Bitcoin Forum
November 22, 2017, 04:36:26 AM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.15.1  [Torrent].
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Poll
Question: Should "bits" become the standard for merchant pricing, wallets and general usage.
Bitcoin best as the common unit. 0.001234 is ok - 108 (14.1%)
milliBitcoins (thousandths) are best - 90 (11.7%)
Bits (millionths) are best - 570 (74.2%)
Total Voters: 768

Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 [21] 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 »
  Print  
Author Topic: 1,000,000 bits = 1 bitcoin. Future-proofing Bitcoin for common usage? VOTE  (Read 56237 times)
Baitty
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 532

Currently held as collateral by monbux


View Profile
June 21, 2014, 01:08:39 PM
 #401

I don't like this kind of system I think its not needed its pretty simple to understand what 0.00001 means now. No need to bring in a new system which would just confuse existing users.

Currently held as collateral by monbux
1511325386
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1511325386

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1511325386
Reply with quote  #2

1511325386
Report to moderator
Join ICO Now Coinlancer is Disrupting the Freelance marketplace!
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1511325386
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1511325386

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1511325386
Reply with quote  #2

1511325386
Report to moderator
1511325386
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1511325386

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1511325386
Reply with quote  #2

1511325386
Report to moderator
101111
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 526


View Profile
June 21, 2014, 01:14:37 PM
 #402

I don't like this kind of system I think its not needed its pretty simple to understand what 0.00001 means now. No need to bring in a new system which would just confuse existing users.
lol, oh that's really funny, thanks, I love that dry sense of humour,  Grin
Stery
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 119


View Profile
June 21, 2014, 01:19:52 PM
 #403

How many coins are already occupied or mined
DooMAD
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1428



View Profile WWW
June 21, 2014, 01:25:57 PM
 #404

I don't like this kind of system I think its not needed its pretty simple to understand what 0.00001 means now. No need to bring in a new system which would just confuse existing users.

I think most users will be pretty happy, actually.  If you have at least a whole bitcoin, you're officially a bitmillionaire now because you have 1 million bits. 

Dunno for certain if that will ever make us real-world millionaires or not, but it still sounds nice, heh.

Bizmark13
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 434


WikiScams.org - Information about Bitcoin Scams


View Profile
June 21, 2014, 04:52:26 PM
 #405

I like this system. If Bitcoin manages to replace fiat, then 1 bit = $1 USD (circa 2014), a satoshi would be worth about a cent, and those who have one or more whole bitcoins will be millionaires or multimillionaires. Nice and simple.
knightcoin
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 238


Stand on the shoulders of giants


View Profile
June 21, 2014, 05:00:39 PM
 #406

I like this system. If Bitcoin manages to replace fiat, then 1 bit = $1 USD (circa 2014), a satoshi would be worth about a cent, and those who have one or more whole bitcoins will be millionaires or multimillionaires. Nice and simple.

/*just thinking to myself
I was reading bytecoin sourcecode thinking about #pragma once */

http://www.introversion.co.uk/
mit/x11 licence 18.x/16|o|3ffe ::71
RepublicSpace
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 109


View Profile
June 21, 2014, 06:00:34 PM
 #407

And what happens if someone wants to make a physical 'coin' from one of these 'bits'? What do we call that?
phillipsjk
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1008

Let the chips fall where they may.


View Profile WWW
June 21, 2014, 06:24:10 PM
 #408

And what happens if someone wants to make a physical 'coin' from one of these 'bits'? What do we call that?

A microbitcoin or µBTC or mike or XBT.

The "bit" abbreviation in the poll was just thrown in there to confuse people.

James' OpenPGP public key fingerprint: EB14 9E5B F80C 1F2D 3EBE  0A2F B3DE 81FF 7B9D 5160
101111
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 526


View Profile
June 22, 2014, 03:02:44 AM
 #409

And what happens if someone wants to make a physical 'coin' from one of these 'bits'? What do we call that?
Bits.

Context is king and language evolves.
bg002h
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358


I outlived my lifetime membership:)


View Profile WWW
June 22, 2014, 03:15:28 AM
 #410


This is brilliant. Mike Caldwell, are you seeing this? Can you make some square 100 bits Casascius coins?

