Could This Be a Pattern Or Strategy That Works

[Donk1]

Well the strategy is actually nice though best to say you aren't forcing the bet, but waiting for the right movements to make precise decisions. Still I think the only thing that can possibly trip you is that fact about the small odds. Because since the profit you are making out of it is going to be small due to Fact that it's the late stage of the game, one unexpected event can easily just wipe out the other wins. So in most cases, to me it would be wise to cash out instead of waiting for the game to be complete first, because that could bring unexpected results that may or may not align with the strategy.

But I guess it doesn't matter as long as it's money you are willing to lose, and even at that it's nice to be sure that your strategy would actually work but for that you have to take certain risks so yeah. That said if the strategy works on more bets along the way then perhaps all you have to be doing is just making little adjustments based on your observations... that's all......

[Hispo]

It could work but for how long? All I can say is there isn't any strategy that is reliable, they can work and fail at any time, I don't know why we are even encouraging ourselves about a gambling strategy, what happen to risking only what you can afford to lose?

I'd rather focus on risking small money, it's all entertainment until it's not more, do what works for you as a gambler and try as much as possible to stay within what you can afford to lose, I've gave up on a gambling strategy that works in a long time.

Today I declare that there is no such thing.

Even if works, it would not do so for a very long period of time before OP starts to lose money, in my opinion.
It does not matter how good an "strategy" looks like on paper, in the end there is no way to get guaranteed money out of betting and gambling... Otherwise the betting market would look very different from what it is today.

OP is free to try and experiment how much he wants within the betting markets, as long as he is responsible with his money and do not get carried away by greed when he happens to start winning some money, then everything is supposed to go alright.

[Ishicryptic]

In this type of strategy where bettors stake on live bets near 80 minutes we know that the probabilities of winning the bet is quite high but the win if it happens is often very small and it's not worth it for many gamblers who would prefer to lose than winning insignificant amounts, if you want to win significant amounts in such a bet then you have to up your stakes. In the end if you you want to win big especially if you plan to reduce your risks then you have to increase your wagering amount, there is no way you can cheat the bookmakers for easy big wins that wouldn't cost you so if you lose it would be their big gains. Essentially we should gamble with what we can afford to lose no matter how sure we are about our strategies because we cannot underestimate luck which can turn a game around where an underdog would come from behind to humiliate a favorite team that many people expected to win.

[AmaGold70]

So recently I decided to try out a live betting strategy instead of betting on the match before it starts I patiently wait until the game is far into the second half but since it is something that I have been studying for a while I deligently wait and take out time to test my theory. What I do is that I place a bet on the team winning with 2 goals ahead during the 80th minute knowing that it would be difficult for their opponents to equalize at that dying minute, I simply use that to my advantage. N/B:I only make this bets when I find such opportunities instead of forcing them. The only down side to this is that the odds can be extremely small and this might require you to take stake high on each bet. I have made four different bets so far and I have been on a winning streak, even though the profits are quite small but it's a work in progress. As someone that has a level of experience with sports betting I know it is possible for the opponent to equalize with the team that's 2 or 3 goals ahead within a space of two minutes, nothing is totally guaranteed.
Has anyone ever tried this?

Some gamblers actually like betting on live bet, and some gamblers say the find more favour gambling on live bet, but live bet is never favourable all the time, and great luck is still attached to it. Sometimes I do place place bet on live bet, but it has failed many times too. In goal scoring, equalizing a goal does not take so much time, and two goals can even be scored in 5 min time, irrespective of the team that is involved. Gambling on live bet can involve betting with more money which doesn't even guarantee winning, because most times gamblers stake their bet when they feel an outcome in a match is certain, certainly there is no certainty in gambling.

[Filicius]

It could work but for how long?

Not for long, but this has given me an idea. In the long run it is unavoidable to lose the bet and therefore lose also the profits obtained up to that point, but maybe it's not such a bad strategy to bet a few times for limited profits, and then stop.

