I'm actually making that topic with no trolling whatsoever

I was going to post something regarding a solution I started to think about related to signature campaign spam - I guess I can put it here (unless you were kidding about making that topic - and I'm a gullible dumb-dumb), and you tell me if it's a decent idea/thought or not.
[or if it's been proposed before]Basically, merit sources can seek employment from campaign managers to be...uhh..."posting enforcers?". The thought is that since (most) merit sources already are trained to look for quality in a post, then they could spend a bit of their time (paid for) during the day monitoring posts made by campaign participants, and handing a merit out to a post that "deserves to count" towards that sweet sweet bitcoin payment at the end of the week or whenever they get paid. So let's say a campaign has 20 participants. A merit source (or two) could approach the manager to that campaign, and apply to become a quality-enforcer of that specific campaign - That way it's sort-of "official", ie. sanctioned form of money-transaction involving merit, as otherwise is looked down upon/grounds for negative ratings.
Their application could even be in the form of 5-10 posts that would be seen as quality, and not LLM generated garbage, not repeated nonsense, etc. Now, they can earn income from being a merit source, since it has an alternative use outside of just meriting for general-quality forum wide. The campaign manager then can look through his 20 participants, and respectively, their posts, and see how many of them got merited by the quality enforcer of that campaign. Manager can then see if adjustments need to be made in the participant roster at his discretion. This idea has several ways it could go sideways, and several semantics/logistics that would need to be worked out, but...yeah. I guess it's a gateway for people, who are disgruntled that their post didn't get merited by a quality enforcer, to make complaint threads in Reputation.
What do you think, @stompix? Looking forward to your eventual topic on the issue.
Place your bets.
Oh, and to stay on-topic I guess I'll parlay bet on: "Why does this forum still look so outdated?", and responses consisting of, "The forum is fine the way it is.".
