[ANN] ¤ DMD Diamond 3.0 | Scarce ¤ Valuable ¤ Secure | PoS 3.0 | Masternodes 65%

[cryptonit]

DMD MULTIPOOL / DMD CLOUDMINING
Visit us:  cloudmining.bit.diamonds

redistributed over 202000 DMD! between its users!
yes thats close to 15% of total coins!


---------------------


---------------------------------------------------------
DMD CLoudmining allow buy shares again NOW!
Starting NOW all accounts who didnt reach ROI 100%
will be boosted with x5 sharepower!
--------------------------------------------------------


(https://cloudmining.bit.diamonds/ log in with DMD Address and activate settings area to enable buy shares mode)


NO Electricity Bills                                
  NO Maintenance                                    
    NO Heat                                                
      NO Noise                                              
        NO Timesink                                        
          NO Complicated technology                
            NO Quickly decreasing mining rewards

Join DMD Cloudmining
     -> EARN DMD EACH DAY!
                    
                   YES!

(additional DMD Cloudmining shares qualify for DMD Reactor  payouts!

Visit us:  cloudmining.bit.diamonds
terms & conditions Terms of Service
for questions Email us: cloud@bit.diamonds

      


What's the best way join into DMD Diamond and DMD Cloudmining?

I suggest split it as follows:

 a) 50% on buying Diamonds directly
 b) 50% in Diamond Cloud Mining.

 This way I could achieve both maximizing the profit and stabilizing the coin.
 Diamond Cloud Mining can earn Diamonds every day, those Diamonds stake with 50% PoS interest.
 Some would call that Double PoS or simply PoS² (Proof of Shares and Proof of Stake).


Step by Step guide buy shares:

Register ur wallet at dmd cloudmining website
activate the settings area
activate the convert to shares option in settings
send btc towards ur linked BTC address
u get them converted into DMD Cloudmining shares

I am not a Registered Investment Advisor, Broker/Dealer, Financial Analyst, Financial Bank, Securities Broker or Financial Planner. The Information is provided for information purposes only. The Information is not intended to be and does not constitute financial advice or any other advice, is general in nature and not specific to you. Before using this information to make an investment decision, you should seek the advice of a qualified and registered securities professional and undertake your own due diligence. None of the information is intended as investment advice, as an offer or solicitation of an offer to buy or sell, or as a recommendation, endorsement, or sponsorship of any security, Company, or fund. DMD Diamond is not a regulated investment vehicle. DMD Diamond, like all crypto currencies, is experimental in nature and should be considered and treated with appropriate caution. There is no central point of control or representative entity, DMD Diamond is a distributed decentralized peer-to-peer currency and commodity. Consult a licensed professional financial advisor before making any investment decisions. I am not responsible for any investment decision made by you. You are responsible for your own investment research and investment decisions.

--------------
--------------

just in case someone missed this now DMD Multipool mining become easy for everyone!
update: working on Nvidia AND AMD based cards!

here come the new nicehash miner tool now also with AMD GPU support
https://www.nicehash.com/index.jsp?p=news&id=50

just use ur https://multipool.bit.diamonds/ BTC address attached to ur registered DMD address and u will earn DMD payouts
provided by our fee free convertion service

[utahjohn]

Forked again ...
Hashrate Distribution
Rank   Pool/Miner   Last 100   Last 1000
1   Proof of Stake      55 %   50.7 %
2   Unknown      39 %   18.0 %
3   StinkFlipper      3 %   1.2 %
4   MiningField      2 %   16.2 %
5   danbi's      1 %   13.9 %


Diff 8-12 right now ...

[shveicar]

Forked again ...
Hashrate Distribution
Rank   Pool/Miner   Last 100   Last 1000
1   Proof of Stake      55 %   50.7 %
2   Unknown      39 %   18.0 %
3   StinkFlipper      3 %   1.2 %
4   MiningField      2 %   16.2 %
5   danbi's      1 %   13.9 %


Diff 8-12 right now ...

You are confusing the concept of fork with a problem related to the pools
Network and transaction work.
You can watch it on https://chainz.cryptoid.info/dmd/#

[pazor_true]

what happen to danbi DMD mining pool ?

