing thousands of live markets in real time means occasional stale prices are unavoidable at any sportsbook, including the big ones.
The alternative isn't "never make pricing mistakes," it's "review before paying out on documented abuse patterns," which is what happens here.

We're not hiding behind vague policy language on this
every flagged case in this thread has bet IDs, deposit/withdrawal numbers, and on-chain proof posted publicly. Happy to apply the same standard to any case you want to raise specifically.





🇪🇸 LA LIGA IS BACK — MATCHDAY 1!

⚽ ODDS OF THE DAY — August 15th

🔴 Sevilla FC vs Rayo Vallecano — 2.34 / 3.10 / 3.30
🔵 Deportivo Alaves vs Getafe CF — 2.36 / 2.76 / 3.75
The wait is over — La Liga 2026/27 kicks off TODAY 🎉

Both games are genuinely open — no safe bet in sight 👀

🎰 Official Website : Kikabet.com
👉 X : @Kikabetcom
📢 Telegram Channel : @Kikabetcom
👪 Discord Server : @Kikabet
📱 Instagram : @Kikabetcom

[mikel_012]

YES, this is standard across the industry, not something unique to us.

Here's why it's not asymmetric the way you're framing it: if a bet loses, there's nothing to flag or dispute
the operator already won fairly, no review is triggered because there's no payout being requested.
The risk review only happens at the point a payout is being processed on flagged patterns, which is when providers like Betby check whether a line was mispriced at the time it was taken.
This is exactly the same principle sportsbooks worldwide use for stale-line/latency arbitrage detection
 it's not a Kikabet invention and it's not designed to "increase house edge," it's designed to prevent exploiting pricing errors at scale.

To your point about "why keep offering lines that get flagged"
 pricing thousands of live markets in real time means occasional stale prices are unavoidable at any sportsbook, including the big ones.
The alternative isn't "never make pricing mistakes," it's "review before paying out on documented abuse patterns," which is what happens here.

We're not hiding behind vague policy language on this
every flagged case in this thread has bet IDs, deposit/withdrawal numbers, and on-chain proof posted publicly. Happy to apply the same standard to any case you want to raise specifically.

Can't you see the problem with this? The casino always wins because if the user wins the bet and they detect a missprice, there is no win and the casino does not lose money. But if the user loses THE SAME bet, the casino keeps the money even if it was a missprice bet. In both cases the casino makes money and the user loses.

Do you think this is fair?

If the bet is wrong it should be voided ALL THE TIME. If the user wins or loses

[khaled0111]

To your point about "why keep offering lines that get flagged"
 pricing thousands of live markets in real time means occasional stale prices are unavoidable at any sportsbook, including the big ones.
The alternative isn't "never make pricing mistakes," it's "review before paying out on documented abuse patterns," which is what happens here.

I understand that mistakes can happen and the sportsbook needs to protect itself, but what I fail to understand is how this can be the user’s fault. Why is the user held responsible and even punished for something he didn’t do.
The user could have been trying to take advantage of these mistakes, but there is no way to prove that.
The best resolution that would satisfy both parties would be to just void the bets in question. Banning the user or confiscating his money is basically like saying "we made a mistake, but you will pay for it"!

[lionheart78]

Fair question, and we're happy to answer it directly rather than leave it vague.

Godenkor's account was flagged by Betby's sportsbook risk team for targeting stale/mispriced lines on low-liquidity markets...
The same documented pattern already covered in this thread for other accounts (jonmaster4's four bet IDs were posted above, for example).
It's not a mystery reason we're withholding; it's a specific, provider-identified pattern, and we've been consistent about naming it every time it comes up.

We agree hidden reasoning helps no one ; that's exactly why we've posted bet IDs, deposit/withdrawal numbers, and on-chain transaction hashes throughout this thread instead of just saying "trust us."
Godenkor's $12 deposit refund has been open for days regardless of the flag;
that's not in dispute.

This is not the first time Betby risk team is flagging accounts because of "mispriced lines"

They keep offering lines like this and then flagging bets and making casinos block funds. Why?

They can keep offering lines and just deny the wins when they want, saying its a stale and mispriced line, and you think this is all fine?

If the user lost the bet would Betby and Kikabet refund because it was mispriced? I don't think so, so you all just use this to prevent losses and increase the house edge?

