Bitcoin Forum
November 10, 2024, 07:09:35 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 28.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 [261] 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 ... 360 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN][JPC]MAKE JACKPOTCOIN GREAT AGAIN!  (Read 470270 times)
Karma.ITM
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 126
Merit: 100


View Profile
June 27, 2014, 04:57:04 PM
 #5201

The Jackpot payout from Dwarfpool has been processed and should have reached miner's offline wallets by now. (as of this post, approx 20mins ago)

The finder got a nice 21,395,283jpc  Cool

http://dwarfpool.com/jpc/address?wallet=JJxo9qvQu23C8eAXwHaR7SypW81W2e4NLj
kebabman
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 655
Merit: 504


You wan chili saus?


View Profile
June 27, 2014, 05:03:17 PM
 #5202

My jackpot payout seems to be stuck on confirmed but not on balance at DwarfPool. Has anyone else not been paid yet?

Not only it was stuck for almost 3 hours I had at first  around 50000 but then they took away 20000 and then payed me.  Angry Angry

You're welcome to come join us at Hash@Me if you're unhappy. Tongue
Atrides
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 658
Merit: 500


Admin of DwarfPool.com


View Profile WWW
June 27, 2014, 05:03:43 PM
Last edit: June 27, 2014, 07:25:27 PM by Atrides
 #5203

My jackpot payout seems to be stuck on confirmed but not on balance at DwarfPool. Has anyone else not been paid yet?

Not only it was stuck for almost 3 hours I had at first  around 50000 but then they took away 20000 and then payed me.  Angry Angry

It was wrongly calculated for block 316214 (that block belongs to the other pool, just confirmation-block for jackpot).
In that case half of miner didn't get anything at all, while the other half would get much more than they "earned".

After that I recalculated the jackpot-reward for the right jackpot-block 316213.
All miners got reward proportional send shares between blocks 316173 and 316213, that means, the calculation of all your shares for ca.10 minutes before next immature block(316213), it is fair !

So you can check your payout:

jackpot reward is 43046721 JPC, you have 0.072% (in the reality 0.072*2, but -50% for winner)
0.072371337331849% from 43046721 is 31153.48766520988317129
0.0724%*2 = 0.1448% that equal your regular payment for "normal" blocks

Very sorry for delay, but I think the most important is that it done right, fair and honestly. Please, not forget, it was the first jackpot I had to share. Thank you for your understanding!


DwarfPool Quality you can trust! http://DwarfPool.com Reliable Monero, Zcash and ETH Pool Monero Proxy
Anonymous pool with failover servers and PPS, Profit Calculator and Price chart: [XMR][ETH][ZEC]... Support thread
MoneroClub - free P2P Exchange Platform www.MoneroClub.com
labestia
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 86
Merit: 10


View Profile
June 27, 2014, 05:07:40 PM
 #5204

zimstake catching up on Mintpal voting guys  Roll Eyes
xojex
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 111
Merit: 10


View Profile
June 27, 2014, 05:43:57 PM
 #5205

https://www.mintpal.com/voting#JPC

Cmon guys Vote. If we hit mintpal on monday. It will be like Jackpot.
There is already 9 BTC at voting address. LOL  (whales are in)
https://blockchain.info/address/1LQkvAdfwkwKgmSurzUtjyp9gtbd9wZaE8
I predict that those who put 9BTC to the voting will be really pissed off when jpc will get back to 3sat  Grin

All previous voted in coins (xmr, myc, enc, itc, meth, yc, xxl, 365) all have something in common right now...will be interesting if ours breaks the trend. The smart ones will know the action.

Sorry guys, the coin has some issues that are keeping new investors from participating. Dev could resolve them in under 5 minutes, but is silent or absent.  This is a pure pump and dump move, a poorly timed one at that. Hell, it was polo for 2 weeks with virtually zero activity. Why would anyone think that the addition to MP now would change investors views? I understand the allure of being selected for being top rank, I just feel were leaving a ton of money on the table by jumping the gun.

