Bitcoin Forum
August 20, 2017, 10:13:19 AM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.14.2  [Torrent].
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 ... 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 [193] 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN] Slimcoin : Proof of Burn NEW BLOCK GEN, Mineable by low power computer!  (Read 270452 times)
primer-
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1008



View Profile
October 01, 2014, 07:36:27 PM
 #3841

Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin

Idiots.

primer- still alive? Amazing.  Grin
Rescue the coin, dude. It's your responsibility. LOL



Its too late, everyone gave up except a few stubborn donkeys Smiley

PS. You were active in shinycoin thread where i called out devs shill accounts, etc. Turns out dev was a scammer afterall... I deserve a positive feedback (to negate the negative given by the mod.), so feel free to +rep me ! Smiley
1503223999
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1503223999

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1503223999
Reply with quote  #2

1503223999
Report to moderator
1503223999
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1503223999

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1503223999
Reply with quote  #2

1503223999
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
comerex
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 7


View Profile
October 01, 2014, 10:12:59 PM
 #3842

Seriously if this crap forked again I'm probably going to leave it.

I try to run the wallet at all times but this is just ridiculous. It's a gamble on this coin ever succeeding, using my time. Doesn't look like that is ever going to happen. Maybe someone implements a similar feature in a new coin. But I think there are other PoB coins out there already.

It sucks that I've lost a bit of money here. Put in a little.. but this is bitcointalk. Where hope goes to die and scammers thrive.
I bet the original dev cashed out while it was possible. Now there are literally no buy orders anywhere.
a123
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 98


View Profile
October 02, 2014, 09:08:49 AM
 #3843

one of my nodes got stuck at 111900s as well a couple of hours ago; though i suppose it might have resolved since you guys mentioned this almost half a day ago.

the latest version by dev on github "v0.3.2.0-6-gafd8ef7-dirty-alpha" seems quite stable. haven't had it give me any problems for quite a while.

all these seem to be listeners and have synced up to at least 112489 on my peer list.

192.3.21.71:41682, 37.187.100.75:41682, 203.20.114.252:41682, 5.9.81.9:41682
comerex
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 7


View Profile
October 02, 2014, 10:32:13 PM
 #3844

If anyone tells me how and is interested - I'd sell my wallet file with ~2000 burnt slimcoins.
I'm out of this.
pantheist
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 63


View Profile
October 02, 2014, 10:40:04 PM
 #3845

If anyone tells me how and is interested - I'd sell my wallet file with ~2000 burnt slimcoins.
I'm out of this.

If you're sure, I'll take it. PM'd



edit: ah I misread that- didn't realize you were looking to sell. Sorry- it'd be easier to buy 2k more slim for just about nothing and burn those than deal with two wallets
comerex
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 7


View Profile
October 02, 2014, 10:58:21 PM
 #3846

Thought it might be possible to get the private key of the address that sent to the burn address out of it.

Whatever, I'm spending my time on something more productive than bitcoin again. It appealed to my technophiliac side but ended up being a hobby that just cost money and didn't return anything other than a really bad experience in the bitcoin community. (bitcointalk being one of the worst places of them all) I don't gamble on the bitcoin price either so I'm kinda done.

Have fun anyway.
hankrules
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 598


View Profile
October 02, 2014, 11:04:16 PM
 #3847

Thought it might be possible to get the private key of the address that sent to the burn address out of it.

Whatever, I'm spending my time on something more productive than bitcoin again. It appealed to my technophiliac side but ended up being a hobby that just cost money and didn't return anything other than a really bad experience in the bitcoin community. (bitcointalk being one of the worst places of them all) I don't gamble on the bitcoin price either so I'm kinda done.

Have fun anyway.

It's possible to dump private keys from your wallet, then import them into another wallet.  Problem is, whoever sells you that key will also have a copy of it.  I don't think there is a way around that.
BTW, there is money to be made and good experiences to be had in cryptoland... You just have to know where to look Smiley
d5000
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1470


Enjin Coin - Smart Cryptocurrency for Gaming.


View Profile
October 06, 2014, 12:26:34 AM
 #3848

Maybe someone implements a similar feature in a new coin. But I think there are other PoB coins out there already.

As I'm more interested in the PoB concept than in Slimcoin itself, I have searched Bitcointalk for it. But it seems that, at least for distribution and blockchain maintainance, Slimcoin continues to be the only PoB coin. There is KoreCoin, but they use it as an anonymization feature, and not in the way Slimcoin does. TGCoin, the only slimcoin fork, is dead.

