|
MCOnyx
|
 |
June 18, 2014, 04:24:52 PM |
|
Good to hear, thanks for explanation and your hard work.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
gpools
|
|
June 18, 2014, 04:28:14 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OracionSeis (OP)
|
|
June 18, 2014, 04:38:46 PM |
|
Is there a stable GUI wallet for QCN? BBR has a decent one.
I'll publish a MAC-wallet review today. |
Time off to sleep ... (￣︶￣)~
|
|
|
HashInvest
Full Member
 Offline
Activity: 143
Merit: 100
Pools: XMR.HashInvest.net
|
|
June 18, 2014, 04:42:55 PM |
|
Mandatory update
Folks, download updating binaries! You should replace daemon&wallet files in the folder. Don't delete the '.bin' & 'bin.keys' files!
Temporary solved the issue with transaction.
Thanks, Pool updated and running latest release as always.http://qcn.hashinvest.net / EU |
|
|
|
|
gpools
|
|
June 18, 2014, 04:46:02 PM |
|
Done update latest version.
|
|
|
|
|
|
sleepdog
|
|
June 18, 2014, 05:30:15 PM |
|
About an error with transaction size
This error is common in all coins based on the CryptoNote protocol. There's no special bug-fix for now.
Each particular wallet has it's own maximum transaction size which depends on received inputs. Wallet selects inputs randomly until it reaches the transaction limit. The more inputs, the larger the size of the transaction.
Actually it's a pool's problem - they send a lot of small transactions. The open-source pool code is a bit lame and it isn’t fixable.
Any workaround for this? Will you get a new size limit if you re-open the wallet or refresh? Wallet selects inputs randomly for each transaction. Simply you can type a command again (and again). The limit doesn't change, no matter how many times I try to send. Mine hasn't for two days now, with old version and the one just released, always it's 24400 and I can only send 1 at a time...  |
|
|
|
|
crz
Member
Offline
Activity: 116
Merit: 10
|
|
June 18, 2014, 10:17:10 PM |
|
Fix works, thank you! :-) |
Branding/Graphics, UI/UX Designer, Front/Back-end Developer. (IRC (freenode): crz)
|
|
|
adhitthana
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1000
|
|
June 19, 2014, 12:40:44 AM
Last edit: June 19, 2014, 01:34:47 AM by adhitthana |
|
While we wait for the team to be announced it might be worth looking at what one (perhaps highly regarded) poster here had to say about Monero. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=624223.msg6923973#msg6923973MRO (Monero)
Okay, there was a reason why I wrote on alts. Cause I have just made my first altcoin investment ever! Monero has a trait which pretty much all other alts lack: slow and geometrically decreasing issuance. At present, only 5% of MRO is mined, and even after 4 years there will still be 20% left to be mined. There is no premine, and the community consists of several people Smiley Furthermore, it is at least currently a CPU coin, since the hashing algorithm is designed to make it difficult to implement for GPU let alone ASIC. These things make it "fair" so that there is no way to amass large stashes except by working for them in the competitive mining or buying in the open market.
The market for the coin is very active and extremely liquid. There was an OTC market in the beginning. MRO was listed in Poloniex 5 days ago and the reception has been good. It has been the most traded coin ever since despite having a market cap of only 1-3 M$! Up to 10% of the outstanding MRO changes hands daily in Poloniex, mitigating the extreme volatility that is plaguing many alts with concentrated ownership.
And now comes the main point: The coin has a feature, which is not implementable in Bitcoin - privacy! It is called CryptoNote, and means that all transactions are mixed in a protocol level. This is imo the most advanced privacy that is currently found in crypto universe, although I am sure that some disagree and let them teach me how I am wrong Wink
The coin is probably circulating quite widely already. New mining is about 30kMRO per day (BTC180), which is about $100k (!) and the price is rising (despite that). This is not a pump and dump coin, because the inflation takes care that new coins are constantly coming to the market. A word of warning though - the market cap may seem lucratively small, but the total issuance of MRO is 20 times the current, which is a little less than that of BTC. Therefore it is easy to compare the relative valuations by just comparing the prices. At 0.006 BTC currently, MRO is not the cheapest coin around (1:166 of BTC). I would advice to not buy hastily, and not participate in bubbles (if any). Mining is also an option.
