Bitcoin Forum
October 20, 2018, 08:47:50 PM *
News: Make sure you are not using versions of Bitcoin Core other than 0.17.0 [Torrent], 0.16.3, 0.15.2, or 0.14.3. More info.
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Poll
Question: Where would you prefer the VRC/VRM exchange pair be?
Bittrex
Poloniex
Both
Other

Pages: « 1 ... 875 876 877 878 879 880 881 882 883 884 885 886 887 888 889 890 891 892 893 894 895 896 897 898 899 900 901 902 903 904 905 906 907 908 909 910 911 912 913 914 915 916 917 918 919 920 921 922 923 924 [925] 926 927 928 929 930 931 932 933 934 935 936 937 938 939 940 941 942 943 944 945 946 947 948 949 950 951 952 953 954 955 956 957 958 959 960 961 962 963 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN][VRC] VeriCoin Proof of Stake-Time Currency | New Roadmap Released  (Read 1351014 times)
WhoCaresCoins
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 594
Merit: 500


EaT-SleeP-TradE-REPEAT


View Profile
November 03, 2016, 01:55:19 AM
 #18481

The marketing agreement with Blue Lynx is signed and has been paid. Efforts by them will start November 3.

How much of the VRM ico fund has been used to pay Blue Lynx so far?

This is the payment to them: https://chainz.cryptoid.info/vrc/address.dws?VHrJBxBFeRcK8WgXm1q74JToXedjMfXCWD.htm

Well it's veri nice to see the payment in VRC for marketing. I expected 200k VRC dump while BTC continue pump soon. Tongue
1540068470
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1540068470

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1540068470
Reply with quote  #2

1540068470
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1540068470
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1540068470

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1540068470
Reply with quote  #2

1540068470
Report to moderator
1540068470
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1540068470

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1540068470
Reply with quote  #2

1540068470
Report to moderator
1540068470
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1540068470

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1540068470
Reply with quote  #2

1540068470
Report to moderator
monsanto
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1232
Merit: 1004


..like bright metal on a sullen ground.


View Profile
November 03, 2016, 04:09:09 AM
 #18482

The marketing agreement with Blue Lynx is signed and has been paid. Efforts by them will start November 3.

How much of the VRM ico fund has been used to pay Blue Lynx so far?

This is the payment to them: https://chainz.cryptoid.info/vrc/address.dws?VHrJBxBFeRcK8WgXm1q74JToXedjMfXCWD.htm

Well it's veri nice to see the payment in VRC for marketing. I expected 200k VRC dump while BTC continue pump soon. Tongue

They should advertise in the Zcash forums for cpu miners to switch over when Zcash starts dumping hard Tongue.  I'm not really joking because hashrate and price influence each so who knows.  It's just sort of a chicken and egg thing with getting the price then hashrate high enough to integrate the coins together.

this note's for you.
user0000001
Sr. Member
****
Online Online

Activity: 770
Merit: 261


View Profile
November 03, 2016, 10:15:40 AM
 #18483

wallet 1.6.5.5            2-17 connection. not syc.
any please work node.
monsanto
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1232
Merit: 1004


..like bright metal on a sullen ground.


View Profile
November 03, 2016, 01:41:11 PM
 #18484

I've tried reloading the blockchain and my wallet still gets stuck with several hundred blocks to go.

this note's for you.
user0000001
Sr. Member
****
Online Online

Activity: 770
Merit: 261


View Profile
November 03, 2016, 02:08:20 PM
 #18485

redownload and rescan(
not sync(
dbstmddhks
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 563
Merit: 250



View Profile
November 03, 2016, 02:22:25 PM
 #18486

very nice coin..

Only mintpal hacking issue make this hard..


I hope to see this coin to go far more great from here..
L.H. Mysterieux
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 13
Merit: 0


View Profile
November 03, 2016, 02:54:54 PM
 #18487

parameters.... eh?


lel


burn it all.

everything that has been staked since you acquired your slush fund... burn it.

then try again.
souljah1h
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1092
Merit: 1000


Hyperspace snail


View Profile WWW
November 03, 2016, 02:55:35 PM
 #18488

Make sure you are on the right block, getting some nice interest payouts.