Now its undeniable that the Slimcoin client still is buggy as hell, and the original dev has disappeared. So PoB enthusiasts like me have two choices:
- continue to support Slimcoin and trying to find skilled devs to fix the client's bugs
- fork the coin and start from zero with a new development team - perhaps even with some kind of transition mechanism (e.g. slimcoin holders getting free coins).

I think if a skilled dev discovers this coin, buys a lot of coins for a cheap price and then fixes the client's bugs, that could be a chance for Slimcoin to resurrect, as the potential to grow in price with a stable client and good dev team is huge.

But there are also aspects which speak in favour of a fork. So I think the last update of the distribution mechanism (more reward for PoS) was going in the wrong direction, as it has made the coin very inflationary and favours big coin holders disproportionately.

Also, I have ideas for a own PoB coin (combinating PoB with "Proof of Deposit") but I would need a dev too Wink

AizenSou
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 910


View Profile
October 06, 2014, 06:27:13 AM
 #3849

Maybe someone implements a similar feature in a new coin. But I think there are other PoB coins out there already.

As I'm more interested in the PoB concept than in Slimcoin itself, I have searched Bitcointalk for it. But it seems that, at least for distribution and blockchain maintainance, Slimcoin continues to be the only PoB coin. There is KoreCoin, but they use it as an anonymization feature, and not in the way Slimcoin does. TGCoin, the only slimcoin fork, is dead.

Now its undeniable that the Slimcoin client still is buggy as hell, and the original dev has disappeared. So PoB enthusiasts like me have two choices:
- continue to support Slimcoin and trying to find skilled devs to fix the client's bugs
- fork the coin and start from zero with a new development team - perhaps even with some kind of transition mechanism (e.g. slimcoin holders getting free coins).

I think if a skilled dev discovers this coin, buys a lot of coins for a cheap price and then fixes the client's bugs, that could be a chance for Slimcoin to resurrect, as the potential to grow in price with a stable client and good dev team is huge.

But there are also aspects which speak in favour of a fork. So I think the last update of the distribution mechanism (more reward for PoS) was going in the wrong direction, as it has made the coin very inflationary and favours big coin holders disproportionately.

Also, I have ideas for a own PoB coin (combinating PoB with "Proof of Deposit") but I would need a dev too Wink

+1 sounds like a good plan. The problem is only how to find a skilled dev. I support your 2. option. So community if any of you know any good dev please recommend him to here.
d5000
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1470


Enjin Coin - Smart Cryptocurrency for Gaming.


View Profile
October 06, 2014, 10:45:17 PM
 #3850

Forking is far more difficult and would require starting from zero. Slimcoin at least has made it to an high-volume exchange like BTER.

I have posted a reference to Slimcoin to the original Proof-of-burn thread.  Perhaps some of the original inventors of the concept can join here and post their opinions. I have seen Iain Stewart (the PoB inventor) was active in September but doesn't write often in the forum. Does someone know him?

BitcoinFX
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1498


youtu.be/3kqLVeP7iHA


View Profile WWW
October 06, 2014, 11:38:12 PM
 #3851

The more I look at this it is PoS that is the main issue over PoB aside from the networking protocol bugs. If Slimcoin had been just PoW and PoB then that would probably of been much better.

The 'randomness' of the PoB implementation is also an issue. We essentially have a code base from early Peercoin - thus the best person to ask for help is most likely Sunny King or another or the Peercoin devs.

They were / are busy with Nubits and PeerShares, but now those are mostly launched maybe someone can take a look at this ?

Sadly it might be best to start again with Slimcoin 2.0

"The industry of the integrated spectacle and immaterial command owes me money." - We do not Forgive. We do not Forget. Expect Revolution! for we are all Satoshi now? - youtu.be/G7Z8MMk45U0 - "the multiple and the multiplex!" - Don't Cry! Support : https://tornull.org - #freeBogatov
d5000
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1470


Enjin Coin - Smart Cryptocurrency for Gaming.


View Profile
October 07, 2014, 02:26:51 AM
 #3852

@BitcoinFX: As far as I know, Slimcoin is a fork of Peercoin 0.3.2. The actual Peercoin version 0.4 is only a minor bugfix version, with a protocol update related to pools. The next major version would be PPC 0.5, but it's still in develpment. So the Peercoin code has not changed drastically since the fork.

Peercoin 0.3 was stable for more than one year, so I think the PoS implementation alone should not be the issue. Probably it's the combination of the three kind of algorithms which makes the client unstable.