[pazor_true]

question:
if i leave the same wallet with X DMD inside running on 3 different clients (IP different) will i get the power multiplied three times ?
(i suppose not, but i am not sure)

[cryptonit]

what happen to danbi DMD mining pool ?

actual status we have 4 pools and all seems to be ok
if one of them have some issues and u mine there please contact ur pool operator


http://dmd.cryptopools.com/ ok
https://dmd.miningfield.com ok
http://stinkflipper.tk:8088/ ok
http://dmdpool.digsys.bg/ ok

[cryptonit]

question:
if i leave the same wallet with X DMD inside running on 3 different clients (IP different) will i get the power multiplied three times ?
(i suppose not, but i am not sure)

the rewards wont change because once a POS block successful claimed
the coin age is used up in each wallet that use that address

the chance to find a block faster might improve a bit

try and share ur experience 

[kiklo]

question:
if i leave the same wallet with X DMD inside running on 3 different clients (IP different) will i get the power multiplied three times ?
(i suppose not, but i am not sure)

When you says clients, do you mean 3 different PCs running the same wallet.dat
if so , Very Bad Idea , your wallets would start drifting apart with each use
http://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/4904/can-wallets-be-shared-by-different-machines


 

[pazor_true]

question:
if i leave the same wallet with X DMD inside running on 3 different clients (IP different) will i get the power multiplied three times ?
(i suppose not, but i am not sure)

When you says clients, do you mean 3 different PCs running the same wallet.dat
if so , Very Bad Idea , your wallets would start drifting apart with each use
http://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/4904/can-wallets-be-shared-by-different-machines


 

this will happen on prof-of-stake wallets, thats right
on prof-on-work wallets (if i leave them untouched) this does not matter.
thank you!

[cryptonit]

interesting germany took place 2 from russia
something going on there? lot new wallets 

[cryptonit]

question:
if i leave the same wallet with X DMD inside running on 3 different clients (IP different) will i get the power multiplied three times ?
(i suppose not, but i am not sure)

When you says clients, do you mean 3 different PCs running the same wallet.dat
if so , Very Bad Idea , your wallets would start drifting apart with each use
http://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/4904/can-wallets-be-shared-by-different-machines


 

u can set a changeaddress=yourmanaddress
in conf and u wont have issued with different change addresses in different wallets using same address

yes there is a tiny chance to mint for example with both wallets the same coin piles
but only one of that blocks will be accepted from network
and ur wallets reorg to the network truth

after all a blockchain is nothing else than a shared database with a bit cryptografic technologie involved 

its impossible spend the same coin age twice

[StinkFlipper]

Are you guys mad? Miningfield pool heading straight back to over 50% of POW.

[kiklo]

question:
if i leave the same wallet with X DMD inside running on 3 different clients (IP different) will i get the power multiplied three times ?
(i suppose not, but i am not sure)

When you says clients, do you mean 3 different PCs running the same wallet.dat
if so , Very Bad Idea , your wallets would start drifting apart with each use
http://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/4904/can-wallets-be-shared-by-different-machines


 

this will happen on prof-of-stake wallets, thats right
on prof-on-work wallets (if i leave them untouched) this does not matter.
thank you!

Actually the article quoted is BTC, Prof of work.
It is worse for PoS because staking creates more transactions and more keys.
Diamond is a hybrid, hits you both ways.

Your Diamonds your call, be aware if there is ever 100 total different transactions difference between the wallets ,
it is a possibility to lose your diamonds beyond recovery.
That is why most say it is a bad idea.

 

[talks_cheep]

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Pazor_true knows moar and better than you and me combined. Let him lose his diamonds. There are so many deaf AND blind people on the forum, I guess greed makes them that way.

[pazor_true]

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Pazor_true knows moar and better than you and me combined. Let him lose his diamonds. There are so many deaf AND blind people on the forum, I guess greed makes them that way.

thank you for your kind words... follow me to share my experiences...

[cryptonit]

question:
if i leave the same wallet with X DMD inside running on 3 different clients (IP different) will i get the power multiplied three times ?
(i suppose not, but i am not sure)

When you says clients, do you mean 3 different PCs running the same wallet.dat
if so , Very Bad Idea , your wallets would start drifting apart with each use
http://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/4904/can-wallets-be-shared-by-different-machines


 

this will happen on prof-of-stake wallets, thats right
on prof-on-work wallets (if i leave them untouched) this does not matter.
thank you!

Actually the article quoted is BTC, Prof of work.
It is worse for PoS because staking creates more transactions and more keys.
Diamond is a hybrid, hits you both ways.