Client should be on same block as chainz. Check that here https://chainz.cryptoid.info/vrc/# or in the wallet.

If you are having problems getting synced / getting on the right block do the following -
Use File > Reload Blockchain if out of sync. Bootstrap just got updated.


_@/'
souljah1h
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1092
Merit: 1000


Hyperspace snail


View Profile WWW
November 03, 2016, 02:56:33 PM
 #18489

parameters.... eh?



lel
Yes parameters. What do you want to know?

_@/'
effectsToCause
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 760
Merit: 505

VeriCoin & Verium Creator/Developer


View Profile WWW
November 03, 2016, 07:52:48 PM
 #18490

Hey Guys,

Update on network condition:

So it turns out the VeriFund now has most of the coins of many previous stakers. Because of this we had to change the parameters for the VeriFund staking to accommodate so many stakes going through us and still properly distributing the consensus in the network over time. It turns out the parameters we had while they worked well for the old network dynamic, they don't work great for the new dynamic where many former stakers coins, we are staking. We now have the verifund with the right parameters to continuously stake while maintaining a fair share of the consensus. After some testing with these parameters we will release a new wallet generally that has these same parameters. They are a new more general purpose set of parameters that don't depend on certain network conditions like we had in the past. Since the network consensus dynamic changed post ICO this issue presented itself. It seems we have it all ironed out now and will continue to test these new more general stake parameters. So if all goes well we won't see the kind of network issue like this again. Also the parameters being too specific to the old network dynamic was a bit of a surprise to us which is why we had issues with the last update and why it's taken a little time to get the new more generally applicable parameters ironed out.
souljah1h
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1092
Merit: 1000


Hyperspace snail


View Profile WWW
November 03, 2016, 09:46:01 PM
 #18491

Quoting this again for visibility since it was the last post on the previous page.

Hey Guys,

Update on network condition:

So it turns out the VeriFund now has most of the coins of many previous stakers. Because of this we had to change the parameters for the VeriFund staking to accommodate so many stakes going through us and still properly distributing the consensus in the network over time. It turns out the parameters we had while they worked well for the old network dynamic, they don't work great for the new dynamic where many former stakers coins, we are staking. We now have the verifund with the right parameters to continuously stake while maintaining a fair share of the consensus. After some testing with these parameters we will release a new wallet generally that has these same parameters. They are a new more general purpose set of parameters that don't depend on certain network conditions like we had in the past. Since the network consensus dynamic changed post ICO this issue presented itself. It seems we have it all ironed out now and will continue to test these new more general stake parameters. So if all goes well we won't see the kind of network issue like this again. Also the parameters being too specific to the old network dynamic was a bit of a surprise to us which is why we had issues with the last update and why it's taken a little time to get the new more generally applicable parameters ironed out.

If you have some spare time and own a steemit account, give this post some love! https://steemit.com/verium/@birty/cpu-mining-is-back-a-complete-how-to-guide-and-profit-analysis-for-verium-mining-on-a-farm-of-single-board-computers-part-1

_@/'
RJF19
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 420
Merit: 250


AKA RJF - Since '14 - On line since '84


View Profile
November 04, 2016, 02:18:07 AM
 #18492

Quoting this again for visibility since it was the last post on the previous page.

Hey Guys,

Update on network condition:

So it turns out the VeriFund now has most of the coins of many previous stakers. Because of this we had to change the parameters for the VeriFund staking to accommodate so many stakes going through us and still properly distributing the consensus in the network over time. It turns out the parameters we had while they worked well for the old network dynamic, they don't work great for the new dynamic where many former stakers coins, we are staking. We now have the verifund with the right parameters to continuously stake while maintaining a fair share of the consensus. After some testing with these parameters we will release a new wallet generally that has these same parameters. They are a new more general purpose set of parameters that don't depend on certain network conditions like we had in the past. Since the network consensus dynamic changed post ICO this issue presented itself. It seems we have it all ironed out now and will continue to test these new more general stake parameters. So if all goes well we won't see the kind of network issue like this again. Also the parameters being too specific to the old network dynamic was a bit of a surprise to us which is why we had issues with the last update and why it's taken a little time to get the new more generally applicable parameters ironed out.

