[XMR] Monero - A secure, private, untraceable cryptocurrency

[c789]

Another exchange may be ExchangeD.I2P. It's an exchange that runs over I2P for privacy. Here's the link to their thread where they mentioned that they'll be adding cryptonote coins (i.e. Monero) this week (hopefully):

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1092682.msg13532750#msg13532750

It should compliment Monero's pillars very well...

[Frodomaga]

Recommend an exchange for New York residents barred from plx?

Move. Alternatively, consider relocating.

Actually, after looking a bit, it appears that bittrex.com has applied for a BitLicense. Volume is quite low (~5 BTC) on the XMR market, but I'm sure some tasty bids would attract more sell-side liquidity (or buy-side dumping).

Recommend an exchange for New York residents barred from plx?

Bittrex is another one.

Sad that NY consistently chooses banning over freedom, even to the point of a 20oz soda.

That's just New York City, rather than the whole state, but agree nonetheless.

Can you use a proxy to access the poloniex?
                                                                                                                                                                                           

[saddambitcoin]

Recommend an exchange for New York residents barred from plx?

Move. Alternatively, consider relocating.

Actually, after looking a bit, it appears that bittrex.com has applied for a BitLicense. Volume is quite low (~5 BTC) on the XMR market, but I'm sure some tasty bids would attract more sell-side liquidity (or buy-side dumping).

Recommend an exchange for New York residents barred from plx?

Bittrex is another one.

Sad that NY consistently chooses banning over freedom, even to the point of a 20oz soda.

That's just New York City, rather than the whole state, but agree nonetheless.

Can you use a proxy to access the poloniex?

Sure you could, and in fact you don't have to provide address info for the lowest tier of Poloniex verification (limited to $2000/day withdraw). However if you keep money there you'd be constantly at risk of them potentially asking for more ID in the future. I've not heard of it happening but the risk is there. If I was a NY resident, its not a chance I'd like to take.

[nioc]

Well, I left bitmonerod opened for several days. Here is what I see today:

This was asked on #monero yesterday as well:

<TL123> ERROR  {2} {p1} 2016-01-19 15:32:37.489227 [abstract_tcp_server2.inl+494 ::do_se nd_chunk] send que size is more than ABSTRACT_SERVER_SEND_QUE_MAX_COUNT(1000), s hutting down connection
<TL123> Server send que max count 1000? Is that something i should rise or what is causing that
<fluffypony> TL123: it's on the list of things to fix, it's harmless and does go away, or else just restart the daemon

I got this very same thing earlier this week as well.  I didn't take a screen shot of it but this was it.

Happened to me twice. Both times it happened around two days after restarting the daemon. Last time i left it to run for 3 hours in order to see if it corrects itself but it kept showing errors and the incoming connections were dropping so i restarted the daemon.

Yes restart the daemon.

[boestin]

Guys,

Anyone know when the gui wallet is coming?  I want to transfer my xmr's from polo...  Yes, I can use the bitmonerod, but I'd rather use a nooby client 

Ty,
Boestin

[GingerAle]

Guys,

Anyone know when the gui wallet is coming?  I want to transfer my xmr's from polo...  Yes, I can use the bitmonerod, but I'd rather use a nooby client 

Ty,
Boestin

there are primarily 2 wallets available.
https://monerobase.com/Wallet

lightwallet bt jwinterm is probably the most developed. MxNero is the newest on the scene.

[dEBRUYNE]

Please give  conf file  for 7950

Could you be a bit more precise?

[luigi1111]

Guys,

Anyone know when the gui wallet is coming?  I want to transfer my xmr's from polo...  Yes, I can use the bitmonerod, but I'd rather use a nooby client 

Ty,
Boestin

If you are just wanting to store them, versus actually spending them or whatever, I'd recommend a paper wallet instead.

[jwinterm]

Guys,

Anyone know when the gui wallet is coming?  I want to transfer my xmr's from polo...  Yes, I can use the bitmonerod, but I'd rather use a nooby client 

Ty,
Boestin

there are primarily 2 wallets available.
https://monerobase.com/Wallet

lightwallet bt jwinterm is probably the most developed. MxNero is the newest on the scene.

If you want to use lightwallet, I'd recommend waiting a week or two as I plan to release a new version that works with latest simplewallet in that timeframe.

[boestin]

thanks for the links! Bit lazy here, sorry.

[pawel7777]

Just came across this article on 'wired':

http://www.wired.com/2016/01/zcash-an-untraceable-bitcoin-alternative-launches-in-alpha/

Apparently they're trying to promote new altcoin as first (!?) untraceable cryptocurrency. Not a single mention of Monero in article (multiple in comment section tho).

