braxx
|
|
May 05, 2014, 02:57:44 PM Last edit: May 05, 2014, 04:02:52 PM by braxx |
|
Hello Carlo,
Thank you for letting us know about this coin! I have added your coin to the list of coins our development team is reviewing for addition to the cryptsy market.
Sincerely, Marjorie Cryptsy.com
as they say to every coin who wants to be listed let's wait it out probably being added to voting list
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"If you don't want people to know you're a scumbag then don't be a scumbag." -- margaritahuyan
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
braxx
|
|
May 05, 2014, 04:01:02 PM |
|
switched to nonce-pool but seems like a hard nut to crack... 330% already.. they could use some more hashpower. remember 0% fee edit: hahaha my words are not cold yet and block has been solved
|
|
|
|
ocminer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2660
Merit: 1240
|
|
May 05, 2014, 04:03:19 PM |
|
https://mnr.suprnova.cc also 0% fee, but seems like 1gh is more popular ^^
|
suprnova pools - reliable mining pools - #suprnova on freenet https://www.suprnova.cc - FOLLOW us @ Twitter ! twitter.com/SuprnovaPools
|
|
|
cryptomines
|
|
May 05, 2014, 04:15:24 PM |
|
switched to nonce-pool but seems like a hard nut to crack... 330% already..
they could use some more hashpower.
remember 0% fee
Glad you brought some hashpower over! All the pools for MNR are great, Hopefully we can build up Nonce and Supernova to a few GH/s. Distributing the hash amongst the 3 pools would be great for MNR. Is there another pool? public or private? or some people solo mining? 1gh: 14.3 gh/s Nonce: 304 mh/s Supernova: 0mh/s Reported network hashrate: 23.9 gh/s 9.3 gh/s unaccounted for?
|
|
|
|
cayars
|
|
May 05, 2014, 05:33:23 PM |
|
Now showing as 19,855 MH/s global 1GH 14036 MH/s Nonce 304 MH/s
5,515 solo mining perhaps?
|
|
|
|
djm34
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050
|
|
May 05, 2014, 05:46:02 PM |
|
nothing personal, but that's the registration for me which makes me choose 1gh. If you could make your pool without registration (or once and for all, no matter the coin you mine) that would be much better.
|
djm34 facebook pageBTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
|
|
|
cryptomines
|
|
May 05, 2014, 05:50:02 PM |
|
nothing personal, but that's the registration for me which makes me choose 1gh. If you could make your pool without registration (or once and for all, no matter the coin you mine) that would be much better. 1 signup for multiple coins would be very nice indeed.
|
|
|
|
TheRealSteve
|
|
May 05, 2014, 05:54:17 PM |
|
"no signup" is better. That's what 1gh is doing - your address (be that BTC, HVC, MNR, whatever) is essentially your account, and they craftily make use of the password to do some difficulty tweaking. MPOS pools seem to always require registration - which, even with throw-away e-mail addresses - can be rather annoying, especially once you have to set up workers as well. More of a thing to request from the MPOS author, though. (Then again, it's open source - can always fork it )
|
|
|
|
SimkoMiner
|
|
May 05, 2014, 06:38:39 PM |
|
I have good feeling about this coin and I have no freakin idea why. ;-) Oh, I know why...again I can mine on my favorite anonymous pool and I don't need to take care about my mining rig which just mines smoothly without any error, no sick/dead gpu's like on scrypt, almost no rejects. Just awesome. Hefty is a miner's dream. I am happy I don't need to dump my GPU's to eBay yet. Let's hope this miner's dream generates some profit in far future. Cool mining is fine until first electricity bill arrives haha.
|
|
|
|
cayars
|
|
May 05, 2014, 06:42:00 PM |
|
Each has advantages. With MPOS you can setup a worker for each GPU or machine which can be useful for remotely being able to see if something is wrong.
|
|
|
|
auy
Member
Offline
Activity: 336
Merit: 10
|
|
May 05, 2014, 06:48:20 PM |
|
We need a market
|
|
|
|
RavenX
Member
Offline
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
|
|
May 05, 2014, 07:05:24 PM |
|
We need a market
+1.000.000
|
|
|
|
SimkoMiner
|
|
May 05, 2014, 07:09:22 PM |
|
We need a market
I think this coin needs to mature just a little. It needs more miners first, more hashrate spread across pools, etc. We need to spread the word across internet and clearly communicate what the value of this coin is or will be which I don't really know myself yet besides cool algo. We need to learn from all the mistakes which HVC made in first place and we need to learn from other successful coins all the tricks. :-) Last week I was mining UniversityCoin and I'm quite impressed by those students and their engagement (if this coin is really developed by university students for students). And I am not talking about other "big" coins and their upcomming "wallstreet" actions.
|
|
|
|
cryptomines
|
|
May 05, 2014, 07:22:22 PM |
|
We need a market
+1.000.000 Make sure you vote here https://www.cryptoaltex.com/index.php?page=newcoinYou can also copy and paste cayars email from a few pages back and send to other exchanges as well. I think this coin needs to mature just a little. It needs more miners first, more hashrate spread across pools, etc. We need to spread the word across internet and clearly communicate what the value of this coin is or will be which I don't really know myself yet besides cool algo. We need to learn from all the mistakes which HVC made in first place and we need to learn from other successful coins all the tricks. :-) Last week I was mining UniversityCoin and I'm quite impressed by those students and their engagement (if this coin is really developed by university students for students). And I am not talking about other "big" coins and their upcomming "wallstreet" actions. I totally agree we should learn from all of HVC mistakes. This coin can be what HVC should have been. Cool algo and low power draw are great selling points to get miners interested, but I agree that we need a plan to market MNR to a broader audience.
|
|
|
|
mfqrs3
|
|
May 05, 2014, 07:32:55 PM |
|
As for the price, HVC was at around 5000 satoshi, and this coin is 10x more rare and hard to get, so price should be minimum at 50k satoshi, even more.
|
|
|
|
chango
|
|
May 05, 2014, 07:41:55 PM |
|
Hi there, apparently this algo doesn't work well when the diff is low, can you increase the diff for the shares? If you do that I might use your pool :p. Also for everyone, if you solo mine you should get slightly more coins than using a pool hashing at a lower diff. Cheers!.
|
|
|
|
auy
Member
Offline
Activity: 336
Merit: 10
|
|
May 05, 2014, 07:53:37 PM |
|
As for the price, HVC was at around 5000 satoshi, and this coin is 10x more rare and hard to get, so price should be minimum at 50k satoshi, even more.
A total of 4200W A lot of less than HVC
|
|
|
|
djm34
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050
|
|
May 05, 2014, 08:19:44 PM |
|
As for the price, HVC was at around 5000 satoshi, and this coin is 10x more rare and hard to get, so price should be minimum at 50k satoshi, even more.
A total of 4200W A lot of less than HVC ?
|
djm34 facebook pageBTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
|
|
|
reorder
|
|
May 05, 2014, 08:21:21 PM |
|
As for the price, HVC was at around 5000 satoshi, and this coin is 10x more rare and hard to get, so price should be minimum at 50k satoshi, even more.
A total of 4200W A lot of less than HVC ? 'W' is a 10000 unit in China.
|
|
|
|
cayars
|
|
May 05, 2014, 08:23:42 PM |
|
'W' is a 10000 unit in China.
Learn something new everday.
|
|
|
|
|