mountainview
|
|
April 29, 2014, 03:41:09 AM |
|
anyone can tell me the hashrate of 7950 or 280? my number a bit weird, not sure if it is correct.
EDIT: saw above the 7950 is 81.5Mh/s...
BTW, jackpot is 6 mil, impressive, what's the max jackpot?
|
|
|
|
jpcsupport
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
|
|
April 29, 2014, 03:51:01 AM |
|
anyone can tell me the hashrate of 7950 or 280? my number a bit weird, not sure if it is correct.
EDIT: saw above the 7950 is 81.5Mh/s...
BTW, jackpot is 6 mil, impressive, what's the max jackpot?
Max Jackpot will keep going up, maximum is 100,000,000 coins And, it will increasing more quickly via time. For the jackpot, I am mining also ^^
|
|
|
|
valley365
|
|
April 29, 2014, 04:17:04 AM |
|
anyone can tell me the hashrate of 7950 or 280? my number a bit weird, not sure if it is correct.
EDIT: saw above the 7950 is 81.5Mh/s...
BTW, jackpot is 6 mil, impressive, what's the max jackpot?
Max Jackpot will keep going up, maximum is 100,000,000 coins And, it will increasing more quickly via time. For the jackpot, I am mining also ^^ max jackpot is 1000x, so 1000x 100K = 100 million. Current jackpot is 6.1 mil.
|
|
|
|
Spoetnik
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1011
FUD Philanthropist™
|
|
April 29, 2014, 05:50:58 AM |
|
i think got some POS stake and to the guy earlier who asked about the TC tweaking.. i am a bit late to the game when it comes to mining on x11 and x13 algo's but i noticed you will often have far lower memory usage (dedicated) on your gpu for those algo's why i don't know maybe a cgminer implementation issue..i have not looked at the sgminer code but i have on cudaminer and as soon as i use settings too high for cudaminer the ram usage drop like a rock even though it may look like it's hashing at far faster speeds.. So TC being tied to the ram usage seems to be in my experience a scrypt or scypt-n thing.. But i just what i said earlier as my rough method of setting up sgminer for all algo's. I mean if that is is high as it can go then well yeah then that is it lol quality not quantity when hashing.. if you see 1 HW error CHANGE your settings.. from my experience that means your pushing it too far and you will almost certainly benefit from lowering your settings. pushing it too far will give more errors and lower the submitted shares and lower overall hash speed. more is not better always.. and WU (Work Utility) is a tricky thing a bit it's largely based on luck of the pool (or your wallet/daemon or what ever) what that means is if your using some reasonable settings then WU should be random luck from the pool.. BUT if your settings are really shitty that will affect it ALSO + luck so take WU with a bit of a grain salt kind of.. sorry about the last long winded reply about miner tweaking people i noticed a lot of spelling errors and i can't see too good pretty much (mainly my PC setup to blame)
|
FUD first & ask questions later™
|
|
|
mountainview
|
|
April 29, 2014, 06:32:48 AM |
|
anyone can tell me the hashrate of 7950 or 280? my number a bit weird, not sure if it is correct.
EDIT: saw above the 7950 is 81.5Mh/s...
BTW, jackpot is 6 mil, impressive, what's the max jackpot?
Max Jackpot will keep going up, maximum is 100,000,000 coins And, it will increasing more quickly via time. For the jackpot, I am mining also ^^ max jackpot is 1000x, so 1000x 100K = 100 million. Current jackpot is 6.1 mil. 100 millions! Impressive... who will be the lucky guy?
|
|
|
|
otila
|
|
April 29, 2014, 06:36:20 AM |
|
If that exchange was for real, I would buy over 600 LTC for less than 0.01621 BTC/LTC..
|
|
|
|
mountainview
|
|
April 29, 2014, 07:41:21 AM |
|
Do we have a mining pool yet?
|
|
|
|
Spoetnik
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1011
FUD Philanthropist™
|
|
April 29, 2014, 07:42:22 AM |
|
Do we have a mining pool yet?
just wait until after the fork...
|
FUD first & ask questions later™
|
|
|
Mikellev
|
|
April 29, 2014, 07:44:18 AM |
|
Do we have a mining pool yet?
just wait until after the fork... another fork ??
|
|
|
|
ig0tik3d
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1246
Merit: 1000
|
|
April 29, 2014, 08:38:37 AM |
|
Do we have a mining pool yet?
just wait until after the fork... another fork ?? from 6000 block
|
|
|
|
JackpotCoin (OP)
|
|
April 29, 2014, 09:47:41 AM |
|
If that exchange was for real, I would buy over 600 LTC for less than 0.01621 BTC/LTC.. I removed it from OP!
|
|
|
|
djm34
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050
|
|
April 29, 2014, 10:36:13 AM |
|
If that exchange was for real, I would buy over 600 LTC for less than 0.01621 BTC/LTC.. the beta testing of alcurex (with free coins) looks more real than this exchange
|
djm34 facebook pageBTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
|
|
|
|
mamaspaliLa
Member
Offline
Activity: 116
Merit: 10
|
|
April 29, 2014, 12:17:36 PM Last edit: April 29, 2014, 12:37:11 PM by mamaspaliLa |
|
miner not have connection for my pool. O_o wtf? 3.7.2 cgminer work and accepted shares and blocks, but info in mpos not see, cron worked fine
|
|
|
|
AizenSou
|
|
April 29, 2014, 12:40:39 PM |
|
miner not have connection for my pool. O_o wtf? 3.7.2 cgminer work and accepted shares and blocks, but info in mpos not see, cron worked fine You manage a pool? Then post the address for us to test.
|
|
|
|
mamaspaliLa
Member
Offline
Activity: 116
Merit: 10
|
|
April 29, 2014, 12:43:27 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
Mikellev
|
|
April 29, 2014, 12:57:54 PM |
|
Did you fix the 88 byte block header in stratum ?
|
|
|
|
mamaspaliLa
Member
Offline
Activity: 116
Merit: 10
|
|
April 29, 2014, 01:00:33 PM |
|
Did you fix the 88 byte block header in stratum ?
in coin_jackpotcoin.class.php protected $target_bits = 88; this?
|
|
|
|
AizenSou
|
|
April 29, 2014, 01:04:11 PM |
|
ccminer can't connect to your pool. You use another stratum protocol ?
|
|
|
|
mamaspaliLa
Member
Offline
Activity: 116
Merit: 10
|
|
April 29, 2014, 01:08:12 PM Last edit: April 29, 2014, 01:21:27 PM by mamaspaliLa |
|
We are trying to deal with the problem
we need normal stratum-mining for this coin. and update for mpos
|
|
|
|
|