Anyone familiar with this alt? Any advantages over XMR?

Wired is pretty big news site, I'm surprised they published such article. Sponsored?

[dEBRUYNE]

Just came across this article on 'wired':

http://www.wired.com/2016/01/zcash-an-untraceable-bitcoin-alternative-launches-in-alpha/

Apparently they're trying to promote new altcoin as first (!?) untraceable cryptocurrency. Not a single mention of Monero in article (multiple in comment section tho).

Anyone familiar with this alt? Any advantages over XMR?

Wired is pretty big news site, I'm surprised they published such article. Sponsored?

Probably, they had another article on there too last year.

We already had a discussion regarding Zcash vs Monero in another thread, I'll copy it in my post below.

[dEBRUYNE]

Relevant post. There was also a discussion on reddit, most of it is the same though.

https://www.reddit.com/r/Monero/comments/41vg68/monero_vs_zcash_eli5_fundamental_differences

zcash alpha has been launched

https://github.com/Electric-Coin-Company/zcash

http://www.wired.com/2016/01/zcash-an-untraceable-bitcoin-alternative-launches-in-alpha/

I'll just copy my reddit comment here:

I've made this list earlier:

List of possible pitfalls wrt ZeroCash/ZeroCoin:

[1] If ZeroCash/ZeroCoin is launched on behalf of a company, which seems the case here, the company can be given a gag order (e.g. to add a line of malicious code).

[2] If I recall correctly, the creator of the genesis block holds some kind of masterkey. As a result, you have to trust this person. Even if this key was held by a group, you still have to trust that particular group. In addition, you have to trust the program they run to create the Genesis block (the masterkey could be in there).

[3] It's too opaque in my opinion. If a bug existed that would create additional coins, there is no way you would see it.

[4] The math and cryptography backing it isn't peer reviewed yet and in an infancy stage.

[1] seems to be confirmed. They will be launching as a for profit company, see:

For its first four years online, a portion of every mined Zcash coin will go directly to Wilcox’s Zcash company

This could also invoke some legal issues, since they are basically not a decentralid currency and bear in mind they are **US** based (http://www.bizapedia.com/de/THE-ZEROCOIN-ELECTRIC-COIN-COMPANY-LLC.html). Just remember what happened with Ripple.

Basically, with Ring Confidential Transactions included in Monero it's basically pepsi vs coke (thanks to u/smooth_xmr for this analogy), where both have their advantages and disadvantages.

P.S. They are currently only on testnet, the "real-version" is at least 6 months away.

P.P.S. It seems like they transactions are also quit inefficient compared to Monero's. See this description on how to get from the basecoins (the transparent ones) to the zerocoins (anonymous ones):

This operation (called a pour) might take a minute or two depending on your hardware. It is producing a zero-knowledge proof. (This operation's performance will be improved in the coming months.)

Shen Noether (aka NobleSir), who is obviously more knowledgeable about this subject than me, also made a comparison on reddit:

I've done a little bit of comparison in the Ring CT paper / you can also look here for some facts on zcash- there are a few I've seen so far

[1] Setup: Monero (Trustless) vs Zerocash (Must Trust zcash company)

[2] Proof Generation: Monero (100's second ) vs Zcash (1/minute)

[3] Algorithm auditability: Monero (a decent number of people seem to understand ring signatures and confidential transactions) vs Zerocash (I'm not sure how many people actually understand the proofs besides the small group of authors) - although this point is certainly subjective.

[4] Poison-pill attack vulnerability: Monero (attacker would need 51%) vs Zerocash Vulnerable, (see zerocash extended paper section 6.4

[5] Anonymity set: Monero (although the zcash proponents note that a ring signature is a "smaller" anonymity set, they usually don't mention that the stealth address factor actually means that each transaction is masked, whereas the ring signatures provide additional plausible liability, furthermore, since keys appear in different ring signatures in different blocks in time, the anonymity set for when a given key is spent grows infinitely, and could eventually grow larger than the zcash anonymity set at any fixed instant in time) vs Zcash (anonymity set is the entire blockchain )

[6]Anonymous Multisig: Monero (yes! see "written up" link on ring ct sticky, this could make things like lightning potentially possible ) vs Zerocash (?)