True, I also see Betby on other casino thread giving problem to the casino by offering mispriced lines.  This gives a bad reputation to the casino since Betby keeps on creating probem to the casino and affecting bettors due to their irresponsibility to correct Betting prices.

The player should not be apprehended here since bettors are only picking what the book maker offers.  if it is agains the casino or bookers rules then why offered such odds?

At the same time, it is good to see the casino act rightfully by refunding the bettors deposit but still it brings disappointment and stress to the player because they expect to have winning but did not received it.

[GODENKOR]

We need to ask why they decided to block my account.

That is a good question so that you will know the reason and if you are okay with their reason, you bow down for them but casinos use to hide that part I till now we don't know why. If they can tell the gambler the break down reasons of blocking and restricting accounts, most of these dramas would not display.

And agreed on Godenkor, the $12 refund offer has been open for days. Be good to see that closed out.

I think to solve the long lasting problem here. GODENKOR is saying that he wants to know why the account was blocked. I think that shall be a fair hearing.

Fair question, and we're happy to answer it directly rather than leave it vague.

Godenkor's account was flagged by Betby's sportsbook risk team for targeting stale/mispriced lines on low-liquidity markets...
The same documented pattern already covered in this thread for other accounts (jonmaster4's four bet IDs were posted above, for example).
It's not a mystery reason we're withholding; it's a specific, provider-identified pattern, and we've been consistent about naming it every time it comes up.

We agree hidden reasoning helps no one ; that's exactly why we've posted bet IDs, deposit/withdrawal numbers, and on-chain transaction hashes throughout this thread instead of just saying "trust us."
Godenkor's $12 deposit refund has been open for days regardless of the flag;
that's not in dispute.

Listen, guys, first of all, you blocked my account, and that's a fact. A provider can't do that; they can refund my bets. Secondly, I bet on the same event at two other casinos with the same provider, and for some reason my accounts weren't blocked. Based on these facts, why did you block my account? - Question one. Why won't you unblock my account so I can show proof? - Question two.

[Agbe]

Listen, guys, first of all, you blocked my account, and that's a fact. A provider can't do that; they can refund my bets. Secondly, I bet on the same event at two other casinos with the same provider, and for some reason my accounts weren't blocked. Based on these facts, why did you block my account? - Question one. Why won't you unblock my account so I can show proof? - Question two.

Guy calm down Kikabet representative here is also making a soft landing in the case. And this is not the first time we have discussed cases in this magnitude of restricted and blocked accounts which have resolved. People thanks us for helping them to solve the issue. Here we have listened to the two sides of the story, Kikabet said they didn't blocked the account and it was from "Betby sportsbook risk management team" and quoted here

...was flagged by Betby's sportsbook risk team for targeting stale/mispriced lines on low-liquidity markets...

  And the reason of your account blockage is stated clearly there and you are offered to received your deposit from the casino. It would have been better you take your deposit.

And from what lionheart78 said, the problem was from the Betby and the casino from their end off you the deposit which is a good move from them. You can read what lionheart78 said, which I also like as well.

True, I also see Betby on other casino thread giving problem to the casino by offering mispriced lines.  This gives a bad reputation to the casino since Betby keeps on creating probem to the casino and affecting bettors due to their irresponsibility to correct Betting prices.

The player should not be apprehended here since bettors are only picking what the book maker offers.  if it is agains the casino or bookers rules then why offered such odds?

At the same time, it is good to see the casino act rightfully by refunding the bettors deposit but still it brings disappointment and stress to the player because they expect to have winning but did not received it.

GODENKOR you are a member here and Kikabet is a member and brought a casino therefore we protect the interest of you all so we handle case in a neutral way. Let there be peace in the forum. The mot important thing is your deposit, there are allegations against you and base on the alleged crime, your account was flag, and it is for Kikabet responsibility to contact Betby for valid allegations. And once they have confirmed from them, the actions will be taking base on the finding. And from them they have investigated the matter and willing to refund the deposit. I think others can critically look into the case from this angle too.

[GODENKOR]

What does my sport provider have to do with my blocking? You're missing the point. It was the casino itself, just like they blocked my live chat with customer support. Betby simply provides a service; they can't block casino accounts. Don't talk nonsense. Access can be restored if the casino that blocked the account does so. Do you understand this? Write a letter to Betby and find out if they even block casino accounts to which their sports betting lineup provides access, and you'll understand everything. I repeat, it was Kikabet that blocked it. I have committed no violations.