Let's go with a simple example: for each bet you get say 1% of your wager, and the probability to lose is also 1% (we know it's greater, because of the house edge, but let's keep the example simple). So you would need to win 100 times to double your wager, and 1 out of 100 times you would lose. Maybe it wasn't such a bad idea to bet let's say 50 times, before the odds of losing are too high. What do you think?

Of course, that is if what happened to me does not happen, and you lose in your first bet of that kind , but it is unlikely.

[sompitonov]

In this type of strategy where bettors stake on live bets near 80 minutes we know that the probabilities of winning the bet is quite high but the win if it happens is often very small and it's not worth it for many gamblers who would prefer to lose than winning insignificant amounts, if you want to win significant amounts in such a bet then you have to up your stakes. In the end if you you want to win big especially if you plan to reduce your risks then you have to increase your wagering amount, there is no way you can cheat the bookmakers for easy big wins that wouldn't cost you so if you lose it would be their big gains. Essentially we should gamble with what we can afford to lose no matter how sure we are about our strategies because we cannot underestimate luck which can turn a game around where an underdog would come from behind to humiliate a favorite team that many people expected to win.

I gave up on betting strategies targeting the final minutes of a match a long time ago because, in my view, they simply aren't very effective. Sure, you can place a large bet, but as you noted, it won't yield a significant payout so what’s the point? It is better to look for riskier bets where the winner isn't obvious to the majority and where we can spot undervalued odds. Only by placing such bets leveraging our expertise can we potentially edge closer to a profitable strategy, though even that isn't guaranteed we need to keep experimenting and come up with angles that aren't obvious to most players.

[Dr.Bitcoin_Strange]

This is a strategy that I have not only talked about once on this forum but on few threads that I can't remember the subject, I have described using this strategy to my advantage but it doesn't work all the time, I even took such bet  3 weeks ago, I placed the bet when the game was already on the 60th minutes, at the end, they were given extra time which the losing team used to their advantage and equalised on the match and I lost my bet. So, I can tell you from my experience that this strategy doesn't work always and you risk huge amount because of the poor odds you will get in such bet.

[len01]

I don't really like strategies like that, even though many people try them. The problem is that this kind of strategy can slowly encourage us to bet more after getting a series of wins. Just imagine that bookmakers usually offer odds of 1.01 when the favorite is two goals ahead, but the opposing team manages to make a comeback in the remaining minutes and the match ends in a draw. You lose all your money.

There have been many stories in the past about gamblers who became too confident in a 2-0 lead and ended up losing their entire bankroll. For me, 1.01 is simply not an attractive price because the potential return does not justify the risk.

[Smartprofit]

I believe that a truly effective strategy should require minimal effort and minimal action. This is true in life, trading, and gambling. Any action always increases the likelihood of error. 🙋

Making a huge number of bets with odds of 1.01... No, frankly, I don't like that!

Yes, you can have a long winning streak, but it's just an illusion. And, in my opinion, a very dangerous illusion. Having become accustomed to constant wins, you will later experience very painful losses that will be absolutely catastrophic for you. In such a situation, it is very difficult to resist the urge to win back your losses. And this, in turn, will lead to another loss...

Not to mention the possibility of "broadcast delay." If the bookmaker receives important information before you, you find yourself in a very dangerous position. Your bet with odds of 1.01 could turn out to be a losing one from the very beginning (you just didn't find out about it in time).  This, in my opinion, is the most annoying thing about using this betting strategy. 🤷

[DiMarxist]

Good strategy op, having the patience to do wait until that exact time to place your bet is quite commendable, not every bettor has such level of patience. But i would not advise you to risk too much for such little odds, what if you end up losing a huge amount in the course of trying to discover a new strategy, if that happens the wins you've gotten for the past four days would not really matter because you might end up losing more than what you have won.

soccer is such a funny game, at that dying minute you talked about, it might seem that much cannot be done again but I have seen a team that were able to catch up with another team that were 3 goals ahead of them. This isn't a discouragement but you need to be more careful, take breaks if you have to because you cannot always make profit, don't get carried away by your wins.