[7] Mining: Monero (has it's own strongly decentralized mining process) vs Zerocash protocol from the paper lacks it's own mining (it's essentially just a distributed anonymous database), so there must be another coin which is mined to convert to zerocash tokens

--note that point 4. is an actual potential compromise of anonymity, which contradicts some of the statements the zerocash team has made.
.
Other Differences are slight: Slight differences in transaction size - however Monero transactions should end up being a bit larger when transmitted, but cost less in terms of storage (their eventual block-chain cost will be approximately 32 bytes* (n+1) where n is mixin + epsilon, where epsilon is the current tx size - ring signatures (Note in the recent Ring CT drafts, there is pruning mentioned for the range proofs, see the "written up" link)

https://www.reddit.com/r/Monero/comments/41vg68/monero_vs_zcash_eli5_fundamental_differences/cz63pqw

And:

TPTB_need_war has repeatedly been stating that Zerocash does not need IP obfuscation and therefore is not subject to I2P/TOR, which are, in his opinion, flawed.

However, it seems like Zerocash actually needs IP obfuscation as well and they seem to go with TOR, see -> https://twitter.com/ioerror/status/689958030859960321

I took out this excerpt from the discussion in this thread -> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1139756.msg13623846#msg13623846 (starting point).

Look way back in 2014 when you launched Monero, I told you smooth and fluffypony that IP address correlation was the weakness. Fluffypony proceed to try to integrate I2P. I warned you all many times that was not an adequate direction. But you wouldn't listen.

I2P, and even somewhat Tor, is perceived as adequate by 99% of the market. The remaining 1% may be smarter but isn't obviously much of a market at all. Very niche-y.

By the speculators because they are clueless.

But the corporations do not use darknets. They want privacy on the block chain, like we have disk encryption. Mention dark nets, illegal drug trade, etc, and they won't touch it with a 100 foot pole.

I would guess that many corporations do use Tor now for certain things. I2P will be integrated and invisible. No one will know or care how it works, except that the obvious network level vulnerabilities having to do with broadcasting transactions will be removed, and it will pass routine (though not intelligence agency level) technical muster for being private sufficient to satisfy most of the market. That's my opinion, and you are welcome to disagree.

Zerocash still needs IP obfuscation for a lot of private usages in practice too. They acknowledge it in the paper.

Zerocash does not need IP obfuscation when all the transactions are in the private zerocoins. Cite the section of the paper. I think you must be misunderstanding something. You are probably conflating the use of the regular non-anonymous coins mentioned in the paper.

Here you are making excuses again. Corporations are not going to trust unprovable shit. And moreover, mixnets are always vulnerable to flood attacks. They are very, very unreliable. Not only do I disagree, but I also think you are ignoring basic fundamental realities about the technologies.

Edit: arguing for Tor/I2P is akin to arguing for Dash's off chain mixing. Now look in the mirror and remember your arguments for End-to-End Principled ring sigs (versus off chain mixing) and realize the same logic applies to why Zerocash is superior to using off chain mixnets. Hypocrite.

Edit#2: okay I see the section you are referring to:

6.4 Additional anonymity considerations
Zerocash only anonymizes the transaction ledger. Network trac used to announce transactions,
retrieve blocks, and contact merchants still leaks identifying information (e.g., IP addresses). Thus
users need some anonymity network to safely use Zerocash. The most obvious way to do this is
via Tor [DMS04]. Given that Zerocash transactions are not low latency themselves, Mixnets (e.g.,
Mixminion [DDM03]) are also a viable way to add anonymity (and one that, unlike Tor, is not as
vulnerable to trac analysis). Using mixnets that provide email-like functionality has the added
benet of providing an out-of-band notication mechanism that can replace
Receive
.
Additionally, although in theory all users have a single view of the block chain, a powerful
attacker could potentially fabricate an additional block
solely
for a targeted user. Spending any
coins with respect to the updated Merkle tree in this \poison-pill" block will uniquely identify the
targeted user. To mitigate such attacks, users should check with trusted peers their view of the
block chain and, for sensitive transactions, only spend coins relative to blocks further back in the
ledger (since creating the illusion for multiple blocks is far harder).

I will need to understand this attack better. Seems to me they are saying that you need to spend from a block where your pour transaction was the only transaction in the block. But the user would I think know this and thus not spend the coin any more. Thus I believe the anonymity remains provable without the use of any mixnet. I will need to understand this more deeply to be sure.

Bear in mind that I2P will be integrated in Monero, but you can always choose to run Monero over TOR if you want.

[Hueristic]

Recommend an exchange for New York residents barred from plx?

Move. Alternatively, consider relocating.

