Could This Be a Pattern Or Strategy That Works

[Joy- maker]

So recently I decided to try out a live betting strategy instead of betting on the match before it starts I patiently wait until the game is far into the second half but since it is something that I have been studying for a while I deligently wait and take out time to test my theory. What I do is that I place a bet on the team winning with 2 goals ahead during the 80th minute knowing that it would be difficult for their opponents to equalize at that dying minute, I simply use that to my advantage. N/B:I only make this bets when I find such opportunities instead of forcing them. The only down side to this is that the odds can be extremely small and this might require you to take stake high on each bet. I have made four different bets so far and I have been on a winning streak, even though the profits are quite small but it's a work in progress. As someone that has a level of experience with sports betting I know it is possible for the opponent to equalize with the team that's 2 or 3 goals ahead within a space of two minutes, nothing is totally guaranteed.
Has anyone ever tried this?

I don't bet on live matches because of the odds,  and they require you to stake a large amount of money before you can win something reasonable which sometimes ends up resulting in a loss instead.

Let me share my personal experience with you guys,  there was this game I played early last month. The away team was winning the home team with 2:0,  and with way things were going I was convinced that the away team was going to win since they were already leading with 2 goals.

You needed to see how relaxed I was and I placed a $150 bet,  when I come back to check my ticket I couldn't believe what my eyes saw that day,  to cut the long story short home team came back and won the match with 3:2.

[_act_]

when it comes is usually high because it would demand the gambler to pick many legs due to it's extreme small odds and accumulating many legs creates more risk to loss because 2:0 result can change with a comeback in no time.

It is happening daily from my findings. The person will see the odd to be very small, look for similar games daily, waste his time and later the money will still be lost. All the money will likely be lost in just a single failed bet. But if he managed to get going, second failed bet will result in total betting bankroll loss.

[Ojima-ojo]

when it comes is usually high because it would demand the gambler to pick many legs due to it's extreme small odds and accumulating many legs creates more risk to loss because 2:0 result can change with a comeback in no time.

It is happening daily from my findings. The person will see the odd to be very small, look for similar games daily, waste his time and later the money will still be lost. All the money will likely be lost in just a single failed bet. But if he managed to get going, second failed bet will result in total betting bankroll loss.

Those betting patterns will definitely make you as bettor to go in a parleys direction, because of the small odds you become pressured to go for multiple games selection and for such move you increase your risks, let say you pick 1.50 odds and the game you need to select is up to 10 game at once to be able to accumulate total odds that is high, but at that you are likely going to lose the bet, that is the risks in the method and reason you should not call it a strategy.

[uchegod-21]

So recently I decided to try out a live betting strategy instead of betting on the match before it starts I patiently wait until the game is far into the second half but since it is something that I have been studying for a while I deligently wait and take out time to test my theory. What I do is that I place a bet on the team winning with 2 goals ahead during the 80th minute knowing that it would be difficult for their opponents to equalize at that dying minute, I simply use that to my advantage. N/B:I only make this bets when I find such opportunities instead of forcing them. The only down side to this is that the odds can be extremely small and this might require you to take stake high on each bet. I have made four different bets so far and I have been on a winning streak, even though the profits are quite small but it's a work in progress. As someone that has a level of experience with sports betting I know it is possible for the opponent to equalize with the team that's 2 or 3 goals ahead within a space of two minutes, nothing is totally guaranteed.
Has anyone ever tried this?

I am usually not lucky with live bets. I have tried to make my predictions while the match is still ongoing and somehow, my decisions get influenced by my emotions and some external factors which leads me to make choices that do not favour my bets.

What you have just stated here is a strategy that works for you. You do not need any validation from anyone to continue with a strategy that is giving you the results that you already expected.

However, you should be careful. The risks are very high and the chances of losing are also high. The stakes are high, profit not too appealing and the odds not that good. Every good strategy has it's weak side.

[I_Anime]

So recently I decided to try out a live betting strategy instead of betting on the match before it starts I patiently wait until the game is far into the second half but since it is something that I have been studying for a while I deligently wait and take out time to test my theory. What I do is that I place a bet on the team winning with 2 goals ahead during the 80th minute knowing that it would be difficult for their opponents to equalize at that dying minute, I simply use that to my advantage. N/B:I only make this bets when I find such opportunities instead of forcing them. The only down side to this is that the odds can be extremely small and this might require you to take stake high on each bet. I have made four different bets so far and I have been on a winning streak, even though the profits are quite small but it's a work in progress. As someone that has a level of experience with sports betting I know it is possible for the opponent to equalize with the team that's 2 or 3 goals ahead within a space of two minutes, nothing is totally guaranteed.
Has anyone ever tried this?