[programmer3666]

So recently I decided to try out a live betting strategy instead of betting on the match before it starts I patiently wait until the game is far into the second half but since it is something that I have been studying for a while I deligently wait and take out time to test my theory. What I do is that I place a bet on the team winning with 2 goals ahead during the 80th minute knowing that it would be difficult for their opponents to equalize at that dying minute, I simply use that to my advantage. N/B:I only make this bets when I find such opportunities instead of forcing them. The only down side to this is that the odds can be extremely small and this might require you to take stake high on each bet. I have made four different bets so far and I have been on a winning streak, even though the profits are quite small but it's a work in progress. As someone that has a level of experience with sports betting I know it is possible for the opponent to equalize with the team that's 2 or 3 goals ahead within a space of two minutes, nothing is totally guaranteed.
Has anyone ever tried this?

Obviously, a team can easily concede twice before you even blink and you know that football matches are never truly over until you hear that final whistle in the 90th minute of added time. Look at teams like PSG and Real Madrid they have so many individual star power upfront that tehy can sleep and play sloppy most of the match and then suddenly they ignite counter-attacking moments and score 2 goals in the space of 60 seconds. Grabbing tiny payouts if such a team plays is very possible, but you can't bet against them, you have to be extremely selective about the matches you pick to bet on.

[Bryan jessy]

In as much it is a nice strategy it is also risky because anytime is possible within the few minutes that is left that is one thing about all this games, I can try this method if it is 2:0 and is about 5 to 3 minutes left for the game to be over, the nice thing is the fact that a person do not necessarily need to bet with a huge amount so it will be very easy to try it out without being scared of losing, the onl it can become an issue is when a person bet with good amount and he ended up losing the game, truth be told whether the bet is place at the beginning, before the game started or few minutes before the game ended the outcome still remains the same.

[Frankolala]

Before I will use this strategy, I need to consider the two teams playing against each other strength because some teams are used to equalizing whenever, they're behind. I like the strategy but I wouldn't use it because the odd is small and using big amount to bet might end up in a loss. Why will I lose big money for little profit.

[ArabBTC]

OP your strategy is nice, waiting patiently gives you an edge to know the flow/direction of the game, it makes your prediction easier because you will be predicting based on the current shoreline of the game and such way it is easier to win, the only challenge is that the odds of such games will be extremely low and even though you win the winning ratio will be low compared to your stake, the strategy is better for those with large staking power so they won’t accumulate a lot of games with small odds, the odds at the ending part of matches 60mins and above is always extremely low.

[Chinesebaby]

So recently I decided to try out a live betting strategy instead of betting on the match before it starts I patiently wait until the game is far into the second half but since it is something that I have been studying for a while I deligently wait and take out time to test my theory. What I do is that I place a bet on the team winning with 2 goals ahead during the 80th minute knowing that it would be difficult for their opponents to equalize at that dying minute, I simply use that to my advantage. N/B:I only make this bets when I find such opportunities instead of forcing them. The only down side to this is that the odds can be extremely small and this might require you to take stake high on each bet. I have made four different bets so far and I have been on a winning streak, even though the profits are quite small but it's a work in progress. As someone that has a level of experience with sports betting I know it is possible for the opponent to equalize with the team that's 2 or 3 goals ahead within a space of two minutes, nothing is totally guaranteed.
Has anyone ever tried this?

I have tried this strategy before and I was successful for a while, but only to start losing my bets when I become greedy and starting betting on more than 4 to 5 games consecutively that are already having 2 goals ahead in it's second half, as some where able to equalized which made the bet end in losses and some couldn't. And you know one thing about parley bets is that immediately one cuts, the entire game have lost. But if you are to keep betting as a single game, then the chances of winning are always high, but only just that the odds are extremely always very small, due to the 2 goals gap difference.

[Dave1]

Yeah, it could be good strategy on betting live in sports as you can see how the game is going on and most likely you might seen how the game will end.

So there's no question about it, although it might not be a guarantee as there could be certain things that could make it bad like suddenly for some reasons, the opponent score goals out of luck.