Litoshi
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 700
Merit: 500

Member of the Crypti Foundation Board of Directors


View Profile
June 27, 2014, 05:46:11 PM
 #5206

The Jackpot payout from Dwarfpool has been processed and should have reached miner's offline wallets by now. (as of this post, approx 20mins ago)

The finder got a nice 21,395,283jpc  Cool

http://dwarfpool.com/jpc/address?wallet=JJxo9qvQu23C8eAXwHaR7SypW81W2e4NLj

That is AROUND 6.3 btc OR $3700usd

labestia
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 86
Merit: 10


View Profile
June 27, 2014, 05:54:43 PM
 #5207

https://www.mintpal.com/voting#JPC

Cmon guys Vote. If we hit mintpal on monday. It will be like Jackpot.
There is already 9 BTC at voting address. LOL  (whales are in)
https://blockchain.info/address/1LQkvAdfwkwKgmSurzUtjyp9gtbd9wZaE8
I predict that those who put 9BTC to the voting will be really pissed off when jpc will get back to 3sat  Grin

All previous voted in coins (xmr, myc, enc, itc, meth, yc, xxl, 365) all have something in common right now...will be interesting if ours breaks the trend. The smart ones will know the action.

Sorry guys, the coin has some issues that are keeping new investors from participating. Dev could resolve them in under 5 minutes, but is silent or absent.  This is a pure pump and dump move, a poorly timed one at that. Hell, it was polo for 2 weeks with virtually zero activity. Why would anyone think that the addition to MP now would change investors views? I understand the allure of being selected for being top rank, I just feel were leaving a ton of money on the table by jumping the gun.



what issues specifically are you referring to?  honest noob trying to learn question
guitarplinker
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1694
Merit: 1024



View Profile WWW
June 27, 2014, 06:09:01 PM
 #5208

Damn I wish people would use AllCrypt more, it's so much nicer to trade on than Bittrex. For all it's fanciness the UI on Bittrex is really slow and clunky, and it sucks not being able to set priority orders.  Sad
AllCrypt has barely any volume though, there are very few buy orders compared to Bittrex.
kebabman
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 655
Merit: 504


You wan chili saus?


View Profile
June 27, 2014, 06:14:33 PM
 #5209

Damn I wish people would use AllCrypt more, it's so much nicer to trade on than Bittrex. For all it's fanciness the UI on Bittrex is really slow and clunky, and it sucks not being able to set priority orders.  Sad
AllCrypt has barely any volume though, there are very few buy orders compared to Bittrex.

I know, that's what I'm saying, it deserves to have more volume. I would much rather use it than Bittrex.
xojex
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 111
Merit: 10


View Profile
June 27, 2014, 06:59:45 PM
 #5210


what issues specifically are you referring to?  honest noob trying to learn question

I think the biggest turnoff to investors is the stated total number of coins at around 30 billion. Big investors see just 30B in the OP specs and they don't bother looking any further.

A more accurate description has been put forth at 7 billion. 5 billion from POW, plus 2 billion from reward and 2 years of POS. So far we've mined around 53% of the 7 billion available to us. The remaining 23 billion would come from staking spread out over 25 years. If the dev made an edit to the original post reflecting this, we would likely see more participation from investors and thus a higher valuation.

Lack of a polished brand image also hinders growth. Need to stand out from the crowd to get noticed and be taken seriously. Can't expect merchants and casinos to adopt this coin if it looks like amateurs are running the show. Investor understand this as well.
Litoshi
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 700
Merit: 500

Member of the Crypti Foundation Board of Directors


View Profile
June 27, 2014, 07:01:16 PM
 #5211

Damn I wish people would use AllCrypt more, it's so much nicer to trade on than Bittrex. For all it's fanciness the UI on Bittrex is really slow and clunky, and it sucks not being able to set priority orders.  Sad
AllCrypt has barely any volume though, there are very few buy orders compared to Bittrex.