Some friends of mine mentioned something similar to this strategy. Something about waiting for the game to play to some certain extent before Staking , like you said one of the down side is the odds are usually small . Due to you having the short time remaining as an edge to know who’s going to win . Is a nice strategy, the only problems is to keep to it and don’t go your beyond your budget , because of greed. There are chances the small odds may get to you especially now you kept winning continuously.

[Sandra_hakeem]

N/B:I only make this bets when I find such opportunities instead of forcing them.

How you find such opportunities? I mean, it's impossible to know the next action of the game, so imo that's a riskier way to gamble, and it pays peanuts.

The only down side to this is that the odds can be extremely small and this might require you to take stake high on each bet.

That's not true. You know damn well there are so many downsides to this pattern of gambling. First of all, take an instance in the Chelsea's EFL third round game again Leeds, did you see what happened in that game? There's a lot that I can make mention on. Some had a massive comeback at about 85th minutes or so. In that case, after trying to manage a considerably small odd per game, with a huge stake to make a potential winning a big encouraging, you stand a chance to lose everything.

I know it is possible for the opponent to equalize with the team that's 2 or 3 goals ahead within a space of two minutes, nothing is totally guaranteed.

You know, exactly. That alone makes it an unreliable strategy.

[Versatile_choice]

This looks like a good strategy that's working until it starts getting bad and you begin to lose more than you have made from previous winnings. I don't fancy this strategy that much, and the reason is because the risk in disguise looks appealing to take but the loss to it when it comes is usually high because it would demand the gambler to pick many legs due to it's extreme small odds and accumulating many legs creates more risk to loss because 2:0 result can change with a comeback in no time.

There's no strategy that is unique so long as gambling is concerned, a strategy can only work for a period of time. It is just like this current strategy he employed, he might be feeling that it's the best among all . But a time will come when you will no longer get favoured by this strategy and then you will start looking for a different one, so that's just how strategy works there's no strategy that will give you constant wining. Rather it can only give you wining for a week or two then after that it seize, but if that strategy is working perfectly for you then I will suggest that you stick to it then when you discover that it's no longer working as expected you should look into a different one.

[el che]

So recently I decided to try out a live betting strategy instead of betting on the match before it starts I patiently wait until the game is far into the second half but since it is something that I have been studying for a while I deligently wait and take out time to test my theory. What I do is that I place a bet on the team winning with 2 goals ahead during the 80th minute knowing that it would be difficult for their opponents to equalize at that dying minute, I simply use that to my advantage. N/B:I only make this bets when I find such opportunities instead of forcing them. The only down side to this is that the odds can be extremely small and this might require you to take stake high on each bet. I have made four different bets so far and I have been on a winning streak, even though the profits are quite small but it's a work in progress. As someone that has a level of experience with sports betting I know it is possible for the opponent to equalize with the team that's 2 or 3 goals ahead within a space of two minutes, nothing is totally guaranteed.
Has anyone ever tried this?

Most people who bet live try this strategy at least once. Statistically two goal comebacks late in the game don't happen often but the issue is the risk to reward ratio.

Betting high stakes at minimal odds means one single bad beat will erase 20 or 30 wins in an instant. The math is heavily in the bookmaker's favor over a long sample size.

It's good that you're picking your spots carefully but just keep your bankroll management tight so one crazy game doesn't wipe out your gains.

[Brizi5000]

So recently I decided to try out a live betting strategy instead of betting on the match before it starts I patiently wait until the game is far into the second half but since it is something that I have been studying for a while I deligently wait and take out time to test my theory. What I do is that I place a bet on the team winning with 2 goals ahead during the 80th minute knowing that it would be difficult for their opponents to equalize at that dying minute, I simply use that to my advantage. N/B:I only make this bets when I find such opportunities instead of forcing them. The only down side to this is that the odds can be extremely small and this might require you to take stake high on each bet. I have made four different bets so far and I have been on a winning streak, even though the profits are quite small but it's a work in progress. As someone that has a level of experience with sports betting I know it is possible for the opponent to equalize with the team that's 2 or 3 goals ahead within a space of two minutes, nothing is totally guaranteed.
Has anyone ever tried this?

Ordinarily, this is a very cool strategy but in gambling there’s no easy winning, you might be thinking it’s not too risky but from my experience most goals are scored during the last minute of a game and most bets usually cuts around those last minutes. this strategy will require you to stake heavily before you can win something meaningful  except you’ll Want to add more bets to it to enable you accumulate more odds and by so doing you might select the one that will end up cutting the ticket and most times if a team is already two goals up like you said in the 80th minutes, they will remove the winning odd and will be replaced with something else.

