Vann
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 05, 2014, 08:53:33 AM |
|
SCAM, FIRST 140 BLOCKS MINED BEFORE WALLET WAS RELEASED HERE:getblockhash 140 000005ed74d6164f0fec8c970d2c7362916734d027ff859f44cfa3aa3276e9a3 getblock 000005ed74d6164f0fec8c970d2c7362916734d027ff859f44cfa3aa3276e9a3 ... "time" : 1399053600, ... that's 18:00 GMT, you can check it by yourself on http://www.epochconverter.com/ No, noo, nooo it's not SCAM it's you just too vigilant! Dev just get impatient at waiting for launch, empty pools and so on and he decided in ecitment to mine a little bit coins! Let's forgive and forget, anyway did you thought this copy coin has future? so was it premined or not? Chinese shitcoin instamine scam. ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2F9ywfbyl.jpg%5D&t=665&c=8KXqRoryuBQQMw)
|
|
|
|
svetliopi44
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 05, 2014, 09:02:23 AM |
|
140 block = 3.5 million coins. If this is true .... the current price is about 1 BTC. I think it's not a tragedy.
|
|
|
|
azhago
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 05, 2014, 09:04:02 AM |
|
Yes, I want to know. 140 block = 3.5 million coins.
3.5M/500 = 0.007% of total coin. Don't think it's a premine, but instamining, probably. Anyway, it's a very low amount of the total.
|
|
|
|
ibfragalot
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 05, 2014, 09:10:08 AM |
|
PINK IS AWESOME! ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) I wish there were more coins like this. It's the most profitable mining coin there is right now PLUS it costs 50% less power to mine. AND... POW+PoS... AND it mines quickly!! LOVE IT, well done dev, even if you did put in a sneaky start (like 99% of coins)
|
|
|
|
gr8n8
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 05, 2014, 09:32:16 AM |
|
Yes, I want to know. 140 block = 3.5 million coins.
3.5M/500 = 0.007% of total coin. Don't think it's a premine, but instamining, probably. Anyway, it's a very low amount of the total. ur maths is wrong it's 0.7% of the coins
|
|
|
|
kaliostro
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 05, 2014, 09:38:29 AM |
|
bigman, have any news about new Exchanges?
|
|
|
|
orpington
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 05, 2014, 09:42:29 AM |
|
0.7% premine not too bad really ![Tongue](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/tongue.gif)
|
|
|
|
azhago
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 05, 2014, 09:47:02 AM |
|
sorry for the bad calculation, i must drink my second coffee right now.
0.7 is much bigger, but nothing dramatic. Is there a way to see were did the first block go?
|
|
|
|
Vann
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 05, 2014, 09:53:27 AM |
|
sorry for the bad calculation, i must drink my second coffee right now.
0.7 is much bigger, but nothing dramatic. Is there a way to see were did the first block go?
The ANN says 0% premine. Do you really beieve they stopped mining at block 140? There are also reports chinese farms are raping x11 coins with FPGA miners. I don't know about you, but I'm not mining a coin knowing i'm getting dicked by chinese!.Too many PoS shitcoins out already.
|
|
|
|
azhago
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 05, 2014, 09:58:02 AM |
|
There are also reports chinese farms are raping x11 coins with FPGA miners Chineese gpu farm, yes, surely, but fpga ? It cost higher to make/use fpga than GPU. Nothing unfair if gpufarm rape the coin, unfortunately for little miners like us. If i had ton of fpga, i'll go on DRK, not a coin without confirmed success. Did someone look at the source ? (i'm not competent to)
|
|
|
|
Vann
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 05, 2014, 10:19:03 AM |
|
There are also reports chinese farms are raping x11 coins with FPGA miners Chineese gpu farm, yes, surely, but fpga ? It cost higher to make/use fpga than GPU. Nothing unfair if gpufarm rape the coin, unfortunately for little miners like us. If i had ton of fpga, i'll go on DRK, not a coin without confirmed success. Did someone look at the source ? (i'm not competent to) http://elinux.org/Parallella_HardwareOnly $99 for a board with both a Parallella manycore and Xilinx Zynq 7010 or 7020 FPGA...
|
|
|
|
azhago
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 05, 2014, 10:33:00 AM |
|
There are also reports chinese farms are raping x11 coins with FPGA miners Chineese gpu farm, yes, surely, but fpga ? It cost higher to make/use fpga than GPU. Nothing unfair if gpufarm rape the coin, unfortunately for little miners like us. If i had ton of fpga, i'll go on DRK, not a coin without confirmed success. Did someone look at the source ? (i'm not competent to) http://elinux.org/Parallella_HardwareOnly $99 for a board with both a Parallella manycore and Xilinx Zynq 7010 or 7020 FPGA... And the hashrate is ?? As i know (but i'm not a specialist at all), the hashrate is pretty low. It's cheaper to use GPU. On a fpga board, you can reach 400MH/s with SHA256. A R9 280x do much more than that if i remember well (and if i'm wrong, i'll buy fpga instead of gpu!)
