Bitcoin Forum
December 15, 2024, 09:38:35 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 28.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Poll
Question: Should "bits" become the standard for merchant pricing, wallets and general usage.
Bitcoin best as the common unit. 0.001234 is ok - 108 (14.1%)
milliBitcoins (thousandths) are best - 90 (11.7%)
Bits (millionths) are best - 570 (74.2%)
Total Voters: 768

Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 [23] 24 25 26 27 »
  Print  
Author Topic: 1,000,000 bits = 1 bitcoin. Future-proofing Bitcoin for common usage? VOTE  (Read 57143 times)
nahtnam
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1092
Merit: 1000


nahtnam.com


View Profile WWW
June 23, 2014, 06:28:37 PM
 #441

Congratulations! Smiley

http://blog.coinbase.com/post/89405189782/its-bits

bananaControl
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 322
Merit: 250


Decentralize All The Things!


View Profile
June 23, 2014, 10:21:57 PM
 #442


Uhm, hate to say it, but you're about 4 days too late Wink
nahtnam
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1092
Merit: 1000


nahtnam.com


View Profile WWW
June 23, 2014, 11:02:55 PM
 #443


Uhm, hate to say it, but you're about 4 days too late Wink

Coinbase's newsletter is about 4 days late.

zimmah
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1106
Merit: 1005



View Profile
June 23, 2014, 11:06:58 PM
 #444

I suspect that as with many things, the Americans will use their quirky unit, while the rest of the world will simply use the metric system.


I vote for the banana scale
serje
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1232
Merit: 1002



View Profile
August 02, 2014, 06:22:51 PM
 #445

What's wrong with the 0.00024512BTC option?

I like it this way ... because it's easier to know how much we are talking about ... you just need to see if there are 8 numbers after period ... not like other sites that use 11 numbers after period ....

Space for rent if its still trending
franky1
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 4438
Merit: 4821



View Profile
August 02, 2014, 06:29:24 PM
 #446

What's wrong with the 0.00024512BTC option?

I like it this way ... because it's easier to know how much we are talking about ... you just need to see if there are 8 numbers after period ... not like other sites that use 11 numbers after period ....

you at a bar and after your 6th pint the barman says "that will be zero point zero zero zero two four five one two please"
. you try typing in 0.00024512 blurred vision so you cant really count the number of 0 you typed into your phone. also when the barman is trying to shout over the loud music the total.. did you hear him should 3 or 4 zero's. was the four before or after the five.


now imagine it "thats two hundred and fourty five bits and 12sats"
instead of typing in 245.12

I DO NOT TRADE OR ACT AS ESCROW ON THIS FORUM EVER.
Please do your own research & respect what is written here as both opinion & information gleaned from experience. many people replying with insults but no on-topic content substance, automatically are 'facepalmed' and yawned at
serje
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1232
Merit: 1002



View Profile
August 02, 2014, 06:30:21 PM
 #447

What's wrong with the 0.00024512BTC option?

I like it this way ... because it's easier to know how much we are talking about ... you just need to see if there are 8 numbers after period ... not like other sites that use 11 numbers after period ....

you at a bar and after your 6th pint the barman says "that will be zero point zero zero zero two four five one two please"
. you try typing in 0.00024512 blurred vision so you cant really count the number of 0 you typed into your phone. also when the barman is trying to shout over the loud music the total.. did you hear him should 3 or 4 zero's. was the four before or after the five.


now imagine it "thats two hundred and fourty five bits and 12sats"
instead of typing in 245.12

Seriously why can't he give me a qr code to scan?Huh

Space for rent if its still trending
Gimpeline
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 555
Merit: 507



View Profile
August 02, 2014, 06:42:49 PM
 #448

What's wrong with the 0.00024512BTC option?