If you have some spare time and own a steemit account, give this post some love! https://steemit.com/verium/@birty/cpu-mining-is-back-a-complete-how-to-guide-and-profit-analysis-for-verium-mining-on-a-farm-of-single-board-computers-part-1

How will this change effect the real world generation of coins using the staking wallet?


Our greatest weakness lies in giving up. The most certain way to succeed is always to try just one more time. Thomas A. Edison
Cryptonite310
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 227
Merit: 100


View Profile
November 04, 2016, 05:59:11 AM
 #18493

Quoting this again for visibility since it was the last post on the previous page.

Hey Guys,

Update on network condition:

So it turns out the VeriFund now has most of the coins of many previous stakers. Because of this we had to change the parameters for the VeriFund staking to accommodate so many stakes going through us and still properly distributing the consensus in the network over time. It turns out the parameters we had while they worked well for the old network dynamic, they don't work great for the new dynamic where many former stakers coins, we are staking. We now have the verifund with the right parameters to continuously stake while maintaining a fair share of the consensus. After some testing with these parameters we will release a new wallet generally that has these same parameters. They are a new more general purpose set of parameters that don't depend on certain network conditions like we had in the past. Since the network consensus dynamic changed post ICO this issue presented itself. It seems we have it all ironed out now and will continue to test these new more general stake parameters. So if all goes well we won't see the kind of network issue like this again. Also the parameters being too specific to the old network dynamic was a bit of a surprise to us which is why we had issues with the last update and why it's taken a little time to get the new more generally applicable parameters ironed out.

If you have some spare time and own a steemit account, give this post some love! https://steemit.com/verium/@birty/cpu-mining-is-back-a-complete-how-to-guide-and-profit-analysis-for-verium-mining-on-a-farm-of-single-board-computers-part-1
Woah, that was a good read post there on SteemIt. That's all going to pay off one day.
Mogul59
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 170
Merit: 10


View Profile
November 04, 2016, 06:06:16 AM
 #18494

quickly devalued coin
souljah1h
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1092
Merit: 1000


Hyperspace snail


View Profile WWW
November 04, 2016, 02:18:30 PM
 #18495

quickly devalued coin
$ value is what matters, not the satoshi price.

_@/'
L.H. Mysterieux
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 13
Merit: 0


View Profile
November 04, 2016, 02:58:41 PM
 #18496


$ value is what matters, not the satoshi price.

it would seem that not everyone agrees with you on that.


but the network has to work and be trusted first if you want any value fiat or satoshi.

both of those things are debatable at this time.
souljah1h
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1092
Merit: 1000


Hyperspace snail


View Profile WWW
November 04, 2016, 03:02:13 PM
 #18497


$ value is what matters, not the satoshi price.


not everyone will agree with you on that.
I can imagine, the world would not be fun if everyone agreed on everything Cheesy

_@/'
RJF19
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 420
Merit: 250


AKA RJF - Since '14 - On line since '84


View Profile
November 04, 2016, 03:35:59 PM
 #18498

Quoting this again for visibility since it was the last post on the previous page.

Hey Guys,

Update on network condition:

So it turns out the VeriFund now has most of the coins of many previous stakers. Because of this we had to change the parameters for the VeriFund staking to accommodate so many stakes going through us and still properly distributing the consensus in the network over time. It turns out the parameters we had while they worked well for the old network dynamic, they don't work great for the new dynamic where many former stakers coins, we are staking. We now have the verifund with the right parameters to continuously stake while maintaining a fair share of the consensus. After some testing with these parameters we will release a new wallet generally that has these same parameters. They are a new more general purpose set of parameters that don't depend on certain network conditions like we had in the past. Since the network consensus dynamic changed post ICO this issue presented itself. It seems we have it all ironed out now and will continue to test these new more general stake parameters. So if all goes well we won't see the kind of network issue like this again. Also the parameters being too specific to the old network dynamic was a bit of a surprise to us which is why we had issues with the last update and why it's taken a little time to get the new more generally applicable parameters ironed out.

