gilad215
|
|
May 20, 2014, 11:26:12 AM |
|
Well, -I 19 and GPU engine 1100 gave my 280x a 1.0MH Increase! from 2.15 to 3.15!
lets see how it goes..
|
Neluns ♦ New Generation Financial Ecosystem ♦ Pre-sale on Aug, 1
|
|
|
anatolikostis
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2026
Merit: 1005
|
|
May 20, 2014, 11:33:18 AM |
|
i got only 20% increase (but 2% goes to donator so 18% only)
options: -I 13 --xintensity 4 -w 256 --lookup-gap 2 -g 2 --shaders 2048 --thread-concurrency 8192 --gpu-engine 1080 --gpu-memclock 1500 --auto-fan --gpu-powertune 0 --temp-target 70 --temp-overheat 80 --temp-cutoff 87
meaby i miss something ?
check the pool stats of your worker - I`m not sure you have +18% hashrate increase
|
|
|
|
gilad215
|
|
May 20, 2014, 12:02:13 PM |
|
Trying to set up my 290s rigs with no success!
2 of my 280x rigs works just fine with the miner with good improvement but with my 290s i get a kernel error and a gpu failure.
anyone can help?
|
Neluns ♦ New Generation Financial Ecosystem ♦ Pre-sale on Aug, 1
|
|
|
Freekje
|
|
May 20, 2014, 12:12:30 PM |
|
[08:11][root@pimp:/opt/sph-sgminer]# ./sgminer -k darkcoin -c config.conf ./sgminer: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.15' not found (required by ./sgminer) ./sgminer: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.14' not found (required by ./sgminer)
guess I'll have to way for the sourcecode :[
|
Signatures are so 2014.
|
|
|
anatolikostis
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2026
Merit: 1005
|
|
May 20, 2014, 12:20:09 PM |
|
ok! 0.15btc prize for win32 free release PM me.
|
|
|
|
tytanick
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2660
Merit: 1096
Simplemining.net Admin
|
|
May 20, 2014, 12:45:08 PM |
|
yeah 2.1MH -> 3.1 MH boost 280x -I 19 and gpu clock 1080 memory 1500 nice !
|
|
|
|
goodluck0319
|
|
May 20, 2014, 12:49:36 PM |
|
what is the setting for 290 non x and 270x on this miner?
|
|
|
|
Sglasio
|
|
May 20, 2014, 01:13:38 PM |
|
Cool! i have 3.3 Mhs per VGA (280x) But, how run after CGwatcher? dll error (((
|
|
|
|
marcoman22
|
|
May 20, 2014, 01:17:04 PM |
|
How this affects the temperature and power consumption of cards ? Has anyone compared ?
|
|
|
|
kaene
|
|
May 20, 2014, 01:27:09 PM |
|
After 20 minutes of testing:
first 7950 from 1.97 Mhs to 2.77 Mhs. second 7950 from 1.88 Mhs to 2.64 Mhs. one 280x from 2.22 Mhs to 2.65 Mhs.
So this rig (2x 7950 + 1x 280x) from 6.0 Mhs to 8.0 Mhs.
No settings changed. No temperature changes.
Not bad. Strange that 7950 gets higher Mhs than 280x ?! Maybe can improve a bit more...
I like the "No temperature changes" part
|
|
|
|
marcoman22
|
|
May 20, 2014, 01:44:03 PM |
|
After 20 minutes of testing:
first 7950 from 1.97 Mhs to 2.77 Mhs. second 7950 from 1.88 Mhs to 2.64 Mhs. one 280x from 2.22 Mhs to 2.65 Mhs.
So this rig (2x 7950 + 1x 280x) from 6.0 Mhs to 8.0 Mhs.
No settings changed. No temperature changes.
Not bad. Strange that 7950 gets higher Mhs than 280x ?! Maybe can improve a bit more...
I like the "No temperature changes" part If no temp changes then its great .
|
|
|
|
coin123123
|
|
May 20, 2014, 02:08:49 PM |
|
after hour of use i have +10c all rigs,
i have gigabyte, msi and sapphire 280x's rigs
about 50% gains
EDIT: just checked pool and there is no speed difference than before, only miner showing improvement, ill revert and compare WU now.
|
|
|
|
anatolikostis
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2026
Merit: 1005
|
|
May 20, 2014, 02:20:09 PM |
|
EDIT: just checked pool and there is no speed difference than before, only miner showing improvement, ill revert and compare WU now.
That`s it what is the setting for 290 non x -tc 20481 or 22529 -w 256 -I 21 -g 1 PS Now I`m working to generate correct *.bin files with this miner to import It to the ordinary sph-sgminer directory
|
|
|
|
bestsponsor
|
|
May 20, 2014, 02:25:10 PM |
|
Speed at the pool is constantly falling. Now there is no gain in speed. Only miner shows inflated figures.
|
|
|
|
Demontager
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 60
Merit: 0
|
|
May 20, 2014, 02:26:10 PM |
|
[08:11][root@pimp:/opt/sph-sgminer]# ./sgminer -k darkcoin -c config.conf ./sgminer: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.15' not found (required by ./sgminer) ./sgminer: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.14' not found (required by ./sgminer)
guess I'll have to way for the sourcecode :[ You have to add testing repo first nano /etc/apt/sources.list
#Tesing deb http://http.us.debian.org/debian/ testing non-free contrib main Then apt-get update apt-get -t testing install libc6-dev
|
|
|
|
coin123123
|
|
May 20, 2014, 02:53:02 PM |
|
after hour of use i have +10c all rigs,
i have gigabyte, msi and sapphire 280x's rigs
about 50% gains
EDIT: just checked pool and there is no speed difference than before, only miner showing improvement, ill revert and compare WU now.
WU is hogher like speed, 50% gain but still pool not showing this hashrate. somebody checked that 2% is really 2% ?
|
|
|
|
Amph
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3248
Merit: 1070
|
|
May 20, 2014, 02:57:30 PM |
|
did anyone check the temp, to see if the cards are using more power? they should if the miner is really more optimized
also more consumption
|
|
|
|
Jos-T
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 49
Merit: 0
|
|
May 20, 2014, 03:01:11 PM |
|
did anyone check the temp, to see if the cards are using more power? they should if the miner is really more optimized
also more consumption
I'm using it on two HD7950's and the power consumption is around the same, give or take 10W. Mh/s and WU seems higher. The pool I'm using hasn't entirely made up its mind about whether or not the figures are actually true... Edit: I just rented my own rig at Betarigs for 3 hours so I can use the graphs that get displayed there. Will let you know whether or not the reported Mh/s is higher than usual.
|
|
|
|
cayars
|
|
May 20, 2014, 03:08:21 PM |
|
It's lower.
Only reported higher on the client but far less shares are accepted.
|
|
|
|
Amph
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3248
Merit: 1070
|
|
May 20, 2014, 03:13:17 PM |
|
It's lower.
Only reported higher on the client but far less shares are accepted.
it make sense because if the cards aren't drawing more power they can't perform a better hashrate, you can't escape from this
|
|
|
|
|