[kikabet]

Listen, guys, first of all, you blocked my account, and that's a fact. A provider can't do that; they can refund my bets. Secondly, I bet on the same event at two other casinos with the same provider, and for some reason my accounts weren't blocked. Based on these facts, why did you block my account? - Question one. Why won't you unblock my account so I can show proof? - Question two.

Guy calm down Kikabet representative here is also making a soft landing in the case. And this is not the first time we have discussed cases in this magnitude of restricted and blocked accounts which have resolved. People thanks us for helping them to solve the issue. Here we have listened to the two sides of the story, Kikabet said they didn't blocked the account and it was from "Betby sportsbook risk management team" and quoted here

...was flagged by Betby's sportsbook risk team for targeting stale/mispriced lines on low-liquidity markets...

  And the reason of your account blockage is stated clearly there and you are offered to received your deposit from the casino. It would have been better you take your deposit.

And from what lionheart78 said, the problem was from the Betby and the casino from their end off you the deposit which is a good move from them. You can read what lionheart78 said, which I also like as well.

True, I also see Betby on other casino thread giving problem to the casino by offering mispriced lines.  This gives a bad reputation to the casino since Betby keeps on creating probem to the casino and affecting bettors due to their irresponsibility to correct Betting prices.

The player should not be apprehended here since bettors are only picking what the book maker offers.  if it is agains the casino or bookers rules then why offered such odds?

At the same time, it is good to see the casino act rightfully by refunding the bettors deposit but still it brings disappointment and stress to the player because they expect to have winning but did not received it.

GODENKOR you are a member here and Kikabet is a member and brought a casino therefore we protect the interest of you all so we handle case in a neutral way. Let there be peace in the forum. The mot important thing is your deposit, there are allegations against you and base on the alleged crime, your account was flag, and it is for Kikabet responsibility to contact Betby for valid allegations. And once they have confirmed from them, the actions will be taking base on the finding. And from them they have investigated the matter and willing to refund the deposit. I think others can critically look into the case from this angle too.

Appreciate the neutral read on this, Agbe, that's exactly the standard we want to be held to.

To answer Godenkor's two questions directly, since he asked:

Why was the account restricted? Betby's sportsbook risk team flagged it for targeting stale/mispriced lines on low-liquidity markets ; stated plainly above, not hidden.
This isn't a manual decision by us; it's a provider risk determination applied the same way across every flagged account in this thread.

Why not unblock it so he can "show proof" on other casinos? Because what happens on other platforms isn't something we can verify or that's relevant to our own risk review; we can only act on what our own provider flagged here. If other casinos blocked the same activity, that's between him and them; if they didn't, that doesn't change what Betby identified on our side.

On lionheart78's point : agreed that stale pricing is a provider-side issue, not a player integrity issue, and that's exactly why the resolution here isn't "you did something wrong, no refund"
..it's "the bets are void per the risk flag, but your deposit is yours, take it."
That's the fairest version of this outcome and we've offered it from day one.

Godenkor, the offer stands: post your wallet, we send the $12, hash posted right after. Nothing else needs to happen for that part to close.




🥊 UFC 330 — TITLE FIGHT IS HERE

Ian Garry 🇮🇪 vs Islam Makhachev 🇷🇺

3.75 | 1.24

The Lightweight Championship belt is on the line tonight and Makhachev is looking to defend his throne once again 👑

Garry is the massive underdog at 3.75 — but he's unorthodox, dangerous and believes he can pull it off. Do you?

🎰 Official Website : Kikabet.com
👉 X : @Kikabetcom
📢 Telegram Channel : @Kikabetcom
👪 Discord Server : @Kikabet
📱 Instagram : @Kikabetcom

[GODENKOR]

You're talking nonsense. What do you mean other casinos let me withdraw my winnings, but you didn't? Why didn't they heed the warnings from the Betby team? Maybe it doesn't even exist? Two casinos decided to withdraw my money after a warning? And you didn't. Strange, right? And besides, I repeat: the provider has no power to block accounts. You blocked my access to my personal account, and now you're making a big deal out of it. You don't want to show everyone the truth. The provider can cancel a sports bet if necessary, but they can't block anything.