But perhaps it's really a possibility that we can add SLM to the "Peercoin family", as they have "adopted" NuBits. The PPC community is quite open-minded (I am a moderator of two local subforums there). Code obviously for this must be audited to make sure there was no scam attempt, but I don't think that was the case as all source code was published. I think "slimcoin" (the dev) simply got angry because of the continuous (in part, racist) attacks on him and because the bugs were more severe than he thought, and that is the reason he is quiet now.

AizenSou
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 910


View Profile
October 07, 2014, 09:37:28 AM
 #3853

The more I look at this it is PoS that is the main issue over PoB aside from the networking protocol bugs. If Slimcoin had been just PoW and PoB then that would probably of been much better.

The 'randomness' of the PoB implementation is also an issue. We essentially have a code base from early Peercoin - thus the best person to ask for help is most likely Sunny King or another or the Peercoin devs.

They were / are busy with Nubits and PeerShares, but now those are mostly launched maybe someone can take a look at this ?

Sadly it might be best to start again with Slimcoin 2.0

I did suggest remove PoS from Slimcoin long time ago because it's sure the source of bugs.

Only if we could find a dev who could remove PoS entirely from Slimcoin and fix the bugs. BitcoinFX and d5000 since you two are hero member, do you know some good devs?
BitcoinFX
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1498


youtu.be/3kqLVeP7iHA


View Profile WWW
October 07, 2014, 10:30:29 AM
 #3854

@d5000: You are right in regards to the Peercoin version releases. What is interesting is that the 1st Slimcoin release was seemingly quite 'stable' in comparison to now.

Having three algorithms for block generation is partly causing these network propagation issues. Its possible that these issues were somewhat unrealized with fewer networked nodes and less of a blockchain.

It is not going to be easy to fix this and it may be better to try a different or similar PoB implementation altogether. Again, a coder with an extensive working knowledge of the Peercoin base is the best option to provide advice on whats possible here - I'd imagine. I do have an account on the peercoin forums, but I've not logged-in for a while, so as you are a mod. then go-for-it.   Smiley

@AizenSou: Being a 'Hero' member on this forum, sadly does not make us magic men. The term 'Hero' is used to much these days imho.

Although, lots of us have put time and resources into mining and supporting Slimcoin, so it would be a shame to see all that just go to waste.

"The industry of the integrated spectacle and immaterial command owes me money." - We do not Forgive. We do not Forget. Expect Revolution! for we are all Satoshi now? - youtu.be/G7Z8MMk45U0 - "the multiple and the multiplex!" - Don't Cry! Support : https://tornull.org - #freeBogatov
AizenSou
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 910


View Profile
October 07, 2014, 12:48:57 PM
 #3855

@d5000: You are right in regards to the Peercoin version releases. What is interesting is that the 1st Slimcoin release was seemingly quite 'stable' in comparison to now.

Having three algorithms for block generation is partly causing these network propagation issues. Its possible that these issues were somewhat unrealized with fewer networked nodes and less of a blockchain.

It is not going to be easy to fix this and it may be better to try a different or similar PoB implementation altogether. Again, a coder with an extensive working knowledge of the Peercoin base is the best option to provide advice on whats possible here - I'd imagine. I do have an account on the peercoin forums, but I've not logged-in for a while, so as you are a mod. then go-for-it.   Smiley

@AizenSou: Being a 'Hero' member on this forum, sadly does not make us magic men. The term 'Hero' is used to much these days imho.

Although, lots of us have put time and resources into mining and supporting Slimcoin, so it would be a shame to see all that just go to waste.

I don't mean you have the magic to resurrect a coin Wink My point is you might know a lot of things and have a lot contacts in this forum, so by any chance that you know some devs? I did try to find a core dev for my own project since three months and the only one I could find is bushstar.
rfcdejong
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 616


View Profile
October 07, 2014, 05:40:02 PM
 #3856

Sadly i'm not a coin dev and i don't have time either.
A dev or better a team of dev's that take over this coin would be best.

ps: slimcoin never really left, he is just very inactive and that is what he said, he will help in time of need but won't actively develop
ps2: slimcoin, there is a checkpoint needed!

d5000
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1470


Enjin Coin - Smart Cryptocurrency for Gaming.


View Profile
October 09, 2014, 02:34:40 AM
 #3857

I have started a thread about Slimcoin in Peercointalk forum:

http://www.peercointalk.org/index.php?topic=3461.msg33518;topicseen#msg33518

I probably will also a separate thread about proof of burn in one of the main sections, as the block generation method even can be useful for Peercoin or NuBits in the future.

a123
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 98


View Profile
October 09, 2014, 08:36:57 AM
 #3858

Slimcoin still appears very promising to me but it lacked marketing and awareness, and is also difficult to set up and learn about the various innovations.

