|
newuser01
|
 |
May 27, 2014, 06:49:18 PM
Last edit: May 27, 2014, 07:11:35 PM by newuser01 |
|
How did a new order #10152 get ahead of my order #8920 on the sha256 cue at .04btc/th/day. I put my order in days ago and have been waiting for it to come to the top of the cue and to have a new order queued ahead of mine at the same price is unfair.
This just happend for scrypt #10339 gets priority over #8979 how does this work? why are some new orders placed before the current ones? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Every time a block is mined, a certain amount of BTC (called the
subsidy) is created out of thin air and given to the miner. The
subsidy halves every four years and will reach 0 in about 130 years.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
odie158
Member
 Offline
Activity: 85
Merit: 10
|
|
May 27, 2014, 07:48:46 PM |
|
How did a new order #10152 get ahead of my order #8920 on the sha256 cue at .04btc/th/day. I put my order in days ago and have been waiting for it to come to the top of the cue and to have a new order queued ahead of mine at the same price is unfair.
This just happend for scrypt #10339 gets priority over #8979 how does this work? why are some new orders placed before the current ones? Now two are ahead of me. I trust that you are working to fix this. perhaps you should consider refunding fees to those whose positions were usurped. if I was 8979 I'd be steaming. |
|
|
|
|
|
kenshirothefist (OP)
|
|
May 27, 2014, 07:50:49 PM |
|
How did a new order #10152 get ahead of my order #8920 on the sha256 cue at .04btc/th/day. I put my order in days ago and have been waiting for it to come to the top of the cue and to have a new order queued ahead of mine at the same price is unfair.
This just happend for scrypt #10339 gets priority over #8979 how does this work? why are some new orders placed before the current ones? Thanks for reporting this. We'll take a look at this issue ASAP! |
|
|
|
|
|
saykor
|
|
May 27, 2014, 10:20:15 PM |
|
Ok guys, i am using the modded x11 sgminer, and got a very decent hash rate increase. however, it is not failing over to my backup pools.
can you please send me info for my config file in order to work better with nicehash? i believe there are some instructions thats needed to be set in the bat/conf files in order to work.
much appreciated.
Same situation. When nicehash not have work then i need to switch to second pool manually. |
|
|
|
|
aznboy84
|
|
May 28, 2014, 02:24:48 AM |
|
Ok guys, i am using the modded x11 sgminer, and got a very decent hash rate increase. however, it is not failing over to my backup pools.
can you please send me info for my config file in order to work better with nicehash? i believe there are some instructions thats needed to be set in the bat/conf files in order to work.
much appreciated.
There's another sgminer modded has the same peformance with failover supported https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=623409.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
newuser01
|
|
May 28, 2014, 05:40:45 AM |
|
How did a new order #10152 get ahead of my order #8920 on the sha256 cue at .04btc/th/day. I put my order in days ago and have been waiting for it to come to the top of the cue and to have a new order queued ahead of mine at the same price is unfair.
This just happend for scrypt #10339 gets priority over #8979 how does this work? why are some new orders placed before the current ones? Thanks for reporting this. We'll take a look at this issue ASAP! so how's it going? I just want to thank you for fucking me over last night so I had to wait another ~7 hours or so before my order went through Thanks!! If you're gonna use nicehash you better be ready to place orders with highest bid because everything else is fucked. |
|
|
|
|
|
Pfool
|
|
May 28, 2014, 07:22:41 AM |
|
Ok guys, i am using the modded x11 sgminer, and got a very decent hash rate increase. however, it is not failing over to my backup pools.
can you please send me info for my config file in order to work better with nicehash? i believe there are some instructions thats needed to be set in the bat/conf files in order to work.
much appreciated.
Same situation. When nicehash not have work then i need to switch to second pool manually. Same here bu works fine with this proxy ( https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=611338.0) between nicehash and sgminer. |
Thanx  BTC: 19wv8FQKv3NkwTdzBCQn1AGsb9ghqBPWXi |
|
|
ranlo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1974
Merit: 1007
|
|
May 28, 2014, 07:37:53 AM |
|
If average price is 2.8 BTC/GH/Day and you have p=2.7, then your miner will work but if you have p=2.9 then your miner won't work on nicehash.
That was my point exactly. After reading the FAQ I thought I could set a number of prices trying to sell my hashing power for the highest value. Namely, I have nicehash as my main pool and also as two of my failover pools. The main pool has a higher price, the second one a lower price and the third one an even lower price. Now I realize I should have only a minimum price because I will always get paid by the average price. Right? I found that the best way to do this is to just set Nicehash's value to whatever the second highest pool is (and a little above). Ie. if hashco.ws is doing 0.0035 BTC, set Nicehash up to 0.0036. This way you will always get whichever is most profitable. Note: edit this to whatever pools/type you're using, but the same concept remains. |
|
|
|
|
saykor
|
|
May 28, 2014, 08:27:15 AM |
|
Ok guys, i am using the modded x11 sgminer, and got a very decent hash rate increase. however, it is not failing over to my backup pools.
can you please send me info for my config file in order to work better with nicehash? i believe there are some instructions thats needed to be set in the bat/conf files in order to work.
much appreciated.