|
|
|
|
cryptohunter
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2100
Merit: 1167
MY RED TRUST LEFT BY SCUMBAGS - READ MY SIG
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 05, 2014, 10:35:04 AM |
|
0.7% premine not too bad really ![Tongue](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/tongue.gif) Instamined scam shit, 140 block before release then another 150 blocks before anyone had downloaded, virus scanned, conf, bat it was a shit scam coin, let it die
|
|
|
|
Vann
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 05, 2014, 11:10:00 AM |
|
There are also reports chinese farms are raping x11 coins with FPGA miners Chineese gpu farm, yes, surely, but fpga ? It cost higher to make/use fpga than GPU. Nothing unfair if gpufarm rape the coin, unfortunately for little miners like us. If i had ton of fpga, i'll go on DRK, not a coin without confirmed success. Did someone look at the source ? (i'm not competent to) http://elinux.org/Parallella_HardwareOnly $99 for a board with both a Parallella manycore and Xilinx Zynq 7010 or 7020 FPGA... And the hashrate is ?? As i know (but i'm not a specialist at all), the hashrate is pretty low. It's cheaper to use GPU. On a fpga board, you can reach 400MH/s with SHA256. A R9 280x do much more than that if i remember well (and if i'm wrong, i'll buy fpga instead of gpu!) Depends on the board but FPGA's are far more efficient: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=49180.980X11 has some 1.8GH and 1.2GH FPGA miners around. How many GPU's you need for that, LOL: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=556277.0
|
|
|
|
azhago
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 05, 2014, 11:29:10 AM |
|
There are also reports chinese farms are raping x11 coins with FPGA miners Chineese gpu farm, yes, surely, but fpga ? It cost higher to make/use fpga than GPU. Nothing unfair if gpufarm rape the coin, unfortunately for little miners like us. If i had ton of fpga, i'll go on DRK, not a coin without confirmed success. Did someone look at the source ? (i'm not competent to) http://elinux.org/Parallella_HardwareOnly $99 for a board with both a Parallella manycore and Xilinx Zynq 7010 or 7020 FPGA... And the hashrate is ?? As i know (but i'm not a specialist at all), the hashrate is pretty low. It's cheaper to use GPU. On a fpga board, you can reach 400MH/s with SHA256. A R9 280x do much more than that if i remember well (and if i'm wrong, i'll buy fpga instead of gpu!) Depends on the board but FPGA's are far more efficient: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=49180.980X11 has some 1.8GH and 1.2GH FPGA miners around. How many GPU's you need for that, LOL: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=556277.0FPGA implementation of SHA algo (keccak, groestl etc.. all part of X11) is not new. But why didn't we see bunch of seller with FPGA with X11 ready (or even groestl, keccak etc) I read your links : 50KH/s with scrypt. It's just a proof of concept, not economicaly usuable. X11 has some 1.8GH and 1.2GH FPGA miners around Where ? Any evidence of that other than conspiracy theory? (if yes, again, i will buy some...)
|
|
|
|
Vann
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 05, 2014, 11:44:00 AM |
|
There are also reports chinese farms are raping x11 coins with FPGA miners Chineese gpu farm, yes, surely, but fpga ? It cost higher to make/use fpga than GPU. Nothing unfair if gpufarm rape the coin, unfortunately for little miners like us. If i had ton of fpga, i'll go on DRK, not a coin without confirmed success. Did someone look at the source ? (i'm not competent to) http://elinux.org/Parallella_HardwareOnly $99 for a board with both a Parallella manycore and Xilinx Zynq 7010 or 7020 FPGA... And the hashrate is ?? As i know (but i'm not a specialist at all), the hashrate is pretty low. It's cheaper to use GPU. On a fpga board, you can reach 400MH/s with SHA256. A R9 280x do much more than that if i remember well (and if i'm wrong, i'll buy fpga instead of gpu!) Depends on the board but FPGA's are far more efficient: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=49180.980X11 has some 1.8GH and 1.2GH FPGA miners around. How many GPU's you need for that, LOL: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=556277.0FPGA implementation of SHA algo (keccak, groestl etc.. all part of X11) is not new. But why didn't we see bunch of seller with FPGA with X11 ready (or even groestl, keccak etc) I read your links : 50KH/s with scrypt. It's just a proof of concept, not economicaly usuable. X11 has some 1.8GH and 1.2GH FPGA miners around Where ? Any evidence of that other than conspiracy theory? (if yes, again, i will buy some...) There have been reports that FPGA farms exist for x11. The low profitablility of all x11 coins compared to scrypt which already has ASIC miners avaible and the fact that 1GH+ miners are showing up in pools seems to indicate there is more to x11 mining than is being made available, don't you think? Perhaps they are too busy raping the coins to offer them for sale!