Your Diamonds your call, be aware if there is ever 100 total different transactions difference between the wallets ,
it is a possibility to lose your diamonds beyond recovery.
That is why most say it is a bad idea.

 

thats just not true for DMD

yes two copy of same wallet.dat can get over time (after the 100 pregenerated addresses stored inside are used up)
a different set of private keys and addresses for new addresses

NO this dont affect staking the way DMD POS works the reward goes to the same address the coins coming from there is no other address utilized

NO this dont affect change of transactions if u set the changeaddress= parameter to ur mainaddress in diamond.conf

only way u can lose access of coins in wallet A from wallet B is when u didnt set the changeaddress= paramenter because wallet B dont know the change address wallet A created

BUT that dont change the fact that wallet A is able to access it

so please no horror stories or urban legends

stay with facts

[cryptonit]

dHearthhcpde37LYJX7YoBEKBs4K1NwxNi

something like this will be my legendary address

yes vanitygen works for DMD addresses
just use the correct parameter -X 90

download from here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=25804.0

useful help:

http://www.bongbitcoin.com/vanity_addresses.php

example:

this utilize my first GPU to search for a DMD Diamond address starting with dTestAD
and save any valid addresses with their private keys it finds into the file.txt

never use any online services that generate private keys for u!
generate urself or be happy with random address names

[kiklo]

question:
if i leave the same wallet with X DMD inside running on 3 different clients (IP different) will i get the power multiplied three times ?
(i suppose not, but i am not sure)

When you says clients, do you mean 3 different PCs running the same wallet.dat
if so , Very Bad Idea , your wallets would start drifting apart with each use
http://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/4904/can-wallets-be-shared-by-different-machines


 

this will happen on prof-of-stake wallets, thats right
on prof-on-work wallets (if i leave them untouched) this does not matter.
thank you!

Actually the article quoted is BTC, Prof of work.
It is worse for PoS because staking creates more transactions and more keys.
Diamond is a hybrid, hits you both ways.

Your Diamonds your call, be aware if there is ever 100 total different transactions difference between the wallets ,
it is a possibility to lose your diamonds beyond recovery.
That is why most say it is a bad idea.

 

thats just not true for DMD

yes two copy of same wallet.dat can get over time (after the 100 pregenerated addresses stored inside are used up)
a different set of private keys and addresses for new addresses

NO this dont affect staking the way DMD POS works the reward goes to the same address the coins coming from there is no other address utilized

NO this dont affect change of transactions if u set the changeaddress= parameter to ur mainaddress in diamond.conf

only way u can lose access of coins in wallet A from wallet B is when u didnt set the changeaddress= paramenter because wallet B dont know the change address wallet A created

BUT that dont change the fact that wallet A is able to access it

so please no horror stories or urban legends

stay with facts

OK,  
you're not understanding me. This is not an insult toward diamond, this is a issue that can affect every single coin out there.
It has something to do with the random key address creation.

See here:
http://bitzuma.com/posts/five-ways-to-lose-money-with-bitcoin-change-addresses/
__________________________________________________________________
1. Backup Failure

Alice uses Bitcoin-Qt. Understanding the importance of backups, she created an encrypted wallet backup long ago and stored it in a safe place. After making dozens of transactions with Bitcoin-Qt, Alice's hard drive crashed.

Alice bought a new hard drive and then re-installed Bitcoin-Qt on it. She then restored her wallet backup. To her horror, Alice discovered the restored wallet was empty.

Explanation: Alice generated enough change addresses to overflow the original pool of 100. On the 100th spending transaction, Bitcoin-Qt moved Alice's change (which happend to be her entire balance) into an address not in the backup. Restoring the backup only restored empty addresses.
_____________________________________________________________________

But hey , it is only my Opinion,
I just thought people would like to know the possible dangers that arise from running multiple systems with the same wallet.dat concurrently.
Your Coins Your Decision.  

 

[shveicar]

question:
if i leave the same wallet with X DMD inside running on 3 different clients (IP different) will i get the power multiplied three times ?
(i suppose not, but i am not sure)

When you says clients, do you mean 3 different PCs running the same wallet.dat
if so , Very Bad Idea , your wallets would start drifting apart with each use
http://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/4904/can-wallets-be-shared-by-different-machines


 

this will happen on prof-of-stake wallets, thats right
on prof-on-work wallets (if i leave them untouched) this does not matter.
thank you!