I know, that's what I'm saying, it deserves to have more volume. I would much rather use it than Bittrex.

AllCrypt has more coins than a Roman Fountain.  Thats the problem.  Too many different coins.  Also, they dont have the auto-sell auto-buy feature ala Cryptsy.  

I use Allcrypt, but dont like it.  

Litoshi
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 700
Merit: 500

Member of the Crypti Foundation Board of Directors


View Profile
June 27, 2014, 07:04:14 PM
 #5212


what issues specifically are you referring to?  honest noob trying to learn question

I think the biggest turnoff to investors is the stated total number of coins at around 30 billion. Big investors see just 30B in the OP specs and they don't bother looking any further.

A more accurate description has been put forth at 7 billion. 5 billion from POW, plus 2 billion from reward and 2 years of POS. So far we've mined around 53% of the 7 billion available to us. The remaining 23 billion would come from staking spread out over 25 years. If the dev made an edit to the original post reflecting this, we would likely see more participation from investors and thus a higher valuation.

Lack of a polished brand image also hinders growth. Need to stand out from the crowd to get noticed and be taken seriously. Can't expect merchants and casinos to adopt this coin if it looks like amateurs are running the show. Investor understand this as well.

If the dev would hire a big name to push this coin, it would help.  I suggest Peter Schiff, David Morgan, or Jim Sinclair.

xojex
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 111
Merit: 10


View Profile
June 27, 2014, 07:15:30 PM
 #5213



If the dev would hire a big name to push this coin, it would help.  I suggest Peter Schiff, David Morgan, or Jim Sinclair.

You think Goldman Sachs or Stanley Morgan might have time for us this weekend? Time is short... Grin
atomrigs
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 282
Merit: 250



View Profile
June 27, 2014, 08:59:05 PM
 #5214


what issues specifically are you referring to?  honest noob trying to learn question

I think the biggest turnoff to investors is the stated total number of coins at around 30 billion. Big investors see just 30B in the OP specs and they don't bother looking any further.

A more accurate description has been put forth at 7 billion. 5 billion from POW, plus 2 billion from reward and 2 years of POS. So far we've mined around 53% of the 7 billion available to us. The remaining 23 billion would come from staking spread out over 25 years. If the dev made an edit to the original post reflecting this, we would likely see more participation from investors and thus a higher valuation.

Lack of a polished brand image also hinders growth. Need to stand out from the crowd to get noticed and be taken seriously. Can't expect merchants and casinos to adopt this coin if it looks like amateurs are running the show. Investor understand this as well.

I also suggested to change the total coins to 7B, not 30B. It is really critical for the new investors.
Also other professional designers already sent all new image files to Jackpotcoin. Please change the images on this op first.
kebabman
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 655
Merit: 504


You wan chili saus?


View Profile
June 27, 2014, 09:32:59 PM
 #5215


what issues specifically are you referring to?  honest noob trying to learn question

I think the biggest turnoff to investors is the stated total number of coins at around 30 billion. Big investors see just 30B in the OP specs and they don't bother looking any further.

A more accurate description has been put forth at 7 billion. 5 billion from POW, plus 2 billion from reward and 2 years of POS. So far we've mined around 53% of the 7 billion available to us. The remaining 23 billion would come from staking spread out over 25 years. If the dev made an edit to the original post reflecting this, we would likely see more participation from investors and thus a higher valuation.

Lack of a polished brand image also hinders growth. Need to stand out from the crowd to get noticed and be taken seriously. Can't expect merchants and casinos to adopt this coin if it looks like amateurs are running the show. Investor understand this as well.

I also suggested to change the total coins to 7B, not 30B. It is really critical for the new investors.
Also other professional designers already sent all new image files to Jackpotcoin. Please change the images on this op first.