[o48o]

So recently I decided to try out a live betting strategy instead of betting on the match before it starts I patiently wait until the game is far into the second half but since it is something that I have been studying for a while I deligently wait and take out time to test my theory. What I do is that I place a bet on the team winning with 2 goals ahead during the 80th minute knowing that it would be difficult for their opponents to equalize at that dying minute, I simply use that to my advantage. N/B:I only make this bets when I find such opportunities instead of forcing them. The only down side to this is that the odds can be extremely small and this might require you to take stake high on each bet. I have made four different bets so far and I have been on a winning streak, even though the profits are quite small but it's a work in progress. As someone that has a level of experience with sports betting I know it is possible for the opponent to equalize with the team that's 2 or 3 goals ahead within a space of two minutes, nothing is totally guaranteed.
Has anyone ever tried this?

If at that point those odds exist at all, there's a small change that other team will suddenly catches up. Even if it's a low change, you are going to risk a lot if you want anything from it. And those rewards are going to be so low that you are likely making more by putting that money on high interest saving account. Or just "stake" it in some exchange.

Sadly, there's a very little to do to have any strategy against a sport books. You can win with luck but that's not a strategy.

[Hazink]

I have also tried it before and I used it to lose high amount of money. You will be winning very well but the amount won each time are very small, so a single loss will be a big blow that will wipe almost all the money the person has in the gambling account. People that want to win in gambling compulsorily will later know this failed strategy, use it and fail.

Every strategy appears to be working for the gambler until they start losing. What you mentioned is the part which the op or anyone thinking like the op might not be considering. Imagine placing a bet on games with odds of 1.1 and 1.05 and winning 5 straight 5 hands to him, they are on a winning streak one lose can burn both the capital and all which have been won on that 5 legs, I also place bet on live match, but I can't settle for game odds which is almost equal to nothing.

[Dreadboost]

This looks like a good strategy that's working until it starts getting bad and you begin to lose more than you have made from previous winnings. I don't fancy this strategy that much, and the reason is because the risk in disguise looks appealing to take but the loss to it when it comes is usually high because it would demand the gambler to pick many legs due to it's extreme small odds and accumulating many legs creates more risk to loss because 2:0 result can change with a comeback in no time.

There's no strategy that is unique so long as gambling is concerned, a strategy can only work for a period of time. It is just like this current strategy he employed, he might be feeling that it's the best among all . But a time will come when you will no longer get favoured by this strategy and then you will start looking for a different one, so that's just how strategy works there's no strategy that will give you constant wining. Rather it can only give you wining for a week or two then after that it seize, but if that strategy is working perfectly for you then I will suggest that you stick to it then when you discover that it's no longer working as expected you should look into a different one.

That's not a general view of what gambling is all about. People gamble with the strategy that fits their finances and risk tolerance. A strategy may not guarantee a win, but it can be unique. The uniqueness of strategy is subjective. Maybe you've not seen someone who makes a big profit from sports betting. I have many of them in my area. I know them winning huge money, and sometimes they lose too. Accordingly, strategies exist. It is unique to the person who uses it, if it helps them win more than they lose.

[Ndabagi01]

N/B:I only make this bets when I find such opportunities instead of forcing them. The only down side to this is that the odds can be extremely small and this might require you to take stake high on each bet. I have made four different bets so far and I have been on a winning streak, even though the profits are quite small but it's a work in progress. As someone that has a level of experience with sports betting I know it is possible for the opponent to equalize with the team that's 2 or 3 goals ahead within a space of two minutes, nothing is totally guaranteed.
Has anyone ever tried this?

Not much gamblers really use this strategy when placing a bet, they focus more on the normal one we all used to, betting before the game begins to tell the outcome of the game. Betting can be very risky and requires a lot of patient, strategy and also luck.

Games that are already on the verge of coming to an end are easily predictable but not when the team winning is not the favorite to win the game, that’s where the complexity of the game comes that makes it hard to select the team that will prevail finally in the game.

Betting on games like this is for people who are after chasing small profits and managing their risk well without using a bigger money to risk on a game outcome like this because in the end, gambling is still a game of luck.

[Rgram]

I don't bet on live matches because of the odds,  and they require you to stake a large amount of money before you can win something reasonable which sometimes ends up resulting in a loss instead.

Let me share my personal experience with you guys,  there was this game I played early last month. The away team was winning the home team with 2:0,  and with way things were going I was convinced that the away team was going to win since they were already leading with 2 goals.

You needed to see how relaxed I was and I placed a $150 bet,  when I come back to check my ticket I couldn't believe what my eyes saw that day,  to cut the long story short home team came back and won the match with 3:2.