This is the first altcoin I bought, and I did it during the time when it had been listed in the exchange. My relative position is less than in BTC though, so if only one remains, I would still do better if it is BTC Smiley This same person seems to be negative on QCN (from other comments in the thread). Yet if QCN can come up with a credible team, one must wonder about's chances compared to Monero. Monero definitely seems to have a good head start, but it's early days.  I wonder if anyone would like to comment on QCN compared to Monero as far as the specs mentioned here go? |
|
|
|
|
adhitthana
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1000
|
|
June 19, 2014, 01:25:31 AM |
|
MRO has a solution which I disliked worse then the bug fix. If your transaction isn't transferred within 24h it's returned to your wallet. But it's impossible to trace it since you're not notified. This is harmful for businesses that work with MRO (and potentially QCN).
I'm working on the reward bug and problem with transactions.
Good work. |
|
|
|
|
restless
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1151
Merit: 1001
|
|
June 19, 2014, 07:50:56 AM |
|
Is there a way to "unlock" coins stuck in a wallet because they were achived in small amounts?
In one of my wallets atm I have 4 coins, and max amount i'm able to send with ~ 10 attempts is 0.1...
If i keep retrying and sending small amounts is there hope that dust will be sent, or it will continue accumulating and I'll be better simply closing this wallet?
|
|
|
|
|
dengzw
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 11
Merit: 0
|
|
June 19, 2014, 08:21:19 AM |
|
Anyone can tell me how to find transaction information and transaction id (TxID)?
|
|
|
|
|
arielbit
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3416
Merit: 1059
|
|
June 19, 2014, 08:59:40 AM |
|
Anyone can tell me how to find transaction information and transaction id (TxID)?
simplewallet.log |
|
|
|
|
polecrab
Member
Offline
Activity: 68
Merit: 10
|
|
June 19, 2014, 12:01:06 PM
Last edit: June 21, 2014, 12:47:53 PM by polecrab |
|
I've been mining at http://qcn.cryptity.com/ since yesterday and paid less then 1/10 what I expect based on hashrate and blocks discovered. EDIT: coins turned up late, better late than never . |
|
|
|
|
crz
Member
Offline
Activity: 116
Merit: 10
|
|
June 19, 2014, 12:49:21 PM |
|
I've been mining at http://qcn.cryptity.com/ since yesterday and paid less then 1/10 what I expect based on hashrate and blocks discovered. Same here - Still they got msg in the header "On June 17th some payments failed! Working on a solution. Thanks for your patience." |
Branding/Graphics, UI/UX Designer, Front/Back-end Developer. (IRC (freenode): crz)
|
|
|
pfo
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 27
Merit: 0
|
|
June 19, 2014, 01:44:56 PM
Last edit: June 19, 2014, 02:24:07 PM by pfo |
|
can someone suggest me a good reliable pool for qcn... im mining so far with 3.5khs @ http://qcnpool.org/ but on 3 block foundd all 3 orphan.... is there something more stable ? I installed the latest Quazarcoin software on http://qcnpool.org and unleashed some hash power on it. It looks much better now, but I think that the problem really is that any CryptoNote pool will only work well if it has enough miners / hash power. One of the most stable pools for QCN is currently http://minin.gs/qcn, at one point their Pool Hash Rate was higher than the Network Hash Rate (no clue how that can happen). Posted from Bitcointa.lk - #XVikHGuO7c6JTZWU |
|
|
|
|
|
ciocgun
|
|
June 19, 2014, 02:02:29 PM
Last edit: June 19, 2014, 02:25:40 PM by ciocgun |
|
I've done the update..
but the lost money where are?
|
|
|
|
q327K091
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1792
Merit: 1010
|
|
June 19, 2014, 03:49:41 PM |
|
While we wait for the team to be announced it might be worth looking at what one (perhaps highly regarded) poster here had to say about Monero. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=624223.msg6923973#msg6923973MRO (Monero)
Okay, there was a reason why I wrote on alts. Cause I have just made my first altcoin investment ever! Monero has a trait which pretty much all other alts lack: slow and geometrically decreasing issuance. At present, only 5% of MRO is mined, and even after 4 years there will still be 20% left to be mined. There is no premine, and the community consists of several people Smiley Furthermore, it is at least currently a CPU coin, since the hashing algorithm is designed to make it difficult to implement for GPU let alone ASIC. These things make it "fair" so that there is no way to amass large stashes except by working for them in the competitive mining or buying in the open market.
The market for the coin is very active and extremely liquid. There was an OTC market in the beginning. MRO was listed in Poloniex 5 days ago and the reception has been good. It has been the most traded coin ever since despite having a market cap of only 1-3 M$! Up to 10% of the outstanding MRO changes hands daily in Poloniex, mitigating the extreme volatility that is plaguing many alts with concentrated ownership.