I like it this way ... because it's easier to know how much we are talking about ... you just need to see if there are 8 numbers after period ... not like other sites that use 11 numbers after period ....

you at a bar and after your 6th pint the barman says "that will be zero point zero zero zero two four five one two please"
. you try typing in 0.00024512 blurred vision so you cant really count the number of 0 you typed into your phone. also when the barman is trying to shout over the loud music the total.. did you hear him should 3 or 4 zero's. was the four before or after the five.


now imagine it "thats two hundred and fourty five bits and 12sats"
instead of typing in 245.12

Problem is with a name on every decimal he would have to say "thats 2 whateverdecimalname 4whateverdecimalname 5 whateverdecimalname 1 whateverdecimalname and 2 sats" to be acurate
serje
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1232
Merit: 1002



View Profile
August 02, 2014, 06:45:04 PM
 #449

What's wrong with the 0.00024512BTC option?

I like it this way ... because it's easier to know how much we are talking about ... you just need to see if there are 8 numbers after period ... not like other sites that use 11 numbers after period ....

you at a bar and after your 6th pint the barman says "that will be zero point zero zero zero two four five one two please"
. you try typing in 0.00024512 blurred vision so you cant really count the number of 0 you typed into your phone. also when the barman is trying to shout over the loud music the total.. did you hear him should 3 or 4 zero's. was the four before or after the five.


now imagine it "thats two hundred and fourty five bits and 12sats"
instead of typing in 245.12

Problem is with a name on every decimal he would have to say "thats 2 whateverdecimalname 4whateverdecimalname 5 whateverdecimalname 1 whateverdecimalname and 2 sats" to be acurate

I think it will be easier for everyone to know that there are 8 numbers after decimal point .... rather than converting a lot of stuff ...


Space for rent if its still trending
franky1
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 4438
Merit: 4821



View Profile
August 02, 2014, 07:19:08 PM
Last edit: August 02, 2014, 07:50:48 PM by franky1
 #450

What's wrong with the 0.00024512BTC option?

I like it this way ... because it's easier to know how much we are talking about ... you just need to see if there are 8 numbers after period ... not like other sites that use 11 numbers after period ....

you at a bar and after your 6th pint the barman says "that will be zero point zero zero zero two four five one two please"
. you try typing in 0.00024512 blurred vision so you cant really count the number of 0 you typed into your phone. also when the barman is trying to shout over the loud music the total.. did you hear him should 3 or 4 zero's. was the four before or after the five.


now imagine it "thats two hundred and fourty five bits and 12sats"
instead of typing in 245.12

Problem is with a name on every decimal he would have to say "thats 2 whateverdecimalname 4whateverdecimalname 5 whateverdecimalname 1 whateverdecimalname and 2 sats" to be acurate

I think it will be easier for everyone to know that there are 8 numbers after decimal point .... rather than converting a lot of stuff ...


ask a friend to try and remember:
zero point zero zero zero two four five point one two

and then ask another friend to try and remember
two hundred and fourty five point twelve

wait 3 hours. and ask them to tell you what they can remember. repeat th test 10 times on different people or swap the two people around offering them different numerics, but in same formats and you will find the people offered the numbers in bits format will hear it, understand/interpret it easier to be able to remember. meaning bit format as oppose to multiple decimal, is easier to handle

I DO NOT TRADE OR ACT AS ESCROW ON THIS FORUM EVER.
Please do your own research & respect what is written here as both opinion & information gleaned from experience. many people replying with insults but no on-topic content substance, automatically are 'facepalmed' and yawned at
nahtnam
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1092
Merit: 1000


nahtnam.com


View Profile WWW
August 02, 2014, 07:25:06 PM
 #451

What's wrong with the 0.00024512BTC option?

