I can understand. Quasar is economically superior.
I don't give a damn about the monero quasar fight , but you said the word "economically". Now can you explain this a bit , how this coins is "economically" superior to the other one , or if it's superior to bitcoin?
In regards to coin supply, QCN has extremely low inflation. At this rate, Appx 6500 coins mined per day. MRO has 30,000 coins mined a day.
The mining is also designed to transition smoothly over time instead of rapidly dropping the block reward.
That is the
basis for the claim.
1) It's 24k a day and dropping.
2) The only major difference is that we get high inflation now but low inflation later whilst you get low inflation now and high inflation later.
3) Some thoughts:
You can't call Monero an insta-mine (If we changed the emission curve now then you probably could, but this will never happen). A lot of people know about Monero, old timers in Bitcoin, the troll box on Poloniex, so no one is being left out. The situation with Bytecoin was different, someone mined the same diff for two years undercover (look at Bytecoin block difficulty, they are the same from block 5,000 to 400,000), no new added hashpower.
At the moment the rarity of QCN is it's attraction.
Consider this: if it takes a couple of years for any one of the CryptoNote coins to begin it's descent into reaching mainstream with Bitcoin, then Monero will look more attractive at that time because the inflation will begin to drop off, in contrast QCN will not be dropping off and you will encounter the current problems Monero faces, except it'll be in several years during your main adoption phase.
Thing is, you can easily argue both ways, I have personally been for and against the Monero emission curve and have changed stance quite a lot whilst working out the numbers.
The way you could look at it is like this: If one of these CryptoNote coins becomes mainstream in a month and the world starts using it as a sister currency to Bitcoin, then perhaps QCN will seem more attractive because the early adopters are not being diluted as much. However, if the mainstream adoption phase happens in a couple of years, the inflation of Monero will start to look more attractive in contrast to QCN.
Regarding the economics of coin release, if you come to the conclusion that it's certain that QCN or MRO has the best economics then you're probably wrong.
It's almost an art and a science, hence the different projects trying different things.
I like to discuss this stuff, but when you, Johncitizen, are so sure of your position it shows how little you actually know.