And now comes the main point: The coin has a feature, which is not implementable in Bitcoin - privacy! It is called CryptoNote, and means that all transactions are mixed in a protocol level. This is imo the most advanced privacy that is currently found in crypto universe, although I am sure that some disagree and let them teach me how I am wrong Wink
The coin is probably circulating quite widely already. New mining is about 30kMRO per day (BTC180), which is about $100k (!) and the price is rising (despite that). This is not a pump and dump coin, because the inflation takes care that new coins are constantly coming to the market. A word of warning though - the market cap may seem lucratively small, but the total issuance of MRO is 20 times the current, which is a little less than that of BTC. Therefore it is easy to compare the relative valuations by just comparing the prices. At 0.006 BTC currently, MRO is not the cheapest coin around (1:166 of BTC). I would advice to not buy hastily, and not participate in bubbles (if any). Mining is also an option.
This is the first altcoin I bought, and I did it during the time when it had been listed in the exchange. My relative position is less than in BTC though, so if only one remains, I would still do better if it is BTC Smiley This same person seems to be negative on QCN (from other comments in the thread). Yet if QCN can come up with a credible team, one must wonder about's chances compared to Monero. Monero definitely seems to have a good head start, but it's early days. I wonder if anyone would like to comment on QCN compared to Monero as far as the specs mentioned here go? too early, collect coins, do not sell |
|
|
|
|
kondiomir
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1568
Merit: 1000
Twitter @Acimirov
|
|
June 19, 2014, 04:18:28 PM |
|
2014-Jun-19 19:09:42.293300 [P2P2]ERROR c:\projects\quazarcoin\contrib\epee\incl
ude\net\levin_protocol_handler_async.h:638 [222.82.65.207:23080 OUT]Failed to do
_send()
2014-Jun-19 19:10:23.823675 [P2P5][sock 700] Some problems at write: An existing
connection was forcibly closed by the remote host:10054
2014-Jun-19 19:10:30.210040 [P2P6]ERROR c:\projects\quazarcoin\contrib\epee\incl
ude\net\abstract_tcp_server2.inl:307 send que size is more than ABSTRACT_SERVER_
SEND_QUE_MAX_COUNT(100), shutting down connection
2014-Jun-19 19:10:30.219041 [P2P6]ERROR c:\projects\quazarcoin\contrib\epee\incl
ude\net\levin_protocol_handler_async.h:515 [115.210.177.178:23080 OUT]Failed to
do_send
2014-Jun-19 19:10:36.837419 [P2P7]ERROR c:\projects\quazarcoin\contrib\epee\incl
ude\net\abstract_tcp_server2.inl:307 send que size is more than ABSTRACT_SERVER_
SEND_QUE_MAX_COUNT(100), shutting down connection
2014-Jun-19 19:15:15.961384 [P2P4]ERROR c:\projects\quazarcoin\contrib\epee\incl
ude\net\abstract_tcp_server2.inl:307 send que size is more than ABSTRACT_SERVER_
SEND_QUE_MAX_COUNT(100), shutting down connection
2014-Jun-19 19:15:15.973385 [P2P4]ERROR c:\projects\quazarcoin\contrib\epee\incl
ude\net\levin_protocol_handler_async.h:515 [115.210.177.178:23080 OUT]Failed to
do_send
2014-Jun-19 19:15:41.527847 [P2P2]ERROR c:\projects\quazarcoin\contrib\epee\incl
ude\net\abstract_tcp_server2.inl:307 send que size is more than ABSTRACT_SERVER_
SEND_QUE_MAX_COUNT(100), shutting down connection
2014-Jun-19 19:15:41.540847 [P2P2]ERROR c:\projects\quazarcoin\contrib\epee\incl
ude\net\levin_protocol_handler_async.h:638 [115.210.177.178:23080 OUT]Failed to
do_send()
2014-Jun-19 19:15:41.550848 [P2P2]ERROR c:\projects\quazarcoin\contrib\epee\incl