I like it this way ... because it's easier to know how much we are talking about ... you just need to see if there are 8 numbers after period ... not like other sites that use 11 numbers after period ....

you at a bar and after your 6th pint the barman says "that will be zero point zero zero zero two four five one two please"
. you try typing in 0.00024512 blurred vision so you cant really count the number of 0 you typed into your phone. also when the barman is trying to shout over the loud music the total.. did you hear him should 3 or 4 zero's. was the four before or after the five.


now imagine it "thats two hundred and fourty five bits and 12sats"
instead of typing in 245.12

Problem is with a name on every decimal he would have to say "thats 2 whateverdecimalname 4whateverdecimalname 5 whateverdecimalname 1 whateverdecimalname and 2 sats" to be acurate

I think it will be easier for everyone to know that there are 8 numbers after decimal point .... rather than converting a lot of stuff ...


ask a friend to try and remember:
zero point zero zero zero two four five one two please

and then ask another friend to try and remember
two hundred and fourty five point twelve

wait 3 hours. and ask them to tell you what they can remember. repeat th test 10 times on different people or swap the two people around offering them different numerics, but in same formats and you will find the people offered the numbers in bits format will hear it, understand/interpret it easier to be able to remember. meaning bit format as oppose to multiple decimal, is easier to handle

I am actually with serje. I dont think the bartender is actually going to say anything. IRL he would probably generate a QR code on the phone/computer and tell the customer to scan it. The customer can then just check to make sure its roughly correct and send the money.

franky1
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 4438
Merit: 4821



View Profile
August 02, 2014, 07:59:00 PM
 #452

I am actually with serje. I dont think the bartender is actually going to say anything. IRL he would probably generate a QR code on the phone/computer and tell the customer to scan it. The customer can then just check to make sure its roughly correct and send the money.

ok you people ignore the technology of bitcoin. my analogy is about the ease of understanding numbers, again which is easier to say, to be heard, to understand AND/OR be read

ignore it being bitcoin. lets say you are having a conversation with someone and they owe you gold, carrots, potato's whatever

is it easier to say
0.00024512 of a tonne of gold
or
245.12 bits of gold

for the recipent. if he is being told by someone, is it easier to HEAR
0.00024512 of a tonne of gold
or
245.12 bits of gold

and for typing on a keyboard is it easier to TYPE

0.00024512 of a tonne of gold
or
245.12 bits of gold

and for transacting, is it easier to transact
0.00024512 of a thousand dollar bill
or
245.12 bits a micropenny

as for the drunk customer and the bar scenario, if the drunk man was to only receive a QR code and try to read the screen to check that the value seems right. which is easier to read with blurred vision
0.00024512 bitcoin
or
245.12 bits

I DO NOT TRADE OR ACT AS ESCROW ON THIS FORUM EVER.
Please do your own research & respect what is written here as both opinion & information gleaned from experience. many people replying with insults but no on-topic content substance, automatically are 'facepalmed' and yawned at
Bitcoin Hitter
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 14
Merit: 0


View Profile
August 02, 2014, 09:40:30 PM
 #453

I am actually with serje. I dont think the bartender is actually going to say anything. IRL he would probably generate a QR code on the phone/computer and tell the customer to scan it. The customer can then just check to make sure its roughly correct and send the money.

ok you people ignore the technology of bitcoin. my analogy is about the ease of understanding numbers, again which is easier to say, to be heard, to understand AND/OR be read

ignore it being bitcoin. lets say you are having a conversation with someone and they owe you gold, carrots, potato's whatever

is it easier to say
0.00024512 of a tonne of gold
or
245.12 bits of gold

for the recipent. if he is being told by someone, is it easier to HEAR
0.00024512 of a tonne of gold
or
245.12 bits of gold

and for typing on a keyboard is it easier to TYPE

0.00024512 of a tonne of gold
or
245.12 bits of gold

and for transacting, is it easier to transact
0.00024512 of a thousand dollar bill
or
245.12 bits a micropenny

as for the drunk customer and the bar scenario, if the drunk man was to only receive a QR code and try to read the screen to check that the value seems right. which is easier to read with blurred vision
0.00024512 bitcoin
or
245.12 bits

interesting but from money come from ?
serje
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1232
Merit: 1002



View Profile
August 02, 2014, 09:42:26 PM
 #454

I am actually with serje. I dont think the bartender is actually going to say anything. IRL he would probably generate a QR code on the phone/computer and tell the customer to scan it. The customer can then just check to make sure its roughly correct and send the money.