|
|
|
|
traumschiff
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1001
180 BPM
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 05, 2014, 11:46:19 AM |
|
There are also reports chinese farms are raping x11 coins with FPGA miners Chineese gpu farm, yes, surely, but fpga ? It cost higher to make/use fpga than GPU. Nothing unfair if gpufarm rape the coin, unfortunately for little miners like us. If i had ton of fpga, i'll go on DRK, not a coin without confirmed success. Did someone look at the source ? (i'm not competent to) http://elinux.org/Parallella_HardwareOnly $99 for a board with both a Parallella manycore and Xilinx Zynq 7010 or 7020 FPGA... And the hashrate is ?? As i know (but i'm not a specialist at all), the hashrate is pretty low. It's cheaper to use GPU. On a fpga board, you can reach 400MH/s with SHA256. A R9 280x do much more than that if i remember well (and if i'm wrong, i'll buy fpga instead of gpu!) Depends on the board but FPGA's are far more efficient: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=49180.980X11 has some 1.8GH and 1.2GH FPGA miners around. How many GPU's you need for that, LOL: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=556277.0FPGA implementation of SHA algo (keccak, groestl etc.. all part of X11) is not new. But why didn't we see bunch of seller with FPGA with X11 ready (or even groestl, keccak etc) I read your links : 50KH/s with scrypt. It's just a proof of concept, not economicaly usuable. X11 has some 1.8GH and 1.2GH FPGA miners around Where ? Any evidence of that other than conspiracy theory? (if yes, again, i will buy some...) PPL who use bold capital letters to make their argument seem more valid are retarded for sure. I stopped reading there after a few rows.
|
|
|
|
azhago
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 05, 2014, 12:08:11 PM |
|
There have been reports that FPGA farms exist for x11 say a lie enough, it will sound like the truth, but still a lie. rumors, no any proof. So, asic for bitcoin and scrypt, fpga for x11 and other algo. What are you mining, i'm curious ? You can go to cpu only coin (but i heard some has gpu miner for them and keep it for themselves..) the fact that 1GH+ miners are showing up in pools Multipool (yes, there are multipool for x11) or stratum low diff hack/exploit. Do some research. A gpu farm with 200MHs or even 400MHs is not unbelievable. "only" 200 to 400 gpu. Search here in mining subforum, you will see plenty. You can even lease some on betarigs ( https://www.betarigs.com/rig/5084 , https://www.betarigs.com/rig/4424 for example) There are many farms that turn into X11, leaving scrypt to their brand new asics. I will keep mining pinkcoin and badger, till end of POW. Nobody force you.
|
|
|
|
Vann
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 05, 2014, 12:29:52 PM |
|
There have been reports that FPGA farms exist for x11 say a lie enough, it will sound like the truth, but still a lie. rumors, no any proof. So, asic for bitcoin and scrypt, fpga for x11 and other algo. What are you mining, i'm curious ? You can go to cpu only coin (but i heard some has gpu miner for them and keep it for themselves..) the fact that 1GH+ miners are showing up in pools Multipool (yes, there are multipool for x11) or stratum low diff hack/exploit. Do some research. A gpu farm with 200MHs or even 400MHs is not unbelievable. "only" 200 to 400 gpu. Search here in mining subforum, you will see plenty. You can even lease some on betarigs ( https://www.betarigs.com/rig/5084 , https://www.betarigs.com/rig/4424 for example) There are many farms that turn into X11, leaving scrypt to their brand new asics. I will keep mining pinkcoin and badger, till end of POW. Nobody force you. LOL, They said the same thing about Scrypt ASIC 'it's just a rumor', even until just a few months ago. I guess nobody is saying that now right? The fact is if you do your research, there are no facts that x11 is any less ASIC resitent than Scrypt was and the fact that x11 makes GPU's more energy efficient also suggests they are not ruining at their maximum potential with the current miners wildly available.
|
|
|
|
azhago
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 05, 2014, 12:40:29 PM |
|
LOL, They said the same thing about Scrypt ASIC 'it's just a rumor', even until just a few months ago. I guess nobody is saying that now right? The fact is if you do your research, there are no facts that x11 is any less ASIC resitent than Scrypt was and the fact that x11 makes GPU's more energy efficient also suggests they are not ruining at their maximum potential with the current miners wildly available.
We talked about FPGA, not asic. FPGA support for SHA coin like groestl, keccak, blake (all component of X11) etc.. exist for a long time. It's just not interessant to mine with it. If you mistake asic and FPGA, well.. ASIC resistent do not mean ASIC proof. It's just not worth to develop asic for X11 at the moment. Nobody will invest millions $ to mine coins that didn't had that marketcap. Asic scrypt come because you have LTC, and also Doge.
|
|
|
|
|