But either way, it's good to test this kind of strategy from time to time, or change the way you bet. Specially that if you are in a losing skid and you just want to break that.

[Bigjoe33]

So recently I decided to try out a live betting strategy instead of betting on the match before it starts I patiently wait until the game is far into the second half but since it is something that I have been studying for a while I deligently wait and take out time to test my theory. What I do is that I place a bet on the team winning with 2 goals ahead during the 80th minute knowing that it would be difficult for their opponents to equalize at that dying minute, I simply use that to my advantage. N/B:I only make this bets when I find such opportunities instead of forcing them. The only down side to this is that the odds can be extremely small and this might require you to take stake high on each bet. I have made four different bets so far and I have been on a winning streak, even though the profits are quite small but it's a work in progress. As someone that has a level of experience with sports betting I know it is possible for the opponent to equalize with the team that's 2 or 3 goals ahead within a space of two minutes, nothing is totally guaranteed.
Has anyone ever tried this?

It's all betting, and there is still a degree of risk in it because sometime, the game can just change and the opponents score, but it's rare like you said. The major challenge is the odds. They would be relatively very low and cannot yield anything tangible at all. You would almost be getting the same amount as your stake.

For you to get something, you have to add more games as possible to increase the odds a bit, but you know its somehow difficult to find a game that has the same thing you are looking for, that's leading with 2-3 goal ahead as you mentioned. It's really difficult. With this, you night be forced to add some degree of risk to it, and this increases your chances of loss because one of the games added can act funny. If you can select some games that will provide such quality as you mentioned, then I think it's a good way to bet and win games..  But nothing is sure, it's betting and it still has some level of risk in it.

[L E G E N D A R Y]

One  mistake that a lot of gamblers often make almost all the time is believe that waiting for a clearer situation can actually remove the risks associated with that decision, but in reality, what it only does is to reduce the uncertainty. If I were you, I’d be really careful about the small odds/big stakes  combination, I’ve been there before and I can tell you for free that it doesn’t always end well, sometimes it may appear to be working, but before you finally realize what’s happening, it hits you really hard, so hard that you don’t even know what actually hit you.

[abaeze]

OP strategy may be good but sometimes in the end the odds are much higher against the team that is more likely to lose, and once you lose, you lose a lot of money in one match which you might have earned by winning many matches.

However, it is a good decision that you are not betting on all matches or forcing yourself to do so but rather waiting for the right move to make the right decision. Still, even after being aware enough, you can lose because luck is a big factor in gambling.

[fredericktaylor]

So recently I decided to try out a live betting strategy instead of betting on the match before it starts I patiently wait until the game is far into the second half but since it is something that I have been studying for a while I deligently wait and take out time to test my theory. What I do is that I place a bet on the team winning with 2 goals ahead during the 80th minute knowing that it would be difficult for their opponents to equalize at that dying minute, I simply use that to my advantage. N/B:I only make this bets when I find such opportunities instead of forcing them. The only down side to this is that the odds can be extremely small and this might require you to take stake high on each bet. I have made four different bets so far and I have been on a winning streak, even though the profits are quite small but it's a work in progress. As someone that has a level of experience with sports betting I know it is possible for the opponent to equalize with the team that's 2 or 3 goals ahead within a space of two minutes, nothing is totally guaranteed.
Has anyone ever tried this?

From my point of view, the strategy you are using to bet will help you win because it will be very difficult or challenging for any team to score two goals in such a short time. However, in a casino, you will get this opportunity very rarely and you will have to bet a lot of money for it and the amount of profit by winning will be very limited. Which strategy you will adopt for betting depends entirely on your own willpower.

If the main purpose of gambling is for entertainment, then you will never be able to enjoy and excitement of this type of betting, because at the very end of the game, the main purpose of betting is to make money. It is very important to be aware of one thing. Winning through gambling cannot be guaranteed, the result can change at any time, so it is not right to gamble with excessive risks, it is very important to limit yourself to your own means to reduce the risk.