ude\net\abstract_tcp_server2.inl:307 send que size is more than ABSTRACT_SERVER_
SEND_QUE_MAX_COUNT(100), shutting down connection
2014-Jun-19 19:15:41.563849 [P2P2]ERROR c:\projects\quazarcoin\contrib\epee\incl
ude\net\levin_protocol_handler_async.h:638 [115.210.177.178:23080 OUT]Failed to
do_send()
2014-Jun-19 19:15:56.299692 [P2P7]ERROR c:\projects\quazarcoin\contrib\epee\incl
ude\net\abstract_tcp_server2.inl:307 send que size is more than ABSTRACT_SERVER_
SEND_QUE_MAX_COUNT(100), shutting down connection
2014-Jun-19 19:15:56.311692 [P2P7]ERROR c:\projects\quazarcoin\contrib\epee\incl
ude\net\levin_protocol_handler_async.h:638 [115.210.177.178:23080 OUT]Failed to
do_send()
2014-Jun-19 19:15:58.739831 [P2P3]ERROR c:\projects\quazarcoin\contrib\epee\incl
ude\net\abstract_tcp_server2.inl:307 send que size is more than ABSTRACT_SERVER_
SEND_QUE_MAX_COUNT(100), shutting down connection
2014-Jun-19 19:15:58.751832 [P2P3]ERROR c:\projects\quazarcoin\contrib\epee\incl
ude\net\levin_protocol_handler_async.h:638 [115.210.177.178:23080 OUT]Failed to
do_send() After the update. And I'm still missing 50 coins  |
|
|
|
|
|
trogdorjw73
|
|
June 19, 2014, 06:20:10 PM |
|
I sent about 10.4 QCN to Poloniex yesterday as a test -- so verify I could transfer the coins properly, basically. Unfortunately, all has not gone well and while their support apparently looked into things and credited one of the deposits, the other six are still missing. Wait, seven deposits? Oh, yeah... I couldn't send one bigger transaction due to the old "too many inputs" problem. So I split it up into seven transactions (I just pressed the up arrow to repeat the last command, though I did generate a new payment ID after the first transfer). Here's the list of commands I used in the wallet: [wallet 1VmHEJ]: transfer 0 1VQpANF1pcKHPRAsZpeyG4jLDd1kbPn32YMeXkr9n8jNFvf8aaJdecB3FyAvo7X1DWJDQt3nii9eUTP5kJSfRpL5AwT72FM 1.434445242462 6fa3b62aaee7d3cbe881f52305273383030e4b06ad2bfb687d94712b80392ae9
Money successfully sent, transaction <0bef9c21aa0532c90969a669b9557f810b315d1088924d1e1c7205a637003c5d>
[wallet 1VmHEJ]: transfer 0 1VQpANF1pcKHPRAsZpeyG4jLDd1kbPn32YMeXkr9n8jNFvf8aaJdecB3FyAvo7X1DWJDQt3nii9eUTP5kJSfRpL5AwT72FM 1.434445242462 818e395099f31d65e4166ee167511ffb812fc849df175b54b0c86e56aba29f52
Money successfully sent, transaction <30b865d16e7944965273e1d66ac112dfd49fb06068b7061e7b7299ca9879cbc3>
[wallet 1VmHEJ]: transfer 0 1VQpANF1pcKHPRAsZpeyG4jLDd1kbPn32YMeXkr9n8jNFvf8aaJdecB3FyAvo7X1DWJDQt3nii9eUTP5kJSfRpL5AwT72FM 1.434445242462 818e395099f31d65e4166ee167511ffb812fc849df175b54b0c86e56aba29f52
Money successfully sent, transaction <0f91c5fe9109dae34608cc6160800917627d7f27b501986211df41bfb5b23c64>
[wallet 1VmHEJ]: transfer 0 1VQpANF1pcKHPRAsZpeyG4jLDd1kbPn32YMeXkr9n8jNFvf8aaJdecB3FyAvo7X1DWJDQt3nii9eUTP5kJSfRpL5AwT72FM 1.434445242462 818e395099f31d65e4166ee167511ffb812fc849df175b54b0c86e56aba29f52
Money successfully sent, transaction <4c974596b3670b88ee9cf54712e248312a6a772b1873cf89a35697fc3cb4d25d>
[wallet 1VmHEJ]: transfer 0 1VQpANF1pcKHPRAsZpeyG4jLDd1kbPn32YMeXkr9n8jNFvf8aaJdecB3FyAvo7X1DWJDQt3nii9eUTP5kJSfRpL5AwT72FM 1.434445242462 818e395099f31d65e4166ee167511ffb812fc849df175b54b0c86e56aba29f52
Money successfully sent, transaction <a442d51602c693c73536dd6b8cb04c7d036b93a4a71a160bb9575cf9338836b0>
[wallet 1VmHEJ]: transfer 0 1VQpANF1pcKHPRAsZpeyG4jLDd1kbPn32YMeXkr9n8jNFvf8aaJdecB3FyAvo7X1DWJDQt3nii9eUTP5kJSfRpL5AwT72FM 1.434445242462 818e395099f31d65e4166ee167511ffb812fc849df175b54b0c86e56aba29f52
Money successfully sent, transaction <e69144a25ba7c7ed73eff9980c1529851369c2048427a8aa2c166bc13904ffdf>