Hardfork aren't that hard.
1GCDzqmX2Cf513E8NeThNHxiYEivU1Chhe
rext
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 210



View Profile WWW
June 22, 2014, 04:08:52 AM
 #411

wafer mode?

BurtW
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2086

All paid signature campaigns should be banned.


View Profile WWW
June 22, 2014, 05:38:40 PM
 #412

Ok 1 bitcoin @ current USD $585.00, you are losing $58.50 USD using this (.000001 or bit) idea, If you don't understand this, then may the force be with you.

This is flat out wrong and a lie.

Please enlighten me with an intellegent rebuttal. I'm sorry buddy, I know the truth hurts. We are not going away anytime soon!!
I will try one more time to explain this to you using your own example.  I have lined up the decimal points so maybe you can see what everyone is talking about.  Forget the idea of naming the microbitcoin "one bit".  Let's see if you can understand this much because this post contains nothing new or controversial.  In your example 1 bitcoin = $585.00.  Therefore:

Code:
1 bitcoin      = 1.00000000 BTC = $585.00
1 millibitcoin = 0.00100000 BTC =   $0.585
1 microbitcoin = 0.00000100 BTC =   $0.000585
1 satoshi      = 0.00000001 BTC =   $0.00000585

Does that make sense to you now?  I am still at a loss as to why very simple math upsets you so much.  Now given this post above and just forget that a few people want to possibly create a shorthand name for the microbitcoin, please explain how anyone would lose anything whether they do transactions in bitcoins, millibitcoins, microbitcoins or satoshis.

Our family was terrorized by Homeland Security.  Read all about it here:  http://www.jmwagner.com/ and http://www.burtw.com/  Any donations to help us recover from the $300,000 in legal fees and forced donations to the Federal Asset Forfeiture slush fund are greatly appreciated!
BitAddict
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1190


DoctorBitcoin


View Profile
June 22, 2014, 06:32:11 PM
 #413

+1 for bits.
Using bitcoin is weird for small transactions like 0.00327
zimmah
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 896



View Profile
June 22, 2014, 09:29:42 PM
 #414

+1 for bits.
Using bitcoin is weird for small transactions like 0.00327

i hate how people fail to see the difference between two statements

Statement 1) We need a name for 0.000001 Bitcoin
Statement 2) The name should be 'bit'

I (and many others) agree with statement 1

I (and many others) do NOT agree with statement 2.
wonkytonky
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 409

iota the future


View Profile
June 22, 2014, 09:32:38 PM
 #415

+1 bits

bitfinex discount code : FvwrZ545k2
LucasCambon
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 6


View Profile
June 22, 2014, 11:09:27 PM
 #416

Good
TimS
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 247


View Profile WWW
June 23, 2014, 02:18:14 AM
 #417

I voted for the millibit/mBTC option. Why? Because at the current value, and since I'm used to dealing with figures in USD, it makes the most sense. (by thinking in millibits, I can easily see figures like 0.019 BTC ~= $10, 0.5 BTC ~= $300, 0.0000132 BTC is insignificant, etc) If bitcoins become more valuable, we might move to microBTC/uBTC/bits (which is just a lousy word for microBTC - the metric system was invented for a reason!), satoshi, or nanoBTC/nBTC (if the protocol changes to allow values so small). Someone in Japan might prefer to see uBTC today, because they're used to dealing with the larger numbers in Yen.
We don't need just one standard abbreviation, but options are good. Flexibility is good, as long as we always have a straightforward way to convert back to a basic unit, i.e. bitcoins. Fixing into one unit besides bitcoins, or trying to imagine that bits is always going to be the "right" unit is silly.
Cicero2.0
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 98

★☆★Bitin.io★☆★


View Profile
June 23, 2014, 03:21:01 AM
 #418

This is an excellent idea. It is a lot easier to wrap your brain around buying 1000 bits instead of a row of zeros following a decimal point.

666uazan
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 41


View Profile
June 23, 2014, 09:33:23 AM
 #419

I think bits make perfect sense. If everyone that agrees starts using that by default when posting we should slowly start to move everyone over. For example, did you know you can buy over 2,000 bits for just a dollar?
Ceuri
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 5


View Profile
June 23, 2014, 09:48:37 AM
 #420

Why bits? Because people are conditioned since birth to think of prices as whole numbers. There's a reason retailers price their goods and services at $19.99, $24.95, $99, etc.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 [21] 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!