Same situation. When nicehash not have work then i need to switch to second pool manually. Same here bu works fine with this proxy ( https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=611338.0) between nicehash and sgminer. Sorry but, I not know java. This not mean anything for me. |
|
|
|
|
Pfool
|
|
May 28, 2014, 09:05:05 AM |
|
Ok guys, i am using the modded x11 sgminer, and got a very decent hash rate increase. however, it is not failing over to my backup pools.
can you please send me info for my config file in order to work better with nicehash? i believe there are some instructions thats needed to be set in the bat/conf files in order to work.
much appreciated.
Same situation. When nicehash not have work then i need to switch to second pool manually. Same here bu works fine with this proxy ( https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=611338.0) between nicehash and sgminer. Sorry but, I not know java. This not mean anything for me. Java is a programming language which produces programs running over a Virtual machine called JVM (Java Virtual Machine). Just install the JVM ( http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/downloads/jre8-downloads-2133155.html) for your operating system then launch the proxy as described on the project main page. If you need more advices/details, you are welcome on the stratum-proxy thread ( https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=611338.40). |
Thanx BTC: 19wv8FQKv3NkwTdzBCQn1AGsb9ghqBPWXi |
|
|
|
saykor
|
|
May 28, 2014, 09:29:38 AM |
|
Ok guys, i am using the modded x11 sgminer, and got a very decent hash rate increase. however, it is not failing over to my backup pools.
can you please send me info for my config file in order to work better with nicehash? i believe there are some instructions thats needed to be set in the bat/conf files in order to work.
much appreciated.
Same situation. When nicehash not have work then i need to switch to second pool manually. Same here bu works fine with this proxy ( https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=611338.0) between nicehash and sgminer. Sorry but, I not know java. This not mean anything for me. Java is a programming language which produces programs running over a Virtual machine called JVM (Java Virtual Machine). Just install the JVM ( http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/downloads/jre8-downloads-2133155.html) for your operating system then launch the proxy as described on the project main page. If you need more advices/details, you are welcome on the stratum-proxy thread ( https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=611338.40). As a C# developer with 10 years XP i know what is java and C++. Just not know to develop on them. And you can't expect from every single user to understand program languages to build or compile his own miners. |
|
|
|
|
Pfool
|
|
May 28, 2014, 11:15:21 AM |
|
As a C# developer with 10 years XP i know what is java and C++. Just not know to develop on them. And you can't expect from every single user to understand program languages to build or compile his own miners. If you had read the main project page, you would have seen that you don't have to compile anything. Binaries are available. Moreover, I just give some advices to people who have the same kind of problems as I had. If you do not want to use it (it is your right),please, just ignore the post. PS: the stratum proxy is not a miner, just a stratum proxy |
Thanx BTC: 19wv8FQKv3NkwTdzBCQn1AGsb9ghqBPWXi |
|
|
gch
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 6
Merit: 0
|
|
May 28, 2014, 12:19:05 PM |
|
Just made a really dirty x11mod sgminer with nicehash patches - https://github.com/Cremator/sph-sgminer_x11mod - around 40% improvement for my 270s from 1370kh/s to 1930kh/s per card. GPU 0: 57.0C 1931RPM | 1.932M/1.928Mh/s | R: 0.0% HW:0 WU:0.026/m I:21
GPU 1: 57.0C 1925RPM | 1.929M/1.924Mh/s | R: 0.0% HW:0 WU:0.027/m I:21
GPU 2: 58.0C 2099RPM | 1.929M/1.924Mh/s | R: 0.0% HW:0 WU:0.026/m I:21
|
|
|
|
|
csa1234
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 286
Merit: 100
O2-Protocol.com Carbon Offset DeFi
|
|
May 28, 2014, 03:29:59 PM |
|
nicehash is it possible your site could start doing folding at folding@home (just Google about it), it pays 0.005 btc/day per R9 280x or more with 290's and consume same power as x11 algo
Posted From bitcointalk.org Android App
|
O2-Protocol.com
Carbon Offset DeFi
|
|
|
kieco
Member
Offline
Activity: 76
Merit: 10
|
|
May 28, 2014, 05:54:59 PM |
|
I am new to nicehash.com. I am trying to place a x11 order but keep on getting this message: "Amount or price not valid. Please check your order again." Anyone else having this problem OR is it just me? Here is an example of an order i was trying to place:  |
|
|
|
|
|
nicehashdev
|
|
May 28, 2014, 06:02:58 PM |
|
Minimal order pay amount is 0.01 BTC, which is clearly visible on placeholder before you put any numbers in.
|
|
|
|
|
kieco
Member
Offline
Activity: 76
Merit: 10
|
|
May 28, 2014, 06:04:19 PM |
|
Minimal order pay amount is 0.01 BTC, which is clearly visible on placeholder before you put any numbers in.
duh ... missed that. Ok thanks |
|
|
|
|
BitcoinGeekBoy
Member
Offline
Activity: 104
Merit: 10
|
|
May 28, 2014, 06:13:51 PM |
|
Any plans for supporting X13 in the near future?
|
|
|
|
|
|
saykor
|
|
May 28, 2014, 08:55:41 PM |
|
If you had read the main project page, you would have seen that you don't have to compile anything. Binaries are available.
Moreover, I just give some advices to people who have the same kind of problems as I had. If you do not want to use it (it is your right),please, just ignore the post.
PS: the stratum proxy is not a miner, just a stratum proxy
Sorry but I not understand how to use stratum proxy to fix the stick problem in the miner. |
|
|
|
|