It was your experience alright and that singular facts sets the record straight at least, at your end but, I do think live bets is one way to easily win on a bet. That being mostly when you are actually watching the game and seeing the dynamics of it, how the game is going especially when the elite teams are loosing. You just know they would start scoring at some point and you need to look at the stats of the game to come to that conclusion.

At times the odds might be much and other times low. The only disappointments here is always the fact that, you don’t have time for multiple bets combination. The odds would remain in a constant flux and you might not get to have your target odds for a bet.

[Felicity_Tide]

~snip

Has anyone ever tried this?

I have thought about trying it before, but I doubt I actually did. I personally don't like the strategy considering the fact that games that are already close to full-time are always given smaller odds, and a suppose strategy like this is never a 100% guarantee either because a sport like football can come with a lot of drama towards to the end of a game. Take for example, when a smaller team/underdog does the unthinkable... It doesn't eliminate the possibility of a late equaliser.

But if this strategy seems to be working fine for you, then you should do you while you still have luck on your side. Remember that betting also relies on luck, and not just strategies.

[Silverstonez]

This strategy doesn’t work for everyone, as a matter of fact live matches odds are not always good enough for a player to risk a large amount of money on. To be able to win something reasonable in a live match you need to stake a large amount of money because the odd will be too small.  The last time I bet on a live match it didn’t end well for me because the team I trusted to win disappointed me in that match.

[Churchillvv]

Every strategy works in sport betting until it stops working, basically you have a strategy that is promising and efficient enough for those who’ll want to try but that means one have to stay active and vigilant to watch find out games that in this category they could work as plan, it’s a big work for someone like me, you can actually make this bet with big leagues only knowing that when a certain time is passed equity is now difficult and wining teams get more guarantee fir wining and make you more confident and less afraid to play or take the risk.

[blockman]

This strategy doesn’t work for everyone, as a matter of fact live matches odds are not always good enough for a player to risk a large amount of money on. To be able to win something reasonable in a live match you need to stake a large amount of money because the odd will be too small.  The last time I bet on a live match it didn’t end well for me because the team I trusted to win disappointed me in that match.

I've tried to do it many times and there have been times that I was able to pull with this strategy and win little. I'm not expecting to win huge when it's live and you are likely to see how the game will end. I think one of the risk here is if you rely on this strategy is you need to be quick in putting that bet because the bookies can close it any moment and there's no exact time when they'd do that. So IMO, that's one of the cons of this strategy when you always monitor it and have to do it before the bookie closes it at a random time.

[Cantsay]

That is a very safe approach, or I can say a safe betting strategy. Most users apply this strategy because it can give you a maximum success rate for your bets. You wait until the end, and when you are totally sure about the results, then you place your bet. This will be the best strategy for new users who want small profits. However, the drawback of this strategy is that you can only place a large stake because of the low odds, and if you lose, then all your profits can be gone. Sometimes, at the end, unexpected things happen for example, in the last two minutes, players can score one or maybe two goals, which will result in a loss for your bet. So keep this in mind too.

I won't consider it safe, though.

Like I said in my previous post, the whole thing might look safe and like a good strategy until you finally start using it and you experience your first loss; that is when you would realise that just that single loss has set you back a huge amount, and all that you had manage to save or earn from all your previous wins are not even enough to cover it.

Do not forget the fact that you need to stake a huge amount since the odds are usually very low, so it even exposes you to the risk of losing an even larger amount each time you are gambling.

[Alphakilo]

This strategy doesn’t work for everyone, as a matter of fact live matches odds are not always good enough for a player to risk a large amount of money on. To be able to win something reasonable in a live match you need to stake a large amount of money because the odd will be too small.  The last time I bet on a live match it didn’t end well for me because the team I trusted to win disappointed me in that match.

I've tried to do it many times and there have been times that I was able to pull with this strategy and win little. I'm not expecting to win huge when it's live and you are likely to see how the game will end. I think one of the risk here is if you rely on this strategy is you need to be quick in putting that bet because the bookies can close it any moment and there's no exact time when they'd do that. So IMO, that's one of the cons of this strategy when you always monitor it and have to do it before the bookie closes it at a random time.

Am of the opinion that instead of using this kind of strategy that may be known as backing heavy favourites late in-play, why not use the handicap option to bet from when first half is almost over. At least by then if you have an opportunity to view the match, you could already have a read on how the match may end due to strategy or presence of star players or team in form.
It could probably work best than betting late with more funds and less potential returns because of the low odds that may be available by then.

If OP intends to keep trying out this strategy, maybe keeping records could help so as to know if it is a profitable strategy or just a waste of time and resources.