[wallet 1VmHEJ]: transfer 0 1VQpANF1pcKHPRAsZpeyG4jLDd1kbPn32YMeXkr9n8jNFvf8aaJdecB3FyAvo7X1DWJDQt3nii9eUTP5kJSfRpL5AwT72FM 1.434445242462 818e395099f31d65e4166ee167511ffb812fc849df175b54b0c86e56aba29f52
Money successfully sent, transaction <a017a05da2bb9317c07bef8db4becd1c1547d120f511a422b5af571720503c3f> That's a bit of a mell-of-a-hess as my mom liked to say, so let me just focus on the transactions: 0bef9c21aa0532c90969a669b9557f810b315d1088924d1e1c7205a637003c5d
30b865d16e7944965273e1d66ac112dfd49fb06068b7061e7b7299ca9879cbc3
0f91c5fe9109dae34608cc6160800917627d7f27b501986211df41bfb5b23c64
4c974596b3670b88ee9cf54712e248312a6a772b1873cf89a35697fc3cb4d25d
a442d51602c693c73536dd6b8cb04c7d036b93a4a71a160bb9575cf9338836b0
e69144a25ba7c7ed73eff9980c1529851369c2048427a8aa2c166bc13904ffdf
a017a05da2bb9317c07bef8db4becd1c1547d120f511a422b5af571720503c3f So here's where I get confused: all of those transactions were sent between blocks 28452 and 28455 as far as I can tell (I'm looking at the simplewallet.log and quasarcoind.log files). None of those transfer amounts shows up in the block explorer around those blocks, but I believes that's the point of the whole anonymous transactions thing, right? After a few hours and no QCN on my Poloniex account, I opened a ticket with most of the above information. This morning I now see a balance of 1.43444524 QCN in my account, and in my wallet when I refreshed I saw the following: Height 29142, transaction <0f91c5fe9109dae34608cc6160800917627d7f27b501986211df41bfb5b23c64>, received 0.000007000000
Height 29142, transaction <0f91c5fe9109dae34608cc6160800917627d7f27b501986211df41bfb5b23c64>, received 0.000020000000
Height 29142, transaction <0f91c5fe9109dae34608cc6160800917627d7f27b501986211df41bfb5b23c64>, received 0.000800000000
Height 29142, transaction <0f91c5fe9109dae34608cc6160800917627d7f27b501986211df41bfb5b23c64>, received 0.004000000000
Height 29142, transaction <0f91c5fe9109dae34608cc6160800917627d7f27b501986211df41bfb5b23c64>, spent 0.000001000000
..... (There are 245 lines of magenta text for the spents, four lines for the receives, all on block 29142 and with the same transaction.) So what's going on? That block 29142 has one of the seven transaction codes from above, but it came about 685 blocks after I sent the transaction. Prior to that block, I can't find any record of the payment ID or transaction code. Sure, I feel like the seven transactions are quite anonymous, but they're also anonymously lost right now. Does Poloniex need to somehow manually receive those other six transactions for them to show up? (That seems unlikely.) Or what exactly has happened that things are not working as I would expect? Any input/suggestions would be welcome -- heck, donations are welcome as well! Maybe I can recover my lost 9 QCN. Hahaha.... 1VmHEJ8TDcx4wQ9DTUgiogVDejzPrUJ6VT7FKeQZCNoThYsM5TC6Md2U58W6NgBeTKGsVWitGX16mZy RR6SwtbG5JKUQxoB Edit: PS, I also notice that when I type balance in my wallet now, I get the following: balance: 0.793321787690, unlocked balance: 0.652022415308 There's a difference of 0.14 QCN, give or take, and it has been like that since I sent the seven transactions. Again, confusing would be an appropriate term for what's going on. It seems like each transaction included some "dust" coins, and when the transaction is processed by the receiver I got that dust back. I can see that prior to the above my "unlocked balance" was 0.647195415308, and if I add the four "receieved" lines to that I end up with the current 0.652022415308. |
|
|
|
|