[kikabet]

Hey everyone 👋

New addition to Kikabet, Horse Racing is now live on the platform.

Over 10,000 races per month from tracks worldwide. If you're into racing or just want a fast-paced alternative to traditional sports betting, there's always a race about to start on Kikabet.

Check it out 👉 https://kikabet.com




🏆 ODDS OF THE DAY — August 17th

Coppa Italia is here ; 4 first round matches live on Kikabet today 🇮🇹

🔴 Palermo vs US Lecce
🔴 US Cremonese vs Sampdoria
🔴 Sassuolo vs Cesena
🔴 Pisa SC vs Empoli

Palermo vs Lecce is the tightest line of the day , genuine 50/50 👀

[DYING_S0UL]

- snip -

I'm not sure whether anyone else reported this before (nothing major though) but there seems be a little UI/UX glitch. Right below, where the live betting section is located, whenever a bet disappears from the bottom, everything under that section also moves or jumps! Maybe specify a border there? Sort of a wall?..that below that point everything remains still? Go to that section and you'll understand what I meant.

Note: I wasn't scrolling up or down all the time, it was doing that on it's own (mostly).

[Porfirii]

- snip -

I'm not sure whether anyone else reported this before (nothing major though) but there seems be a little UI/UX glitch. Right below, where the live betting section is located, whenever a bet disappears from the bottom, everything under that section also moves or jumps! Maybe specify a border there? Sort of a wall?..that below that point everything remains still? Go to that section and you'll understand what I meant.

Note: I wasn't scrolling up or down all the time, it was doing that on it's own (mostly).

I don't think it was reported before, so thank you DS not only for noticing but for sharing it here with everyone so that a solution can be found.

The truth is that although it does not seem to be a serious issue, it is certainly annoying and can give a bad image.

I knew many facets of you DS, but Bug Hunter is new to me keep up the great work!

[Taskford]

- snip -

I'm not sure whether anyone else reported this before (nothing major though) but there seems be a little UI/UX glitch. Right below, where the live betting section is located, whenever a bet disappears from the bottom, everything under that section also moves or jumps! Maybe specify a border there? Sort of a wall?..that below that point everything remains still? Go to that section and you'll understand what I meant.

Note: I wasn't scrolling up or down all the time, it was doing that on it's own (mostly).

Maybe you are not the only one noticing it, but people don't get bothered to raise this issue here. Because there's nothing serious about that matters.

I also check their site and it seems that there's layout glitch or UI bug exist. So I guess they should try to use fading animation, maybe it helps to avoid having that jumping text.

Best for them to fix that issue. Since maybe that bothers their gamblers focus, also to those people love to check what's happening in their site. Then to have much smoother interface.

[MusaMohamed]

Maybe you are not the only one noticing it, but people don't get bothered to raise this issue here. Because there's nothing serious about that matters.

I also check their site and it seems that there's layout glitch or UI bug exist. So I guess they should try to use fading animation, maybe it helps to avoid having that jumping text.

Best for them to fix that issue. Since maybe that bothers their gamblers focus, also to those people love to check what's happening in their site. Then to have much smoother interface.

This issue only appeared at the bottom, and I guess it is because of quickly changes in their bet table above that brand banner at the bottom. I guess they put the Kikabet avatar brand and bottom area too nearly with the bet table, so if they don't want to see it lagging issue as consequence of the table update, they can move the area of Kikabet avatar brand to a little bit below. That will make a little bit bigger space between the table and the bottom area, then there will be no laggy displaying issue.

It's best for them and user experience if Kikabet team fix this issue.

[kikabet]

- snip -

I'm not sure whether anyone else reported this before (nothing major though) but there seems be a little UI/UX glitch. Right below, where the live betting section is located, whenever a bet disappears from the bottom, everything under that section also moves or jumps! Maybe specify a border there? Sort of a wall?..that below that point everything remains still? Go to that section and you'll understand what I meant.

Note: I wasn't scrolling up or down all the time, it was doing that on it's own (mostly).

Thanks for flagging this, appreciate the detail  that's a useful catch.
We'll get the live betting section looked at, sounds like a layout/reflow issue when a bet drops off the list.
Will follow up here once it's sorted.