Actually the article quoted is BTC, Prof of work.
It is worse for PoS because staking creates more transactions and more keys.
Diamond is a hybrid, hits you both ways.

Your Diamonds your call, be aware if there is ever 100 total different transactions difference between the wallets ,
it is a possibility to lose your diamonds beyond recovery.
That is why most say it is a bad idea.

 

thats just not true for DMD

yes two copy of same wallet.dat can get over time (after the 100 pregenerated addresses stored inside are used up)
a different set of private keys and addresses for new addresses

NO this dont affect staking the way DMD POS works the reward goes to the same address the coins coming from there is no other address utilized

NO this dont affect change of transactions if u set the changeaddress= parameter to ur mainaddress in diamond.conf

only way u can lose access of coins in wallet A from wallet B is when u didnt set the changeaddress= paramenter because wallet B dont know the change address wallet A created

BUT that dont change the fact that wallet A is able to access it

so please no horror stories or urban legends

stay with facts

OK,  
you're not understanding me. This is not an insult toward diamond, this is a issue that can affect every single coin out there.
It has something to do with the random key address creation.

See here:
http://bitzuma.com/posts/five-ways-to-lose-money-with-bitcoin-change-addresses/
__________________________________________________________________
1. Backup Failure

Alice uses Bitcoin-Qt. Understanding the importance of backups, she created an encrypted wallet backup long ago and stored it in a safe place. After making dozens of transactions with Bitcoin-Qt, Alice's hard drive crashed.

Alice bought a new hard drive and then re-installed Bitcoin-Qt on it. She then restored her wallet backup. To her horror, Alice discovered the restored wallet was empty.

Explanation: Alice generated enough change addresses to overflow the original pool of 100. On the 100th spending transaction, Bitcoin-Qt moved Alice's change (which happend to be her entire balance) into an address not in the backup. Restoring the backup only restored empty addresses.
_____________________________________________________________________

But hey , it is only my Opinion,
I just thought people would like to know the possible dangers that arise from running multiple systems with the same wallet.dat concurrently.
Your Coins Your Decision.  

 

If you use only one Diamond address for the  POS mining and your wallet has the one old backup copy, then you do not worry about it.

[cryptonit]

thats just not true for DMD

yes two copy of same wallet.dat can get over time (after the 100 pregenerated addresses stored inside are used up)
a different set of private keys and addresses for new addresses

NO this dont affect staking the way DMD POS works the reward goes to the same address the coins coming from there is no other address utilized

NO this dont affect change of transactions if u set the changeaddress= parameter to ur mainaddress in diamond.conf

only way u can lose access of coins in wallet A from wallet B is when u didnt set the changeaddress= paramenter because wallet B dont know the change address wallet A created

BUT that dont change the fact that wallet A is able to access it

so please no horror stories or urban legends

stay with facts

OK,  
you're not understanding me. This is not an insult toward diamond, this is a issue that can affect every single coin out there.
It has something to do with the random key address creation.

See here:
http://bitzuma.com/posts/five-ways-to-lose-money-with-bitcoin-change-addresses/
__________________________________________________________________
1. Backup Failure

Alice uses Bitcoin-Qt. Understanding the importance of backups, she created an encrypted wallet backup long ago and stored it in a safe place. After making dozens of transactions with Bitcoin-Qt, Alice's hard drive crashed.

Alice bought a new hard drive and then re-installed Bitcoin-Qt on it. She then restored her wallet backup. To her horror, Alice discovered the restored wallet was empty.

Explanation: Alice generated enough change addresses to overflow the original pool of 100. On the 100th spending transaction, Bitcoin-Qt moved Alice's change (which happend to be her entire balance) into an address not in the backup. Restoring the backup only restored empty addresses.
_____________________________________________________________________

But hey , it is only my Opinion,
I just thought people would like to know the possible dangers that arise from running multiple systems with the same wallet.dat concurrently.
Your Coins Your Decision.  

 

kilo if u read my answer then we not talk against each other
i confirm that different addresses will be used in the wallet.dat once the 100 pre-generated are used up
but i also describe how u still can use ur address in two different wallet.dat without any risc involved

the important part is
changeaddress=[yourmainaddress]
in diamond.conf

i agree there lot other cryptocoins that not even have the changeaddress= option to be set in conf
and with such coins after lot transactions ur coins will be in change addresses that are not stored in ur wallet.dat backup