+1

Where is the OP user?  Undecided
guitarplinker
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1694
Merit: 1024



View Profile WWW
June 27, 2014, 09:52:07 PM
 #5216

Damn I wish people would use AllCrypt more, it's so much nicer to trade on than Bittrex. For all it's fanciness the UI on Bittrex is really slow and clunky, and it sucks not being able to set priority orders.  Sad
AllCrypt has barely any volume though, there are very few buy orders compared to Bittrex.

I know, that's what I'm saying, it deserves to have more volume. I would much rather use it than Bittrex.

AllCrypt has more coins than a Roman Fountain.  Thats the problem.  Too many different coins.  Also, they dont have the auto-sell auto-buy feature ala Cryptsy.  

I use Allcrypt, but dont like it.  
That's true as well... They've picked up some coins with absolutely no support.

ex. Nutcoin
allcrypt
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 350
Merit: 250


View Profile WWW
June 27, 2014, 11:00:53 PM
Last edit: June 27, 2014, 11:49:20 PM by allcrypt
 #5217

Damn I wish people would use AllCrypt more, it's so much nicer to trade on than Bittrex. For all it's fanciness the UI on Bittrex is really slow and clunky, and it sucks not being able to set priority orders.  Sad
AllCrypt has barely any volume though, there are very few buy orders compared to Bittrex.

I know, that's what I'm saying, it deserves to have more volume. I would much rather use it than Bittrex.

AllCrypt has more coins than a Roman Fountain.  Thats the problem.  Too many different coins.  Also, they dont have the auto-sell auto-buy feature ala Cryptsy.  

I use Allcrypt, but dont like it.  

So having TOO many coins is a problem HOW?

If you don't want to trade a coin, you just don't trade a coin. There's no requirement.

Too many on the screen and on the menus? Use the 'hide inactive coins' feature.  Still seeing crap you don't want to see? Hide all but the ones you want to.

Autosell? We HAVE autosell.

It's amazing, I'd say about 90% of the features people email us asking for, or complain on forums we don't have (without ever contacting us to ask for it) we actually DO have. The features aren't hidden either. And if you can't find something you think SHOULD be there - we have a FAQ that actually has all that information in it.

As to keb's comment about the priority orders - about time someone noticed how powerful that is. What? You don't know what that is?

Long version: https://allcrypt.zendesk.com/hc/en-us/articles/201039940-What-is-a-Priority-Order-

Short version: JPC is trading at a high volume - and you want to buy before the price goes up (or sell before the price goes down), but want to do it now, not after the 3.7 BTC in trades stacked up on it go through. Use a priority order. You cut in front of the line. Your trade happens BEFORE the others do. Sure, you could just list at a lower price to 'go first' but then how much BTC are you losing? Or maybe it's sitting at a 33 sat buy and a 34 sat sell. Sure, 1 satoshi isnt the end of the world, but if you're selling off a 21 million JPC jackpot you just got, thats .21 BTC, about $100.

Anyway, we HAVE the features that most people want and other sites dont have. Just no one stays around long enough to USE them.

Weeks ago we had a few 50+ BTC volume days with JPC. We can obviously handle the volume.

Then it dropped to nothing. Because bittrex listed it. NOT because bittrex is BETTER, but because, bittrex listed it.

Over 70 million JPC was withdrawn from AllCrypt last night when the price at bittrex started going up.

AllCrypt has no volume because you guys use the other sites, usually for a reason no better than "its better", and if asked why, there's no real answer.

We're faster, we have more features, we have more OPTIONS, we pay attention to user needs, we are active in the coin's forums, we have support that responds (although sometimes rudely if it's me at the keyboard and the requestor is a moron Wink quickly, we have more security features than any other site (that, I might add, a shockingly few number of you actually use) - yet - we're losing to bittrex

Why? Because our site is ugly? I don't buy that. Craigslist is the most bare bones website out there and is THE #1 classifieds site on the net.

We're losing because bittrex and mintpal are bittrex and mintpal. They got there first. Not because they are better.

Our new coin shorting, margin trading, and liquidity investment (with hourly interest payments), as well as a de-uglification of the site is, hopefully, rolling out soon. A wallet server memory failure set us back a week cleaning up the mess.