⚽ ODDS OF THE DAY — 19 August | La Liga

🔴 Atletico Madrid 1.33 - Draw 5.00 - Malaga CF 9.80

Atletico's La Liga opener — all odds live now 👇

🎰 Official Website : Kikabet.com
👉 X : @Kikabetcom
📢 Telegram Channel : @Kikabetcom
👪 Discord Server : @Kikabet
📱 Instagram : @Kikabetcom

[DYING_S0UL]

The truth is that although it does not seem to be a serious issue, it is certainly annoying and can give a bad image.

I knew many facets of you DS, but Bug Hunter is new to me keep up the great work!

I know it wasn't anything major but a bug is still a bug. And to be honest, as harmless as it seemed, it was pretty annoying. Imagine trying to visit the terms and conditions page, and the links just keeps jumping up and down, lmao!

Thanks, but I'm happy with my current job (as a translator) , although I do like to find broken things from time to time. The other day, I found a broken onion link to a service, made a report, and it was quickly updated.

Thanks for flagging this, appreciate the detail  that's a useful catch.
We'll get the live betting section looked at, sounds like a layout/reflow issue when a bet drops off the list.

Yeah anytime! Happy to help! 

[Itz-prisigold]

Can't you see the problem with this? The casino always wins because if the user wins the bet and they detect a missprice, there is no win and the casino does not lose money. But if the user loses THE SAME bet, the casino keeps the money even if it was a missprice bet. In both cases the casino makes money and the user loses.

Do you think this is fair?

If the bet is wrong it should be voided ALL THE TIME. If the user wins or loses

Seriously to some extent I understand what you're saying and I totally agree with this your point. Because I feel the way this reviews are processed doesn't look very fair to the user.  If a player's bet is being considered as a bet that is not valid just because the line was mispriced, the same rule should be applied whether the game wins or loses. Because I don't understand why I'll place a bet and when I win the game, then all of a sudden the bet get reviewed and possibly voided, but if the game loses then the casino still get to keep the money that's so unfair.

With the way the situation is being handled, that will make people think the whole thing is one sided. And I have no issues with voiding a genuinely mispriced bet, but there should be a fair system and a good way to handle the situation that doesn't protect only the casino, but the both parties involved.

[kikabet]

Can't you see the problem with this? The casino always wins because if the user wins the bet and they detect a missprice, there is no win and the casino does not lose money. But if the user loses THE SAME bet, the casino keeps the money even if it was a missprice bet. In both cases the casino makes money and the user loses.

Do you think this is fair?

If the bet is wrong it should be voided ALL THE TIME. If the user wins or loses

Seriously to some extent I understand what you're saying and I totally agree with this your point. Because I feel the way this reviews are processed doesn't look very fair to the user.  If a player's bet is being considered as a bet that is not valid just because the line was mispriced, the same rule should be applied whether the game wins or loses. Because I don't understand why I'll place a bet and when I win the game, then all of a sudden the bet get reviewed and possibly voided, but if the game loses then the casino still get to keep the money that's so unfair.

With the way the situation is being handled, that will make people think the whole thing is one sided. And I have no issues with voiding a genuinely mispriced bet, but there should be a fair system and a good way to handle the situation that doesn't protect only the casino, but the both parties involved.

Understand the concern, so let's be precise about the mechanism, because "the casino keeps losses but voids wins" isn't actually what's happening.

Review happens at the point a payout is requested ; that's simply when there's something to review.
A losing bet doesn't get "kept" by the casino as some separate decision; there's no payout being claimed, so there's nothing to check against the risk pattern in the first place.
It's not that losses are exempt from the rule, it's that the rule is about the payout, and a loss has no payout.

Here's the part that actually answers the fairness question: if an account is flagged for the pattern (stale/mispriced lines on low-liquidity markets), that flag applies to all bets in that pattern on the account going forward, win or lose; the account gets restricted, not just the one winning bet.
That's what happened in every case posted in this thread. So it's not "heads we win, tails you lose", it's "this specific pattern gets shut down entirely once identified," which happens to usually surface at the payout stage because that's the natural trigger point, not because losses are being quietly pocketed.

We do agree voiding should mean returning the player's own deposit, not the casino keeping it ;
and that's exactly what's been offered in every case here, Godenkor included.
If anyone thinks a specific bet was handled outside that standard, post the details and we'll go through it the same way as every other case in this thread.