I thus spent sometime deciphering the slimcoin source and built this site http://www.slimcoin.club/. It has a brain wallet with mining, transaction and burning built in; all transactions and blocks are signed locally (I never see your key) then sent to one of my nodes for broadcasting.  

(oh yea while burning coins is ok, burnt-coin mining on browser is still buggy; that'll be my next to fix. mining works but is very slow, so i'm thinking of using it more for faucet and coin distribution and to introduce the concept of mining)

I plan to make the page the on-board ramp to get people interested and learn about slimcoin mining, transactions, burning, and to eventually install the client full-time; but yet remain completely functional for those who aren't into running the full client (assuming my nodes remain up).

Also, for us slmers there's a rudimentary block explorer.

Everything's still very alpha and I'm open to your suggestions and your help.
a123
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 98


View Profile
October 09, 2014, 08:38:16 AM
 #3859

For the client itself, I will hope that improved awareness and better prices will also bring in developer interest (perhaps the original dev's interest too?). In the meantime, I think we can start building up a list of things to fix specifically, perhaps by listing them as issues on github. If no one steps up, I'll fork and make changes to the slimcoin code-base.

The latest version for github is actually quite stable: 3.2.0.6. So far for me, the high cpu/memory usage stems from 2 issues: PoS and bad nodes. Because the version numbers have not changed, older incompatible nodes are freely connecting and repeatedly downloading the blockchain data which fails their verification; I had to block each ip/ip range one by one.

I usually disable PoS cos it sucks my cpu, but PoS itself doesn't really contribute much to the growth. d5000 mentioned that previously there was bump in the reward, but it was also met with a corresponding 10x increase in difficulty which should cancel out: this change was to reduce the number of PoS blocks generated then, which was overwhelming the PoW/PoB blocks.

PoS also appears to be the cause of some block sync and distribution issue: Primer- had mentioned it quite regularly back then, and I also had the same experience. I also noticed that in the past consecutive PoS blocks actually caused my nodes to reject the chain thus orphaning it, though it could also have been an effect of the automatic checkpointing server which seems down now.

I'm still in favour of PoS actually, as long as the bugs can be fixed. Think one of the main issue could also be that dcrypt instead of dbl-sha256 is used for PoS blocks, and that is really really intensive (which can lead to unresponsiveness with a lot of transactions), so that can be an avenue of exploration.

I don't encounter these problems now; but as BitcoinFX mentioned, this could be because of the small number of active nodes.

Needed Changes
1. Add checkpoints
2. Remove PoS or Fix PoS
3. Hardfork with new Protocol Version to reject all older clients
AizenSou
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 910


View Profile
October 09, 2014, 10:15:56 AM
 #3860

For the client itself, I will hope that improved awareness and better prices will also bring in developer interest (perhaps the original dev's interest too?). In the meantime, I think we can start building up a list of things to fix specifically, perhaps by listing them as issues on github. If no one steps up, I'll fork and make changes to the slimcoin code-base.

The latest version for github is actually quite stable: 3.2.0.6. So far for me, the high cpu/memory usage stems from 2 issues: PoS and bad nodes. Because the version numbers have not changed, older incompatible nodes are freely connecting and repeatedly downloading the blockchain data which fails their verification; I had to block each ip/ip range one by one.

I usually disable PoS cos it sucks my cpu, but PoS itself doesn't really contribute much to the growth. d5000 mentioned that previously there was bump in the reward, but it was also met with a corresponding 10x increase in difficulty which should cancel out: this change was to reduce the number of PoS blocks generated then, which was overwhelming the PoW/PoB blocks.

PoS also appears to be the cause of some block sync and distribution issue: Primer- had mentioned it quite regularly back then, and I also had the same experience. I also noticed that in the past consecutive PoS blocks actually caused my nodes to reject the chain thus orphaning it, though it could also have been an effect of the automatic checkpointing server which seems down now.

I'm still in favour of PoS actually, as long as the bugs can be fixed. Think one of the main issue could also be that dcrypt instead of dbl-sha256 is used for PoS blocks, and that is really really intensive (which can lead to unresponsiveness with a lot of transactions), so that can be an avenue of exploration.

I don't encounter these problems now; but as BitcoinFX mentioned, this could be because of the small number of active nodes.

Needed Changes
1. Add checkpoints
2. Remove PoS or Fix PoS
3. Hardfork with new Protocol Version to reject all older clients

Wow finally we have a dev to fix these problems. I opt for removing PoS. Could I have your SLM address for donation, please? Very appreciate for helping this coin.
Pages: « 1 ... 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 [193] 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!