ok you people ignore the technology of bitcoin. my analogy is about the ease of understanding numbers, again which is easier to say, to be heard, to understand AND/OR be read

ignore it being bitcoin. lets say you are having a conversation with someone and they owe you gold, carrots, potato's whatever

is it easier to say
0.00024512 of a tonne of gold
or
245.12 bits of gold

for the recipent. if he is being told by someone, is it easier to HEAR
0.00024512 of a tonne of gold
or
245.12 bits of gold

and for typing on a keyboard is it easier to TYPE

0.00024512 of a tonne of gold
or
245.12 bits of gold

and for transacting, is it easier to transact
0.00024512 of a thousand dollar bill
or
245.12 bits a micropenny

as for the drunk customer and the bar scenario, if the drunk man was to only receive a QR code and try to read the screen to check that the value seems right. which is easier to read with blurred vision
0.00024512 bitcoin
or
245.12 bits

I always say twenty-four thousand five hundred twelve and I instantly know that a number that is thousand has 5 digits and only need to have 3 zeros ahead ... so yeah it's easier for me to remember just this one simple little thing rather then use 2 or 3 names for bitcoins .... it's like I awlays have to convert kilometers to miles

Space for rent if its still trending
phillipsjk
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1008
Merit: 1001

Let the chips fall where they may.


View Profile WWW
August 04, 2014, 03:52:08 AM
 #455

I always say twenty-four thousand five hundred twelve and I instantly know that a number that is thousand has 5 digits and only need to have 3 zeros ahead ... so yeah it's easier for me to remember just this one simple little thing rather then use 2 or 3 names for bitcoins .... it's like I awlays have to convert kilometers to miles

PSA: For the metric system, you divide/multiply by multiples of 10 for conversions. The result is that you simply move the decimal place to where it is most convenient.

It appears that people used to the imperial system expect the conversions to be more complicated than that for some reason (the original reddit post advocating "bits" instead of "mikes" specifically mentioned conversion difficulty as well).

Quote from: bitcoin_bits on reddit
We need to lose the sci-prefixes. No one wants your micro anything. People want cents and pennies, not micro dollars. We aren't in a lecture theatre, we're trying to buy class-A drugs, guns and morally questionable porn (i kid, i kid!).

The average person doesn't remember how many decimal places the conversion is to this or that unit, and i don't want a test in long division every time i try to buy some alpaca socks.

James' OpenPGP public key fingerprint: EB14 9E5B F80C 1F2D 3EBE  0A2F B3DE 81FF 7B9D 5160
harrymmmm
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 576
Merit: 503


View Profile
August 04, 2014, 04:43:04 AM
 #456

Even with the rigged polls (not even offering the 'mike/micro' option), this debate still rages?

I gotta say it looks like the 'bit'wits have won, but I'll still use millies and mike/micros for clarity.

MasterOwel
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 98
Merit: 10

Life is my dream, what is yours?


View Profile
August 08, 2014, 02:03:07 AM
 #457

I think this is a beautiful idea. And the psycology of it might make users feel better with themselves, as it is a larger number than currently used. (This would make people feel as if they have more). Doing something like this might also encourage people to randomly tip bitcoin to people in order to spread the currency.
solex (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1078
Merit: 1006


100 satoshis -> ISO code


View Profile
August 08, 2014, 02:22:32 AM
 #458

I think this is a beautiful idea. And the psycology of it might make users feel better with themselves, as it is a larger number than currently used. (This would make people feel as if they have more). Doing something like this might also encourage people to randomly tip bitcoin to people in order to spread the currency.

Yep. And Reddit leads the way...

http://www.reddit.com/user/changetip

bitcoinanon
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 71
Merit: 10


The way of the future...


View Profile
August 08, 2014, 03:32:00 AM
 #459

Is this going to happen soon? Im sure if this is a standard feature of the bitcoin core other developments will follow suit like electrum and mycelium etc.
e1ghtSpace
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1554
Merit: 1001


Crypto since 2014


View Profile WWW
August 08, 2014, 03:33:46 AM
 #460

This sounds so much better. I hope bits have as much value as cents in the future.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 [23] 24 25 26 27 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!