Not that I think offering features that kick the shit out of every other exchange out there will matter. So far, it hasn't seemed to.

This isn't a whine or a rant - it's more of me trying to figure out just why the heck the better, more involved, more responsive site is losing to the guys who could care less.

Mintpal? Really? I saw earlier in the thread (I read this daily) that the donation wallet was up to 9 BTC. NINE BITCOIN. Over FIVE THOUSAND DOLLARS. Just to LIST JPC.

We listed JPC FIRST. And didn't ask for a penny.

But, just keep paying Mintpal. Do you really think those votes arent played with? Do you honesty think that Mintpal doesnt see BTC donations come in, and oh no... you just missed it... keep voting, keep donating, maybe next time...

When THEY control when a coin is added, but then say "Pay us money, and more money, and more money" to get it on... and still it waits... Do you HONESTLY think that's NOT fishy? You're paying for votes because they are making more money on votes than they are on JPC volume. If JPC traded at 100 BTC a day on there, it'd take them 45 days of solid 100 BTC a day volume to equal the 9 BTC you guys have paid them. They are making more money off you guys WANTING to get it listed than they would if they DID list it. Your BTC donations are INCENTIVE to NOT list the coin. I'd never list the coin either - until it became more profitable TO list it.

Nevermind the BTC fight between JPC and ZEIT fighting for that top spot. Ka-ching!

Hmm. List JPC and stop the money train... or let them keep paying. For nothing. Paying for the chance to do, on mintpal, what you're already doing on bittrex, or could be doing on AllCrypt, and WERE DOING, WEEKS AGO, for free.

That seems ok?

But, when JPC finally gets on there, the rest of the JPC on deposit at AllCrypt will be withdrawn to be moved to MintPal, because, hey, it has higher volume.

Except if you CHOSE to trade on AllCrypt, we WOULD have the volume.

Other than 'the site is ugly' and 'low volume' I havent heard a single good reason why bittrex and mintpal are better. We have low volume because ya'll decided to make sure we have low volume.

Don't go bitching about something you guys did Wink I cant make anyone trade on AllCrypt.

Sorry for that wall of text. The site, and cryptocurrency, is something I am personally deeply passionate about. I didn't build AllCrypt.com to make money. I built it because the other sites sucked hard in one way or another (or 10), and I knew I could do it better.

We have the speed, features, security and responsiveness that I believe rivals all the other sites.

We're just missing you guys. Question is - how to convince ya'll of that.

Ed
AllCrypt.com Admin

AllCrypt.com - Your new CryptoCurrency Exchange Now Open! www.AllCrypt.com
RavenXBR
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 140
Merit: 100


View Profile
June 27, 2014, 11:46:12 PM
 #5218

The Jackpot payout from Dwarfpool has been processed and should have reached miner's offline wallets by now. (as of this post, approx 20mins ago)

The finder got a nice 21,395,283jpc  Cool

http://dwarfpool.com/jpc/address?wallet=JJxo9qvQu23C8eAXwHaR7SypW81W2e4NLj

Already received my part of Jackpot at Dwarfpool...  Cheesy
ltcnim
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 914
Merit: 1001



View Profile
June 27, 2014, 11:49:32 PM
 #5219

I think most people think that listing a coin on mintpal will attract buyers there who don't have (or maybe don't want) an account on other trading sites. I'm not sure if that works out, but I think it's believable that potential investors would rather use "their" exchange than registering on another one. It's also true that there's a lot more BTC on MP than on other exchanges (maybe cryptsy has more, haven't checked).

I personally like allcrypt, because it's pretty fast and easy to use. I don't trade that often to be honest, but I'd say I use the exchanges equally Smiley

smulork
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 19
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 28, 2014, 01:23:10 AM
 #5220

As predicted, people are just dumping everything they have after jackpot found...

Shame people dont believe on this coin.
Pages: « 1 ... 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 [261] 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 ... 360 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!