Actually, after looking a bit, it appears that bittrex.com has applied for a BitLicense. Volume is quite low (~5 BTC) on the XMR market, but I'm sure some tasty bids would attract more sell-side liquidity (or buy-side dumping).

Recommend an exchange for New York residents barred from plx?

Bittrex is another one.

Sad that NY consistently chooses banning over freedom, even to the point of a 20oz soda.

That's just New York City, rather than the whole state, but agree nonetheless.

Can you use a proxy to access the poloniex?

Sure you could, and in fact you don't have to provide address info for the lowest tier of Poloniex verification (limited to $2000/day withdraw). However if you keep money there you'd be constantly at risk of them potentially asking for more ID in the future. I've not heard of it happening but the risk is there. If I was a NY resident, its not a chance I'd like to take.

They won't let me withdraw anything without a scanned id and a pic of myself holing said id. I only have 15xmr on there so fuck them.

[woodenships]

Join a lottery pool with Monero!

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1336615.msg13636364#msg13636364

Hello! I apologize for the noob account, but it ultimately felt like the right thing to do.

I have started a lottery pool service. You send me monero, I buy lottery tickets. If we win, I turn the cash into monero and send it back to you.

The primary website is lotteryconnect.i2p , and for those needing to inproxy, lotteryconnect.i2p.xyz

Enjoy!

[smooth]

Join a lottery pool with Monero!

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1336615.msg13636364#msg13636364

Hello! I apologize for the noob account, but it ultimately felt like the right thing to do.

I have started a lottery pool service. You send me monero, I buy lottery tickets. If we win, I turn the cash into monero and send it back to you.

The primary website is lotteryconnect.i2p , and for those needing to inproxy, lotteryconnect.i2p.xyz

Enjoy!

Just a reminder that anonymous newbies asking you to send them money are usually a scam. No guarantees in any particular case, so make up your own mind.

[vokain]

Join a lottery pool with Monero!

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1336615.msg13636364#msg13636364

Hello! I apologize for the noob account, but it ultimately felt like the right thing to do.

I have started a lottery pool service. You send me monero, I buy lottery tickets. If we win, I turn the cash into monero and send it back to you.

The primary website is lotteryconnect.i2p , and for those needing to inproxy, lotteryconnect.i2p.xyz

Enjoy!

Just a reminder that anonymous newbies asking you to send them money are usually a scam. No guarantees in any particular case, so make up your own mind.

Much better odds at monerodice.net :p

[wpalczynski]

Join a lottery pool with Monero!

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1336615.msg13636364#msg13636364

Hello! I apologize for the noob account, but it ultimately felt like the right thing to do.

I have started a lottery pool service. You send me monero, I buy lottery tickets. If we win, I turn the cash into monero and send it back to you.

The primary website is lotteryconnect.i2p , and for those needing to inproxy, lotteryconnect.i2p.xyz

Enjoy!

[woodenships]

Join a lottery pool with Monero!

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1336615.msg13636364#msg13636364

Hello! I apologize for the noob account, but it ultimately felt like the right thing to do.

I have started a lottery pool service. You send me monero, I buy lottery tickets. If we win, I turn the cash into monero and send it back to you.

The primary website is lotteryconnect.i2p , and for those needing to inproxy, lotteryconnect.i2p.xyz

Enjoy!

Just a reminder that anonymous newbies asking you to send them money are usually a scam. No guarantees in any particular case, so make up your own mind.

Much better odds at monerodice.net :p

Yes, these are obvious things to consider. But for 5 XMR... take a chance? Well, its impossible to ultimately convince you without defeating the entire purpose of the noob account, and the stupid lottery tickets have a state on them. Oh well. Internet privacy + trust is hard.

[vokain]

Join a lottery pool with Monero!

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1336615.msg13636364#msg13636364

Hello! I apologize for the noob account, but it ultimately felt like the right thing to do.

I have started a lottery pool service. You send me monero, I buy lottery tickets. If we win, I turn the cash into monero and send it back to you.

The primary website is lotteryconnect.i2p , and for those needing to inproxy, lotteryconnect.i2p.xyz

Enjoy!

Just a reminder that anonymous newbies asking you to send them money are usually a scam. No guarantees in any particular case, so make up your own mind.

Much better odds at monerodice.net :p

Yes, these are obvious things to consider. But for 5 XMR... take a chance? Well, its impossible to ultimately convince you without defeating the entire purpose of the noob account, and the stupid lottery tickets have a state on them. Oh well. Internet privacy + trust is hard.

Expected values in probability are relatively easier