If you have some spare time and own a steemit account, give this post some love! https://steemit.com/verium/@birty/cpu-mining-is-back-a-complete-how-to-guide-and-profit-analysis-for-verium-mining-on-a-farm-of-single-board-computers-part-1


How will this change effect the real world generation of coins using the staking wallet?




Never mind, I get it now, should have just read the post!  Grin


Our greatest weakness lies in giving up. The most certain way to succeed is always to try just one more time. Thomas A. Edison
souljah1h
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1092
Merit: 1000


Hyperspace snail


View Profile WWW
November 04, 2016, 04:08:47 PM
 #18499

Quoting this again for visibility since it was the last post on the previous page.

Hey Guys,

Update on network condition:

So it turns out the VeriFund now has most of the coins of many previous stakers. Because of this we had to change the parameters for the VeriFund staking to accommodate so many stakes going through us and still properly distributing the consensus in the network over time. It turns out the parameters we had while they worked well for the old network dynamic, they don't work great for the new dynamic where many former stakers coins, we are staking. We now have the verifund with the right parameters to continuously stake while maintaining a fair share of the consensus. After some testing with these parameters we will release a new wallet generally that has these same parameters. They are a new more general purpose set of parameters that don't depend on certain network conditions like we had in the past. Since the network consensus dynamic changed post ICO this issue presented itself. It seems we have it all ironed out now and will continue to test these new more general stake parameters. So if all goes well we won't see the kind of network issue like this again. Also the parameters being too specific to the old network dynamic was a bit of a surprise to us which is why we had issues with the last update and why it's taken a little time to get the new more generally applicable parameters ironed out.

If you have some spare time and own a steemit account, give this post some love! https://steemit.com/verium/@birty/cpu-mining-is-back-a-complete-how-to-guide-and-profit-analysis-for-verium-mining-on-a-farm-of-single-board-computers-part-1


How will this change effect the real world generation of coins using the staking wallet?




Never mind, I get it now, should have just read the post!  Grin


That helps!  Grin

_@/'
RJF19
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 420
Merit: 250


AKA RJF - Since '14 - On line since '84


View Profile
November 04, 2016, 07:52:17 PM
 #18500

Quoting this again for visibility since it was the last post on the previous page.

Hey Guys,

Update on network condition:

So it turns out the VeriFund now has most of the coins of many previous stakers. Because of this we had to change the parameters for the VeriFund staking to accommodate so many stakes going through us and still properly distributing the consensus in the network over time. It turns out the parameters we had while they worked well for the old network dynamic, they don't work great for the new dynamic where many former stakers coins, we are staking. We now have the verifund with the right parameters to continuously stake while maintaining a fair share of the consensus. After some testing with these parameters we will release a new wallet generally that has these same parameters. They are a new more general purpose set of parameters that don't depend on certain network conditions like we had in the past. Since the network consensus dynamic changed post ICO this issue presented itself. It seems we have it all ironed out now and will continue to test these new more general stake parameters. So if all goes well we won't see the kind of network issue like this again. Also the parameters being too specific to the old network dynamic was a bit of a surprise to us which is why we had issues with the last update and why it's taken a little time to get the new more generally applicable parameters ironed out.

If you have some spare time and own a steemit account, give this post some love! https://steemit.com/verium/@birty/cpu-mining-is-back-a-complete-how-to-guide-and-profit-analysis-for-verium-mining-on-a-farm-of-single-board-computers-part-1


How will this change effect the real world generation of coins using the staking wallet?




Never mind, I get it now, should have just read the post!  Grin


That helps!  Grin

With so many threads to keep up with, sometimes I just get lazy. Have to work on that...


Our greatest weakness lies in giving up. The most certain way to succeed is always to try just one more time. Thomas A. Edison
Pages: « 1 ... 875 876 877 878 879 880 881 882 883 884 885 886 887 888 889 890 891 892 893 894 895 896 897 898 899 900 901 902 903 904 905 906 907 908 909 910 911 912 913 914 915 916 917 918 919 920 921 922 923 924 [925] 926 927 928 929 930 931 932 933 934 935 936 937 938 939 940 941 942 943 944 945 946 947 948 949 950 951 952 953 954 955 956 957 958 959 960 961 962 963 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!